Production has been delayed on Iron Man 3 following the injury of Robert Downey Jr. on set. Disney has released the following statement:

“While performing a stunt on the set of Iron Man 3, Robert Downey Jr. sustained an injury to his foot. There will be a short delay in production while he recuperates.”

No other information regarding the extent of Downey’s injury is known nor how long production will be delayed. Iron Man 3 has been filming since late May and is scheduled to be released May 3rd, 2013.

Source: Deadline

Geekscape writer Allison interviews Noah Jones and Maxwell Atoms from Fish Hooks!

So, tell me a little about what you’re working on now.

Noah Jones:  Well, my name is Noah Jones and I am the creator and one of the executive producers of Fishhooks on the Disney Channel and this is Maxwell Atoms, the other executive producer.  We’re in our third season of Fishhooks.  We’re really excited about where the show has been and where it’s going.  There are lots of fun, exciting, fishing adventures in store ahead.

How did you guys come up with this idea?

NJ:  I was illustrating children’s books out of my house on the coast of Maine and one day I got a call from one of the executives at Disney and they said, “Hey, we saw your characters online, we really like them, do you want to pitch us some shows?”  And I’m, you know, working out of my house on the coast of Maine, so I’m like, “What are the chances that anything will ever come of this?”  So I say, “Sure, of course, I’ll pitch you a show!  Why not?” and a week later I sent in five ideas and one of them was these little fish characters Milo, Bea, and Oscar.  Originally they were a punk rock band of fish, but they were like, “We actually don’t like the punk rock angle, but we love the designs of the fish.” – they were these crazy jellybean colors— so we kinda started from there.

From there we did a short and the whole time we were working on the short, I was thinking, “This isn’t ever going to go anywhere.”  You know, I’ve been around for a while, I’ve worked on a couple projects fall through so that I never got too excited about it, but they’re like, “Hey, short’s testing really well.  Do you want to do a pilot?”  And I’m like, “Okay, why not?”  So we did a pilot episode and the whole time I’m still living in Maine and they said, “Just so you know, the pilot’s testing really well and we might make it into a series and if we did, would you move your family out to Los Angeles?”  So I said, “Let me talk to my wife and see what she thinks about it.”

She thought it was a great idea because Maine was cold and rainy and so we had a one and a half year old son and my wife was seven months pregnant with our second child when we moved out to California.  She had never been there before, and it was this really weird kinda way to get into Hollywood.  Like Disney put this amazing team of directors, artists, and writers together, Maxwell was at the head of that and he has tons of TV experience and they put me in very good hands.  And that’s how this show thing started.

Has Comic-Con been really crazy for you this year?

NJ:  I remember last year at Comic-Con, I was nervous.  We had a panel and I was afraid that nobody would show up, you know?  It would be us two jerks just sitting there at the table going, “Hey, we’ll answer any questions that anybody has,” but there’s nobody there to ask us any questions.  But we filled the room and that was a pretty good feeling.  It was like 2,000 people, and it’s nice to know that you’re connecting with somebody.  We signed posters afterwards and the line was so long it was snaking across the court and we actually ran out of posters.  Part of that was we actually just came from the panel with Chelsea Kane and people adore her—she’s the voice of Bea.

MA: We ended up last year with some of the actors just walking around the floor and checking it out and then about five minutes into it, the job just became protecting Chelsea.

NJ:  It was like a thousand Batmans and Boba Fetts and here she was just in the middle of all of that.

I noticed that the animation style changes from outside the fish tank and inside the fish tank.  What was behind that divide in design?

NJ:  When we were first talking to Disney about doing the show seriously, they told us that they wanted us to do something that was different visually and totally from what else was on the channel, so this kind of collage-style was something that I came up with very early on.  I just took a picture of a fish tank and put out a chair and put it in the middle of it and dropped one of my fish on it.  And it looked so funny.  It was so funny seeing this dumb googly-eyed thing in the middle of this realistic environment.  We carried that through.  And one thing we are trying to do is to get back to a simpler background style.  Naturally as the show has gone on a lot of things have changed and evolved and there are some kinds of simpler things about the earlier episodes that I want to get back to.  I think it’s funnier.  The stupider it is, the funnier it is, as far as the look goes.  Visually we can make it look really goofy, and I think that works the best.

MA:  The photo collage  was something we kinda had to experiment with just because it was really intensive with all of the Photoshop the artists had to do.  At first we didn’t do too many of those, but I think everybody got up to speed and knows how to handle it now.

NJ: The animation studio, Mercury Filmworks, up in Canada, they’re really good at animating those photo collage characters, so once we figured out they were good at it, we’re like, “Oh, yeah, we’re going to do that a lot more.”  I think we’re all very proud about the show in general, but also about how it looks.  It does look very different, it does kind of plant a flag in the sand in a kind of a benchmark on how something could be visually interesting.

Do you have any plans on the series going forward?  Any hints you can give us?

MA:  Like I said, we’re in our third season working on pre-production.  We’ve got a really good second season finale—fish prom.

NJ:  The theme of the prom is ‘Under the Sea’.  That’s brilliant, right? [laughter]

But, really, we just watched the final picture this week and it came together really well.  The story is there, the heart is there, there are some emotional moments.  And it’s really funny.

MA:  I don’t want to give anything away, but the fans will be really excited to see what happens to the characters.

Are they ever going to go to college?

NJ:  Yes.  There is Fish University.

If they go to Fish University, what classes would they take?

NJ:  Fish Physics.  Fish American Literature.  Fish Film Theory.  I’m trying to think of stupid fish classes.

Which subject would each of the main characters major in?

NJ:  Milo would major in Fish Partying and Fish Video Games.  And Bea would do theater.

That’s been more of a trend in recent years of fan-interaction.  Have you been using that more as the show has progressed?

NJ: I think it’s something we’re all aware of.  We’re aware of the internet, and it’s the giant beast that’s constantly breathing down your neck and like analyzing every single moment of the show and line of dialogue.  And we do put things in there to kind of feed that beast.

MA:  Well, we honestly try not to do that most of the time.

NJ:  But there are things that we’ve read on the internet that are completely wrong fan theories that I feel that we’ve tipped our hat to, but in our own way because it amuses us.  Like, somehow it got out that Milo and Oscar’s last name is “Fishtooth” but it’s not.  We’ve never ever said their last name, but the entire internet is under the impression that that’s their last name.

MA: So they sort of make up these fictional identities in one of the episodes and that’s the last name they use.

NJ: Fishtooth.  Yeah, we don’t know where that came from.

Have you ever read any fan-fiction on the internet and thought “Wow, this is so insane” or “Wow, this is so brilliant, I wish I could use it”?

NJ: Mostly it’s the insane part.  And also, partly “how does somebody have this much time?”  But I love that they’re that passionate about the show.  Someone theorized that one of the first episodes was called “Pizza Cave” –I don’t know where that came from— and the kids go to a cave to get pizza.  And that’s something that I loved the idea of—a pizza cave!

So aside from the uber awesome geektastic news that Joss Whedon is returning for Avengers 2, Disney also released the news that Whedon would be helping to develop a live action television series for Disney/ABC set in the Marvel Studios Movie-verse. Considering Whedon’s fairly awesome track record with producing quality genre shows, this is just about as good of news as the Avengers 2 announcement, at least to this geek. While Whedon would probably be too busy to be day to day on a new series, and do much apart from help develop it and (maybe) direct the pilot, no doubt his stamp would be felt on the show due to the writing staff he would bring in, as well as other considerations.

So that begs the question….just what Marvel characters would be ripe for exploitation on the small screen? You can forget about any of the Marvel A-listers, and even some of the B-listers like Iron Fist and Black Panther who have potential movies in development. The following are characters/concepts that are not only very unlikely to ever get their own movies, but are right within Joss Whedon’s wheelhouse as a writer and producer.

#5. Avengers Academy

No one does ensemble shows quite like Joss Whedon, and no one does shows about teenagers and younger people with special abilities taking on adult responsibilities better than Whedon either. Now that the Avengers has been established, how about a series where future wanna be heroes can train to be big time Avengers one day? The show can just use the title of the current comic as simply a jumping off point, and the characters from the current comics aren’t neccessarily needed. If he wanted, Joss can just do teenage or early twentysomething versions of some of his favorite B- list Marvel heroes, the kind that you know would never make it into a proper Avengers movie. Maybe take some Avengers no one cares about (I’m lookin at you, Sersi and Quasar) and just run with ’em. The one drawback to this concept is that Disney/Marvel might not want to oversaturate the name/concept of Avengers and make it seem less special by using it in a weekly televsion show. But if anyone can make it happen, it would be Joss Whedon.

#4. S.H.I.E.L.D

I would say that S.H.I.E.L.D is the obvious choice for an ongoing live action television series set in the Marvel movie universe, due to the fact that the covert agency played a part in all the films since the first Iron Man. In fact, it may be a little too obvious, which is why it is closer to the bottom of this list. But still….a S.H.I.E.L.D series would be like a lot like Alias or Mission Impossible, but set in a world where there are super heroes and villains in it, as well as magic and aliens as well. The most recent comic book version of S.H.I.E.L.D has the entire concept of the organization going back hundreds of years to the time of Leonardo da Vinci, and that might make for an interesting series that could span several seasons if done right.

#3. Spider-Woman

There is almost no one out there, especially no one with a Y chromosome anyway, that can write realistic and nuanced female action heroes quite like Joss Whedon. Obviously Buffy the Vampire Slayer is the most famous example, but also Black Widow in the Avengers would have just been “the hot chick” in the group under someone else’s direction, but under Whedon’s auspices she was maybe the most interesting and nuanced character on the team.

Which is why I think that Spider-Woman could be the perfect choice for a Whedon helmed series. As a character, Jessica Drew is damaged and with a strange past that she can’t make heads or tails of (think Dollhouse, only better) and she has a unique origin story to boot. On top of all that, the character has serious ties to S.H.I.E.L.D and Nick Fury (sweeps week cameo from Sam Jackson!) Because Jessica Drew isn’t as famous as other Marvel heroes, her supporting cast and roster of villains are more of an open book for Whedon to play without pissing off a huge fanbase of angry geeks. Lastly, she has a visually striking costume and overall look, and it’s time that television gave us a super hero who wore a costume and made it work, and didn’t shy away from that aspect like Smallville did for ten years.

#2. Damage Control

Originally created by the late, great Dwayne McDuffie as kind of as a sitcom set in the Marvel Universe, Damage Control is the company that cleans up the massive city wide damage done whenever super heroes battle super villains. I mean, somebody has gotta clean that shit up, right? First appearing in a series of mini series in the late 80’s and early 90’s, the characters kept popping back up in the Marvel Universe over the years, usually during some big event like Civil War that has a lot of collateral damage done to poor old Manhattan. The company has ties to both Tony Stark and S.H.I.E.L.D, which makes them fit in perfectly in the Marvel Movie verse. The lighter, jokier tone would fit in perfect with Joss Whedon’s sensibilities as well, and the fact that not many people are familiar with the comic means they have all but a blank slate to use; they can use the name and concept but create all new characters. This one is a bit of a no brainer.

#1.She-Hulk

Ok, I’d say it is pretty well established among geekdom how good Whedon is with strong female characters. Well, Marvel has one of the strongest female heroes out there already with Jennifer Walters, otherwise known as the Sensational She Hulk. For the last few decades, Bruce Banner’s less angry cousin the She-Hulk has been played as a quippy, off the cuff character by creators from John Byrne to Peter David and most recently Dan Slott. Jennifer Walters in the comics is a gamma powered lawyer who deals in court cases that deal strictly with super heroes and super villains and other strange phenomenon. Whedon kind of already has experience with the idea of lawyers who only handle otherworldly cases on his show Angel, which frequently featured the demonic law firm of Wolfram & Hart. Plus, She-Hulk by her very nature ties into the Hulk, who already stole the show in the Avengers movie and is a much beloved character. I know that Marvel Studios and Guillermo del Toro are planning an Incredible Hulk tv reboot, but I think this is an even better idea. Not to mention, getting a tall built actress and painting her green is a lot easier and cheaper than a CGI monster week in and week out.

Not that this will surprise anyone but it is now official, Joss Whedon will write and direct Avengers 2. Disney CEO Bob Iger made the announcement today during a conference call. That wasn’t the only news he had though. He went on to say that Whedon will also help develop  the live-action drama series set within the Marvel cinematic universe that we previously reported.

With Avengers having made $1.46 billion since it’s release this news isn’t really shocking but still, THANK YOU Marvel for bringing back Whedon. His being involved with the live-action show also comes as great news. With Marvel’s catalogue of characters the possibilities are endless for this show. Looks like it’s time to get the band back together.

Source: Deadline

Things are about to get interesting when it comes to the Marvel/Twentieth Century Fox deal. Fox had until October 10th of this year to start work on a reboot of Daredevil, or the rights would revert back to Marvel Studios. But their director of choice David Slade didn’t pan out, and there was no way production on Daredevil could have begun by the October end date.

But according to Variety, Marvel Studios is willing to give Fox and extension on the Daredevil property, if Fox relenquishes rights to two characters from the Fantastic Four universe: Galactus and the Silver Surfer. (ain’t nothin’ free folks) Fox would really like to keep the Daredevil franchise, as they are  in discussions with Joe Carnahan (Smokin’ Aces, The Grey) to direct what is said to be a  “Frank Miller-esque, hardcore 70s thriller” take on Daredevil. Carnahan has yet to receive an official offer, though multiple sources are telling Variety that he is the choice.

Fox is said to want a grittier, less family friendly take on Daredevil, something Disney would be less likely to do. Maybe this will all work out for the best?

If Marvel/Disney gets the rights to Galactus/Silver Surfer back, not only does that mean we’d get a proper version of the world devourer on screen (and not a stupid giant cloud like in Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer) but it would likely be in an Avengers sequel. And how awesome would that be?? And the addition of the Silver Surfer to the Marvel Studios cast means we could one day see a proper version of The Defenders on screen as well. This could all be good news.

If the Silver Surfer ends up back at Marvel Studios, that means all the main Defenders characters will be free to use if they ever want to do that franchise.

UPDATE: 

So, maybe there wasn’t as much to this story as we thought. According to Deadline, Reports that Fox and Marvel Studios are going to do some trading with its Fantastic Four franchise to keep Daredevil in the fold were being adamantly denied by Fox studio insiders. With Fantastic Four being rebooted with Josh Trank as director, the article states that Fox insiders think it would be crazy to let two major FF characters go to Disney, especially when the studio is said to be very lukewarm about rebooting Daredevil.  Although Joe Carnahan has come to the studio with a take, it sounds like Fox is ready to let it revert to Disney-owned Marvel, unless Disney is interested in co-financing. That is what the current talks are really about, insiders said told Deadline. I’m sure this isn’t the last we’ve heard of this story.

It was only a matter of time before Disney started using Marvel characters on their shows. I’m actually amazed it took them this long. According to the Hero Complex, a slew of Marvel heroes and villians will be featured in a special episode of Disney XD’s Phineas and Ferb.

Announced at Comic-Con, “Phineas and Ferb: Mission Marvel” will have Spider-Man, Iron Man, Thor and Hulk drop into Danville but they’re not happy to be there — a scheme by Dr. Doofenshmirtz has robbed the mighty quartet of their powers.  The marooned heroes will have a fight on their hands with four super villains — the Red Skull, Whiplash, Venom and M.O.D.O.K. — who are working together with Dr. Doofenshmirtz.

Phineas and Ferb: Mission Marvel wont hit TV until the summer of 2013 but fear not fans, here’s a teaser to hold you over.

I have a 6 year old niece so I am well-versed in the greatness that is Phineas and Ferb. Anyone who’s worried that the Marvel characters will be poorly handled needn’t worry. I fully support this move on Disney and Marvel’s part. It’s a smart move and I’m sure it’s just the first of many to come.

Andrew Stanton’s first live-action movie John Carter may have been a gigantic flop for Disney but that doesn’t seem to be stopping Stanton from getting work. Deadline is reporting that Stanton has officially come on-board as the director for the sequel to Finding Nemo. Pixar won’t confirm this of course but his working on the sequel makes complete sense. He did after all win not one but two Oscars for Pixar with Finding Nemo and Wall-E.

The sequel is in development so no other details are known at this time but supposedly Disney is also open to the giving him another crack at directing a live-action movie. Sure, John Carter was a $200 million dollar loss for the studio but that’s not Andrew Stanton’s fault. I thought it was a great movie but was just marketed wrong. I look forward to seeing more from him.

Here’s the latest trailer for Frankenweenie. This trailer shows a little more of the story. I for one am looking forward to this, I love stop-motion animation. The voice-cast is made up of Tim Burton main-stays and includes Winona Ryder, Martin Short, Catherine O’Hara and Martin Landau.  It comes alive in theaters October 5th.

Now that the dust has settled and the internet has gone on to complain about new things, I thought it might be an apt time to examine Disney/Pixar’s Brave in more detail.  Now, granted I’m sure many of you are already exceedingly weary all of the Brave chatter and articles, but a movie such as this fascinates me. For one, as the CinemaScore would suggest,  Brave isn’t a bad movie–it’s just a spectacularly mediocre one; as Douglas Adams would say, “mostly harmless.” Well, considering this is coming from the studio that has produced over the past 17 years a voluminous cannon of movies unmatched by anybody else in Hollywood, mediocre just doesn’t cut it for me. But, in what is probably the larger point, it could have been so good. (And, yes, I’m aware that our fearless Geekscape leader really loved the film.)

So, let’s make Brave good.  Instead of just criticizing what doesn’t work, let’s workshop this sucker until it actually does.  Here it is, ladies and germs, the Top 10 Ways to Fix Pixar’s Brave.

(Obviously, massive spoilers are below)

6.) Get into the action!

Yeah…yeah…it’s an ancient screenwriting tip: start in medias res. I’m not reinventing the wheel here. But, Brave would have really benefited from cutting a good 10 to 15 minutes from its first act, and basically starting with the scene where Merida is “auditioning” her suitors. Instead, we get a lot of exposition of her being a free spirit, including an opening song montage. I suppose you could argue that all this Bohemian frolicking is used to develop Merida’s character, but honestly, is her character really that deep?  She’s a Princess who is being forced to live a life she does not want. Holy crap, is that a cliché starting point! Major props to Pixar for giving us a female centric lead character. That still doesn’t excuse the fact that she’s a walking stock character (C’mon! Splitting the arrow! Mel Brooks killed that shtick 19 years ago with Robin Hood Men in Tights). Brave shouldn’t waste so much time examining the fact that she’s an unconventional princess, because that’s not really what the movie is about. The film is about a mother and daughter learning to understand each other (think Finding Nemo with reversed gender roles). So, from a story point, get to the Suitor competition earlier, have her visit the Witch sooner, have the Bear/Mother transformation happen earlier, and ultimately, give yourself some more script space for…..

5.) Mother and Daughter Bonding Time

For a movie that is so conventional in its structure, Brave feels oddly misshapen. The first act is far too long, whereas the second and third act are improperly developed. The best scene in the movie occurs when Merida and Mother Bear (Queen Elinor) fish with one another. They are bonding–developing and rebuilding a relationship. However, essentially, the directors have their relationship change within that single scene. Granted, I like a Rocky-montage as much as the next guy, but Brave should have been about the adventure and journey that mother and daughter go on together. Instead of one scene, have it be several: show them in peril together, make them work together. Show how both Merida’s free spirited ways and Momma’s conservative teachings can be fused together so each takes the best from one another. There’s a shot after the fishing sequence where the camera jibs up to the landscape showing a lengthy path of wisps indicating a long and perilous journey. But, we as the audience never get to see that journey–we literally jump cut to them arriving at their destination. That’s the equivalent of Sam and Frodo looking at Mount Doom in the distance and then immediately arriving at the peak in the next scene, turning to each other and exclaiming “Gosh, I’m pooped! What a long walk!”  As a result, the sequence in the cave where Merida and Queen Elinor confront the evil bear, Mor’du, ends up just being the next step in their journey, instead of the climax. Funny thing is, the screenwriters of the film understand this larger point on a macro level as we see the results of “mother/daughter bonding time”  when Merida gives the speech in the banquet hall. The problem is that the film doesn’t earn the moment. It happens because the plot needs it to happen, not because the characters have actually learned and grown together.

4.) More Menace

Behind every great  fairytale is an even better villain. Think of Scar from the Lion King. Now, THAT’S evil.  The bear Mor’du doesn’t cut it because, frankly, he doesn’t do enough. The most frustrating thing is that the framework is there. I mean, essentially, the story implies he destroyed the Scottish kingdoms by turning against the other leaders. Wouldn’t it be cool if he had a more developed arc, where he is attempting to destroy the four kingdoms because he knows that, as a bear, he could never lead them? It’s the ole’ idea that if he can’t rule, then nobody can. Not only would this have added much needed complexity and depth to the plot, but it would have made his ultimate death more substantial. Plus, it would mean that Merida fought for something more than just herself and her personal mistakes.

3.) Even Magic Needs Rules

The weird thing about us moviegoers is that we are willing to believe anything on screen as long as such things operate within clearly defined rules. Brave never establishes these boundaries. Magic happens. That’s it. How do the wisps work? How do they appear? Why two sunsets until the bear spell is permanent? Why, of all animals, does the witch turn people into bears? Why does the witch’s home change locations? Brave seems far too content to answer all these questions with a nonchalant shrug of magic and pixie dust. That’s not a good enough answer for me. The movie needs to make decisions supported by rules. I’m not saying to ditch the fantastical elements altogether, but at least have the courtesy to define them.

2.) Characters, Not Mechanisms

Brave suffers from a big problem: its characters often act as plot mechanisms instead of…you know…actual characters. The biggest offender is the Witch.  She’s not integrated into the story whatsoever. She appears, makes her magic cake, and then–poof–she’s never seen again. Not only does this introduce the odd question of why there is a wood-whittling, bear obsessed Witch in the middle of the forest, it also means her character only serves as a stepping stone to the next plot point. How do you fix this? I say ditch the witch (hey, that rhymed!) all together. With the introduction of the wisps it’s made clear that there is magic in the world. It would be much more interesting if the wisps themselves were responsible for the mother’s transformation. Instead of introducing more ancillary characters, use what’s already established in our defined magical world (i.e. see above) to incite change.

The same problem exists with several other characters, especially the three clan leaders and their respective Suitors. While I definitely admire Brave for not giving us a cliche “prince” for Merida to fall in love with, do all the firstborn sons have to be so useless?  If we revisit the idea of Mor’du as a more substantive villain, perhaps the three suitors can help Merida in the third act as she faces Mr. Evil Bear head-on. Merida and the Suitors could work and fight together, protecting the kingdom as a unified team, each using their respective strengths to come out on top. Not only would this give the movie a much needed action set piece (ala the Monsters Inc. door sequence or the final fight in the Incredibles), it would also allow Merida to gain the trust and respect of the Suitors and the clans, even if she’s still not willing to give up her hand.

1.) Girl Power, Not Jerk Power

Maybe I’m crazy here, but Merida comes off as kind of a jerk.  Granted, I get that she’s a strong woman who is being unfairly oppressed by societal norms. Still, she essentially gives her mother a poisoned cake that has completely unknown effects. Heck, it could have killed the Queen for all she knew. And then, to top it off, she doesn’t feel that sorry about it–after Mom becomes a bear she immediately blames the Witch instead of herself. While we eventually get a muffled apology from Merida at the end, it feels tacked on and forced. Merida never really changes as essentially she sort of gets what she wants without any negative consequences.  Merida’s arc should be that of changing from a free spirited selfish girl, to a free-spirited and courageous leader. And, we as an audience need to watch that change happen in real time. If her arc would have been constructed that way, as the sun rises at the end, we would feel genuine emotion, instead of being told to feel genuine emotion. Now, that, ladies and gentleman, is the Pixar magic.

Whew! We did it! Brave is now a much better movie. Pixar, be sure to send all subsequent royalties my way. I accept pay pal.

With the success of The Avengers and the upcoming release of The Amazing Spider-Man, Marvel fandom is at an all time high. But there was a time, only 10 years ago, when this wasn’t the case, when the idea of having our favorite Marvel characters inhabiting our cinema screens and being widely accepted as cool was merely a dream. In that day, before the X-Men and Spider-Man films blew the doors open, there was still a place you could go to see your favorite Marvel characters in real life… and maybe even share a drink with them!

In November of 1998, at Universal Studios, the Marvel Mania Restaurant opened its doors for business. It offered food and drinks based on almost every Marvel hero (and villain!) that you could imagine. Sadly, it was closed less than a year later, in September of 1999. What happened? Why did it go under? What fiends were responsible (I’m guessing the chefs and the prices…)?

We may never know. But here, Geekscape has provided scans of the two original menus for you to look over… so that you can dream of a day, before Marvel was widely accepted as cool, when you could feed your feelings of geekdom alongside its largest symbols.

Personally, I’m a fan of “Doc Ock’s Wok”. What’re your favorites off the menu?

Bonuses: Jonathan and his wife Laura read over the menu in this episode of Geekscape. You can also download the Kids Menu here as a PDF, compliments of TheStudioTour.com!

Geekscape writers Scott Alminiana and Shawn Madden join me on this Geekscapepod to talk through a few things! Green Lantern and Nightwing are going gay in Justice League XXX 3D! Avengers: Earth’s Mightiest Heroes is NOT cancelled… we think! Shawn recommends the Netflix Instant indie “Boy Wonder”! Play as Stan Lee in new Amazing Spider-Man preorder DLC! Monster University gets a trailer! More info on Geekscape at SDCC! And we say how much we love Geekscapist Xan!

Subscribe to the show on iTunes!

Mike and Sulley are back! The first teaser trailer for the sequel/prequel Monsters University is here

A look at the relationship between Mike and Sulley during their days at the University of Fear — when they weren’t necessarily the best of friends.

The voice-cast includes Billy Crystal, John Goodman, Steve Buscemi, Ken Jeong, and Kelsey Grammer. Monsters University comes out June 21, 2013.

About two weeks ago the news hit the net that they were cancelling ‘Avengers: Earths Mightiest Heroes’ letting down numbers of fans. Well, it looks like some people take trolling and their hatred of the ‘Ultimate Spider-Man’ cartoon way too far. It’s been revealed that this “news” was totally made up.

Bleeding Cool posted an interesting article earlier today.

“Ultimate Spider-Man is a successful show on Disney XD, with decent ratings, audience reaction and the kind of thing a broadcaster likes to hear. It was recently renewed for a second season.

For some, however, it’s not enough. Specifically, it’s not the Spectacular Spider-Man animation show that preceded it, which had a very different style, and an older demographic.

And there is one internet user called Nabil Elmjati who seems to have started a one man covert war against the show and Marvel Animation.

Since Ultimate Spider-Man began running, every Sunday he’s tweeted to Joe Quesada about how so many fans hate the show and wanted Spectacular back.

It was enough for Joe to take the bait. He told Nabil that if the show wasn’t to his liking, then he should just stop watching and that the production team were already working on season 2. Nabil agreed.

Ish.

Because, despite denials, Nabil appears to have created the site ——– which runs stories about Marvel animation and games, but mostly about how awful the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon is, and how everyone hates it. It is registered to a “Nabil Mjati” in Morocco. So, you know. That’s him.

And then he posted the news that the Avengers Earth’s Mightiest Heroes would be cancelled and replaces with the cartoon Avengers Assemble. He also quoted from a press release, purported to be “print only”, saying “The Avengers: Earth’s Mightiest Heroes won’t be renewed for the 3rd Season. Marvel Animation will present their newly developed series Marvel’s Avengers Assemble in 2013.”

Which was picked up verbatim by sites all across the internet, some like Comic Book Movie, Oh No They Didn’t, CBR, Critiques For Geeks, giving credit to Marvel TV News, others like iFanboy, ScreenRant, Geek Tyrant, Super Hero Hype, Comic Vine

Only problem was that the quote was made up. There was no official press release. It was a lie that few chose to question.

There is certainly the rumour that Earth’s Mightiest Heroes has been cancelled. It may well be replaced by the new Avengers Assemble. But no official word. Marvel TV News made up an official quote and all the websites followed suit without checking.

It gets better. Nabil also directed people on Twitter to Jeph Loeb’s Facebook page, where Loeb was being bombarded by negative comments about Ultimate Spider-Man. So much so that Jeph had to take his Facebook page down.

Except Jeph doesn’t have a Facebook page, there’s just an Author page which doesn’t take comments. It looks like Nabil may have created that too, and recruited people to write such comments. Facebook were informed of the situation and took it down.”

Yay. Our name wasn’t on the list of sites that reported this. But really…that’s a little over the top for a hatred of a cartoon.

On the bright side…Earths Mightiest Heroes fans rejoice! They may return for a third season after all!

I start this episode off telling all of you to go pick up “The FP” this week! Also, “Adventure Time” Season 1 is coming to DVD in July! Fantastic! Falling Skies has returned to TV and why should you be watching it? Is “Before Watchmen” turning itself around? Ed Brubaker’s got your Captain America fix! I review Pixar’s “Brave” and it’s fantastic! And Geekscape favorite BigYanks gets married… finally! But what do we get him?

Subscribe to the show on iTunes!

Brave Review

Brave, this summer’s entry into Pixar’s pantheon of yearly animated feature films, at times feels like classic Pixar clockwork and at other’s like a new path being discovered for the first time. As much as it owes to the established Pixar (and Disney) storytelling conventions that we’ve grown up knowing, there’s a lot in directors Mark Andrews and Brenda Chapman (and co-director Steve Purcell’s) film that feels just fresh enough (and sometimes strange enough) to warrant the name “Brave”. I could go into detail on where the story waxes when maybe we would expect it to wane but that would be spoiling one of the most interesting and rewarding films that Pixar has ever made.

Really, this is a movie that would be spoiled by knowing what awaits you, and I urge anyone reading this to avoid any and all possible spoilers. And I’ll avoid using any of them in my review here. Disney’s ad campaign has been great in not telling us anything about the actual plot and I would even warn you from the film’s IMDB page if you want to go into the film completely fresh.

So what IS safe to know going in? Well, why not start with what we all already know? Brave is the story of the young Celtic princess Merida (Kelly Macdonald), first born of King Fergus (Billy Connolly) and Queen Elinor (Emma Thompson). Upon coming of age, Merida will be married off to the first born son of one of the three Clan Leaders, Lord Dingwall (Robbie Coltrane), Lord MacGuffin (Kevin McKidd) or Lord Macintosh (Craig Ferguson). And since Merida is a feisty young girl who would rather find her own destiny on the back of her horse with a bow in her hand than have others choose it for her, she sets out to thwart her parents and remain unmarried.

The rest of this movie is on point too.

You got all that? Great… because that’s the first 20 to 30 minutes of the movie. The rest of the running time sees the film go in some really interesting directions as Merida goes off to cut her own path. I wish I could tell you more about the plot, including some of my favorite moments, but I really want you to discover this movie for yourselves and the campaigns for the film have done such a great job in keeping things secret. My job is in reviewing the film, not ruining it. Just know that once Merida sets this snowball rolling, it begins to grow beyond her control, knocking down everything in its path and awakening both past secrets and inner truths. As soon as the “plot” started kicking in and going into some strange places, I turned to my friend Brian Walton and whispered “did you know what this movie was about?” He shook his head no. “It’s fantastic.”

And it is… for many reasons. Probably the strongest and most obvious reason is that Brave has the strongest female characters of any of the Pixar movies. And I don’t just mean Merida, although she’s pretty strong and fantastic to watch as she grows through the trials and lessons of the film. But Merida’s mother, Queen Elinor, works as a wise and patient counterweight to Merida’s youthful impatience. The movie is very much about this central relationship and how both characters grow from one another. It’s also how they work to define not only their own lives, but their family and the legacy of their kingdom. I don’t recall Disney or Pixar telling a story that had this strong of a female message or protagonist without the counterweight of a Prince or a male hero. In fact, the males in the film are all entirely used as comedic relief or as cautionary tales. Knowing that little boys make up so much of the toy buying market that drives these summer films (last summer’s “Cars 2” seemed to be completely dictated by it), it was a brave decision (there’s that word again) to make a children’s summer tentpole movie that relies entirely on a female driven story.

And it works. Not only were there no little boys complaining of boredom when the lights came up, there didn’t seem to be a whole lot of dry eyes as well. “Brave” gets very emotionally intense, especially at the end. I was asked by a friend if he could take his 4 year old daughter to see the film and I had to pause and think on it. There are some really scary sequences in the film, and again that ending did a number on everyone. I know that “Toy Story 3” has that scene in the end that everyone quotes as being the scariest, most intense moment in a Disney movie, and it maybe still is, but these two sequences are emotionally intense in two different ways. In the way that Toy Story 3’s end scene found the collective heroes resigned to a horrific fate, but at least there was no question that they were “together in the end”, the emotional ending of “Brave” has everything relying on the shoulders of one female hero and whether or not she did the right thing… and was it enough in the end? It’s just as heartbreaking as the idea that you may not ever see Buzz and Woody again. I could keep arguing on the permanent ramifications and differences of each ending but I’m coming very close to telling too much and that’s something I swore not to do. Just come prepared with some tissues.

The Comedy Rule of 3s applies here… the funniest characters in the movie.

In the end, is “Brave” the best of the Pixar films? I don’t think there’s ever going to be a definite answer for that but it’s definitely one of the best and one of the most interesting. And it’s great to see Monkey Island alum and Sam and Max creator Steve Purcell involved in such a huge film. There is a sequence in the movie in which I thought “wow… that like something they would have put in a Lucasarts adventure game”! And sure enough, Steve’s name was right there in the titles. Tonally, the movie plays light and dark better than most of the Pixar films, and swings between the two probably the widest and the most frequently while hanging the audience out to dry for the longest stretches of time in the most uncomfortable middle, where you really don’t know where this movie is headed. While some detractors have named this as a reason to not enjoy the film, I argue that it’s what makes it one of the most interesting and I can’t wait to see it again because there seemed to be plenty still left unexplored. Technologically and visually, Pixar is still the company to beat. Even though the film has a bit in common with the similar setting of “How to Train Your Dragon”, it’s apparent in “Brave” that they are still the masters of the CGI animated film, both on the screen and on the page. I can’t recommend it to you enough and will be venturing back into the wilds of the megaplexes to see it again when it’s released this weekend.

My wife Laura joins me on this episode to talk about the difference between the Resident Evil and Underworld films, talk fictitious characters we’d like to bang and George W Bush’s cameo in Game of Thrones. I also review Beasts of the Southern Wild, Lego Batman 2 and The Amazing Spider-Man on 3DS and Michael Bay’s Ninja Turtles gets delayed! Finally Disney might be bringing Marvel to theme parks and we both pretend we’re eating at the late 90s Marvel restaurant… that really existed! Eat up!

Subscribe to the show on iTunes!

“Walt Disney Co’s design team has increased its efforts to bring the Marvel superhero team “The Avengers” to the company’s theme parks after the film’s smashing success, the head of Disney’s parks unit said on Thursday.”

Well this rumor has been floating around for quite some time now. These rumors have included changing rides to have Marvel characters and even turn Innoventions into a Stark Expo (yes…please). Well it looks like it just may be coming true and coming to a theme park near you. Well…that is if you live in California.

“We were hard at work on attractions using Marvel characters previously, and that work has only intensified given (the film’s) great success,” Staggs, chairman of Disney’s parks and resorts division, told Reuters in an interview at the park’s Golden Vine Winery.

Now while Disney cannot bring the characters to their Orlando park where they are contractually restricted due to them being licensed to Comcast Corp’s Universal Studios.

The big reason behind this seems to due to the massive drop in California Adventure’s attendance since its 2001 opening. Disney is probably seeing the huge success in ‘The Avengers’ as a chance to revitalize the park and expand the franchise.

Will you assemble at the happiest place on earth if so?

Rumor warning! This is not confirmed.

SuperHeroAuthority is reporting that we may just see the 35 minute longer ‘Directors Cut’ being released into theaters this summer in an attempt to knock ‘Titanic’ and ‘Avatar’ off the top of the hill.

“The Avengers is sitting comfortably at No. 3 overall on both the domestic and International ticket sale charts but it seems both Marvel and Disney desire the No. 1 overall spot and a current rumor says they could be contemplating releasing The Avengers: Director’s Cut in theaters at the end of this summer.

Please remember this is from a ComicBook.com post and another Hollywood source who has heard this rumor and told SuperHero Authority this is a possibility but nothing has been confirmed to actually happen. Marvel and Disney have not said anything regarding this new rumor as well.

So, while this is a major rumor…I would definitely not rule it out as a possibility. Especially because of the fact that most of us have seen this movie at least 2-3 times already. Would we most likely assemble again with that additional 35 minutes of footage? Definitely.

And what comic fan wouldn’t love to see ‘The Avengers’ hit number one?

The first trailer for the new Disney animated movie Wreck-It Ralph has just been released. It features the voice-talent of John C. Reilly, Jack McBrayer, Sarah Silverman, and Jane Lynch.

Here’s the synopsis for the movie: ‘The bad-guy character in a classic game who longs to be a hero brings trouble to his entire arcade after sneaking into a new first-person shooter game and unleashing a deadly enemy.”

Wreck-It Ralph wrecks his way into theaters on November 2.

Posted in NewsTagged , , , , , 1 Comment on Trailer For Disney’s ‘Wreck-It Ralph’

It was announced around the same time that two movies based on the fictional character of Snow White would be released in 2012. First, there was Mirror Mirror, a lighthearted and quirky take on the Disney Princess. The other being Snow White and the Huntsman, Rupert Sanders’ dark and Grimm-like interpretation of the iconic story. Headlined by Kristen Stewart, the star of the Twilight franchise, along with Chris Hemsworth (Thor) and Charlize Theron, Sanders has everything imaginable at his disposal. But even with an Academy Award winning actress and one of the most famous stories ever created,  can the first-time director deliver?

Snow White and the Huntsman initially ventures back to the childhood of Snow White (played by Stewart). After the death of her mother, Snow White’s father falls victim to the luring charisma of the Queen (played by Theron). When the villainous woman murders him on their wedding night, the Queen overtakes the throne and the kingdom succumbs to evil. Eventually able to escape imprisonment from the Queen, Snow White must survive the dark forest and conjure up an army to reclaim the throne. With the aid of the Huntsman (played by Hemsworth) and seven dwarfs, Snow White attempts to restore peace and serenity throughout the land.

Director Rupert Sanders is given a large task with his directorial debut. Serving up a never-before-seen interpretation of a much anticipated blockbuster, the bar was set astronomically high. To his praise, Sanders delivers an astonishingly visual and profound journey into the childhood story that we all know so well. The director does a fantastic job of effectively using colors to set the mood for each and every scene. Easily the highlight of Snow White and the Huntsman, it’s no exaggeration to start talking about a possible Visual Effects nomination from the Academy. In addition to the film’s stunning visuals, actress Charlize Theron must once again be applauded for her magnificent work on screen. The remarkably gifted, Academy Award winning actress takes control of the film and shoulders all of the attention on herself. In doing so, she proves to be a much more reliable central character than the heroine Snow White. Theron effortlessly commands the screen and shows the audience multiple dimensions to the character of the Queen. In a similar approach to 2008’s superhero classic The Dark KnightSnow White and the Huntsman is a daring rendition that ultimately succeeds because of its elaborate focus on the villain.

Although the dark fairy tale manages to work well on screen, it does so with a few blemishes. Snow White and the Huntsman starts out strong and hits a lull in the second act. The audience is forced to sit through a mid-section that is much longer than it needs to be. Surprisingly, the body of the film adds minutes to the runtime without ever offering much to the story. Flooded with uninteresting subplots and other various nonsense, the middle portion pushes the level of unbearable. However, just moments before you’re ready to throw in the towel, Sanders introduces the dwarfs and the comical characters give a much needed boost of energy to the feature. From that moment on, the movie picks up and the audience has no need to ever look back. Furthermore, for all of the praise given to Theron, it becomes almost too easy to criticize the casting decision of Kristen Stewart as Snow White. Offering up about as much emotion as a paper clip, Stewart only makes sense as Snow White by her appearance alone. Luckily for Sanders, Theron dazzles and Hemsworth proves to be adequate enough in his role to help sustain the film.

For the massive level of excitement I had prior to viewing the film, Snow White and the Huntsman came just shy of meeting my expectations. That being said, I must give the movie the respect it deserves and recognize it as the solid work that it is. Stunningly visual and original, Snow White and the Huntsman is a winning debut effort from director Rupert Sanders and his entire team. If you’re eager to see the picture, then I suggest doing so. Chances are, you won’t leave the theatre bitter with your decision.

Stars: 2 and a half stars out of 4

Grade: B-

 

When MCDave can’t be found on Geekscape he’s usually lost at Movie Reviews By Dave

Greetings programs! Disney has released the first episode of their new animated series Tron: Uprising online and it is a sight to be seen.

Now, I love me some Tron and Tron: Legacy but I’ll be the first person to admit that they are flawed movies and far from perfect. You know what though? I’m okay with that. I love them for what they each represent. The first was groundbreaking for its use of computer animation and was one of the coolest looking things I’d ever seen as a child. The second played on my childhood nostalgia and looked amazing with its updated version of The Grid and was backed by the great Daft Punk soundtrack. Yeah, sure, the stories weren’t the best and the pacing lags in both but it’s better than a lot of the other crap that gets released.

Disney first announced their intentions for this prequel-series to Tron: Legacy back in December of 2010 and I’ve been eagerly awaiting it ever since. Disney then released a teaser trailer for the series when Legacy was released on DVD/Blu-ray. And now at long last it is here…

The series takes place in-between events shown in Tron: Legacy, and follows a young program named Beck (voiced by Elijah Wood), as he assumes the identity of Tron and attempts to start a revolution against the villainous Clu. The voice-cast is quite impressive, featuring Lance Henriksen, Emmanuelle Chriqui, Mandy Moore, Paul Reubens, Paul Reubens, Nate Corddry, and Bruce Boxleitner as Tron. The animation, a blend of 2D animation and CGI, is also quite impressive. It keeps the up-dated character, vehicle and landscape designs of the movie while setting out to tell a completely new story. The Tron-universe is an untapped gold-mine of stories to tell. If the rest of the series is anything like it’s premiere episode than I think fans have quite the ride in store for them. Don’t take my word for it, check it out yourselves and let me know that you think.

Tron: Uprising premieres on Disney XD on June 7.

The Avengers continued to destroy box office records this weekend. According to Disney’s estimates, the Marvel blockbuster took in $103.2 million in its second weekend, surpassing Avatar‘s previously held record of $75.6 million.

This brings Joss Whedon’s juggernaut to $373.2 million in US earnings; worldwide, the film has now crossed the billion dollar mark in just 19 days, another record. Tim Burton’s soap opera adaptation Dark Shadows opened in second place, pulling in just under $29 million.

Shawarma sales are up by 80 percent, according to TMZ.

In what can be referred to as the most obvious move in film history, Disney today has announced that they have secured a sequel to the EXPLOSIVELY successful Avengers movie.

With $654 MILLION in opening weekend box office sales worldwide, it is no surprise that Disney wants to get the ball rolling on a sequel in order to ride the good press.

Disney CEO Bob Iger was quoted saying “There is a strong demand for Avengers merchandsie.” No fucking duh Bob.

Neil Gaiman’s children’s novel The Graveyard Book has been in some form of development since the book came out in 2008. The Graveyard Book is a riff on The Jungle Book by Rudyard Kipling, but instead of being raised by animals, in this instance the infant boy (here named Nobody) whose parents are murdered is raised in a cemetery by the ghosts and vampire who reside there. Back in 2010, director Neil Jordan, himself no stranger to gothic fiction as the director of Interview with the Vampire and The Company of Wolves, came on board to direct, but the deal fell through and has been in limbo ever since.

So here comes Disney to the rescue. According to Deadline, the Mouse beat out several suitors for the rights to the novel for a six figure deal. What isn’t clear is whether or not Neil Jordan is still in the mix. All that is known is that Disney production chief Sean Bailey is making this a priority for the studio. Anyone else see a stop motion adaptation like the one we got for Gaiman’s Coraline for this story too?

Episode 25 Matt introduces a new format, discusses his elementary school bullying, interviews Joe Whiteford of Calibretto 13 and Harley Poe, Chad Neidt of one minute mash ups and Molly Mahan performs a song about her San Diego Comic Con trip

SHOW NOTES:

Fowl Play’s Facebook
Facts Facebook
Wordburglar Facebook
Harley Poe’s Facebook
Joe’s Blog
Chad’s Youtube Page

Find Us on iTunes

Of all the rides in Disneyland’s Fantasyland section, one of the oddest (and coolest) has got to be Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride. Oddest because Disney’s adaptation of The Wind in the Willows was only a segment in the package film The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr.Toad, and not really a well remembered full length classic like Peter Pan and the like. And coolest because the ride literally ends with your Mr. Toad driven car getting hit by a train and you and your fellow passengers being sent to Hell.  Yes, there is a Disney ride that ends with dying and going to Hell. I’d like to see that concept get past Walt Disney Imagineering these days.

Since opening day in 1955, the ride has remained a beloved fixture at Disneyland (although it was removed from Magic Kingdom in Walt Disney World and replaced with Winnie the Pooh. I know, lame.) According to Deadline, Disney has announced plans to make a  feature film of Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride. Pete Candeland, director of many music videos and commercials, has been hired to develop a live-action/CGI mix movie. Justin Springer (one of the producers on TRON: Legacy) will produce Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride, and the studio is currently looking for a writer.

Disney’s track record with theme park ride adaptations has been very hit and miss; obviously Pirates of the Caribbean is a juggernaut that can’t be stopped, but anyone remember Eddie Murphy’s Haunted Mansion disaster? Or The Country Bears? Aside from Mr. Toad, Disney has revealed in the last few years a slew of ride-to-movie plans, like The Jungle Cruise, a Guillermo Del Toro reboot of Haunted Mansion and the Jon Favreau movie set in Disneyland itself called Magic Kingdom. Now add Mr. Toad to that growing list. The real question is which of this will get made first, if any? And why haven’t they announced a Space Mountain movie??

 

The giant of a series, Kingdom Hearts, is coming to the 3DS this July 31st. Players will take up the roles of Sora and Riku, and will be able to switch characters on the fly using the new Drop Gauge System. Square Enix has said this will add a new element of strategy to the game. Check out the trailer below (Turn on Closed Captioning for English Subtitles) and the new character models!

Disney has set a release date for the sequel to Captain America: The First Avenger and that date is April 4, 2014. As we reported earlier Marvel Studios is still trying to narrow down its list of directors. According to Disney, the sequel will pick up where The Avengers leaves off, with Cap struggling to come to grips with his place in modern society. And we’re guessing that Hydra and (hopefully) The Red Skull won’t be helping things none! Now what about some Baron Zemo or Arnim Zola!?! Or how about “The Artist”s Jean Dujardin as Batroc The Leaper?!?

The first real tidbits of information concerning TRON 3 were inadvertently leaked this weekend at WonderCon; Speaking with io9  at the convention this weekend while promoting their ABC show Once Upon A Time, Adam Horowitz and Edward Kitsis (who co-wrote TRON: Legacy and are producers on the third installment)  ended up giving an update on a potential third movie. Due to their schedule on Once Upon A Time, they are not the screenwriters for TRON 3, but had this to say “We are working on a sequel….we’ve moved to be co-producers on it. But there’s a script being written right now. Dave DiGilio is writing it,  (TRON Legacy director) Joseph Kosinski is right now shooting Oblivion, but we’ve had a lot of meetings and conversations and we’ve seen the first draft of the TRON sequel.”

The writing duo were asked about the possible return of Jeff Bridges’ Kevin Flynn, who (SPOILERS for the last movie) seemingly died at the end of TRON: Legacy“I would say the definition of life and death in the digital realm —Will be explored in the sequel.Also making comments lately about a third installment is TRON himself,  as Bruce Boxleitner has said the current plan is to shoot the movie around 2014.

I know TRON: Legacy has its fair share of haters out there, but despite the crappy acting by lead actor Garrett Hedlund and a generic script, I pretty much dug it. I adored the updated world of the grid, and I think the Daft Punk soundtrack is one of the best soundtracks in years (in other words, I’m shallow, and to impress me you just need to have pretty lights and cool sounds and I’m sold) And for those who maintain that TRON: Legacy was some kind of bomb for not making Avatar level money…I remind you that the movie made $400 million on a $170 million budget. Believe me, right now Disney wishes John Carter was “bombing” like TRON: Legacy did.