Darren Aronofsky is no stranger to crafting polarizing pieces of film. As the visionary behind works like Requiem for a DreamThe Fountain and even Noah, Aronofsky has a profound way of both dazzling and alienating select audiences. But perhaps none of his oeuvre has divided critics and moviegoers quite like his latest ambitious feat, Mother!, a dark and spiraling journey into madness and creation.

Jennifer Lawrence stars as the wife of a world renowned writer (Javier Bardem). But as she works tirelessly to restore his childhood home to the exact proportions from before it tragically burned to the ground, her husband can’t seem to find the inspiration he needs to create his next great masterpiece. However, when a strange cast of unexpected visitors (Ed Harris and Michelle Pfeiffer) arrive at their home, the ensuing chaos leads to a chain of events that send the writer’s career to even greater heights, which begin to threaten the sanctity of their marriage.

Equal parts bold and absurd, Aronsky’s Mother! rings familiar to the recent adapted work of another ambitious filmmaker, Ben Wheatley. Wheatley’s High-Rise serves as a metaphor for societal breakdown and anarchy in a lawless skyscraper where the higher the floor, the more power and wealth. Similarly, Mother! has much to say about the deterioration of society and structure. But where Wheatley’s effort unapologetically prides itself on the foolish lunacy of its story, Mother! half-heartedly masks the same goal with mystery and intrigue. And when Aronofsky finally reveals his hand, the bravado has already begun to wear thin. Mother! stands as a periodically gripping tale with committed performances from a rangy and impressive cast. Yet, much like the chintzy exclamation point thrown at the end of the film’s title, Mother! is as subtle as a sledge-hammer, mercilessly dragging the viewer to a far-off finish line that provides very little in terms of a reward when all is said and done.

GRADE: 3/5

For other reviews, trailers and movie lists visit MCDAVE’s host site

Briefly: Following the insanely cool trailer from just a couple of weeks back, Fox today debuted four gorgeous new character posters for next month’s X-Men: Apocalypse, each image depicting one of Apocalypse’ four horsemen.

In the film, “Since the dawn of civilization, he was worshipped as a god. Apocalypse, the first and most powerful mutant from Marvel’s X-Men universe, amassed the powers of many other mutants, becoming immortal and invincible. Upon awakening after thousands of years, he is disillusioned with the world as he finds it and recruits a team of powerful mutants, including a disheartened Magneto (Michael Fassbender), to cleanse mankind and create a new world order, over which he will reign. As the fate of the Earth hangs in the balance, Raven (Jennifer Lawrence) with the help of Professor X (James McAvoy) must lead a team of young X-Men to stop their greatest nemesis and save mankind from complete destruction.”

Take a look at the new X-Men: Apocalypse posters below (via the film’s official Twitter account), and let us know what you think! The film hits theatres on May 27th!

En Sabah Nur.

En Sabah Nur.

En Sabah Nur.

Praise be unto En Sabah Nur!!!

The one true GOD, Apocalypse (Oscar Isaac), has come to cleanse mankind and create a new world order, over which he will reign. He will unleash upon us his four horsemen, Psylocke (Olivia Munn), Storm (Alexandra Shipp), Archangel (Ben Hardy) and the disheartened Magneto (Michael Fassbender).

As the fate of the Earth hangs in the balance, Raven (Jennifer Lawrence) with the help of Professor X (James McAvoy) must lead a team of young inexperienced X-Men. These fools are nothing but whinny valley kids, Jean Grey (Sophie Turner), Cyclops (Tye Sheridan); a mall rat, Jubilee (Lana Condor); and a circus freak, Nightcrawler (Kodi Smit-McPhee). They do have a bad ass speedster though, i mean have you see this guy in action? DAMNNN QUICKSILVER (Evan Peters). These losers will try and stop the one true God in a feeble attempt to save mankind from complete and utter destruction that it deserves.

Witness the destruction of the weak humans in theaters May 27, 2016

Briefly: This is a damned cool spot. As much as I loved seeing Krang for the first time in the just-released new teaser for Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2: Out of the Shadows, the total destruction witnessed in this new spot for X-Men: Apocalypse might be the coolest Super Bowl trailer thus far (well, unless you count Ant-Man and Hulk fighting over a Coke as a Super Bowl trailer).

In the film, “Since the dawn of civilization, he was worshipped as a god. Apocalypse, the first and most powerful mutant from Marvel’s X-Men universe, amassed the powers of many other mutants, becoming immortal and invincible. Upon awakening after thousands of years, he is disillusioned with the world as he finds it and recruits a team of powerful mutants, including a disheartened Magneto (Michael Fassbender), to cleanse mankind and create a new world order, over which he will reign. As the fate of the Earth hangs in the balance, Raven (Jennifer Lawrence) with the help of Professor X (James McAvoy) must lead a team of young X-Men to stop their greatest nemesis and save mankind from complete destruction.”

Take a look at the X-Men: Apocalypse Super Bowl spot below, and let us know what you think! The film hits theatres on May 27th!

Briefly: The very first trailer for X-Men Apocalypse launched earlier today, and probably stopped the Apocalypse / Ivan Ooze comparisons for good.

Seriously, the character looks astonishingly powerful, and with Psylocke (Olivia Munn) and Magneto (Michael Fassbender) on his side (among others) it’s going to be an impossibly tough battle for McAvoy’s Xavier and company.

If that bad-ass trailer wasn’t enough, Fox has just debuted a stunning new poster for the film, which features an angry Apocalypse crushing… what else but a human skull.

Following the critically acclaimed global smash hit X-Men: Days of Future Past, director Bryan Singer returns with X-MEN: APOCALYPSE. Since the dawn of civilization, he was worshipped as a god. Apocalypse, the first and most powerful mutant from Marvel’s X-Men universe, amassed the powers of many other mutants, becoming immortal and invincible. Upon awakening after thousands of years, he is disillusioned with the world as he finds it and recruits a team of powerful mutants, including a disheartened Magneto (Michael Fassbender), to cleanse mankind and create a new world order, over which he will reign. As the fate of the Earth hangs in the balance, Raven (Jennifer Lawrence) with the help of Professor X (James McAvoy) must lead a team of young X-Men to stop their greatest nemesis and save mankind from complete destruction.

Take a look at the new poster below, and let us know if you’re excited for the film!

Apocalypse

The ‘X-Men: Apocalypse‘ trailer is upon here, all praise Apocalypse!! Oscar Isaac will portray En Sabah Nur (better known as Apocalypse), is a centuries-old mutant who was worshipped in Ancient Egypt as a God. After awakening in the 1980s, he is dissatisfied with the state of the mutant’s on the planet, and goes on to recruit Psylocke (Olivia Munn) and Magneto (Michael Fassbender) to be a part of his Four Horsemen to help him cleanse the world.

I’ve always been a great fan of the X-Men Franchise, so i’m definitely excited to catch the latest installment. I think my favorite thing about the X-Men franchise is that instead of rebooting the series it decided to keep the history and continuity of the earlier films. Which probably had more to do with keeping Hugh Jackman as Wolverine. And to rectify the not so popular ‘Last Stand’, and the status of the staple X-men characters it went back and time and retconned it. GOTTA LOVE COMICS!!

X-Men Apocalypse hits theaters on May 27th.

Following the critically acclaimed global smash hit X-Men: Days of Future Past, director Bryan Singer returns with X-MEN: APOCALYPSE. Since the dawn of civilization, he was worshipped as a god. Apocalypse, the first and most powerful mutant from Marvel’s X-Men universe, amassed the powers of many other mutants, becoming immortal and invincible. Upon awakening after thousands of years, he is disillusioned with the world as he finds it and recruits a team of powerful mutants, including a disheartened Magneto (Michael Fassbender), to cleanse mankind and create a new world order, over which he will reign. As the fate of the Earth hangs in the balance, Raven (Jennifer Lawrence) with the help of Professor X (James McAvoy) must lead a team of young X-Men to stop their greatest nemesis and save mankind from complete destruction.

American Hustle is yet another entry into what is beginning to shape up as the Golden Era of David O. Russell’s career as a filmmaker. Following last year’s hit Silver Linings Playbook, Russell stacks his cast with many of the same faces. The film is set around two con artists and one FBI agent. The film begins by setting up the two con artists, using conventions and techniques usually found in the gangster genre. Think Casino. The first 20 or so minutes have inner monologues, tracking shots, and long takes that all take character over plot. However, as long as we’re talking about David O. Russell here, character over plot isn’t a bad thing.

American Hustle is very much a character driven film, as it should be. Christian Bale knocks this role out of the park. And Jeremy Renner? It almost made me completely forget about how static Hawkeye was in The Avengers. Moving on. Both Amy Adams and Jennifer Lawrence are definitely deserving of best acting nominations. As the film went on, I couldn’t help but think that the two were playing themselves in some scenes. This thought was solidified upon further reading that there was more than a few scenes where the actors would improv. Bradley Cooper delivers what seems to be his greatest performance yet and has great chemistry with both Adams and Bale. Regardless, an ensemble cast that works this well together should not be so quickly overlooked. American Hustle deserves audiences for this feat alone.

As hinted at earlier, Russell’s directorial style is hitting a smooth stride; a stride so flawless, so self-reflexive, you can tell he’s having fun with it. It’s a film made with the same love and care that Silver Linings came from. The director trademarks are there, such as close ups of handholding, and the various musical montages are a blast. All this while the production and costume design will have you invested in the film’s setting and story.

Aside from a few ADR and editing quips, American Hustle delivers a powerful experience, one that with themes and questions that’ll have you thinking while you’re walking out of the theater. In American Hustle, everyone hustles to survive. Do you?

American Hustle is currently in limited release and goes wide on December 20, 2013.

I’d love to talk more about the film as you all see it, so don’t be afraid to comment below!

Be sure to read MCDave’s review of the film here!

To steal a quote from Woody Harrelson in the 1992 comedy White Men Can’t Jump, filmmaker David O. Russell is “in the zone”. Russell finds himself in the midst of an unbelievable directorial stretch that will surely bring him his third consecutive Best Picture Nomination when they’re officially announced early next year. In his latest masterpiece, American Hustle, the writer/director puts a clever fictionalized spin on the FBI’s ABSCAM operation which took place in the late 1970s. So clever, in fact, that we may have found our next Academy Awards Best Picture winner.

After con man Irving Rosenfeld (Christian Bale) and his seductive mistress, Sydney Prosser (Amy Adams), are arrested for loan fraud by up-and-coming FBI agent Richie DiMaso (Bradley Cooper), they have two options: either face some serious jail time, or help DiMaso bring down four other high profile criminals. Needless to say Irving and Sydney choose the latter, assisting DiMaso in a sting operation that couples New Jersey politician Camine Polito (Jeremy Renner), countless political officials and dangerous members of the mafia. The only wild card in the matter is Irving’s wife, Rosalyn (Jennifer Lawrence), whose instability could put the whole operation in jeopardy.

hustle1

With David O. Russell’s American Hustle, you can expect a big-time splash that will leave a ripple effect on just about every major Oscar race out there. The filmmaker has coached his two previous casts to 7 … let that sink in for a minute … 7 Oscar nominations with their work in both Silver Linings Playbook and The Fighter. Current cast members Christian Bale and Jennifer Lawrence understand the greatness of Russell as he helped lead both of them to their only Academy Awards victories. As expected, American Hustle delivers no shortage of fine performances. From top to bottom the cast is excellent. It all starts with leading man Christian Bale who packs on the pounds and shaves the center of his head to truly capture the art of the comb-over. Not only does Bale display onscreen excellence yet again, he continues to remind us of his dedication to the craft. There may not be a more committed actor on the entire planet. But he is far from the only shining star, perhaps Bradley Cooper is most impressive with a towering turn as Richie DiMaso, a young FBI agent who becomes more and more obsessed with making the biggest bust in U.S. history. And let’s not forget Jennifer Lawrence. While the young actress moseys along and embraces all of the onscreen recognition and public love she’s been receiving, her performance actually feels like one of the least convincing roles in the film, although still fantastic. American Hustle‘s ensemble is spectacular and, without question, the finest of the year.

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

You’ll need to search for flaws in David O. Russell’s American Hustle, but one irritating aspect is the director’s fixation on the time period. There’s no subtlety to it whatsoever. Russell continually throws the 1970 vibe right in your face by purposely calling attention to it throughout the entire film. In some ways it feels as though he sacrifices substance for style and it’s a shame. Furthermore, American Hustle does tend to drag on in its latter stages. You can sense where the movie’s headed, but Russell takes his merry old time getting there. Thankfully, the writer/director has mastered the art of story-telling and uses a sharp comedic tone to help balance his out-stretched tale of power, greed and pushing the limits. By the time American Hustle is all said and done, it’s obvious that Russell has a winning effort on his hands, one that’s assured to garner plenty of attention on its road to the Oscars.

With the clock winding down and the cinematic year coming to a screeching halt, 2013 finally has a film that stands out above the rest. American Hustle is an energetic and hilarious adventure. And despite the fact that its dramatics aren’t overly “touching” or “moving”, nor should they be, American Hustle is a fun and engaging ride that you won’t want to miss.

GRADE: 4.5/5

Check out lots of other reviews and fun movie lists at Movie Reviews By Dave.

Briefly: It’s not the most exciting Days of Future Past photo we’ve seen this week, but it’s nice to see Mystique back in action.

Director Bryan Singer today tweeted a mysterious new production photo from the film. The image features Mystique (well, her leg anyways) choking a mysterious figure against a wall. Any idea who the figure may be? Take a look at the photo and sound out below!

After seeing The Wolverine (and listening to Ian Kerner’s breakdown), how much are you looking forward to Days of Future Past?

Bryan Singer is on a roll. Just yesterday he gave us our first look at Peter Dinklage preparing for work on X-Men: Days of Future Past, and today it’s Jennifer Lawrence’s turn. The director has tweeted an image of Lawrence in full Mystique costume, and as always, she’s looking pretty bad-ass. The image is titled “First look: #JenniferLawrence as a vengeful #Mystique”, so it’s probably safe to speculate that she’s pretty unhappy about what happened with Xavier. I guess we’ll find out next Summer.

Take a look at the photo below, and let us know what you think! X-Men: Days of Future Past hits theatres on July 17th, 2014!

The first images for the hugely anticipated sequel to The Hunger Games have made their way online. They’ll premiere on paper in Friday’s issue of Entertainment Weekly, but are posted below for your hungry, hungry eyes.

 

Seeing as the first film raked in nearly 700-million at the box office, it’s no surprise that a rush was put on a sequel. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire follows the second book of the novel series by Suzanne Collins.

 

Check out the new images below (one being the cover of tomorrow’s EW issue), and let us know what you think! Did you like The Hunger Games? Are you looking forward to reuniting with Katniss?

 

I’ve never read the novels myself, but generally enjoyed the first film, so I’m quite looking forward to this one. Plus, Jennifer Lawrence is super-cute.

 

CF1 CF2 CF3 CF4 CF5 CF6

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is slated to hit theatres on November 22nd.

 

Source: EW

In honor of the Academy Award Nominations which will be announced on Thursday January 10th, I give you my personal 2012 year-end movie awards. 2012 proved to be an extraordinary year in cinema (view my top ten films of 2012), one that will certainly leave its mark in history. Having seen nearly 100 new releases over this past calendar year, here’s my top 5 picks for each of the 6 major races:

Notable films I missed in 2012: AmourBeasts of the Southern Wild, Skyfall and Rust and Bone

 

Best Supporting Actress

#5 Sally Field – Lincoln

#4 Amy Adams – The Master

#3 Helen Hunt – The Sessions

#2 Pauline Collins – Quartet

and the winner is …

#1 Anne Hathaway – Les Miserables

 Much like the Academy is sure to do in late February, I reward Anne Hathaway with the Best Supporting Actress role of 2012. For all of the focus on Jean Valjean’s character in Tom Hooper’s Les Miserables, it’s Anne Hathaway who serves as the film’s heart and soul. Her emotionally-crushed rendition of “I Dreamed a Dream” will live on as a Hollywood highlight reel forever, making her the clear cut winner here.

Best Supporting Actor

#5 Benicio Del Toro – Savages

#4 Philip Seymour Hoffman – The Master

#3 Sam Rockwell – Seven Psychopaths

#2 Ezra Miller – The Perks of Being a Wallflower

and the winner is …

#1 Christoph Waltz – Django Unchained

Quentin Tarantino’s Spaghetti Western Django Unchained stood out as one of the year’s funnest movie experiences. The film’s most lovable character was Dr. King Schultz, played by Academy Award Winner Christoph Waltz. While I am starting to feel as though Waltz will be the odd man out in the Best Supporting Actor category when Oscar nominations are announced on Thursday (read about my 2013 Oscar Nomination Predictions), it would be a shame for the Academy to omit his transcending performance.

Best Actress

#5 Helen Mirren – Hitchcock

#4 Naomi Watts – The Impossible

#3 Zoe Kazan – Ruby Sparks

#2 Jennifer Lawrence – Silver Linings Playbook

and the winner is …

#1 Jessica Chastain – Zero Dark Thirty

After storming onto the scene in 2011 with a handful of unforgettable roles, it seemed like a forgone conclusion that Jessica Chastain was a star in the making. Taking home my 2011 Best Supporting Actress Award for Take Shelter, Chastin raises the bar again with her phenomenal portrayal in Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty. Chastain’s character transforms throughout the feature and her development becomes a valuable aspect of the narrative. Although she finds worthy Oscar competition from my runner-up, Jennifer Lawrence (Silver Linings Playbook), Chastain gives the most decisive female performance of the year.

Best Actor

#5 Bradley Cooper – Silver Linings Playbook

#4 Denzel Washington – Flight

#3 Joaquin Phoenix – The Master

#2 John Hawkes – The Sessions

and the winner is …

#1 Daniel Day-Lewis – Lincoln

This race feels like the biggest “no-brainer” to me. For as many brilliant lead actor performances as there were this year (and believe me there were a TON), none of them were even in the same stratosphere as Daniel-Day Lewis’ once in a life time portrayal of Abraham Lincoln. Every chance I get to watch Day-Lewis deliver groundbreaking role after groundbreaking role, it becomes more apparent that I’m experiencing greatness. Steven Spielberg’s Best Picture contender, Lincoln, survives solely on the shoulders of the actor’s performance. There’s no question who deserves this win.

Best Director

#5 David O. Russell – Silver Linings Playbook

#4 J.A. Bayona – The Impossible

#3 Quentin Tarantino – Django Unchained

#2 Kathryn Bigelow – Zero Dark Thirty

and the winner is …

#1 Ben Affleck – Argo

The Best Director race was the most difficult for me to decide. The Kathryn Bigelow/Ben Affleck debate becomes very difficult to dissect. The direction’s outstanding in both Zero Dark Thirty and Argo, but the difference-maker was Affleck’s ability to conjure up a multi-dimensional movie experience. Bigelow’s feature is more of a character based journey, while Affleck focuses on bringing a remarkable true story to life. Distinct opposites in approach, both films are premier examples of modern day filmmaking. However, I just happened to enjoy Argo slightly more than Bigelow’s gripping manhunt tale.

Best Picture

#5 Perfect Sense

#4 The Sessions

#3 Zero Dark Thirty

#2 The Impossible

and the winner is …

#1 Argo

No one can question the abundance of top tier films released in 2012. It was a difficult decision and very close, but I’m going with Argo as the Best Picture of 2012. A roller coaster ride of emotions, Ben Affleck’s Argo interweaves between espionage thriller and comedy. The pacing and tone is perfect, making Argo the most enjoyable film of the year. Its Oscar hopes are still very much alive, despite a major December-long onslaught of competitive releases. Affleck continues to solidify himself as a bonafide filmmaker and gives us Argo, 2012’s Best Picture.

*** Where am I right and where am I wrong? Leave a comment and spark a debate. You can view other work by MCDave at Movie Reviews By Dave

This year’s Philadelphia Film Festival couldn’t have lined up a better Opening Night Film. David O. Russell’s latest work, Silver Linings Playbook, truly embodies the City of Brotherly Love. Everything about the film looks, sounds and feels like Philadelphia. From the carefully selected suburban neighborhoods that appear throughout the movie to our beloved football team, the Philadelphia Eagles, it’s clear that David O. Russell “gets” this often misunderstood city. The director creates a strong and unbreakable kind of bond that’s sure to last a lifetime … especially around here.

Bradley Cooper stars as Pat Solitano, a former high school teacher doing a stint in a mental facility after coming home to his wife having an affair and then severely beating her lover. It’s safe to say that Pat has some issues with anger management and certain “triggers”, like his tainted wedding song that’s guaranteed to set him off on a rampage. On the other hand there’s Tiffany (played by Jennifer Lawrence), a recent widow whose self loathing and erratic antics help support the fact that she’s clearly off her rocker too. But when the pair of crazies decide to help one another out with some sizable favors, they soon discover the best way to help make sense of this screwed up world.

David O. Russell’s Silver Linings Playbook is a surprisingly upbeat and off-the-wall examination of mental health disorders. Way funnier than I anticipated it to be, the director chooses to approach this serious issue with a delicate sense of humor. What could have easily been sold as a dark comedy with a completely different tone, Silver Linings Playbook stays light and refreshing throughout its two hour running time. Perhaps most impressive about David O. Russell’s latest work is the script’s ability to generate a fluent tempo. The character development and plot are frequently progressing, giving Silver Linings Playbook a perfectly suited pace. Never lethargic or lifeless, the film has a pair of tremendously talented stars to thank for such an excellent result. Bradley Cooper continues to elevate his work and a performance such as this one should clearly put him on the Oscar’s radar. But for as phenomenal as Cooper is throughout the film, his counterpart, Jennifer Lawrence, still tends to overshadow his efforts. Lawrence, who has already landed a Best Actress Nomination for her work in the indie hit Winter’s Bone, uses this role to stamp her claim as one of Hollywood’s fastest rising female stars. There’s no limit to what the future has in store for her. Although the two leads steal the film, the quality of the cast doesn’t stop there. Robert De Niro’s name is already floating around the Best Supporting Actor race for his portrayal of Pat’s football crazed father, Pat Sr. Even though I can agree with the praise being thrown De Niro’s way, I was almost equally impressed by Chris Tucker’s character. Completely outside of his normal loud-mouthed range, Tucker demonstrates a more mature style of acting which shouldn’t be ignored. Once again, writer/director David O. Russell assembles a fantastic collection of talent and uses their glowing performances to constantly elevate his work.

Despite all of its commendable aspects, there are a few fair complaints with Silver Linings Playbook. Most notable is an uncomfortable and awkward feel surrounding the character Jake Solitano (played by Boardwalk Empire‘s Shea Whigham). As Pat’s older brother, Jake never finds his niche in the story and it results in plenty of stumbling scenes. Knowing that Silver Linings Playbook is based on Matthew Quick’s novel of the same name, maybe Jake’s character serves a more purposeful role in that platform. Yet, here he does nothing but detract from the otherwise smooth flowing pace of the film. Another small blemish with the feature is some inconsistencies revolving around the final scenes. The audience, like Pat, is force fed a dose of reality that his ex-wife is no longer interested in talking to him. As if her restraining order against him isn’t proof enough. Therefore, when she comes back into the story at the movie’s conclusion, it feels like a bloated Hollywood-esque move on behalf of the writer and director David O. Russell. While none of its faults are detrimental to the success of the film, Silver Linings Playbook easily moves past these flaws and remains one of the year’s best pictures.

With an early head of steam in the race to the Oscar’s, David O. Russell’s Silver Linings Playbook is a serious contender. Finding a large amount of solace in its surprisingly original comedic tone, this Oscar hopeful is in a league of its own. Because of a dazzling ensemble and a lovable pair of crazed characters, Silver Linings Playbook clearly stands out among its Oscar competitors. Due out around Thanksgiving, Silver Linings Playbook is the type of fun and energetic film you make it a point to see. Heed my advice and mark your calendars.

Grade: 4/5

Feel free to check out other work by MCDave at Movie Reviews By Dave

 

With no Dredd 3D showings near me until this evening, I decided to take a stroll down to The House at the End of the Street. It’s a large house, with some pretty faces and some half-decent performances, but is it worth the 101 minutes and your ~$10? Read on to find out!

The film begins with an odd, yet intriguing opening. No introductions, no explanations, just a creepy looking girl slowly stumbling down a hallway. She treks her way to her parents room where she proceeds to kill them both brutally. The scene likely intended to feel much more dramatic, but it felt as though it was executed rather poorly. The camera is constantly jumping around, and irritatingly shifting in and out of focus for the duration, adding a high level of distraction to the scene rather than the discomfort that was likely intended.

The previous scene cuts away, and we’re introduced to Elissa (Jennifer Lawrence) and her mother Sarah (Elizabeth Shue). The pair has just moved into the area (made possible due to the events next door causing a huge drop in property value). As seems to be common in these films (even just a few weeks ago in The Possession), the family has been broken by a recent divorce, and mother and daughter are definitely having trouble getting along. I found many of the mother-daughter conversations to be among the weakest points of the film. Dialogue feels extremely forced, and the two characters will needlessly change tones and moods without a moments notice. Maybe this is realistic? I recall my sister doing this frequently.

A BBQ is hosted to welcome the pair to the neighborhood. It’s here that we spend a little  too much time on some extremely disposable characters (most of which we will never see again). The purpose of the feast is to learn how negatively the neighborhood feels about the house and its remaining resident Ryan, the (seemingly) only remaining member of the family. The feeling is extremely negative: though he is said to keep essentially to himself, one of the neighbors mentions that they wouldn’t mind if the house was to burn down with him inside.

The House at the End of the Street took too long to get to this point, and the pace doesn’t seem to ramp up for some time. When we’re finally introduced to the mysterious Ryan, an intense relationship (with an extremely awkward feeling performance from Max Thieriot) seems to bloom between he and Elissa almost instantaneously. He states that he’s never been able to speak to anyone as he can to Elissa, and she appears to eat up every word he says, all within a day or two of meeting.

Ryan of course,  isn’t being completely honest. He seems like a nice enough guy, but it’s then revealed that he keeps his murderous sister locked in the basement. What’s up with that? Seems like Elissa bit off more than she could chew with this one.

The House at the End of the Street was boring. It takes far too long to introduce its characters, and there are very few of them that we actually give a damn about (a decent performance from Jennifer Lawrence was about the only saving grace). Again, much of the dialogue feels forced, and does little to further plot or character. I can’t really pinpoint a time where the experience fell apart for me, because it rarely (if ever) feels like it’s fully together.

We then get a few instances of Cabin in the Woods level stupidity before the finale hits (I loved Cabin in the Woods, I’m referring to the deliberate stupidity of the characters). Ryan conveniently forgets to lock the door that has been constantly locking for years, and then after this puts the key to said door within easy rich of his prisoner. The finale approaches quickly now (though some scenes do seem to drag on forever).

Shortly before the film ends, there is a moment I found absolutely brilliant, that could have redeemed the rest of the experience. Of course however, it goes nowhere, and the rest of The House at the End of the Street degrades back into a nigh-unwatchable mess.

My recommendation: avoid this house at any cost, even if it’s just to tide you over until Dredd 3D shows (check out our review for that one here!).

1.5/5

Update: Well we reported this almost a month ago and now it’s official. Variety is reporting that Lionsgate officially announced today that Phillip Seymour Hoffman is indeed joining the cast of The Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Thanks for reporting that Variety but we pretty much knew that a month ago!

Earlier today Variety’s Jeff Sneider tweeted  that Phillip Seymour Hoffman has been offered a role in the highly anticipated sequel to ‘The Hunger Games’. But what role would he be playing?

According to Wikipedia:

“In the 74th Hunger Games, he is the judge that falls into the punch bowl when Katniss shoots an arrow at the apple in the suckling pig’s mouth. In Catching Fire, he is the new Head Gamemaker following the execution of Seneca Crane. He is later shown to be the leader of the rebellion movement in the Districts, and is the mastermind behind the plan to break the tributes out of the arena in Catching Fire.”

‘The Hunger Games: Catching Fire’ is set to hit theaters November 22, 2013.

Castings news for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire has slowly been rolling in for sometime now (here and here) and now it looks as if we have some more to report. The Playlist is reporting that sources close to the movie have told them that Alice in Wonderland star Mia Wasikowska and  model/actress Zoe Aggeliki are names currently being discussed to play the role of Johanna Mason.

Johanna Mason is tribute from District 7, who is sarcastic and mean-spirited. She was also a previous winner of The Hunger Games.

Mia Wasikowska is most notably known for playing Alice in Tim Burton’s god aweful re-imagining/re-make or whatever the hell it was supposed to be. Zoe Aggeliki is a name I had never heard of until hearing the casting news. She will be seen alongside Ryan Reynolds and Jeff Bridges in R.I.P.D. as well as Percy Jackson: Sea Of Monsters.

Whether or not this “source’s” info proves to be true you can bet that we will find out sooner rather than later. Filming begins this fall with I am Legend director Francis Lawrence is set to direct. Stars Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, and Liam Hemsworth are set to reprise their roles.  The Quarter Quell begins in theaters  November 22, 2013.

 

Mia Wasikowska (top left) and Zoe Aggeliki (bottom right)

I’ve updated below with larger comments from both Gary Ross and Lionsgate about Gary Ross’ departure!

According to Variety, “Hunger Games” director Gary Ross, has decided that he won’t be directing the sequel “Catching Fire”, scheduled to shoot this Fall.

“As a writer and a director, I simply don’t have the time I need to write and prep the movie I would have wanted to make because of the fixed and tight production schedule,” he said in a statement released Tuesday evening.

I hadn’t read any of the Hunger Games books but I did enjoy the movie. It definitely had some scenes where you wanted to yell at the characters but you know what? WHAT WOULD YOU DO IN THE HUNGER GAMES, HUH!?! You’d be dead in 2 seconds so don’t be talkin’!

Here are Ross’ full statements:

Despite recent speculation in the media, and after difficult but sincere consideration, I have decided not to direct Catching Fire. As a writer and a director, I simply don’t have the time I need to write and prep the movie I would have wanted to make because of the fixed and tight production schedule.

I loved making The Hunger Games – it was the happiest experience of my professional life. Lionsgate was supportive of me in a manner that few directors ever experience in a franchise: they empowered me to make the film I wanted to make and backed the movie in a way that requires no explanation beyond the remarkable results. And contrary to what has been reported, negotiations with Lionsgate have not been problematic. They have also been very understanding of me through this difficult decision.

I also cannot say enough about the people I worked with: Producer Nina Jacobson, a great collaborator and a true friend; the brilliant Suzanne Collins, who entrusted us with her most amazing and important story; the gifted and remarkable Jennifer Lawrence whose performance exceeded my wildest expectations, and the rest of the incredible cast, whom I am proud to call my friends.

To the fans I want to say thank you for your support your faith, your enthusiasm and your trust. Hard as this may be to understand I am trying to keep that trust with you. Thank you all. It’s been a wonderful experience.

And here’s what Lionsgate had to say:

We’re very sorry that Gary Ross has chosen not to direct Catching Fire. We were really looking forward to making the movie with him. He did an incredible job on the first film and we are grateful for his work. This will not be the end of our relationship, as we consider Ross to be part of the Lionsgate family and look forward to working with him in the future.

They sound a little disappointed. That being said… who do you think would make a good director to take on the “Hunger Games” sequel?

The sequel to X-Men: First Class is now officially a go; although director Matthew Vaughn had already been asked to return, and a script was currently being written, nothing concrete was confirmed regarding when/if the new movie would start shooting, at least until now. According to The Hollywood ReporterFox  informed talent agencies Thursday that they plan to begin shooting the sequel to X-Men: First Class in January of 2013. That means Lionsgate could move forward with a Fall  start date for the Hunger Games sequel Catching Fire without a conflict for newly minted star Jennifer Lawrence, who is set to star in both films.

Not much else is known about First Class 2, except that it probably won’t be called First Class 2. If filming is set to begin next January, that means either a Christmas 2013 or Summer 2014 release date. Given that Jennifer Lawrence is now a big star (or at least the “it girl” of the moment) she’ll likely get a bigger part than last time. Rumors have the movie taking place anywhere from the mid 60’s to the 70’s, but right now is little more than fanboy speculation. Personally, I vote for the 70’s…because that increases the chances for an appearance by Dazzler, not to mention killer sideburns for Michael Fassbender’s Magneto.

And so The Hunger Games movie adaptation is here at last; did the big-screen version of the best-selling novel by Suzanne Collins live up to all the hype? I’d say that for the most part, it did indeed, but that is not to say that it’s not without its flaws. For those of you not familiar with the plot; Katniss Everdeen is choosen as a Tribute from District 12 to take part in The Hunger Games. The games were created by the Capital as a reminder t0 the 12 Districts of Panem of their failed rebellion years ago. Each of the districts has a “Reaping” (lottory) and picks one male and one female between the ages of 12 and 18 to be “Tributes” (contestants) in the games where they will fight to the death until there is only one left alive.

First, let me start with what did work in the movie. Namely, the cast, it was top-notch and well acted from all involved. Jennifer Lawrence is cast perfectly as main character Katniss Everdeen and has the acting chops to prove it. The rest of the cast is made-up of equally talented actors, including Josh Hutcherson as fellow District 12 Tribute Peeta Mellark, Donald Sutherland as the creepy President Snow, a hilarious Stanley Tucci as the blue-haired host of the Hunger Games Ceasar Flickerman, Elizabeth Banks as Effie Trinket, and Woody Harrelson (who is greatly cast) as Haymicth Abernathy. They all help flesh out the characters, who could have easily been forgotten if performed by less-talented actors. Hell, even Lenny Kravitz gets in on the action as Cinna, Katniss’s stylist and isn’t too shabby of an actor. Making its film debut is the awesomely-weird beard of Seneca Crane played by Wes Bentley, the beard is just great and the world needs more beards such as his… just saying.

Director Gary Ross was a good choice to helm this flick, but is limited with what he is able to convey on the screen. I felt that the ‘was it or wasn’t it made-for-TV’ relationship between Katniss and Peeta, which was a major focus of the book, never quite has the same gravitas and attention that it had in the book and the movie suffers slightly due to that. The scene between the two characters in the cave is a perfect example of this, but despite that scene not working as well as I’d have hoped for there is room for their relationship to be further explored in the sequel ‘Catching Fire‘. The cinematography is nicely handled, despite the problems of the hand-held shot fight scenes which limit the scope of the action at times.

Despite the flaws that The Hunger Games has, it is still a great movie and fans of the book will be able to enjoy it as a companion piece to the book. Newcomers will also enjoy the movie but might miss a thing or two. I will leave you with the words of Effie Trinket, – “Happy Hunger Games, may the odds be ever in your favor!”