Last week, on March 29th, HB 2549 passed the Arizona State legislature, that’s both houses of the state congress, and the bill is now sitting on Governor Jan Brewer’s desk awaiting her decision.

For those of you who remember your Schoolhouse Rock, a bill is only bill until it is signed by the governing body (The President, or in this case, the state’s governor).  We can only hope Governor Brewer elects to veto this bill on the grounds that it is a brazen pile of poopy.  In fact, under HB 2549, we could be prosecuted for saying that.

If you listen carefully, you can hear Thomas Jefferson spinning in his grave as The Great State of Arizona prepares to accept, into law, a bill that would make it a crime to communicate via an electronic medium (like the Geekscape Forums, text message, email, radio, e-book or website) any speech that is intended to (these are actual, quoted words from the bill) “offend,” “harass,” “terrify,” or “annoy.”  In addition, the bill would also outlaw certain sexual speech.  Yes, a law in th 21st Century United States that would outlaw certain speech.  Outlaw…speech.

This means that under this law, if you are in Arizona and you see something that offends you via an electronic medium, the person responsible for that message can be punished for offending you.  This means that if someone calls you a naughty name on a website forum:  BAM!  Criminal Record.  Rush Limbaugh calls someone a “slut” on the radio in Arizona:  BAM!  Prosecution for Limbaugh under Arizona State Law.  Somebody reads a piece of graphic horror fiction by Steve Niles:  BAM!  Niles is hauled into court in Arizona.

This law would seriously restrict dialog and discourse, no matter how rooted in good-natured ribbing it might be, between sports fans of rival teams, between fans of Star Trek versus Star Wars, between Marvel and DC.  Anywhere that there is a rivalry where the conversation, in an electronic medium, gets bawdy or “trash talking,” this bill proposes to make that a criminal zone in Arizona.

This is a violent offense to the US Constitution’s First Amendment.  For those of you as old as us, who don’t remember High School Civics, here’s the Amendment:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The high points: “No law.. abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”  It’s the principle on which The US was founded.

Further, in this bill, the terms “offend,” “harass,” “terrify,” and “annoy” are not clearly defined, so anything annoying would be illegal in Arizona.

Free Speech is protected by the Constitution, even if it is offensive or ill conceived.  Everything from The Westboro Baptist Church’s hate-crap to “Juggs Magazine” to the diatribe of fanboys upset over the crappiness of the Green Lantern movie is protected speech.  To make it illegal is, in itself, a crime.

How it made past both houses of congress in the state is astounding.

We at Fandom Planet, along with the good people of Media Matters and The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund,  ask you to protect the First Amendment rights of all the people of Arizona and reject or amend H.B. 2549.

The phone number to the Governor’s office is 800-253-0883.  Email can be sent at this website:  http://www.azgovernor.gov/Contact.asp

If you are in Arizona, exercise your right to petition the government and speak out against bad law while you still can.

***********************************

Fandom Planet is the first syndicated all-Geek podcast/radio show. Taking the well established “Drivetime” radio format and turning it on its head, hosts Powers/Carr (that’s Los Angeles Stand-up Comedians Tim Powers and SAX Carr) talk to one or more “creatives” from the worlds of television, movies, comics, video games, and beyond. We created the #AllisonScag4Cassie movement, to encourage the producers of the Hack/Slash movie to cast “Warehouse 13” actress Sallison Scagliotti in the title role. The Fandom Planet is a galactic central point for all geeks to come together and realize that everyone is an enthusiast for something– and that binds us together. We know geeks have power, but only when their voices are heard. Fandom Planet, therefore, will do our best to bring your message to the rest of our listeners.  Listen to Fandom Planet here on Geekscape or on iTunes.  Contact the boys at fandomplanet@yahoo.com

 

 

Many comics fans know Scott Shaw! (yes, the exclamation point is part of his name) as the iconic artist for “Captain Carrot and His Amazing Zoo Crew” from DC Comics.  Animation fans know him as the producer of Saturday Morning’s “Camp Candy” and “The Completely Mental Adventures of Ed Grimley.”  Breakfast Cereal fans know him as the long-standing art director for the advertising for Post Cereals Fruity Pebbles and Coco Pebbles cereals.

Scott Shaw! is also the world-renowned expert on Oddball Comics.  For years, Scott collected and blogged about the weirdest of the weird in comics.  He also brought his Oddball Comics collection to comic cons all over the country and presented slide shows of the most amazingly bizarre comics in history to the delight of audiences!

If you’re a Southern California Resident, you’re in luck.   Starting April 7 and through the Month of May, every Saturday at 8PM, Scott is showing off his Oddball Comics, complete with his own wry and hilarious insight on the wackiness of the comics in a theater in Hollywood.

The Oh My Ribs Theater (Hey, I didn’t name it) in Hollywood is hosting Scott’s show every Saturday at 8PM.  If you like comics, if you dig comedy, if you aren’t opposed to laughing, check out the show.  Tickets are available at the theater’s website.  Buy your tickets HERE!

(Scott Shaw can also be heard on Geekscape’s own FANDOM PLANET podcast that you can listen to on iTunes)

Every once and a while a movie gets a bad rep strictly do to an actor’s past career. I mean after Batman & Robin did anyone really trust George Clooney? Not really but his career since has been paved in great performances and memorable movies. Zac Efron at this point was only known as the kid from High School Musical. So before this film even came out, the demographic who’d probably laugh the hardest already had turned their back on this film. None of this actually mattered as the film grossed 136 million dollars and only cost 20 million to make.

Most of the movies I pick for Guilty Pleasures tend to have awful rotten tomatoes ratings, 17 Again rests at a 55%, not great but not terrible. The reason I’m defending this one is that as I already said most of the people who would laugh the hardest at this movie have already written it off.

17 Again DVD

The movie begins in 1989 (you know because they’re playing Bust a Move by Young MC) as Mike O’Donnell prepares for the big basketball game. Mike is the star player and there are some talent scouts in attendance. However when he finds out that his girlfriend Scarlett is pregnant he leaves the game in order to be with her. The movie begins like a typical 80’s comedy ends.

We just two twenty years later. Scarlett is preparing to divorce him and Mike is forced to live with his nerdy best friend Ned Gold. He then loses his job and the respect of his children Maggie and Alex. When he’s life seems at it’s worse a mysterious janitor turns him into his 17 year old self.

Mike takes advantage of this chance to restart his life and attends his kid’s high school under the alias Mark Gold (posing as Ned’s son). Mike befriends his kids in order to be near Scarlett. Maggie begins to fall in love with him which creates some of the strangest potential incest in recent history.

This all seems like cliche’ high school teen flick/fantasy, and for the most part it is. In fact the film should be mediocre at best, but it’s not and it’s not because of one man, Thomas Lennon. The former member of The State plays Ned Gold, Mike O’Donnell rich but nerdy best friend.

Thomas_Lennon_Landspeeder_17_Again
Thomas Lennon Sleeps in Style

His character is everything that we wish to be as nerds. A Landspeeder bed, every video game system and well… loaded. Any second he’s on film is absolutely hilarious and thankfully they packed the film with him. Unlike a show like Big Bang Theory there’s never a point where he feels like a mocking of geekdom, his character is smart and successful (though slightly socially awkward).

If you’ve been avoiding this movie assuming it’s High School Musical 4 then you’re wrong and need to give this movie a chance.

Tell use about your guilty pleasure in the official thread

When he’s not watching Zac Efron movies Matt Kelly is writing in his blog Pure Mattitude, Tweeting and hosting his podcast The Saint Mort Show.

I had the pleasure of sitting in on a roundtable interview with Mike Birbiglia to discuss his new film, Sleepwalk With Me. Sleepwalk is the latest, and perhaps final, version of a story Mike has been telling for years. You may have seen his one man show, or heard it in his stand up act, or heard it on This American Life, or maybe you read his book.

It’s a testament to his storytelling ability that it has managed to survive all these iterations and continues to garner interest.

The film is surprisingly sure footed for a first time director and the power of the tale has not diminished in the retelling. Mike’s unique voice shines through despite the more collaborative nature of film.

The interview is shown in full below. The questions have been paraphrased.

How did you decide that you wanted to make this a film, and how did you decide to direct:

No one else was available for the amount of money we had. For any of the positions. For all the positions. I took as many positions as I could. As much as that’s a joke, it’s also very true.

There’s a lot of questions in that.

How did we decide to make it a film? I guess that’s the first question. I’ve wanted to make a film since I was 18 years old. I directed shorts in college but I found it to be prohibitively expensive. It’s a money pit, making films. We have stacks of master tapes in our closets and our parents’ basement of films that aren’t done, shorts that aren’t done, and will never be done. That’s discouraging. I veered towards standup comedy around that time because there’s no overhead. I was able to perform my writing and I was able over time to sculpt my writing from something that was kind of short and joke based into something that had more of an arc to it. Just on stage with no cost, really. Film is so expensive, and its really because I’ve built up enough of an audience over the years that someone was willing to take a chance on financing my vision for a film. It’s the very rare company that’s willing to do that.

How has the story evolved over the re-tellings and does this feel like the final stamp on it:

No, I think this is the final stamp. Unless we make Sleepwalk 2. 2 Sleepy. 2 Sleepy 2 Furious. Or Sleepwalk 3D, of course. And the video game, obviously. And the line of pizzas. Pizzas and pizza pillows are of course on the way.

No, I think it’s the final one. It was definitely the hardest. Writing a book is hard, making a movie is unimaginable.

Does the line between reality and story get blurred the more you tell the story:

My life doesn’t have cinematography that good. The color palette in my real life isn’t that interesting. The clothes are better in the movie. I’m not nearly so fashionable.

No, that’s a really interesting question. Everytime I see it, and I watched it last night again, I shudder during the jumping through the window scene. It really makes me cringe, and fortunately the audience as well. There’s a little bit of blurring, but at the same time there’s so many decisions that go into every frame of the film that you just know so well how you got there. I feel like that actually kind of solidifies it. One of the things that struck me when I watched it last night was that we shot it so recently. We shot the movie in August, we wrapped in September, we edited it in October, November, and December. We got into Sundance with a cut of it and now we’re here. So it’s really recent, to the point that I remember the takes. I remember the takes that are on the screen. I don’t think a lot of filmmakers have that. I thinks is all kind of a blur because it was so long ago and they went through so many things. That final scene where I’m talking to the camera and I say I went to visit Abby and she said I didn’t want to hurt you, I remember that take. I remember the parking problems we had. When I pulled in we had to keep going around the block and in that take, I remember driving and remember seeing that there was an intern that had an orange cone and he was running away so I was trying to slow down so he wouldn’t be in the frame. So I’m directing and acting in my head all at the same time. I remember that like it was yesterday and I’m watching it on screen and thinking ‘This is forever’. This memory that I have is as real as going to CVS and picking up a toothbrush. It’s immortalized and that’s such a weird feeling.

Comedy these days is more personal, is your film part of that tradition:

I’ve been doing it for a while. It’s really just an extension of what I’ve been doing. I love Larry David and Louis CK’s work. I think what they’re doing is great. I’d like to think that we’re part of a comedy movement right now that’s moving away from observational comedy into something more personal and real. It’s just one person’s opinion, but it’s what I prefer because I feel it has more heart to it. It has more teeth. I feel like it’s a response to what was the Seinfeldian era or comedy, which was observational to a point of brilliance. Seinfeld did it so well and there were so many mimeographs of that style. At a certain point those mimeographs became so boring. Not only do you see it in stand up comedy, you see it in TV commercials. That’s kind of the ultimate way that you know when something is done. If it’s in a TV commercial, it’s over. I feel like observational comedy is a little bit over right now.

I interviewed Marc Maron on his podcast, and I asked him a question John Mulaney and I had come up with together. ‘What is edgy in an era where nothing is edgy anymore? In an era when everything seems to have been done or said?’ And Marc said being honest. It’s always hard to do. It’s always hard to be honest with an audience, because you’re taking a risk. You’re taking a risk of the audience not liking you. He said, and it’s not paraphrasing, people think it’s edgy to get up and say ‘cunt’ or ‘I fucked your cousin’ or whatever thing that raises peoples tether that are over 60 and are uncomfortable with words. But it’s actually more difficult to just get up and tell your story, and tell it honestly, and admit that you’re kind of wrong about things in a way that’s entertaining. And chances are those first few drafts of that are not entertaining.

And of course this period of comedy will also become watered down and mimeographed and it will become a Doritos commercial and it will be over. We’ll have to figure out some other form of comedy, but for now I think there’s a lot of really great examples like Doug Stanhope and Louis CK.

How did you find your voice as a director, there are some tracking shots that are impressive for a first time director (Mike Birbiglia requested we add this preface – This is a boring answer unless you already love the movie. If you love the movie, this is your question. If not, then don’t read further into this self-indulgent bullshit):

That was actually a funny day when we shot that, because our cinematographer just goes ‘We’re not shooting that’. We had scouted it and we had photo storyboarded the whole film. Our cinematographer was this brilliant guy, Adam Beckman, who had shot This American Life the TV series. Very meticulous, really brilliant. Understanding of light and color. Very meticulous. We had scouted that shot, came up with that shot and we were psyched when we came up with it. The more we thought about it we were like ‘This is going to be awesome’ because it’s going to get across the fact that he’s going to be on the second floor without telling the audience he’s on the second floor.

It’s interesting because it’s telling the story that he’s exhausted, he’s getting pressure from his parents, and he’s on the second floor. So when you come out of the dream your kind of know that in the back of your mind. So we thought it was a really interesting device and we were really excited about it. But then when it came to shooting on the day, the logistics of that shot were so hard. This was a low budget film. We didn’t have the time or resources to shoot that shot.

There’s a moment in that that we actually came up with on the day which is, on the elevator, the guy who is in the towel was a PA on the film. We got on the elevator and realized nothing happens on the elevator. I’m just on the phone. Elevators are boring. We hadn’t accounted for that. So it was me and Jacob and Seth going, ‘Well, what can happen on the elevator?’ I think it was Jacob who said ‘What if there is a guy going to the pool?” So I just said to James ‘Just keep talking to me, just keep trying to talk to me and I’ll blow you off and in ADR we’ll figure out how to choreograph the phone conversation with whatever we improvise.’ So in post we had Carol Kane come in and we did this really involved… basically the other side of that scene, audio wise. It was really time intensive to figure out the choreography of the phone call and that walk at the same time.

That was a really boring answer that is only for people who just love the movie. If you don’t love the movie don’t read this answer. You need a preface to that question. If you love this movie then this is your question, if not, do not read any further into this self indulgent bullshit.

When did you know you had a story worth telling:

The first time I told the actual sleepwalking and jumping out of the window story was at the Just For Laughs festival in Montreal, Canada. I had told it on the road, I was on this Comedy Central Live tour and I had come out with an album called Two Drink Mike and I found that for the first time in my career I showed up to places and people knew my jokes. So I couldn’t tell those jokes anymore. Comedy is not like music, once you’ve heard it you’ve heard it. You’re done. So people were kind of like ‘Alright, what else?’

I had been developing this one man show, Sleepwalk With Me, so I just started telling the stories from the show. I had written them never imagining that they’d be in standup. That was good but I had never done it in front of my peers in the industry at a festival. That’s a whole different thing. At The Just For Laughs festival is this show called Confessing It where you just tell a story you’ve never told in front of people. I told this story and it just killed in this way that was getting monstrous laughs and also was really connecting with the audience. It felt emotional. It felt like an emotional connection with the audience. I came offstage and Doug Stanhope said to me ‘Do you tell that story on stage?’ and I said ‘Yeah, I’m trying to.’ He was like ‘Yeah, that’s your thing. You should tell that. That’s great standup.’ That was a big summer for me. That was the moment I felt I was on to something.

There are four credited screenwriters, how did you keep it in your voice:

That’s because those guys didn’t do anything. You heard it here.

No, I appreciate that. Truthfully, there are four credited screenwriters but I have the document on my computer. I have the master document. I’m making sure that every contribution is fitting into a singular voice. That’s always the case when I’m working with collaborators. I’m always taking their suggestions and ideas and joke pitches and filtering them through what I was writing. It was weird. There’s all these weird WGA rules where we couldn’t write Written and Directed by Mike Birbiglia because there were other writers on it and because it was based on a play. I thought it was weird because I always thought it would say Written and Directed by  and then Screenplay by these people. That was kind of disappointing.

It also wasn’t a formal four person collaboration. It was like, I would work with Joe for a day, then I’d work with Seth for a day, then I’d work for a day with Seth and Joe, then I’d work for a day with Seth and Ira or with Joe and Ira. So it was very fluid and the crediting was weird. We didn’t know how to credit it, honestly. We had to talk to the WGA people and be like ‘How does this work?’ I was like ‘Here’s what happened.’

21 Jump Street doesn’t feel like a recent comedy.  This isn’t just because it’s based on a TV series, but more importantly because it reminds me of the raunchy buddy comedies of years past…a sub-genre that kind of died along with Superbad.  Since that “golden era” we’ve been subjected to the likes of Hall Pass and She’s Out of my League along with countless others.  I’m pleased to say that 21 Jump Street provided me with more laughs than any movie I’ve seen since Jackass 3D and manages to have more universal appeal.  It’s not family friendly, but that’s the point…but everyone over the age of 15 with a slightly twisted sense of humor will come out of the theater beaming.

Jonah Hill is back in the sort of role he shines in as Schmidt, a “not-so-slim-shady” nerd who was picked on in high school by a jock named Jenko (Channing Tatum).  Flash forward a few years and Jenko and Schmidt have become fast friends at Police Academy.  Jenko is, by all accounts, an idiot, so he feeds off of Schmidt’s test-taking skills.  Eventually they graduate the academy and are put on duty patrolling a park on bicycles.  After managing to tackle a drug-dealing perp, they botch the arrest by failing to read the perp his rights.  The two would-be cops are sent to an experimental program located in a church at 21 Jump Street by none other than Parks and Recreation’s Ron Swanson himself (Nick Offerman) where they’re under the jurisdiction of Ice Cube as an intentionally stereotypical black police captain.  Captain Ice Cube assigns Schmidt and Jenko to go undercover as teenagers to prevent the spread of a new super drug, which has killed a teen at a local high school.

When they arrive for the first day of school, the duo of narcs realize times have changed since they were in school (there’s a funny bit where they’re identifying cliques and aren’t sure what to call hipsters).  After an altercation on the first day that lands them in the principal’s office, their fake identities and class schedules are accidentally reversed.  For Schmidt, this is the chance to be cool and popular he never had in high school.  For Jenko, this is a demeaning struggle with chemistry class.  As they go about finding leads on the drugs in their separate ways, Schmidt develops feelings for a girl named Molly (Brie Larson), who he could have never seen himself with back when he was actually in high school.

The film manages to avoid most clichés of action and buddy-comedy cop movies.  It acknowledges and teases at them, (such as shooting a gas tank) but it doesn’t fall into them (the gas tank doesn’t explode).  The real star of the show here is Channing Tatum, who I didn’t know was much of an actor at all prior to his role in this.  Turns out, he’s great in a comedic role here, and manages to outshine his comic-veteran screen partner.  There’s something priceless about his genuinely frustrated reactions to situations his character’s not smart enough to handle.  The supporting cast is great too ranging from Ellie Kemper and Rob Riggle to Johnny Depp.

It certainly entertains an interesting concept: going back to high school, but knowing what you know now, and being more socially aware.  While it devolves into hijinx from time to time, that’s necessary for a movie like this.  I’d argue that it got a little too over the top in the final twenty minutes of the film but there’s some moments that are pure gold.  The chemistry between the characters is believable and even at times…relatable.  One of my favorite moments hands down involves Schmidt and Jenko planning a party.  “But how will we get alcohol without an ID?” Channing Tatum asks sadly (since they’re pretending to be high school students).  They turn to each other and laugh and the audience laughs with them.

In the interest of preserving some of the films best surprises, I’ll taper myself off here.  The trailer methodically walks you through the first fifteen minutes of the film in sequential order, but thankfully spares the viewer the best, and most vulgar moments.  It’s rare that you can call a comedy a legitimately good movie, but thankfully 21 Jump Street is a return to true hilarity without the cheapness.

Greetings Instant Watchers,

Every week movies appear and disappear on netflix instant watch. Nothing is more frustrating when a movie was there and the next day it’s gone when you were planning to watch it. We here at Geekscape want to make sure this stressful thing doesn’t occur to you! So here’s our recommendation of a movie to instant watch before it’s removed on Feb. 28th, 2012

THE GHOST AND MR. CHICKEN (1966)

In the 50’s and 60’s Don Knotts was a big name in comedy. One of his finest films was this horror/comedy. In it Knotts plays Luther Heggs (aka Mr. Chicken), a wanna-be journalist who is hired to cover the mystery of the town’s haunted house. The film was written and directed by Alan Rafkin, Jim Fritzell and Everett Greenbaum (all who worked on The Andy Griffin Show). If you’ve only known Don Knotts as that guy who turns into a cartoon fish in a weird WWII kids movie or the inspiration for the principal on Doug, then you should check out this movie and see why he’s a comedy legend.

Also leaving Instant Watch this week:

Feb. 28th: Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, Bedazzled (1967), The Lady Eve, Valley of the Dolls, The Reluctant Astronaut, Thirtysome 

Feb. 29th: Toy Story 3, Tron: Legacy, Let Me In

After a great appearance on the Geekscape Podcast the Aquabats released a promo of their upcoming TV series. As a huge Aquabats fan I’m stoked for this show but even if I didn’t enjoy the band this show would still be right up my alley!

The Aquabats Super Show premieres March 3rd in the U.S. on The Hub!

In 1995 a band came out of left field and became the favorite band of every elementary school kid that I knew. That band was the Presidents of the United States of America. Their massive hit song Lump became a song that everyone at Pennell Elementary would sing. When the follow-up single Peaches came out, their popularity only grew. They had somehow become a ‘kid’s band’, even performing on Nickelodeon’s Kids Choice Awards (which was weird since the opening track Kitty contains the lyric ‘fuck you kitty you’re going to spend the night outside’ chanted 3 times).

Their debut self-titled album sold over 3 million copies and received rave reviews. The band performed the theme song for The Drew Carey Show, had a decently received cover of Video Killed the Radio Star on the Wedding Singer soundtrack, were parodied by Weird Al and Bill Nye the Science Guy (and later Singer Chris Ballew performed the parody himself) but by 1996 their follow-up album II was a moderate success at best (Peaking at 31 on the Billboard charts) and by 1998 the band had broken up (the first time anyway).

What happened with this band and their former legion of fans? In honor of President’s Day I sat down and listened to their first two albums (Self-titled and II) as well as the rarities farewell album Pure Frosting to try to figure it out for myself.

 

PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1995)

This is a solid album. I think most of the people who are reading this owned this album and already know it’s good so there’s not much of a reason to dwell too long on it. But there are a few key elements I wanted to cover about the band’s sound that made them so interesting to me 17 years ago (and still interest me today).

In the liner notes of the album, Chris Ballew is cited as the basitar player and guitarist Dave Dederer was listed as the guitbass player. I always just assumed this was a cute joke, but as I got older and started playing guitar I realized that the songs were very difficult to play so that they sounded just like the recordings (specifically songs like Dune Buggy and Back Porch) so I did some research.

These were not just cute names. Chris and Dave both played regular six string guitars, except Chris replaced everything with only two bass strings, meanwhile Dave’s guitar consisted of only 3 guitar strings. This innovation of the group helped create a unique sound that is simple to play (with the right instrument) but difficult to play on a regular six string guitar or four string bass.

Furthermore, re-listening to this album reminds me of how insanely talented of a drummer Jason Finn is. A few years ago I made a joke that Presidents of the United States sound like a less talented Primus and I still stand by this statement for no other reason that Jason Finn’s bizarre drum fills and percussion usage (specifically on the song Candy). He uses various bizarre drums much like Brain or Herb would in Golden Years of Primus.

Lyrically, the album falls into line with most alternative groups in the 90’s. Most of the album is either bizarre songs like Feather Plucking and Back Porch or songs about the expected failure of the band’s musical sounds (We’re Not Gonna Make It, Naked & Famous).

This is a solid album that should already be in your CD collection if you were between 10-15 in the mid-90s and never left the collection.

 

Presidents of the Unites States of America: II


So where did the sophomore album fail? It could be the opening track’s fault. It’s really not a good kick off track at all. It’s very clearly written to BE a kick-off with the title Ladies and Gentleman Part 1. Regardless, it’s only a minute and a half long and the next track Lunatic of Love brings us back up to what we expect from Presidents.

Volcano is exactly what we wanted out of the Presidents. It’s bizarre, but still catchy and fun. Sadly, the single didn’t fare as well as the second single off the album. Personally I think the group made a mistake releasing Mach 5 as their first single off the album instead of Volcano. While it’s a fun song, it’s not particular catchy and doesn’t even have a good melody line. I think that we’re already starting to see where this record went wrong.

All in all it’s a good album and a decent follow up to their self-titled, but it just doesn’t hold the same level of consistent quality as the debut. The biggest problem is that while the songs are all okay the album doesn’t really get great until track: 7 Bath of Fire (excluding Volcano which is probably the best song on the album).

It’s not the worst album of the 90’s or even the worst album of 1996 (Cannibal Corpse, Patti Smith, Quad City DJs and Def Leppard all released albums that year, take your pick). The biggest issue really is that despite the songs being fun they lacked the charm of their predecessor.

However, the album still received mostly good reviews but the sales just weren’t there (despite reaching gold status). After two years of touring, Chris Ballew quit the band to spend time with his family and the band disappeared with him. But they still released one last album together.

 

Presidents of the Unites States of America: Pure Frosting


Almost immediately upon hearing the first minute or two of the opening track Love Delicatessen I realize that had the Presidents had released these songs as their second album, they’d probably have had a longer and more successful career.

While the albums contains two covers (Cleveland Rocks, Video Killed the Radio Star) and two live tracks (Lump, Back Porch) and the rest are rarity tracks, these songs are all simply better than 85% of II. My favorite tracks are Mobile Home, Sunshine and Man (Opposable Thumb).

This album simply contains all of the fun and rock sounds that were missing in their second album. But it was the last album of the band’s career. Or so we thought.

After a two year hiatus/break up, the band briefly reunited for an album in 2000 called Freaked Out & Small where they began playing regular guitar and bass. They never toured after that and remained broken up until 2004 when the band has since made a full reformation (though with a new guitarist) releasing two new albums Love Everybody (2004) and These are the Good Times People (2008). Both albums were well reviewed and the band continues to tour, however none of their albums have made the massive impact that the original debut album did. Which is a shame. They truly were one of the most eccentric and innovative groups of the 90s and are worth giving a second chance.

When he’s not listening to bands that haven’t been relevant in over a decade Matt Kelly also hosts his podcast the Saint Mort Show, blogs at Pure Mattitude and tweets. He also can’t stop watching the Rocco’s Modern Life DVD he found at Walmart last week.

Well, it’s February, a month we mostly connect with Valentine’s Day. So for the next few weeks I’ll be defending a few poorly reviewed rom-coms. This week’s romantic comedy was released in 2005 and currently holds a 42% freshness on Rotten Tomatoes. It’s a familiar Christmas themed rom-com called Just Friends.

Just Friends tells the story of Chris Brander, a successful record producer living in Los Angeles. When he was in High School he was an overweight kid in love with his best friend Jamie. After an embarrassing graduation party, Chris moved from Jersey to Los Angeles and never came back. Until one day his plane to Paris is forced to land with his newest client (and former girlfriend) Samantha James. While in Jersey, he’s forced to face old demons. Once again Chris tries to get out of the friend zone, while Jamie starts to fall for the formerly geeky Dusty Dinkleman.

What makes Just Friends work is that almost every guy can relate to the friend-zone concept. Even the world’s biggest ladies man has experienced the pain of rejection at least once in their life. Ryan Reynolds is at his most believable in the beginning of the film as the overweight version of himself. He’s funny, pathetic and charming but none of it ever seems forced. 

Amy Smart is as beautiful as ever in this film. While watching this I realized how rarely I’ve seen her in movies lately (outside of Crank 1 & 2 of course). It’s not hard to see how anyone could fall head over heels for her.

 

The film works best when it’s over the top. This mostly means anything involving Chris Klein’s performance of Dusty Dinkleman, the perfect boyfriend. Be it in the beginning when he’s attempting to perform a song but gets too nervous to get past the first few notes or later in the film when he’s playing Christmas carols like he’s Yngwie Maimsteen, he creates a much needed sense of surrealism to this film.

Anna Faris’ performance of Samantha James, the ex-girlfriend from hell, is a mix of hilarious, annoying and terrifying. A direct inspiration of pop-star train wrecks like Britney Spears, she represents the way we see the young pop-star who gets whatever they want. She’s obsessed with public opinion, things going her way and her ‘vegetarianism’.

But the real star of the movie comes from Chris Marquette’s brilliant performance of Mike, Chris’ younger brother. Mike is lovable and funny but still slightly evil, mostly thinking about himself and his desire to have sex. 

All these elements build towards what you want the most out of a romantic comedy. You want likable characters, you want a happy ending, you want to relate to the movie and most importantly you want to laugh. Just Friends does all those things, it even kicks the movie off with one of the funniest openings in Rom-Com history.

Never has lip-syncing been so funny and so depressingly relatable (for me at least, but I refuse to believe I’m alone in this). At the end of the day, Rom-Com’s are almost always a black sheep with critics (not unlike slasher movies). If you hate romantic comedies, this movie won’t change your opinion, but if you’re a fan, you will love this film and probably be surprised by it.

 

When not watching shitty romantic comedies Matt Kelly is hosting the Saint Mort Show (this week’s episode features Mitch Donaberger, Kyle K and Sonal Shah of Scrubs Fame) as well as tweets and writes in his blog Pure Mattitude.

I’ve wanted to have my friend Cooper Barnes back on the show for a long time now. You guys might remember him from an episode from a few months ago. Well, that was before he auditioned for Saturday Night Live, a story that I had to have him come on the show and tell. Also, Cooper talks about his upcoming pilot The Men’s Room and says that Red Tails is actually pretty good! Enjoy!

Find it on iTunes

Barrett Shuler is an actor, musician and comedian. I first heard about Barrett when he acted in a friend’s film, Smashed, screening this year at Sundance. But Barrett will soon appear in “The Inbetweeners” for MTV, TV’s “Awake” with Jason Isaacs and tons more. In this episode, we discuss acting, auditioning, Youtube haters, Reddit activists and stand up comedy. I think you’ll dig this guy as much as I did. Listen to us become instant friends in this episode!

Find it on iTunes

Few redeeming qualities can be found in this film. Here’s the difficult part: I like Will Smith. Say what you will about whatever summer blockbuster he has brought us in the past few years, but there is no doubt that he is a big name, makes relatively good choices, and is a great actor. We all fell in love with him during his years as our beloved Fresh Prince, but really got to know him as his film career started. Bad Boys made him into a full fledged action star, Independence Day endeared him to audiences all over the world, Ali made him into A-List material, Men in Black entertained us all, and The Pursuit of Happyness made all of us cry. He has excited us, made us laugh, made us cry, and even scared us with I Am Legend. I think he ran out of emotions and went with “anger” and “disappointment” this time around with 2008’s Will Smith summer movie Hancock.

Hancock starts out with a chase scene that drops you right into the action. This is a superhero movie afterall, right? Let’s see this guy fight some crime. We cut to Hancock sleeping on a bus stop bench just like he is in the huge marketing campaign that you no doubt have seen if you have left the house in the last month or so. An eerie looking child wakes him up and points to some televisions and says “Hancock, bad guys”.

Here’s where the film started to lose me: Hancock (Will Smith) takes off (leaving broken pieces pavement in his leave, as he does throughout the film) and destroys what looks like millions of dollars worth of property on the way to stop the criminals on the run. “Move, Bitch” starts playing. That’s right. “Move, Bitch” (“MOVE, BITCH! Get out the way! Get out the way!…”). The tastelessly placed song that ruined the first trailer of this film for me was playing. Songs with such pervasive lyrics tend to take over a scene; and unless you’re intending for the song to be the primary focus and for your audience to take a break from your film making in order to enjoy the song being sung, then that’s a fine choice. If a film maker thinks “it’s kind of funny” to have a song that aligns with what is going on, then that music supervisor should pretty much be fired. That level of cheese is unforgivable in modern superhero movies. Especially in a summer where films like Dark Knight, Iron Man, and Hulk are taking the stories, and the characters seriously.

Remember in the Iron Man trailer when Tony Stark comes out in his Iron Man suit and destroys everything to the song Iron Man? I was ringing my own hands in fear that this song, adding this level of cheese, would destroy that part of that film. Thankfully, Favreau and co. were smart enough to let the film speak for itself (despite its one-power chord score). Hancock not only made this mistake, but kept making it throughout the film. The song “Move, Bitch” is credited twice in the film at the end credits

Needless to say, the rest of the music in the film was atrocious. From ill-chosen hip-hop hits to John Williams Superman clones, this film’s music was one of its biggest downfalls. Except, of course, for one of the most important parts – the script

There is very little, if any, plot in this film. Sure, there is character development, but let’s not mistake that for a story. The film pulls you in three different directions and places you in scenes instead of bringing you to them. We are supposed to have started the film with some kind of caring about this character, when he has not endeared himself to us from the very beginning. This is the film’s biggest mistake. It drops the characters and the story on you as if it were a comic book movie (and this also isn’t ok for comic book movies to do, by the way).

We’re supposed to care about Will Smith’s character and the fact that he’s going through something, because he is, after all, the title character. We are not given a reason, other than the film is being told from his perspective.

After his incarceration, the (100% predictable) revelation of Charlize Theron’s character’s powers, and the introduction of (a very poor excuse for) a villain, we are left with a film absolutely devoid of what would have made it good. There is no tension, there is no sense of danger for any of the characters, and there is no sense of purpose. Why do we care if Hancock does well with the public? So we can have a good viewing experience?

We know Charlize Theron’s character is going to be a bad guy, so we wait for that once the hints are dropped. We get there in the film, and they fight for seemingly no reason other than anger, and then there are no real consequences or conflict beyond Hancock’s origin?

A one-handed bald guy with a gun? Really? That’s the end villain/conflict for this film? Sure he has to save the life of his superhero companion, but if she was so worried about his well being, why didn’t she just leave town so he could get better sooner?

The plot holes, lack of emotional involvement on the audience’s part, the music, and the horrible lines (“Are you a crackpot?!” was actually a punchline in this film) make Hancock the most disappointing experience of this summer.

Here’s the worst part: I wasn’t really expecting very much, if anything, at all. This film was not just bad, it was Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer bad. It was bad because it gives more ammo to those who “don’t want to see another superhero movie as long as they live”. It was bad because it was a relatively sound premise with a great cast and a hell of a lot of money behind it that could have been great if it just had some time, care, and creative effort put into it beyond the “realistic” breaking of the streets during take-offs and landings.

The concept introduced in Hancock of superpowered beings that have been around for thousands of years being dwindled down to only two and whose weakness is being around the one they were meant to love is great. That sentence sounds like there would be a great story to tell there and the saddest part is that there is. The disappointing part is that Will Smith’s Hancock didn’t tell it.

You should skip this movie and rent it if you really need to. Just don’t support movies like this one that take the superhero movie genre into the quality-abyss that would have been ok a few years ago. If Hancock was made a few years ago, then it would have been taken as ok; but with Iron Man, Hulk, and the Batman franchises breathing quality back into the Superhero genre Hancock really should have stepped it up. Don’t support films doing that, because in this downward spiral towards special effects and CGI extravaganzas over good quality films, a good story is hard to come by; and we’re definitely getting there with superhero movies, but I don’t want the bad ones to keep being made and neither do you. Your dollar is your vote in how the coming summers will treat us. Vote wisely. Rent this or borrow it from a friend.