Australia, the land down under, is most commonly known for its massive Great Barrier Reef and a wide variety of unique animals such as kangaroos, koala bears and duck-billed platypuses. But as of late, Australia has delivered some exceptional Hollywood talent that is headlined by a relatively unknown writer, director and actor, Joel Edgerton. After a breakout in 2010 with the overlooked sibling drama, Warrior, Edgerton is best known for his role in Baz Lurhmann’s The Great Gatsby. And whether or not you’re familiar with this rare multifaceted industry talent, once Edgerton’s controversial psychological thriller, The Gift, generates quite a stir following its nationwide release this weekend, he’ll become a household name.

Simon (Jason Bateman) and Robyn (Rebecca Hall) are a young married couple who relocate to the nearby suburbs of Simon’s childhood looking for a fresh start. While doing some routine shopping for their new home, they’re approached by Gordo (Edgerton), an old classmate of Simon. And after Gordo oversteps his welcome in their lives and eventually references a past secret between him and Simon, the couple quickly grows fearful of his intentions.

Gift1

One of the beauties surrounding Joel Edgerton’s major motion picture directorial debut, The Gift, is the effective manner in which it utilizes its tension. Where countless other films look to surprise jumps and scares as a flimsy device to shock its audiences, Edgerton and the rest of his talented cast are exceptional and convincing enough to transform these often hokey tactics into legitimate moments of terror. Furthermore, The Gift does an immaculate job of tearing down the safe haven and boundaries of the home dynamic. Part of the feature’s allure is how vulnerable the home environment becomes and it leads to a wildly impressive and thrilling ride. My highest praises go out to the entire cast. Edgerton himself delivers an eerily iconic performance that’s balanced perfectly with the work of his co-stars Jason Bateman and Rebecca Hall. Detailed writing and top-flight performances allow The Gift to take on a life of its own.

Gift2

Despite all of its amazing attributes, The Gift suffers from a sluggish midsection that trades thrills for dramatics. And although the film loses its suspenseful tone during this portion, it’s a necessary evil that evolves into an explosive and unforeseen finale that’s guaranteed to keep audiences talking long after the credits roll. The Gift paints a unique and realistic picture of humanity. We all have our demons and the movie intentionally shows every character’s true colors before it unravels in the craziest and most compelling of fashions.

Joel Edgerton has emerged as a true industry talent not only on screen, but behind the camera and as a writer as well. The Gift is one of those rare psychological thrillers that transcends the norm and takes chances. Thankfully for audiences everywhere who are destined to enjoy this fine piece of work, those chances pay off in one of the year’s most cerebral and taut films.

GRADE: 4/5

Check out other work from MCDAVE at his host site

The actor-turned-director transition is one that many performers desire to accomplish. Sometimes the flow from onscreen star to behind the camera visionary is smooth and sleek. Clint Eastwood, Ron Howard and Ben Affleck are just a few shining examples of this evolution’s success. On the other hand, actors such as Nicolas Cage (Sonny) and William Shatner (Star Trek V: The Final Frontier) discovered that the conversion can be quite challenging. In fact, when it comes to a familiar star taking the reins and jumping into the director’s chair for the first time, you never really know what to expect. And that’s the major source of intrigue surrounding Jason Bateman’s major motion picture directorial debut, Bad Words.

Guy Trilby (Bateman) is a middle-aged man who uses the fact that he never completed any schooling past the 8th grade as a loophole to infiltrate the world of competitive spelling. While the parents of these studious and ambitiously committed youth see him as a dark cloud over the entire process, Guy has a mysterious motivation to his dastardly antics. That is, until a young Indian-American boy named Chaitanya (Rohan Chand) attempts to befriend the foul-mouthed and middle-aged competitor.

Bad Words 1

Despite the film’s healthy dose of comedy, Bateman’s Bad Words contains a flimsy script and glossed over characters. The leading star and director is serviceable in both regards, but all of the movie’s characters are under-developed and one-dimensional. Bad Words offers no rooting interest and feels like a (very) poor man’s Bad Santa. Bateman and company attempt to wrap a large layer of crude and R-rated humor around an ineffective and purposeless story. Bad Words is actually too simple and safe from a structural standpoint. Perhaps taking more risks and adding a blend of uniqueness could have given film more to offer. Consequently, the audience is left with a slow moving journey to a mysteriously big reveal that isn’t very shocking or exciting. All of which help identify Bad Words as the mediocre effort it so clearly is.

bad words 2

Jason Bateman’s character, Guy Trilby, is intentionally straight-faced. His motives and emotions are meant to be unidentifiable, making it difficult to connect with the clean-canvased character. Therefore, the only remaining personae to latch on to is the Indian-American boy Chaitanya, played by youngster Rohan Chand. The child-actor has proven his abilities in Adam Sandler’s Jack and Jill and 2013’s late year success, Lone Survivor. Rohan continues raising the bar with a heartwarming performance that also demonstrates the boy’s knack for comedic timing. However, the lovable-kid aspect can only carry the film so far and Bad Words ultimately suffers from countless other shortcomings.

In this early-year lull, the options are few and far between. Jason Bateman’s Bad Words is easy to sit through, but nothing spectacular. If you’re in search of some vulgar R-rated jokes in the vein of Bad Santa, you guaranteed to find some laughs and get your fix here. Otherwise, Bad Words is simply a run of the mill comedy with weak characters and an uneventful storyline.

GRADE: 2.5/5

You can check out plenty of other reviews, trailers and movie news at MCDAVE’s Host Site

The first film of my SXSW 2014 experience was Bad Words, the feature film directorial debut of actor Jason Bateman.

The film is about an adult man that finds a loophole in competition rules that allows him to compete in a kid’s spelling bee. Bateman plays a mean, cynical man and much of the humor is derived from his inappropriate interactions with the children, especially a young Indian boy who attempts to befriend him.

After the film I was invited to partake in a roundtable interview with Jason and his co-star Kathryn Hahn. For clarity’s sake, all reporter questions and comments are italicized. I’ve also bolded my own questions, so you know I’m not the weirdo saying women shouldn’t curse and Yale alumni can’t be funny.

Bad Words opens in limited release tomorrow, March 14th, before expanding on March 28th.

Kathryn Hahn:

Is it ok to look at you while we ask questions? (This is in reference to a running joke in the film where Kathryn’s character does not like to be looked at during the act.)

No! Please avoid eye contact.

I have to ask, was that drawn from some sort of personal experience? Maybe not necessarily from you…

You have to ask that? Boy, this just got real personal. That’s from the sicko mind of Andrew Dodge, the writer. That was kind of the parameters of the sex scene.

I’m sure when you’re looking at that in the script you’re like ‘Oh my god, I can’t wait.”

Could. Not. Wait. I knew it would be twice and I also knew that with Bateman it was going to be a beautiful launching pad for us to kind of fill it out and make something happen. Yeah, very funny.

It’s sort of a great structure for your relationship.

I love that every time he looks at her she has to start completely over. Like literally from the very beginning. Like, ‘This is gonna go on all night. Back to one.”

Was that also one of those things that when you’re shooting it you are trying a variety of different ways of doing that?

I mean, we shot in a practical janitors closet at the lovely Sportsman’s Lodge in Burbank, California. Or maybe not Burbank, I think it was Studio City. Details, guys. I gotta fact check myself. I think, in the parameters of that, there were like six of us in there. So there wasn’t a lot of room for trying different positions. We knew that we were stuck in ye olde missionary.

I meant more in like, line delivery…

(Laughs) Sorry, my mind is stuck. Yeah we did, there was some playing around. Absolutely. But, you know, Andrew Dodge wrote such a crazy, tight, economic gem. There really wasn’t a ton we had to do. I think that would have defused what was there.

Jason mentioned last night that you guys had a personal friendship, and how that could make that scene pretty awkward…

Oh my god, yes! So awkward! I was really like, ‘Don’t look at me. I’m going to break and we’ll never get it back.” Which is a hilarious metaphor. We had a pillow between us. Two pillows. So we could just go for it and not be uncomfortable.

So I’m guessing that’s how you go onto the project in the first place? The fact that you guys have a personal relationship?

As it were. Yes, we’ve been friendly for a couple of years. I adore him. I adore his wife. Huge crush on his wife. I knew when the script was sent to me that whatever he decided was gonna be his first time out as a feature director was going to be something special. I’ve always just trusted his taste. Just as an audience member. I’m always checking in with Jason Bateman on screen because I just know that’s where the brains are. I just know that his POV I trust.

That’s got to be interesting because of that dynamic of working with an actor and director but then adding friend into that equation. You don’t ever want your friend to be your boss.

Yeah. I’m telling you, it sounds so cliche but it was a ball. It was a ball. You could tell that he was having the time of his life. He had done so much prep work. He armed himself. I think he knew that with the parameters of the shoot that it was going to be short, so he armed himself with so much prep that by the time we started shooting he was so calm and so comfortable. It would be very hard not to micromanage, I could imagine. Especially your first time out to bat. Especially with a world that is so specific. He created such a visual, tonal world. It would have been very difficult to just relax had you not done all the work up till then.

Obvious question here, would you talk about your own spelling bee experiences.

Awful. I never did an actual spelling bee but I took latin in high school so I thought that I had a leg up on the root words. So I can usually dig a root word out of something but I’m not very good at spelling.

Were you familiar with any of the words that were used in the movie?

Nougat. Very familiar with nougat.

There’s a lot of cursing in this film. Some people would say that the classier the woman the less they curse. Would you agree with that?

No. I like a broad.

What are some life situations that would get you to start letting them fly?

Oh, anything. Name your poison. I love a swear word. I really do. But I have the two peanuts at home, so you gotta edit yourself big time. They take it all in.

Do you have a favorite?

A favorite child? Yes. Absolutely. And I’ll tell you why. (Laughs) No, I love a simple fuck. It’s always so horrible to actually say it out loud but that’s true. Just a simple fuck. In a pinch, guys, it covers a lot. I grew up in Ohio, I don’t know if this is particular to Ohio, but with my parents there was a lot of ‘Oh, poop on a stick! Shut the front door!” You almost with they would have just let it fly. It would have been a little less embarrassing.

What do you like about playing characters that are shameless? You seem to have a couple of those under your belt. Stepbrothers comes to mind.

I’m a fan of bite in comedy. I’m a big fan of comedy that’s got an edge to it. And as a character, comedy or drama, I like a woman that’s on the edge of an abyss. Whatever that is. It could be big or small. It’s just a precipice I’m always interested in. Exploring that leap into the unknown.

How funny were you allowed to get at Yale?

There’s nothing funny about Yale.

I mean on stage. Did you ever do any comedy there?

We had an awesome ragamuffin class. I loved my class at Yale. We got a clown teacher up there. We did some comedia. Not a lot of improvising, that didn’t come for me until later. I never took improv classes or anything like that. It was being introduced to Adam McKay that really cracked that open for me. I think I’ve talked about this before, but at Yale… I will never forget that experience. It was a rigorous, blessed three years. I didn’t have to worry about anything but just the work. We were producing plays at one in the morning. It was heaven, heaven, heaven. We didn’t have a television. The best. I will hold that to my heart forever. I was accruing loans but it was just like pretend. I knew I’d have to eventually pay that off but you didn’t have to really think about that while you were there. It was pure and really blessed. Of course we did a lot of comedy. I think a lot of my classmates would say I was like the clown. There were a lot of clowns in my class, though. We laughed a lot. I think in the theater you find that. It’s not fun to see a real serious serious play.

When you think Yale theater the first thing to pop into mind isn’t a bunch of people up there horsing around.

But the play is to a point. It’s about cracking something open. Comedy is hard, I think. Really hard. We were grad student kids, we had a ball, but it was to a point.

On the same note of being a clown at Yale. Were you aware that on IMDB your one trademark is “known for making exaggerated facial expressions’?

Yeah, I saw that. We were laughing and I said ‘I think that should be the name of my autobiography’. Like ‘Making Faces: The Story of Kathryn Hahn’.

Maybe the quote on your tombstone? ‘She was really good at making exaggerated faces’.

(Laughs) Hmm, I don’t know about that.

Can you talk a little bit about Afternoon Delight? That is such a wonderful film. We always see you in these supporting roles but you totally owned that film. How hard is it to get something like that made?

I will just forever be grateful to Jill Soloway for seeing that in me and giving me that opportunity. They had not come my way with that kind of a role since Yale, really. That hadn’t been really asked of me. To go to those kinds of places, which is all you want to do as a performer. That was heaven. Heaven. We shot it in three weeks. We used my minivan. It was like a three week fever. We shot six days a week and rehearsed on the seventh day. Rented a little house that the DP and Jill and I would just take turns sleeping in so we could get a full night’s sleep because we all had kids. We knew no one could get any sleep. The bar really was raised with that particular experience with me.

Jason Bateman –

Your costar Rohan is a very mature young man. Was it challenging to throw out those expletives his way?

The film was not improvised. He and his parents knew everything that was coming and were certainly prepped for it. I had extensive conversations with him and his parents about the kind of tone and spirit and where all these prickly scenes were coming from. What the deeper and slightly more sophisticated agenda was that would play, hopefully, underneath the whole movie. Certainly Guy’s journey. I just asked them to trust me that I was going to build the film and aesthetic and that it wouldn’t feel gratuitous or arbitrary to the audience. That this wasn’t going to be something embarrassing for them. This was a drama for everyone inside the movie. This guy got his feelings hurt and he’s just not properly equipped to deal with that. And we, the same audience, laugh at his inability to manage his life, but it is a drama to them. That would be, hopefully, the spine of the movie and make those prickly things feel a little less sophomoric.

Can you talk a little bit about where Arrested Development falls into that position where you are now allowed to make your directorial debut?

Arrested Development is the father and mother of my career now in the second half. I was a working actor for the decade between The Hogan Family and Arrested Development but I certainly was not making a lot of choices, you know? I was basically taking what I got and Arrested Development provided a project that was embraced by those who hand out jobs in Los Angeles. That was really, really fortunate. I would have taken a job that was half as good and would have perhaps stayed on the air twice as long. Respect and quality I think is the fuel of longevity as opposed to fame and fortune. Arrested Development gave me a great deal of much needed credibility and was a basic reset button on some of the stuff that I had done in the past. I’m just gonna try my damndest not to screw it up and stay at the party for another 30 years.

A lot has been made about this being your directorial debut, but you’ve been directing television since you were 18…

Yeah, with the exception of Arrested Development all of the directing has been multicamera. Which, I do not mean to belittle, but it’s a different job as a director. You’re mandate there is to corral the rehearsal and make the comedic writing work and have its rhythm stay intact. It’s shot proscenium style where it’s three walls; it’s theater. There’s and audience and it’s a different process. When you direct single camera you are choosing lenses, there’s a lighting strategy, music, and a whole environment that a director is allowed to build. In television it’s a bit more of a writer/producer’s medium. In film you’ve got a bit of creative autonomy that is extremely exciting to me. But very challenging.

Talking about the aesthetic a little bit more, and I don’t know if I’m completely wrong here, but I saw the tiniest twinges of the aesthetic of Wes Anderson in the beginning of the film. Has anybody said that to you or are there any references you used?

That’s high praise. I mean Wes Anderson, Paul Thomas Anderson, David O. Russell, The Coen Brothers, Alexander Payne, and Spike Jonze… these guys have a rawness to the aesthetic. A palette that they use. The way that they use the visual element of this medium to perform. That is a character in the film. It sets a mood for the audience that hopefully allows the audience to be a bit more accepting of a fringe society that these filmmakers usually like to tell their stories in. The characters are usually people that you drive by but you don’t often talk to. Situations that you usually skirt because we’re a bit more highly functional. Decisions that are made that are less responsible than those of responsible adults like us. I think there is a visual component to that and a musical component to that that is fascinating to me and I really look forward to learning a whole lot about. One of the main things that attracted me to this script was that that would be a necessary world and a palette to establish to the audience because we’re dealing with an odd group of people making odd decisions. If it looks like today and like where we all live it would feel broad and hokey, but if it feels real and feels raw then you accept the eccentricities of the story and the characters.

Kathryn was talking, specifically about the “don’t look at me” scene, about how a lot of what was there was in the script. I’m curious about one of my very favorite scenes in the movie which I kind of think of as the ‘Five Easy Pieces’ moment where you’re talking to the woman in the diner and kind of putting her in her place. Is all that in the script as well or did you get to kind of play around and try different retorts?

Well I’ve never been a fan of actors talking about what they wrote and what the writer wrote because that’s very unfair to the writer, but Andrew was incredibly collaborative for a long time. All the way through the process. I invited him to be on set the entire shoot and he was there every day. We worked long and hard on the script for about a year before we ended up shooting it. There were two phases of that. One was just me as a director trying to funnel all that was in the script into the version, style, and aesthetic that I wanted to use. Then once I decided to play the lead character we went through it again and I knew the way I was going to play that part very specifically. So certain words might be inconsistent with that approach and certain words might better enhance that approach.

But not a lot of improv in the film itself? It’s pretty much all what’s on the page?

There certainly was some, which I’m a fan of because once something becomes three dimensional and other actors start doing things that you can’t predict the night before when you’re practicing your faces in the mirror, things are different and you need to be able to pivot. So sometimes certain words or certain things could be a little bit better, but for the most part Andrew and I got that exactly the way we wanted it all the way down to the shooting. Everything was shot listed and storyboarded and I knew exactly the way that every single piece… the way that I’d like to shoot everything. I decided on lens sizes and everything. Scouted. We knew we’d have a pretty abbreviated schedule and that I was going to be splitting my duties, so everything was kind of done.

Can you talk about the color palette because it’s more of a drama color palette…

I was getting a lot of green and that was in sharp contrast with the HD scenes where we see the live television.

Sure. We wanted to make sure that the television had a different look than the film. What you’re privy to in the audience versus what the audience that’s watching the tv show would be privy to. So we shot that on different equipment and had a whole different process. The overall palette of the film is what we were talking about. It was very desaturated, and the greens, and the blues, and the things that just lend themselves to establishing a bit more of a melancholy, introspective position for the audience because hopefully that’s where I wanted the audience to start and to remember as they were experiencing all of the humor and the veneer of Guy. I wanted them to remember that this was a guy that was raw and wounded inside. Something that’s oversaturated, something that’s super lit, something that’s on wide angle lenses usually feels a little bit safer. It’s all parts of the process that I’ve never been able to participate in and the fact that this script demanded that was one of the big draws.

Speaking of script demands, all of the prep that goes into spelling the big words, would you still be able to spell floccinaucinihilipilification?

I could get close, but everything was written on big white boards. The fun part was that we had to write them on multiple boards around the auditorium so that I could get three letters there, three more there, three more there so it didn’t look like I was reading it. I was in one spelling bee in grade school and I lost in the first round because I forgot the w in answer. I’m not bookish.

Briefly: The red-band trailer for the Jason Bateman directed Bad Words hit theatres a few weeks back (check it out here), and the film instantly became one of my most anticipated comedies of the year.

The chemistry and antics of Bateman’s Guy and 8th grader Chaitanya are fantastic, and is something that I could easily watch for the length of a feature film. A family-friendly(ish, unlike the movie itself) green-band trailer for the film has just hit the web; it’s got a bunch of new footage in tow, and it’s just as hilarious as the last preview.

Take a look at the trailer below, and let us know if you’ll be checking out Bad Words when it releases on March 28th!

Jason Bateman makes his directorial debut with the subversive comedy, BAD WORDS.

 

Bateman stars as Guy Trilby, a 40-year old who finds a loophole in the rules of the National Quill Spelling Bee and decides to cause trouble by hijacking the competition. Contest officials, outraged parents, and overly ambitious 8th graders are no match for Guy, as he ruthlessly crushes their dreams of victory and fame.

 

As a reporter attempts to discover his true motivation, Guy finds himself forging an unlikely alliance with a competitor: awkward 10-year old Chaitanya (Rohan Chand of ‘Homeland’), who is completely unfazed by Guy’s take-no-prisoners approach to life.

 

The movie also stars Alison Janney, Kathryn Hahn and Phillip Baker Hall.

Ever since it was announced that Netflix was developing a fourth season of the critically acclaimed series Arrested Development, fans everywhere have been eagerly awaiting its return. With the season launch just around the corner, Netflix has released the first trailer for us geeks to get our grubby little paws on.

Get your Cornballer ready; you can watch all 15 episodes starting May 26th. For now, watch the trailer below and let us know what you think!

Production on the new season of Arrested Development for Netflix begins tomorrow! It appears that the entire cast consisting of Jason Bateman, Jeffrey Tambor, Portia de Rossi, David Cross, Jessica Walter, Will Arnett, Michael Cera, Alia Shawkat and Tony Hale are all in final negotiations and expected to return. Each of the new episodes will focus on one member of the Bluth clan, although some episodes may feature multiple characters. Arrested Development will be in production through the fall.

The new season is set to be a bridge between the original series and the lon rumored Arrested Development movie. However the door is being left open to doing an additional season if the initial 10 new episodes prove successful. All 10 new episodes are set to be available on Netflix at the same time sometime in 2013 but no premiere date has been set yet.

Source: Deadline

The Bluth family reunion is coming. It feels like almost forever since we were told our beloved Arrested Development would be returning to us via Netflix. And some of us began to even doubt in it because we had seen nothing. Well, earlier this week Ron Howard tweeted a picture of a very special script.

And to make it even better, earlier today Jason Bateman tweeted two pics from the set featuring a certain cast member.

It really is happening. The show will start streaming in the first half of 2013 on Netflix. Excuse me I must go now because I’m afraid I just blue myself.

Few redeeming qualities can be found in this film. Here’s the difficult part: I like Will Smith. Say what you will about whatever summer blockbuster he has brought us in the past few years, but there is no doubt that he is a big name, makes relatively good choices, and is a great actor. We all fell in love with him during his years as our beloved Fresh Prince, but really got to know him as his film career started. Bad Boys made him into a full fledged action star, Independence Day endeared him to audiences all over the world, Ali made him into A-List material, Men in Black entertained us all, and The Pursuit of Happyness made all of us cry. He has excited us, made us laugh, made us cry, and even scared us with I Am Legend. I think he ran out of emotions and went with “anger” and “disappointment” this time around with 2008’s Will Smith summer movie Hancock.

Hancock starts out with a chase scene that drops you right into the action. This is a superhero movie afterall, right? Let’s see this guy fight some crime. We cut to Hancock sleeping on a bus stop bench just like he is in the huge marketing campaign that you no doubt have seen if you have left the house in the last month or so. An eerie looking child wakes him up and points to some televisions and says “Hancock, bad guys”.

Here’s where the film started to lose me: Hancock (Will Smith) takes off (leaving broken pieces pavement in his leave, as he does throughout the film) and destroys what looks like millions of dollars worth of property on the way to stop the criminals on the run. “Move, Bitch” starts playing. That’s right. “Move, Bitch” (“MOVE, BITCH! Get out the way! Get out the way!…”). The tastelessly placed song that ruined the first trailer of this film for me was playing. Songs with such pervasive lyrics tend to take over a scene; and unless you’re intending for the song to be the primary focus and for your audience to take a break from your film making in order to enjoy the song being sung, then that’s a fine choice. If a film maker thinks “it’s kind of funny” to have a song that aligns with what is going on, then that music supervisor should pretty much be fired. That level of cheese is unforgivable in modern superhero movies. Especially in a summer where films like Dark Knight, Iron Man, and Hulk are taking the stories, and the characters seriously.

Remember in the Iron Man trailer when Tony Stark comes out in his Iron Man suit and destroys everything to the song Iron Man? I was ringing my own hands in fear that this song, adding this level of cheese, would destroy that part of that film. Thankfully, Favreau and co. were smart enough to let the film speak for itself (despite its one-power chord score). Hancock not only made this mistake, but kept making it throughout the film. The song “Move, Bitch” is credited twice in the film at the end credits

Needless to say, the rest of the music in the film was atrocious. From ill-chosen hip-hop hits to John Williams Superman clones, this film’s music was one of its biggest downfalls. Except, of course, for one of the most important parts – the script

There is very little, if any, plot in this film. Sure, there is character development, but let’s not mistake that for a story. The film pulls you in three different directions and places you in scenes instead of bringing you to them. We are supposed to have started the film with some kind of caring about this character, when he has not endeared himself to us from the very beginning. This is the film’s biggest mistake. It drops the characters and the story on you as if it were a comic book movie (and this also isn’t ok for comic book movies to do, by the way).

We’re supposed to care about Will Smith’s character and the fact that he’s going through something, because he is, after all, the title character. We are not given a reason, other than the film is being told from his perspective.

After his incarceration, the (100% predictable) revelation of Charlize Theron’s character’s powers, and the introduction of (a very poor excuse for) a villain, we are left with a film absolutely devoid of what would have made it good. There is no tension, there is no sense of danger for any of the characters, and there is no sense of purpose. Why do we care if Hancock does well with the public? So we can have a good viewing experience?

We know Charlize Theron’s character is going to be a bad guy, so we wait for that once the hints are dropped. We get there in the film, and they fight for seemingly no reason other than anger, and then there are no real consequences or conflict beyond Hancock’s origin?

A one-handed bald guy with a gun? Really? That’s the end villain/conflict for this film? Sure he has to save the life of his superhero companion, but if she was so worried about his well being, why didn’t she just leave town so he could get better sooner?

The plot holes, lack of emotional involvement on the audience’s part, the music, and the horrible lines (“Are you a crackpot?!” was actually a punchline in this film) make Hancock the most disappointing experience of this summer.

Here’s the worst part: I wasn’t really expecting very much, if anything, at all. This film was not just bad, it was Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer bad. It was bad because it gives more ammo to those who “don’t want to see another superhero movie as long as they live”. It was bad because it was a relatively sound premise with a great cast and a hell of a lot of money behind it that could have been great if it just had some time, care, and creative effort put into it beyond the “realistic” breaking of the streets during take-offs and landings.

The concept introduced in Hancock of superpowered beings that have been around for thousands of years being dwindled down to only two and whose weakness is being around the one they were meant to love is great. That sentence sounds like there would be a great story to tell there and the saddest part is that there is. The disappointing part is that Will Smith’s Hancock didn’t tell it.

You should skip this movie and rent it if you really need to. Just don’t support movies like this one that take the superhero movie genre into the quality-abyss that would have been ok a few years ago. If Hancock was made a few years ago, then it would have been taken as ok; but with Iron Man, Hulk, and the Batman franchises breathing quality back into the Superhero genre Hancock really should have stepped it up. Don’t support films doing that, because in this downward spiral towards special effects and CGI extravaganzas over good quality films, a good story is hard to come by; and we’re definitely getting there with superhero movies, but I don’t want the bad ones to keep being made and neither do you. Your dollar is your vote in how the coming summers will treat us. Vote wisely. Rent this or borrow it from a friend.