This morning Variety broke the big news that DC has secured and gotten Joss Whedon, yes, THAT Joss Whedon, to direct the standalone Batgirl movie. While people endlessly celebrate and get excited, there are still some things that DC should be nervous about. Whedon is a phenomenal director, but there are problems with him that could hurt DC if they aren’t careful. The first thing to consider is that if Whedon isn’t happy with what’s going on, he won’t be shy talking about it. Everyone by now knows about his infamous fallout with Marvel and the meltdown he had when he was forced to put in Thor’s vision scene in Avengers: Age of Ultron if he wanted to keep Hawkeye’s family story line. That fallout was Josh Trank levels of bad, and it shows since he hasn’t really done anything notable since.

Also building off of him not staying quiet about things is that since his recent return to social media, Whedon has gotten very political. I get that you care very much about your country and what happens in it, but talking about it at almost a nauseating extent is getting you up there on Amy Schumer levels of political talk, and you DON’T want to be anywhere near there.

Nonetheless, this is a great chance for DC to really pick themselves up from their rut, and this is a great risk for them to take. Let’s just hope it doesn’t blow up in their face. What are you thoughts on the announcement? Tell us in the comments below!

UPDATE: It has been clarified by our readers that the current arc in the Batgirl series is not centered around a feud with The Joker. As I stated, my familiarity with the series is only foggy at best. The variant comes from a brand-wide celebration of The Joker character’s 75th anniversary and will be featured on variant covers of other DC Comics series. The article remains intact below.

In response to the backlash against a suggestive, controversial variant cover to the upcoming Batgirl #41, publisher DC Comics has canceled the cover at the request of its artist, Rafael Albuquerque.

From Comic Book Resources:

The highly criticized variant cover for “Batgirl” #41 will not be published by DC Comics, CBR News has learned. This move was made at the request of the cover’s artist, Rafael Albuquerque.

 

“My intention was never to hurt or upset anyone through my art,” Albuquerque, the acclaimed artist of “American Vampire,” said in a statement. “For that reason, I have recommended to DC that the variant cover be pulled.”

 

The image was released Friday, as one of 25 Joker-themed variant covers scheduled for release in June. Albuquerque’s “Batgirl” variant took inspiration from Alan Moore and Brian Bolland’s famous 1988 story “Batman: The Killing Joke,” in which Barbara Gordon/Batgirl was shot and paralyzed by the Joker. It has been commonly interpreted, though not definitively established within the story, that the character was also sexually assaulted.

Before we touch on the response that has developed in the last twelve hours, I want to talk about the cover itself: Holy shit.

BG-Cv41-Joker-variant-solicitation-88c4e

In some ways I want to praise it, in other ways I want to outright condemn it. It speaks to how much art can bring about a visceral response, and this is a brilliant example. Exploitative? Unsettling? Good? Bad? I don’t know.

Full disclosure: I haven’t read Batgirl even though I’m repeatedly told it’s one of the best series out in the market right now, but I am roughly aware that Batgirl is colliding with the Joker in her current arc. I am also aware that the current series is bright and cheery, like The Flash series on The CW so I am sure that juxtaposition has contributed to the stark, sharp response to this cover. That said, looking at it and not knowing a hell of a lot of the current Batgirl, it doesn’t tell me much of what I need to know. It’s selling me on the art but not selling me on the book.

There is no question that Albuerque’s skill is top notch, the work’s technical demonstration is fine. But thematically and storytelling-wise, it makes me want to do the human equivalent of hide in a turtle shell. I have played hundreds of violent video games, watched all kinds of horror, slasher and torture porn films and even horrific videos of real-world violence that make their way online for some awful reason or another, and this work still sent a chill down my stomach. It must be the contrasting colors and lighting.

But even if I don’t like it, work such as this should have the right to exist.

Or does it?

Late last night my Twitter feed started buzzing from comics pros, artists, writers and fans alike over the potentially censorship-sensitive controversy. Almost reminiscent of last summer’s GamerGate, there was a sharp divide between readers who feel the cover shouldn’t be pulled and the professionals who produce content and have largely seemed empathetic to the decision. Caught in between are the people — consumers and pros alike — whose nerves were pinched by the suggestive cover.

https://twitter.com/INecari/status/577647939193057280

Like GamerGate claiming ethics in journalism, angry readers are claiming DC Comics are stomping on speech and enforcing censorship. While it’s an easy, almost logical formula to understand, I have to vehemently disagree.

For starters, it was the artist himself who asked the cover be pulled, not DC. Rafael Albuquerque clarified as much on his Twitter:

https://twitter.com/rafaalbuquerque/status/577650683958206466

When an artist “censors” himself, it’s not censorship. That’s an artist being an artist and choosing how they want to be represented. They make the work, they have the right whether or not it lives on. While the work Rafael did is questionable, he must ultimately have the authority to let it live or die.

As a (deluded) filmmaker myself, I have made many projects that I wish would not see the light of day. While I have never created anything within the realm of assault or exploiting trauma, it’s still work I don’t like. Whether it was bad and indicative of growing pains or just work I’m not proud of, I should have the option to choose what I want to exist in the world, shouldn’t I?

Renowned comics author Mark Waid chimed in. Although exhausted and stressed, his stance was clear: it’s not censorship.

And he’s not alone, enter author/activist J. Skyler.

Dozens more are speaking their mind, on both sides.

https://twitter.com/the2scoops/status/577828894780354561

https://twitter.com/richyrichoh/status/577650124597379073

Amid the Twitter debates, I came across a vastly different, fascinating perspective from Dr. Andrea Letamandi, a doctor in clinical psychology who built her career exploring the mythology of Batman.

Keep in mind that Dr. Letamendi isn’t exactly condemning DC or doing anything to make sure DC puts the variant cover back on their schedule. She’s merely expressing disappointment. But it’s a fascinating point-of-view, and it reminds me to not overlook the very reason this uproar exists: the real people who have experienced real, similar trauma.

The debate is still roaring and fresh, and happened in the late hours of the night so forgive me for the lack of collected tweets but you can participate yourself if you’re so inclined.

I’ve come to terms with it and I’m ashamed at how long it nearly took me. (But I also slept, so fuck off.) It’s definitely an unsettling cover and I personally wouldn’t have bought it. That said, I shouldn’t be/am not angry that both an artist and business chose to conduct themselves in a way they deemed fit. I applaud both DC and Mr. Abuquerque for exercising their right and for their empathy to the criticisms laid out to them.

It’s not censorship. End of story.

One last thing: the similarities to GamerGate are only surface-level at the moment, but they’re startling. This retweet I saw from Albuquerque’s feed was very telling:

https://twitter.com/cameronMstewart/status/577656291839119362

Some things I just don’t have words for.

Actress and host Marisha Ray makes her much deserved Geekscape debut! She talks about her projects ‘Super Power Beat Down’ and ‘Batgirl: Spoiled’! And of course, because drama should follow any good actress, this could be the end of ‘Batgirl: Spoiled’ since Warner Bros just sent them a cease and desist! What are they going to do now!?! Also, how wearing a spirit hood absolutely makes you less of a man and Marisha and I review ‘Thor 2: The Dark World’!

Subscribe to the Geekscape podcast on iTunes!

And listen to the full conversation here:

Last week, the second DLC character for the acclaimed Injustice: Gods Among Us was revealed to be Batgirl. Today, we got our first good look at just what she’s capable of, thanks to a cool new trailer from NetherRealm Studios.

I haven’t yet had a chance to pick up Injustice myself, but I’m really looking forward to the day I do. I’ve been thoroughly impressed by what I’ve played of the title, and if review scores are any indication, so is everyone else. I can’t wait to see what NetherRealm has in store for us with the game’s continued DLC.

Watch the Batgirl trailer below, and let us know how you’re liking the game!

Injustice is awesome. I was weary about the title for a long time (remember Mortal Kombat Vs. DC Universe?), but after finally getting a chance to play the demo and a few rounds of the full game, it’s safe to say that it’s a wonderful experience. It’s also an experience that is only going to get better with time, as NetherRealm has confirmed that there is plenty of DLC coming.

Last week, Lobo was announced as the first DLC character. NetherRealm revealed today via twitter that Batgirl is next. They released a single image (and she looks pretty damn cool), and her first gameplay trailer is set to drop next week.

Take a look at the image below, and let us know if you’re enjoying the game!

Legendary comic artist and former DC Comics editorial director Carmine Infantino has passed away today at age 87. Infantino is perhaps best known for his work on Batman with John Broome during the character’s reinvention during the 60’s. He also designed the Silver Age Flash’s red and yellow costume that gone on to become the character’s iconic look and was the co-creator of quite a few of his rogues gallery which included Captain Cold, Gorilla Grodd, Captain Boomerang and Mirror Master. Infantino is also responsible for introducing the original Black Canary in Flash Comics #86 and co-creating both Barbara Gordon and Deadman.

detective-359

In the 1960’s Infantino took the editorial director position at DC Comics and was responsible for bringing Neal Adams, Denny O’Neil and Jack Kirby to the publisher. After his time at DC editorial, Infantino went back to doing freelance work. During this time he illustrated Star Wars, Spider-Woman and Nova for Marvel Comics. He also took over on the Batman newspaper comic strip in 1990 and illustrated it all the way up until it was cancelled. Infantino went on to retire in the ’90 but continued appearing at conventions even after. Infantino is a true comic legend and leaves behind a legacy of work and contributions to the history of comics that will always be remembered.

Star Wars 14

R.I.P. Carmine Infantino

May 24, 1925 – April 4, 2013

Earlier this week rumors hit that writer Gail Simone would be leaving the New 52’s Batgirl, but the writer was quick to debunk them. Well, it looks like the rumors were true and DC has taken her off of the title. Simone tweeted:

 

 

This is definitely quite unexpected due to the reponse that Simone’s run on Batgirl has received from fans. It’s expected that Simone will end her run with issue #16 after “The Death Of The Family” story arc reaches it’s end.

“After a close call leading to a falling out with Batman and Oracle, Batgirl goes out on her own to reexamine her place in the Gotham and the world at large…”

After a massive premiere at Stan Lee’s Comikaze, the much hyped first episode of the fan created Batgirl: Spoiled is online!

Let’s face it. Between the WB’s Birds of Prey and Halle Berry as Catwoman, DC doesn’t have the best track record for bringing its heroines to the screen.

If you’re tired of waiting for a great female superhero on film, you’re not alone. Fans Sax Carr and Marisha Ray decided they couldn’t wait anymore; they filmed their own renegade web series entitled Batgirl: Spoiled.

Ray stars as Batgirl Stephanie Brown, whose life of privilege is turned upside down over the course of a dozen 7-10 minute episodes. The series will be directed by Damian Beurer and will also star Tara Strand (Unlucky Girl), Taliesin Jaffee (Hellsing), Bridget McManus (Wanted), Tara Platt (Naruto), and Chris Smith (Mortal Kombat vs DC).

The first trailer for the web-series was released Monday on Youtube and teases appearances by Catwoman, The Riddler, Harley Quinn, The Question (Renee Montoya), Poison Ivy, Batwoman, Commissioner Gordon, and Zatanna.

Is this Batgirl the hero Gotham deserves?

You be the judge.

We’ve all wondered what would happen if our favorite pop culture characters were pitted against each other in mortal combat. Well we’ve got a few match-ups covered for you! In this exciting episode it is movie villains vs. super heroes. With the help of some trusty 20-sided dice and their vivid imaginations, Heidi and Stephen tackle just who would win and why. Prepare to be surprised and possibly delighted by the outcomes

Subscribe to Brave Nerd World on iTunes.
Follow us on Twitter and “like” us on Facebook

As an enormous comics fan of both the Marvel and DC Universes, ever since I was a child I always gravitated to the DC universe more. Even during the periods where Marvel’s output was clearly superior, I was still a DC boy at heart. And it all probably has to do with my love of female super heroes. DC has, without a doubt, the most iconic female heroes in comics. Wonder Woman is the first and longest running of course, and along with her, characters like Supergirl, Batgirl and Catwoman are all household names. Even your grandma could pick them out of a line up. Supergirl and Catwoman have carried their own series for nearly twenty years, and Batgirl, either in the wheelchair or out if it, has been a monthly feature at DC for the better part of fifteen years straight.

At least four of the female characters are household names even to non comic book fans.

Not to say that Marvel’s heroines are anything to scoff at; In fact Marvel, without question, has some of the best female heroes in comics. The X-Men titles alone have given us possibly the most well rounded and iconic heroines in comic book history with  Storm, Kitty Pryde, Rogue, Phoenix, Psylocke, Emma Frost and several more. And yet Marvel has yet to yield one single female hero to headline her own comic for any considerable length of time, while DC continues to have success with female led books. Why is there a difference? Is editorial at Marvel more sexist, or do Marvel fanboys just not want to read stories from a female perspective?

Without a doubt, the women of the X-Men titles are the most well rounded and interesting in all of mainstream comics.

 

Marvel Women: The Early Years

When Stan Lee began the Marvel universe in 1961, the only prominent female hero regularly published was DC’s Wonder Woman. Supergirl had just been created, and Batwoman was less a hero and more just a character who would pop up occasionally in Batman’s comics and try to get him to marry her. Stan Lee was the first to change all this. While not showcasing a major female super hero character in a book of her own yet, all three of the major team books of the early Marvel Universe (The Fantastic Four, The X-Men and The Avengers) had at least one prominent female character. And not just as a love interest like Gwen Stacy and Mary Jane were for Spider-Man, but as a fully fledged super heroine in their own right. In fact, the Invisible Girl, Marvel Girl and Scarlet Witch were in fact the most powerful members of their respective teams.  So right there, that’s what Stan Lee did right.

The original female Marvel mainstays mostly did a lot of frowning and fussing, despite being way more powerful than the boys, at least in theory.

But here’s Stan Lee did wrong; the women heroes, despite their power pedigree, spent much of the Silver Age fretting over the male heroes on the team. Sue Storm was usually being kidnapped by Doctor Doom or being chewed out by her boyfriend (and later hubbie) Reed Richards, or worst of all, trying to impress him with a sexy new outfit. Scarlet Witch was pretty much a harpy or a victim, complaining about how much she hated working for Magneto, or fending off the lascivious Mastermind’s marriage proposals. And Marvel Girl, despite being telekinetic and telepathic, was mostly just portrayed as the girl next door who all the boys had a crush on. She almost never was the team’s MVP, despite the fact that her power was the easily the greatest.

It is hard to fault Stan Lee here though; he wasn’t a young man when he created the Marvel Universe, and was merely a product of his sexist times. The fact that he made as many new women superheroes as he did is to totally be commended. He created the blueprint others would later improve on in a post sexual revolution world. But maybe that sexist outlook, where women characters were just there to support the men folk, seeped into the editorial culture at Marvel and has maybe never left. Although for a few years in the late 70’s, they really did try to make up for it.

The 1970’s: Women’s Lib Catches Up With Marvel

It wasn’t until the next decade, when creators other than Lee took over the writing on most Marvel titles, that the women started to emerge as strong as their power sets would imply. Under the guiding hand of people like Chris Claremont and John Byrne,  Marvel Girl became the Goddess like Phoenix. Susan Richards dropped the “girl” from her name and became the Invisible Woman, and eventually even became the team leader. Scarlet Witch’s powers were revealed to be more than just random hexes, but the ability to alter reality itself. The Wasp…well, the Wasp got lots of new costumes and got slapped around by her husband Hank Pym.  But she did get to become leader of the Avengers for awhile, so I guess that counts for something. Uhh..right?

The slap heard round the world, as Hank Pym smacks his wife Janet, AKA The Wasp. One single comic book panel neither character would ever really recover from.

But Marvel still lacked a solid marquee female character that could carry her own ongoing title. As  the 70’s continued to roll on, and  the phrase “women’s liberation” was on everyone’s lips, just where were the Marvel solo books for women heroes? DC had Wonder Woman on television, both in live action and animated form,  not to mention non comic related female heroes like The Bionic Woman and Charlie’s Angels kicking ass on the small screen. No doubt feeling the pressure, Marvel fired back with several books to counter Wonder Woman in the late 70’s, starting with an unexpected female take on their most famous hero and corporate mascot, Spider-Man.

Taking a page out of DC's playbook, Marvel unleashed three solo series for women characters, all female analogs for popular male heroes.

In 1977, Spider-Woman was unleashed onto comic book fans everywhere. She very quickly got her own ongoing comic book, and by 1979 even had her very own cartoon series on Saturday mornings. She instantly became a staple of Marvel marketing; I was a young child during this era and remember Spider-Woman being marketed on lunchboxes and toys along with Spider-Man and Captain America as if she were “one of the guys,” and always had been.  I even remember one of those “take a pic with Spidey” events at a local mall when I was four years old, where I took an awkward Sears portrait style photo along with some poor schmo dressed up as Spider-Man…and  there was a Spider-Woman there too.  What made Spider-Woman so cool was that unlike her DC counterparts Batgirl and Supergirl, she wasn’t a Xerox copy of her more famous male namesake. Her powers, her costume, her origins were all different. Aside from living in the same universe, she had no real ties to Peter Parker at all.

During the late 70's and early 80's, Marvel marketed Spider-Woman as if she were equal to her fellow male icons. And then just like that, Marvel all but erased her out of existence.

And then, almost overnight, she was gone. In 1983 her comic book series was cancelled, and worse, she lost her powers and became just Jessica Drew, Private Investigator. X-Men writer Chris Claremont liked her well enough, so she’d show up occasionally in a panel with Wolverine or something, but that was it. No one really knows why, but rumors are that then Marvel Editor in Chief at the time Jim Shooter just plain hated Spider-Woman, as he thought a female version of a male hero emasculated him. (I guess that makes Batman and Superman giant sissies then? And what about the Hulk??) There have been rumors of sexism swirling around the Shooter years at Marvel for decades now, and their treatment of Spider-Woman merely adds fuel to that fire.

A new Spider-Woman was eventually created, but she wore a costume identical to Spider-Man’s black costume and was kept around mostly as just side character in West Coast Avengers, probably just as a way for Marvel to keep the copyright. (a blink-and-you’ll-miss-her third Spider-Woman was also created in the 90’s.)  It was over twenty years later when writer Brian Michael Bendis revived the classic Spider-Woman for New Avengers and did his best to make her a Marvel mainstay again. And so far, it has worked. But despite being announced years ago now, there is still no ongoing Spider-Woman series from Marvel on the horizon.

Julia Carpenter, the replacement Spider-Woman

Another major female character to get her own title during the period was Ms. Marvel. Originally, Carol Danvers was just a female knock off of the alien warrior Captain Marvel, even wearing a sexier version of his costume (eventually as her series progressed, she got her own costume, one which she still wears to this day)  Although her own series was cancelled in 1979, she went on to join the Avengers, where she was a mainstay for quite some time.

Avengers #200 was a very controversial turning point for the character, which essentially had her brainwashed by a villain who was obsessed with her and had her impregnated, only to have her take off with him at the end, with all the other members of the team giving their blessing. This storyline has long been referred to as “The Rape of Ms. Marvel.” This story, along with the editorially mandated death of Jean Grey, gave Marvel of the early 80’s their first accusations of misogynist undertones.  Writer Chris Claremont did his best to undo the damage done to her in his X-Men title,  and made Carol Danvers a cosmically powerful character named Binary. (essentially, he pulled a Phoenix on her)  Today, Ms. Marvel is arguably more important to the Marvel Universe and more high profile than her male counterpart, so that’s gotta count for something. But despite her high profile, her own attempts at carrying a series keep getting ignored by fanboys.

The last major new female character of the era was the She-Hulk. She Hulk has the distinction of being the last major character to be created by Stan Lee for the company, and  the reasons for creating her were similar to the reasons for creating Spider-Woman; copyright. In 1979 The Incredible Hulk was a very popular tv show, and the guys at Marvel feared that the producers would create a female Hulk much like The Six Million Dollar Man gave way to The Bionic Woman. If that was the case, they wanted to make sure THEY created her first, and therefore owned the copyright free and clear.  And so at the end of 1979, She Hulk was bornLike Spider-Woman, She-Hulk’s series only lasted until 1982. But unlike Spider-Woman, after her series ended she continued to be used in comics like The Avengers, and even joined the Fantastic Four title for a while. All this added exposure in popular team titles increased her popularity with the Marvel fanbase, and when she was given a title again in 1989. (with then popular writer/artist John Byrne at the helm) The series was far more popular this time, and lasted five years. Marvel did right this time, but then after the cancellation made no attempts at giving her another ongoing for nearly a decade.

The Present (And Future) of Marvel’s Heroic Women

For the past twenty years or so though, Marvel’s commitment to ongoing series with female protagonists has been spotty at best.  Oh, there have been numerous attempts to do so…characters like Elektra and Mystique have all been given ongoing series, sometimes with big name quality creators, only to flame out quickly after a couple of years. Even highly regarded series like Brian Bendis’ Alias never got incredible sales to go with their rave reviews. Similarly, Spider-Girl, an alternate universe version of Peter Parker and Mary Jane’s teenage daughter, has much critical acclaim but never could generate significant sales, and was ultimately cancelled. In a way, Marvel has had to resort to trickery to get fanboys to buy a series with a female protagonist; X-Men Legacy has essentially been a Rogue series now for years, and It probably would sell half as well were it simply just called “Rogue”.

A disturbing trend from Marvel has been taking their powered-up female heroes and having them become unhinged, as if too much power+ estrogen =disaster. While the Dark Phoenix Saga had a natural build up, by the time Marvel had "Dark Scarlet Witch" the undertones became creepy. I don't remember stuff like this happening to The Silver Surfer or Thor.

In fairness,  the past five or so years have seen Marvel give ongoing solo series to Ms. Marvel and She-Hulk again, but very rarely with their top tier creators, or given much fanfare in an effort to create buzz.  The teen girl version of Wolverine called X-23 was the most recent ongoing super heroine book to get the ax, leaving Marvel with no female lead books yet again. Marvel is pretty much in the exact same spot they were forty years ago, before their late 70’s “Girl Power” moment.

So is Marvel to blame? If you build it, and no one comes, can Marvel really even be at fault? Or have all their recent attempts been anemic and deserving of failure? Or is the ugly truth that most Marvel Fanboys are really just that sexist? The massive popularity of the X-Men titles, with their huge amount of strong female characters suggest otherwise. And the success of Wonder Woman, Batwoman, Batgirl and Catwoman as part of the “New 52” relaunch at DC shows that fanboys WILL buy female heroes if done right. Sooner or later, Marvel will hopefully launch a female centric property and it will stick, but only if they keep trying and don’t give up entirely, as they seem to have done lately.