DC just announced at Fan Expo in that they will be  a brand new version of the Justice League Of America in 2013. Geoff Johns will write, with pencils by David Finch featuring a team that consists of Green Arrow, Martian Manhunter, Catwoman, Bash (the newest Green Lantern), Vibe, Stargirl, and Katana. But don’t worry, this does not mean they are cancelling Justice League. Apparently JLA will run alongside Justice League.

Geoff Johns on the new series:

The idea of why the JLA forms, and what it is, and what it’s in reaction to… It kind of spins out of Justice League #12; what happens in that, and then subsequent issues, because JLA comes out next year some time. But the book itself is a group of heroes that aren’t necessarily coming together because they want to be together… They’ve been selected specifically. They all want, or need something that Steve Trevor, and the other person behind the scenes that’s in charge of this team can provide.

The first arc is going to deal with something they learn is called The Secret Society of Super-Villains.

Johns discussing the team selected:

The characters that are selected like Stargirl, and Vibe, and Green Arrow, they have a lot of personality. If you remember the first couple of issues of Justice League, with their larger than life personalities, and the development… This takes it to the fifteenth degree, because we’re dealing with characters that are… Like, you don’t know where Vibe is coming from. He’s recruited to the JLA by his older brother, and he says, “Why would they want me? I’m just this kid from Detroit. I’ve stopped three liquor store robberies, and one was by mistake.” His brother looks at him and says, “Maybe they see potential in you that you and I don’t see.” And he’s like, “Thanks a lot.”

So you get these weird characters that are unexpected, and they’re thrust into the forefront of Justice League of America… You’ll see why they’re selected, and why this team is going to give the real Justice League a run for its money; because the relationships in this team are going to be incredibly significant. There’s going to be a real learning curve with all the teams, but has the benefit of a true leader in Steve Trevor. Steve Trevor has a heart and soul that’s going to bring these characters that, on first glance, might not ever gel – what does Stargirl ever have in common with Catwoman? How’s that going to work?

I love characters that are more obscure. On Justice League, Shazam will be joining, and the team dynamics will be changing quite a bit on that team, but this is going to be such a great opportunity to work on characters like Katana, who I think is such a great asset, and getting deeper into characters like Vibe… Reintroducing Stargirl… Seeing the new Green Lantern with Green Arrow, and revisiting that relationship with Green Arrow and Hawkman, because we think we know it, we think they’re always at odds… And we want to turn it on its head a little bit, and delve into it more, and see what makes those two characters tick, to find out there’s something in common they both have despite their differences.

So creating dynamics between these characters, and really making it a character driven, intense, intriguing book… One of the words I have on the outline for the series is intrigue. What I mean by that is I always want you to wonder why. Why is this happening, what is their motivation, what are they after, what do they need, what do they want? I just look forward to writing a book that harkens to some of my favorite team books, and mystery books… And hopefully its something that you won’t know what to expect, and when you get it you’ll think it’s what it should be, but you never could have imagined it.

Source: MTV Geek

A fan of the Dark Knight movies? Do you think The Dark Knight Rises is actually a bad movie? Regardless you will LOVE these minimalism posters for all the villains!

I’ll admit, I got these from an IMGUR album, but some digging and I was able to track down the artist. So PLEASE make sure to check out David Ryan Anderson’s page. His other work is just as cool as these!

So, if you haven’t guessed by my bad pun who the latest addition is or by the picture above…it’s Catwoman. Check out the reveal trailer where she lets her claws out below!

Injustice: Gods Among Us release date TBA.

So, when Anne Hathaway was first cast as Selina Kyle many fans were not too happy to say the least. But since the release of The Dark Knight Returns many have begun praising her performance and it’s being said that out of the entire cast she has the best chance to receive an Oscar nomination. And to top off the list of people that loved her performance, during a fundraising event at Henry Weinstein’s home in Connecticut, President Barack Obama revealed his thoughts on the actress.

“She’s spectacular. I got a chance to see Batman, and she was the best thing in it. That’s just my personal opinion.”

The internet trolls are not happy.

Source: The Huffington Post

Christopher Nolan made it clear that he had zero intention of mentioning The Joker in The Dark Knight Rises as a sign of respect to the late Heath Ledger. While some people may not be fond of that choice, I think it was in good taste to do so. But still some people wondered “Just where was he?!” Greg Cox’s novelization of the movie may just shed some light and give you an answer. An excerpt:

Now that the Dent Act had made it all but impossible for the city’s criminals to cop an insanity plea, it (Blackgate Prison) had replaced Arkham Asylum as a preferred location for imprisoning both convicted and suspected felons. The worst of the worst were sent here, except for the Joker, who, rumor had it, was locked away as Arkham’s sole remaining inmate. Or perhaps he had escaped. Nobody was really sure. Not even Selina.

Just in case you forgot, during a segment of The Dark Knight Rises Selina Kyle was held at Blackgate Prison for a short time.

Source: Nuke The Fridge

So, you just saw The Dark Knight Rises and want to read some of the stories that influenced Nolan’s Dark Knight Trilogy? Well, we are here to help you out with that!

Year One by Frank Miller and David Mazzuchelli

A young Bruce Wayne has spent his adolescence and early adulthood, traveling the world so he could hone his body and mind into the perfect fighting and investigative machine. But now as he returns to Gotham City, he must find a way to focus his passion and bring justice to his city. Retracing Batman’s first attempts to fight injustice as a costumed vigilante, we watch as he chooses a guise of a giant bat, creates an early bond with a young Lieutenant James Gordon, inadvertently plays a role in the birth of Catwoman, and helps to bring down a corrupt political system that infests Gotham.

The Long Halloween by Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale

Taking place during Batman’s early days of crime fighting, The Long Halloween tells the story of a mysterious killer named Holiday, who murders people on holidays, one each month. Working with District Attorney Harvey Dent and Lieutenant James Gordon, Batman races against the calendar as he tries to discover who Holiday is before he claims his next victim each month, while attempting to stop the crime war between two of Gotham’s most powerful families, Maroni and Falcone. This novel also acted as a main introduction for one of Batman’s most eluding foes, The Calendar Man, who knows the true identity of the Holiday killer but refuses to share this with Batman. He instead works in riddles and leaves Batman hints from his Arkham Asylum cell. The story also ties into the events that transform Harvey Dent into Batman’s enemy, Two-Face.

Knightfall by various writers/artists

The story takes place over approximately six months. In it we see Bruce Wayne suffer from burnout and systematically assaulted and crippled by Bane. This is the story where we see Bane “break the bat” which is what he has become most known for doing. Wayne is replaced as Batman by an apprentice named Jean-Paul Valley, who becomes increasingly violent and unstable, tarnishing Batman’s reputation. Eventually, Wayne is healed through paranormal means, and reclaims his role as Batman. Knightfall resulted in long-term ramifications for the Batman mythos, as Batman’s trust from the police, the public, and fellow superheroes had to be rebuilt. Additionally, Wayne realizes the peril and burden of attempting to work in solitude, leading to the eventual creation of the modern incarnation of the Batman family. The events of Knightfall also led to the resignation of Wayne’s loyal butler, Alfred Pennyworth. We also see one element of this story in Batman Begins when they release the inmates from Arkham Asylum.

No Man’s Land by various writers/artists

The story began with a major earthquake hitting Gotham City. This was followed by the storylines “Aftershock” and then “Road to No Man’s Land” which resulted in the U.S. government officially evacuating Gotham and then abandoning and isolating those who chose to remain in the city. “No Man’s Land” covered, in detail, a period in the lives of the residents of the city, explaining all events from the time of isolation, until its time of re-opening and the beginning of rebuilding. This story influenced quite a bit of the second half of The Dark Knight Rises.

The Killing Joke by Alan Moore and Brian Bolland

The plot revolves around a largely psychological battle between Batman and his longtime foe the Joker, who has escaped fromArkham Asylum. The Joker intends to drive James Gordon, the Police Commissioner of Gotham City, insane, in order to prove that the most upstanding citizen is capable of going mad after having “one bad day.” Along the way, the Joker has flashbacks to his early life, gradually explaining his origin. Heath Ledger studied this story heavily while preparing for The Dark Knight.

The Dark Knight Returns by Frank Miller and Klaus Janson

The Dark Knight Returns is set ten years in an alternate future, with a worn and weary, aged Bruce Wayne. He numbs his conscience with alcohol to soothe the guilt he feels for his responsibility for the death of Jason Todd. Gotham City is under siege by a vicious criminal gang who call themselves the Mutants. Wayne unleashes his demons to confront the new threats to Gotham, and Batman is born again. Wayne finds himself struggling with the decline of his physique as he patrols and defends Gotham City. An inexperienced but courageous young girl named Carrie Kelly saves Batman’s life, and Wayne takes her in as a new Robin. Batman is seen now as a menace to Gotham’s society and an anti-vigilantism wave is carried on from the government.

I hope you guys enjoy reading these and finding what bits and pieces Nolan and the cast took inspiration from and even maybe just enjoying some stories you may have not read before.

So by now most of us have seen the awesomeness that is The Dark Knight Rises as well as Anne Hathaway’s brilliant portrayal of Selina Kyle. If you haven’t seen it yet then you are sorely missing out! Hathaway’s take on Catwoman is has got to be hands down the best version of the character to ever be seen on film, sorry Lee Meriwether and Michelle Pfeiffer you were both good but you weren’t the Catwoman comic fans know and love.

In an interview with Digital Spy, when asked if she would be open to returning to the character (perhaps in a solo film) Hathaway said,  “I think it would be lovely to see more of her but only if it’s with the right people,”  “She lives in this Gotham City and so it would have to be established by the people who have made this Gotham City. For me, at least.”

So what do you think, would you like to see more of Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman on the big screen? I know I would, especially if Christopher Nolan had a hand in it. There’s no way it could be worse than 2004 Halle Berry Catwoman, right?

Here it is! The most intensive breakdown and discussion of ‘The Dark Knight Rises’! Massively opinionated Batman expert Ian Kerner joins me in a heated debate on why ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ is a massively flawed masterpiece! Is it a satisfying conclusion to Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy? Does it improve on what came before? What does it mean to the future of the DC film universe? What worked amazingly well and what really, really didn’t? It’s all here so strap yourselves in for the full Geekscape ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ Breakdown!

Subscribe to the show on iTunes!

Revisit the entire journey up until ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ with this new trailer. The trailer reminds us that there really isn’t anything out there quite like Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight Saga.

The saga ends with ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ in theaters July 20th.

Looks like DC is shaking up another creative team. Starting with the zero issue of the series Ann Nocenti (‘Green Arrow’) will take over writing duties on ‘Catwoman’.

This fall, industry veteran and acclaimed writer Ann Nocenti (GREEN ARROW) will be taking over writing duties on CATWOMAN. Beginning her run with September’s issue #0, Nocenti will bring an exciting and unique twist to Gotham City’s most notorious femme fatale.

I don’t read the series myself but from what I have read…fans are not too thrilled about this news. We also have a cover for issue #13 which is drawn by Andy Clarke. There is also a rumor around that he will be replacing Guillem March but nothing has been confirmed as far as that goes. Side note: could that be The Joker’s face in the background and a possible tie-in to Snyder’s upcoming story?

Source: DC

If you’re a Batman fan of a certain age, say mid twenties to younger, chances are you pretty much hate the original Batman television series from the 1960’s starring Adam West and Burt Ward, or at least resent the show’s long lasting impact over the character of Batman. But I’m here to tell you why you shouldn’t hate it, and why in fact you should love it, if for no other reason than this: the original Batman show not only helpled save Batman in the comic book world, but it turned him into a global superstar. Aside from that alone being reason enough, there are lots of other long term contributions to the Bat-verse that came from the television series.

Of course, I’m not saying comic book fans haven’t had a lot of reason to resent the 60’s Batman television series over the years. Premiering just a few years after Stan Lee and Marvel Comics began to take comic books to the next level in terms of mature storytelling, the Batman show essentially reinforced the notion that comics were inherently silly and for five year old boys alone. The show was so hugely popular and influential, that its influence still echoes on today; almost any mainstream article in the media about comic books or comic book movies has a reference to the POW! BAM! ZAP! Sound effects of the show, some 45 years after it premiered. As a comic book fan, that annoys the hell outta me, and I look forward to the day when that lazy kind of writing finally stops. We live in a world where Watchmen is considered one of the greatest novels of the past three decades, and where Heath Ledger won an Oscar for his portrayal of the Joker, and still the show’s influence (and notions of comic books being nothing more than “kid’s stuff”) lingers on. I can see how that bugs.

But the truth is, original Batman series was always meant to be a straight up spoof of the comics, and nothing more or less than that. And it turned out to be a brilliant send up at that. In contrast, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is considered one of the pinnacle achievements in horror fiction, but no one hates on Mel Brooks’ Young Frankenstein for brilliantly spoofing it.The old Batman show never gets off that easy, because in the case of Batman, the spoof became more well known than the source material. While that can be annoying for fans of the character, all it really means is that the producers, writers and actors just did a really good job. And while the character of Batman was hurt in a lot of ways by the television show,  in the long run he benefited in just as many ways as well.

The Television Series Made Batman An Icon

Batman was an instant success when debuting in comics in 1939, this is true. But for decades, he played definite second fiddle to Superman in terms of global awareness outside of comics. While Superman debuted only a year prior to Batman in 1938, within a year Clark Kent was a global icon, and within two years he had a radio show, a series of highly expensive cartoon shorts, and a float in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade. Superman mania was something akin to Harry Potter or Twilight mania today, only bigger. Batman, on the other hand, was merely a very succesful comic book series. If you were a nine year old in 1944, chances are your mother knew who Superman was; less likely she knew who Batman was.

The debut of the Batman television show changed all that forever. Debuting in January 1966, Batman was a pop culture sensation that rivaled Beatlemania at the time. Batman aired twice a week on ABC, and the success was so enormous that a movie was shot and rushed into theaters for the summer of ’66. And then, there was the merch; the success of the show caused an avalanche of Batman related products of all sorts, shapes and sizes, rivaled only by Star Wars a decade later. By the time the show had finally burned itself out in 1968, there wasn’t a person in America who didn’t know what and who Batman and Robin were. It might have taken him twenty five years, but because of the television series Batman was finally on equal footing with Superman in recognizabilty. And he has the silly, campy show to thank for it.

The popularity of the show caused an explosion of Batman merchandise, one that lasted long past the show’s network run was over.

Editor’s note: Both of the above pictures are taken from comedian Ralph Garman’s 60s Batman memorabilia collection. Yeah. Both of them.

There are those who say the Batman television series saved the actual comic books themselves from cancellation. Batman co-creator Bob Kane even was quoted as saying that before the show debuted, DC Comics was considering cancelling Batman outright. Now this I find highly unlikely; from 1960-1965, Batman was  consistently in the top ten comic books sold in the country. While he was selling half of what Superman sold, and no where near what he sold in the 40’s, it seems highly doubtful that DC ever seriously considered trashing their second most well known character. But without a doubt, the the surge of sales caused by the success of the television show made sure that not only would Batman never be cancelled, but that Batman would always keep a prominent presence at DC Comics.

The Show Returned The Original Classic Villains To Prominence

The 1954 publication of anti comics screed Seduction of the Innocent nearly brought down the comic book industry in one giant swoop of 50’s White People Paranoia, and although DC Comics survived (many other smaller publishers did not) they did not survive unscathed. No character was more affected by this book at DC than Batman. Within a year, gone were the great, creepy villains of Batman’s 1940’s heyday; Catwoman was deemed “too sexual” for a children’s book, Two Face too scary for kids, and villains like The Penguin, Riddler and Scarecrow vanished, replaced by kooky looking aliens and mad scientists. The Joker remained as Batman’s #1 nemesis, but instead of the murderous, insane gangster clown, he was transformed into a harmless, lame prankster.

Although the televison series mocked the ultra cheesy, day glow color palette tone of the then current comics of the time, the producers wisely chose to go back to the comic book’s glory days of the 40’s for their villain roster. Around the time of the show’s debut, The Riddler was brought back for the first time since 1948 and became Batman’s (arguably) second biggest nemesis  due to his brilliant portrayal by actor Frank Gorshin. Catwoman was brought back from her twelve year exile for being too sexy (the ultimate example of “slut shaming” in comics) and other old villains like Mr. Freeze were resurrected and given new life. The televison show cemented the notion of these bad guys (particulary the “big four” of Joker, Riddler, Catwoman and Penguin) as the “A List” of Bat rogues, a concept that would carry over into the comics and stay that way from then on. Even characters that never made it onto the series were created in an attempt to get on television; Poison Ivy was created in the comics to be a sexy villainess in the Catwoman mold for the show, but the show was canned before she could ever appear.

Just for returning Catwoman from her 12 years long exile alone, fans should love the original television series.

Ever since the show made the villains as iconic as Batman, the comics themselves have never looked back. By the early 70’s, Batman returned to his grim late 1930’s roots, but the classic villains remained and have stayed around ever since. Because of the 60’s show, it is now impossible to imagine a DC Universe without them.

The TV Show Gave Us Barbara Gordon, Batgirl

Batgirl was another addition to the Batman mythology created for the television series…well, sort of. Batman artist Carmine Infantino had debated creating a new Batgirl for the comics, but wasn’t sure if his bosses would go for it, as no one at DC Editorial was too fond of the lame Batwoman character, a relic of the 1950’s. While visiting the DC Comics offices in 1966, the television series producers saw a sketch of Carmine Infantino’s take on Batgirl on his desk.  Looking for a new female character to add to the show, the producers of the show encouraged DC to go through with making this new Batgirl, pretty much just so they could use her on the television series. Although technically debuting a several months prior to her small screen arrival,  if not for the Batman show, the Barbara Gordon version of Batgirl might have just stayed a sketch on Infantino’s desk. Although Yvonne Craig’s Batgirl only appeared in the final season of Batman, because of her popularity she has remained a staple of DC Comics ever since.

The Fetishization of the Batmobile

Batman has had a Batmobile since the early 1940’s, the show certainly didn’t invent it. But George Barris’ customized 1957 Ford Futura was so iconic and central to the show, that from then on the Batmobile in the comics has become equally fetishized and made important. From the early 40’s to the early 60’s, the design of the Batmobile barely changed at all, and really wasn’t much more than “Batman’s car.” It got him from cave to crime scene, but that’s about it. But after the debut of the tv series, and the focus on the car the show had, the Batmobile in the comics has become a character unto itself, constantly changing and evolving to keep up with the times. The Batmobile has become as much a part of Batman as his utility belt or his Batarangs. And the rocket engine was definitely a creation of the old show, now carried over into most media takes on the Batmobile, from the Tim Burton movie to the Bruce Timm animated series.

The Show’s Legacy

Sine the 1989 debut of Tim Burton’s Batman movie, the campy image of Batman has lessened significantly in the popular culture. The Joel Schumacher movies of the mid 90’s tried to emulate the 60’s television series and failed miserably. You can’t be campy and be taken seriously as a narrative at the same time; the producers of the 60’s show understood this fact pretty well.

Not long ago, Batman character owners Warner Brothers finally settled a decades long dispute with Twentieth Century Fox (creators of the show) and now have the license to merchandise the hell out of the old Batman show and its characters. So coming soon, expect a second tide of 60’s Bat merchandise, with Adam West t shirts, Julie Newmar/Catwoman posters, Yvonne Craig/Batgirl Halloween costumes and who knows what else (hopefully the series itself finally comes out on DVD) With Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy finally cementing Batman as a dark and serious character to even Joe Six Pack in Boise Idaho, maybe it is time for fandom to finally embrace the old Batman show for what it was, and realize how truly significant a part of the Batman legacy it really is.

Coming Soon: The second in a series of three Batman articles from yours truly, leading up to the July debut of The Dark Knight Rises. 

Well, many people have been wondering if Nolan is going to kill Batman in the third and final film in his “Dark Knight Trilogy”. And tweets online about the movie bringing the test audiences to tears made it look that way too.

UK filmmaker Danny Allen tweeted recently: “THE DARK KNIGHT RISES has been reducing test screening audiences to tears…. if it matches the truly haunting trailer I don’t blame them.”

But now it looks like that idea has been squashed by Bale in the recent Empire. When asked about returning again he stated “My understanding is that this is the last one. I think it’s appropriate, I think it’s going out at the right time. But…if Chris came to me with a script and said, ‘You know what? There is another story’ then I would love the challenge of making a fourth one work.”

Now Bale could just be playing a game here to not reveal too much but I don’t truly see Nolan killing off Bruce.

Bale was also asked how he would feel about coming for “Dark Knight Returns” style Batman and to play the character as a much older man. He went on to say “That could be an interesting one, couldn’t it? Twenty years down the track…”.

The fire rises July 20, 2012.

 

 

The most recent trailer and TV spots have been a tad mellow…

But this one was definitely exciting. Some awesome bits of new footage too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wj9Z5Qvn_gQ

Let’s face it. Between the WB’s Birds of Prey and Halle Berry as Catwoman, DC doesn’t have the best track record for bringing its heroines to the screen.

If you’re tired of waiting for a great female superhero on film, you’re not alone. Fans Sax Carr and Marisha Ray decided they couldn’t wait anymore; they filmed their own renegade web series entitled Batgirl: Spoiled.

Ray stars as Batgirl Stephanie Brown, whose life of privilege is turned upside down over the course of a dozen 7-10 minute episodes. The series will be directed by Damian Beurer and will also star Tara Strand (Unlucky Girl), Taliesin Jaffee (Hellsing), Bridget McManus (Wanted), Tara Platt (Naruto), and Chris Smith (Mortal Kombat vs DC).

The first trailer for the web-series was released Monday on Youtube and teases appearances by Catwoman, The Riddler, Harley Quinn, The Question (Renee Montoya), Poison Ivy, Batwoman, Commissioner Gordon, and Zatanna.

Is this Batgirl the hero Gotham deserves?

You be the judge.

First we had the movie poster released this week for The Dark Knight Rises. Everyone here at Geekscape was a little underwhelmed and tried to forget about it. Then, we got the character posters which made our nerd boners rise at attention.

In the onslaught of The Dark Knight Rises media blitz this week, two new TV spots where shown during the American Idol finale. If you didn’t sit and watch, captivated by who was going to win a recording contract, you are in luck.

Here are the two TV spots showcasing Bruce Wayne trying to get back into the game and Selina Kyle, well just being Selina Kyle.

Monday saw the release of the newest poster for “The Dark Knight Rises” and it left some feeling mighty a tad underwhelmed.

Well fret not, for new character posters for Batman, Catwoman, and Bane have been released and they are mighty fine.The Catwoman ones in particular are puuuuuuuurefect.

There are two series of posters, one with each character standing in the rain with the word “Rise” behind them, the second set has the characters standing in a blizzard with “The Legend Ends” above them.

What do you think of these posters, do they feel more inspired than the last poster?

     

As an enormous comics fan of both the Marvel and DC Universes, ever since I was a child I always gravitated to the DC universe more. Even during the periods where Marvel’s output was clearly superior, I was still a DC boy at heart. And it all probably has to do with my love of female super heroes. DC has, without a doubt, the most iconic female heroes in comics. Wonder Woman is the first and longest running of course, and along with her, characters like Supergirl, Batgirl and Catwoman are all household names. Even your grandma could pick them out of a line up. Supergirl and Catwoman have carried their own series for nearly twenty years, and Batgirl, either in the wheelchair or out if it, has been a monthly feature at DC for the better part of fifteen years straight.

At least four of the female characters are household names even to non comic book fans.

Not to say that Marvel’s heroines are anything to scoff at; In fact Marvel, without question, has some of the best female heroes in comics. The X-Men titles alone have given us possibly the most well rounded and iconic heroines in comic book history with  Storm, Kitty Pryde, Rogue, Phoenix, Psylocke, Emma Frost and several more. And yet Marvel has yet to yield one single female hero to headline her own comic for any considerable length of time, while DC continues to have success with female led books. Why is there a difference? Is editorial at Marvel more sexist, or do Marvel fanboys just not want to read stories from a female perspective?

Without a doubt, the women of the X-Men titles are the most well rounded and interesting in all of mainstream comics.

 

Marvel Women: The Early Years

When Stan Lee began the Marvel universe in 1961, the only prominent female hero regularly published was DC’s Wonder Woman. Supergirl had just been created, and Batwoman was less a hero and more just a character who would pop up occasionally in Batman’s comics and try to get him to marry her. Stan Lee was the first to change all this. While not showcasing a major female super hero character in a book of her own yet, all three of the major team books of the early Marvel Universe (The Fantastic Four, The X-Men and The Avengers) had at least one prominent female character. And not just as a love interest like Gwen Stacy and Mary Jane were for Spider-Man, but as a fully fledged super heroine in their own right. In fact, the Invisible Girl, Marvel Girl and Scarlet Witch were in fact the most powerful members of their respective teams.  So right there, that’s what Stan Lee did right.

The original female Marvel mainstays mostly did a lot of frowning and fussing, despite being way more powerful than the boys, at least in theory.

But here’s Stan Lee did wrong; the women heroes, despite their power pedigree, spent much of the Silver Age fretting over the male heroes on the team. Sue Storm was usually being kidnapped by Doctor Doom or being chewed out by her boyfriend (and later hubbie) Reed Richards, or worst of all, trying to impress him with a sexy new outfit. Scarlet Witch was pretty much a harpy or a victim, complaining about how much she hated working for Magneto, or fending off the lascivious Mastermind’s marriage proposals. And Marvel Girl, despite being telekinetic and telepathic, was mostly just portrayed as the girl next door who all the boys had a crush on. She almost never was the team’s MVP, despite the fact that her power was the easily the greatest.

It is hard to fault Stan Lee here though; he wasn’t a young man when he created the Marvel Universe, and was merely a product of his sexist times. The fact that he made as many new women superheroes as he did is to totally be commended. He created the blueprint others would later improve on in a post sexual revolution world. But maybe that sexist outlook, where women characters were just there to support the men folk, seeped into the editorial culture at Marvel and has maybe never left. Although for a few years in the late 70’s, they really did try to make up for it.

The 1970’s: Women’s Lib Catches Up With Marvel

It wasn’t until the next decade, when creators other than Lee took over the writing on most Marvel titles, that the women started to emerge as strong as their power sets would imply. Under the guiding hand of people like Chris Claremont and John Byrne,  Marvel Girl became the Goddess like Phoenix. Susan Richards dropped the “girl” from her name and became the Invisible Woman, and eventually even became the team leader. Scarlet Witch’s powers were revealed to be more than just random hexes, but the ability to alter reality itself. The Wasp…well, the Wasp got lots of new costumes and got slapped around by her husband Hank Pym.  But she did get to become leader of the Avengers for awhile, so I guess that counts for something. Uhh..right?

The slap heard round the world, as Hank Pym smacks his wife Janet, AKA The Wasp. One single comic book panel neither character would ever really recover from.

But Marvel still lacked a solid marquee female character that could carry her own ongoing title. As  the 70’s continued to roll on, and  the phrase “women’s liberation” was on everyone’s lips, just where were the Marvel solo books for women heroes? DC had Wonder Woman on television, both in live action and animated form,  not to mention non comic related female heroes like The Bionic Woman and Charlie’s Angels kicking ass on the small screen. No doubt feeling the pressure, Marvel fired back with several books to counter Wonder Woman in the late 70’s, starting with an unexpected female take on their most famous hero and corporate mascot, Spider-Man.

Taking a page out of DC's playbook, Marvel unleashed three solo series for women characters, all female analogs for popular male heroes.

In 1977, Spider-Woman was unleashed onto comic book fans everywhere. She very quickly got her own ongoing comic book, and by 1979 even had her very own cartoon series on Saturday mornings. She instantly became a staple of Marvel marketing; I was a young child during this era and remember Spider-Woman being marketed on lunchboxes and toys along with Spider-Man and Captain America as if she were “one of the guys,” and always had been.  I even remember one of those “take a pic with Spidey” events at a local mall when I was four years old, where I took an awkward Sears portrait style photo along with some poor schmo dressed up as Spider-Man…and  there was a Spider-Woman there too.  What made Spider-Woman so cool was that unlike her DC counterparts Batgirl and Supergirl, she wasn’t a Xerox copy of her more famous male namesake. Her powers, her costume, her origins were all different. Aside from living in the same universe, she had no real ties to Peter Parker at all.

During the late 70's and early 80's, Marvel marketed Spider-Woman as if she were equal to her fellow male icons. And then just like that, Marvel all but erased her out of existence.

And then, almost overnight, she was gone. In 1983 her comic book series was cancelled, and worse, she lost her powers and became just Jessica Drew, Private Investigator. X-Men writer Chris Claremont liked her well enough, so she’d show up occasionally in a panel with Wolverine or something, but that was it. No one really knows why, but rumors are that then Marvel Editor in Chief at the time Jim Shooter just plain hated Spider-Woman, as he thought a female version of a male hero emasculated him. (I guess that makes Batman and Superman giant sissies then? And what about the Hulk??) There have been rumors of sexism swirling around the Shooter years at Marvel for decades now, and their treatment of Spider-Woman merely adds fuel to that fire.

A new Spider-Woman was eventually created, but she wore a costume identical to Spider-Man’s black costume and was kept around mostly as just side character in West Coast Avengers, probably just as a way for Marvel to keep the copyright. (a blink-and-you’ll-miss-her third Spider-Woman was also created in the 90’s.)  It was over twenty years later when writer Brian Michael Bendis revived the classic Spider-Woman for New Avengers and did his best to make her a Marvel mainstay again. And so far, it has worked. But despite being announced years ago now, there is still no ongoing Spider-Woman series from Marvel on the horizon.

Julia Carpenter, the replacement Spider-Woman

Another major female character to get her own title during the period was Ms. Marvel. Originally, Carol Danvers was just a female knock off of the alien warrior Captain Marvel, even wearing a sexier version of his costume (eventually as her series progressed, she got her own costume, one which she still wears to this day)  Although her own series was cancelled in 1979, she went on to join the Avengers, where she was a mainstay for quite some time.

Avengers #200 was a very controversial turning point for the character, which essentially had her brainwashed by a villain who was obsessed with her and had her impregnated, only to have her take off with him at the end, with all the other members of the team giving their blessing. This storyline has long been referred to as “The Rape of Ms. Marvel.” This story, along with the editorially mandated death of Jean Grey, gave Marvel of the early 80’s their first accusations of misogynist undertones.  Writer Chris Claremont did his best to undo the damage done to her in his X-Men title,  and made Carol Danvers a cosmically powerful character named Binary. (essentially, he pulled a Phoenix on her)  Today, Ms. Marvel is arguably more important to the Marvel Universe and more high profile than her male counterpart, so that’s gotta count for something. But despite her high profile, her own attempts at carrying a series keep getting ignored by fanboys.

The last major new female character of the era was the She-Hulk. She Hulk has the distinction of being the last major character to be created by Stan Lee for the company, and  the reasons for creating her were similar to the reasons for creating Spider-Woman; copyright. In 1979 The Incredible Hulk was a very popular tv show, and the guys at Marvel feared that the producers would create a female Hulk much like The Six Million Dollar Man gave way to The Bionic Woman. If that was the case, they wanted to make sure THEY created her first, and therefore owned the copyright free and clear.  And so at the end of 1979, She Hulk was bornLike Spider-Woman, She-Hulk’s series only lasted until 1982. But unlike Spider-Woman, after her series ended she continued to be used in comics like The Avengers, and even joined the Fantastic Four title for a while. All this added exposure in popular team titles increased her popularity with the Marvel fanbase, and when she was given a title again in 1989. (with then popular writer/artist John Byrne at the helm) The series was far more popular this time, and lasted five years. Marvel did right this time, but then after the cancellation made no attempts at giving her another ongoing for nearly a decade.

The Present (And Future) of Marvel’s Heroic Women

For the past twenty years or so though, Marvel’s commitment to ongoing series with female protagonists has been spotty at best.  Oh, there have been numerous attempts to do so…characters like Elektra and Mystique have all been given ongoing series, sometimes with big name quality creators, only to flame out quickly after a couple of years. Even highly regarded series like Brian Bendis’ Alias never got incredible sales to go with their rave reviews. Similarly, Spider-Girl, an alternate universe version of Peter Parker and Mary Jane’s teenage daughter, has much critical acclaim but never could generate significant sales, and was ultimately cancelled. In a way, Marvel has had to resort to trickery to get fanboys to buy a series with a female protagonist; X-Men Legacy has essentially been a Rogue series now for years, and It probably would sell half as well were it simply just called “Rogue”.

A disturbing trend from Marvel has been taking their powered-up female heroes and having them become unhinged, as if too much power+ estrogen =disaster. While the Dark Phoenix Saga had a natural build up, by the time Marvel had "Dark Scarlet Witch" the undertones became creepy. I don't remember stuff like this happening to The Silver Surfer or Thor.

In fairness,  the past five or so years have seen Marvel give ongoing solo series to Ms. Marvel and She-Hulk again, but very rarely with their top tier creators, or given much fanfare in an effort to create buzz.  The teen girl version of Wolverine called X-23 was the most recent ongoing super heroine book to get the ax, leaving Marvel with no female lead books yet again. Marvel is pretty much in the exact same spot they were forty years ago, before their late 70’s “Girl Power” moment.

So is Marvel to blame? If you build it, and no one comes, can Marvel really even be at fault? Or have all their recent attempts been anemic and deserving of failure? Or is the ugly truth that most Marvel Fanboys are really just that sexist? The massive popularity of the X-Men titles, with their huge amount of strong female characters suggest otherwise. And the success of Wonder Woman, Batwoman, Batgirl and Catwoman as part of the “New 52” relaunch at DC shows that fanboys WILL buy female heroes if done right. Sooner or later, Marvel will hopefully launch a female centric property and it will stick, but only if they keep trying and don’t give up entirely, as they seem to have done lately.

Back in June, I wrote a little article on DC’s reboot, and the decision made to cut the female creative force by half (from 4 to 2). At the time, I didn’t give any predictions on how that might affect the female characters or readership. I didn’t speculate because I try to be optimistic about my fandom, despite evidence to the contrary. The only negative comments I made were about the art, because–at the time–that was all I could comment on. I know Amanda Connor and Nicola Scott are talented artists and we all know Rob Liefeld is not. Art is consistent. Stories, on the other hand, can be hit or miss, be it because the creative well has run dry or the characters don’t speak to the writer anymore. For example, I hate Judd Winick’s Green Arrow, I could take or leave his Outsiders run, but I will defend his arcs on Batman to the death. I loved Devin Grayson’s Arsenal miniseries, but after the twentieth tragic event in her Nightwing run, I got bored and moved on.

Additionally, I didn’t want to wage some gender war by saying that men cannot write women (or vice versa). Obviously, that’s just not true as most of these characters were created by men. Bob Kane created Catwoman, Paul Dini and Bruce Timm created Harley Quinn, Marv Wolfman and George Perez created Starfire, John Ostrander, Len Wein and John Byrne created Amanda Waller. I am grateful for these characters and creators because I know many of them are apart of me and helped make me into the woman I am today. My beef, regarding the state of women in the DCnU, is not with men. It is with creators who write without knowing their characters, who write without thinking how it will affect their readership, let alone the world they have created. My beef is with people who just don’t think.

From Catwoman T&A to free love aliens, a lot of the damage has been discussed here and elsewhere, but there is still much to explore (not all of it bad). Really, I’m not the kind of person that looks to hate something. I genuinely want to like and enjoy things. But there are times where I just have to look at something and ask, “Why?” Are the creators purposefully trying to perpetuate the misogynistic and anti-feminist dialogue in comics, or do some of the creators just not see? It’s hard to guess and I’ve never been fond of assuming. So let’s talk about the DC relaunch and what it did and didn’t do for me, as a comic book fan and as a woman.

Let’s begin with Starfire. She’s the one we were all up in arms about, after all. Allow me to start by saying that I have never been a fan of Starfire. Be it because she amplified some insecurity I had about myself (I got deep into comics at age eleven. Who has a strong sense of self at eleven?), hit a mark on my extra-terretial xenophobia (she’s an alien! Aliens were always bad growing up, except for E.T.) or because I was a Babs/Dick shipper to the core (thank you, Batman: The New Animated Series!). The thing was, even if I didn’t like her, she was still a hero with the best intentions. She loved life, she loved earth, she loved being a hero, she loved. To be capable of such love in general, and in spite of her abusive past in particular, was amazing. Her love for humanity is what made her such a great hero, in addition to her power. It’s what made her so special, so singular, so interesting. A character who represented all the positive sides of emotion. Often in comics we focus on the negative aspects of emotion: the angst, the hate, the vengeance (yes, I’m looking at you, Bruce!). It was refreshing to have a character who reminded us that it’s good to feel. Emotions can be positive.

The new Starfire does not love. She is incapable of it, in fact. She has no interest in earth or earthlings and our silly lives. She has no memory of her friendships and previous relationship with Dick Grayson. Why, then, is she here? Why and how is she a hero? How can anyone who loved Starfire before, be bothered to care now? This is not Starfire. This is a doll, a void, a husk. Aside from some early deus ex machina (that almost any super powered hero could have pulled off), the pages that Starfire graces are a waste of ink. She brings nothing to the team, fan-service and cheesecake aside.

In my previous review of Suicide Squad, I mentioned my dissatisfaction with the new Harley Quinn. Harley was one of my favorite characters as a kid, rivaling my Catwoman as my favorite 90s/early millennia comic character (she lost out because her obsession with the Joker didn’t seem healthy, even to my pre-teen self). But she’s not the only problem I have in Squad. My other issue is Amanda Waller, The Wall: Where is she?

I want to know how DC is going to explain away two-thirds of her. Did she have a heart attack? Did her doctor warn her about something? Seriously, how can a historically large character suddenly become 120lbs? Who’s decision was that and why? There aren’t a lot of hefty characters in comics, let alone large women, so if comics are supposed to have “relatable” characters, why do that? Amanda is a widowed mother (two of her children having been murdered, with her husband) who works a sedentary, time consuming, stressful, government job. When did she find time to hit the gym?  Does DC think her deflation in size is going to suddenly urge some readers to go to the gym, or is it more likely to make someone feel ostracized? There are enough thin, stacked female leads that I find it interesting (if not offensive) that the relaunch gave someone the agency to replace The Wall with Zoe Saldana (no offense to Zoe Saldana, she’s lovely. She’s just no Amanda Waller). Next to Starfire’s heroic nonchalance, this is something I must have explained to me.

The Birds of Prey return, with only one original bird and minimal fun. The new Starling is essentially Huntress-light (hard hitter with a case of Catholic guilt) and Black Canary is all business with no time for fun. Part of the greatness of Birds was that the women were like a family. To be in the Birds of Prey was to be a part of one of the coolest, most close-knit bowling leagues ever. Now, it looks to be just another day at the office, with strained friendships and forced partnerships. It’s hard to say how the relationships with the women will change over the course of the book, but if the female characters can’t even be friends and like and/or respect each other, how can I, as a reader, be expected to be a fan?

But not all DC women were thrown under the bus in the relaunch! While I agree fully with Eric Diaz’s article regarding the unoriginal announcement that Zeus is now Wonder Woman’s father, the first issue was great. The gods are once again relevant in our world, making her relevant. Her personality has not been this solid and clear since … never. Wonder Woman was a character whose book I bought because I wanted to like it, but always failed to fully enjoy it. As the Holy Spirit in DC’s Trinity, I was ever confused and lost in the mucky muck that was her story. Her history and personality always came off as convoluted. A shame, since I studied classics in college and am all about empowered, interesting women (obviously). But now, it looks like it’s a new dawn, it’s a new day, it’s a new life for Diana and (wait for it) it feels good. She’s a warrior, in the truest sense. Dutiful, but kind. Stoic, yet compassionate. She cares for those she has sworn to protect in exactly the way the new Starfire does not.

Also, take note regarding Wonder Woman: she, like Starfire, is naked in a couple of panels of her comic. However, it doesn’t make you, as the reader, feel awkward, because it’s realistic. She’s not flaunting her nakedness around so young children can send picture texts to their buddies or post it on some celebrity blog out there. She’s naked, because it made sense for her to be so. Diana is a true Wonder Woman, both strength and beauty incarnate. She stands on her own without the baggage of fanservice and cheesecake. It’s amazing.

Batwoman continues to be brave, bold and beautiful (I seriously cannot get enough of J. H. Williams III’s art) and Batgirl as a hero dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder is inspired. Not to suggest I don’t love Oracle and was against Babs’ return to the cape when it was announced, it is still a topic that is scarcely discusses in comics and one some readers need. I’d prefer if it was another character–male or female–because the chair and Oracle are important, but I don’t know who else could address it like Gail Simone. This seems typical of Barbara Gordon. I love her previous incarnation, but am just as grateful–if not more so–for her latest version. It’s impressive.

My favorite character, The Huntress, also made her debut last week in a shiny new miniseries, and I must say, I approve. She’s a little softer (that is, she didn’t maim any thugs out right) than the pre-boot Bertinelli, but she’s still kicking ass, sporting the crossbow and donning purple. I’ll have a more comprehensive review of THE HUNTRESS #1 up soon, so look out!

I’m still on the fence about Supergirl, and fan-service and some fan-fiction-esque elements aside, I really didn’t have much of a problem with Catwoman. Also, it’s hard to talk about any character in particular in the larger (> 5 hero) team books, so I’m holding my tongue until the first arcs pan out, making this not as extensive as it could be. Obviously there are some wonderful female characters who are still rock solid. Nevertheless, there are some definite changes that I am curious about and request an explanation for the changes.

Comics have a reputation for being sexist, anti-feminist and sometimes even misogynist, but that doesn’t have to be the case.I have read several articles over the month regarding these issues, and even most–if not all–of the creators agree that these exist. So what’s it going to take before they (and we as fans) start developing a solution? Perhaps some who recognize its existence don’t view it as a problem (which is an issue I’d like to address in a different article). But what about those who do see the error in their ways, but do nothing to fix it? Here, I am pin pointing a few of the core issues in the reboot and asking the simple question, “Why?” Once we can understand each other, we can get the dialogue started.

(**I also want to note that female characters weren’t the only ones affected by the reboot. The way the Savant character in the Suicide Squad acted was a big punch in my Birds of Prey loving gut. His presence–if that is my beloved Brian Durlin–was just pointless and unnecessary. A ‘fridging if I ever saw one.)