The new trailer has just dropped for The Dark Knight Rises and wow…it’s awesome!

The Dark Knight Rises starring Christian Bale, Tom Hardy, Anne Hathaway and Michael Caine opens in the US July 20th 2012.

Oh boy… as reported by Deadline Hollywood, Warner Brothers has selected Journey 2 director Brad Peyton as the director of the feature adaptation of DC Comics’ “Lobo”. You know, that foul-talking, ultra-violent bounty hunter… who may now possibly ride a giant bee instead of a space cycle.

This is the first we’ve heard of the feature Lobo project in a while. In 2009, WB announced that Guy Ritchie would be the director (which would have been awesome). Before that, there was a Superman VS Lobo script circulating the studio but Superman ended up being rebooted by Brian Singer (and will now be rebooted again by Zack Snyder). Peyton will also be re-writing the current draft of the script.

What do you guys think? Good news? Bad news? Do you think we’ll actually see the crazy bastich on film this time?

 

According to almost always reliable news source Bleeding Cool, next summer DC Comics is  ushering in an event known as “Trinity War,” which seemingly points to a big fight between Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman, AKA “The Trinity” in DC lingo. It is also possible the series is about those three versus everyone else in the DCU, but I’d think having them fight each other would create a lot more publicity and sales drama. No creative team has been rumored yet, much less announced.

You ask me, this whole thing sounds like a pretty blatant rip off of Marvel’s Civil War and Avengers Vs. X-Men. Fanboys love to see their favorite heroes come to blows with each other, it is nothing new. DC’s who New 52 initiative seems to be a giant riff on Marvel’s approach as it is, and this is no exception.

The sad thing is, I’d be way more excited if this was the pre-New 52 Trinity doing the fighting. In the old DCU, those three had a ton of history between them; Superman and Batman couldn’t stand each other at first, only to years later become close allies. Wonder Woman has had major disagreements with both of the guys, especially when she chose to cross the line to kill, something Clark and Bruce would never do. For those three characters with their long history and friendship having to fight one another, now that could be for an interesting story. But in the new 52 universe, we have almost no idea what these character’s  relationships are to each other. They seem to be co workers who barely know one another, as much of their history has been erased (especially Superman and Wonder Woman’s) This might just be a big fight between corporate icons, and therefore a lot less interesting.

Of all the 80’s toy properties that have had huge revivals in the past decade, like Transformers and GI Joe,  one of the biggest that didn’t get too far in recent times is Mattel’s billion dollar juggernaut Masters of the Universe. There was a 2002-2003 toyline and animated series revival that didn’t really take off like Mattel wanted,  and a big budget movie was planned and later scrapped. Since then (aside from a retro toy line made for adult collectors) there hasn’t been so much as a peep coming from Eternia.

But that’s changing this July, as DC Comics is bringing back He-Man and the Masters of the Universe in the form of a six issue comic book mini series. Writing the book will be longtime comic book veteran James Robinson (Starman, JSA, the upcoming Earth 2) and artist Phillip Tan, best known for his work on Batman and Robin. According to MTV, the premise of the series has Skeletor,  “the skull faced arch-enemy of He-Man has figured out a way to rewrite the reality of Eternia, casting himself as the ruler of Castle Grayskull, and our heroes – including He-Man – as regular peasants with no memory of their previous life. And while simple woodsman Adam may dream of wielding a massive sword, and fighting in battles, he thinks they’re just dreams. That is, until a mysterious sorceress approaches him, and sends him on an epic journey to save all of Eternia.”  

Our first image of the new Phillip Tan-ized He-Man coming this summer from DC.

According to Robinson, he wants to de-cheese the Masters storyline and make it grittier, which will be tough when you have characters named He-Man, Meckaneck and Ram-Man as your leads. As a kid, I was obsessed with all things He-Man and She-Ra, from the ages of about 7 to 12. I had every damn toy and watched the show religiously. Of the many things I was obsessed with as a child, like Star Wars, the DC and Marvel heroes and Star Trek, I was into He-Man the most, and ironically, it is the property I care about the least now as an adult. Once I was old enough to realize the entire mythology was merely created just to sell me toys and the stories were all secondary, I just stopped giving a shit. Still, I have a bit of a soft spot for those old toys, as they were pretty bad ass. Maybe the nostalgia factor alone might be enough to at least get me to check it out. And I’m totally in if he fights Superman again.

My first exposure to He-Man, a good year before his cartoon hit the air, was this 1982 DC Comics Presents issue where he met Superman. Now He-Man has come full circle and is back at DC Comics again, some thirty years later.

The next DC Comics superhero to join Cartoon Network’s DC Comics-based DC Nation block will be: the Dark Knight. It’s been too long without a “Batman” presence on television. Anyway, “Beware the Batman” will be a CGI show and feature obscure or relatively new rogues such as Anarky, Professor Pyg, Magpie and Mister Toad. Besides the villains, “Beware the Batman” will put sword-wielding DC Comics heroine Katana in the role of Batman’s sidekick, having previously appeared in the great “Batman: The Brave and the Bold.” Created by Mike W. Barr and Jim Aparo, the sword-wielding Tatsu Yamashiro has a comic book history with Batman that goes all the way back to the beloved 1980s series The Outsiders, and recently joined the Gotham-based Birds of Prey as part of DC’s New 52 initiative. In addition to Katana, Batman will also have his gun-toting ex-secret agent/butler Alfred on hand to assist him. “Beware the Batman” wasn’t expected to hit airwaves until 2013, but the show will now hit Cartoon Network later this year at an unknown date, possibly in time for “The Dark Knight Rises” or quite possibly after, maybe?

Many comics fans know Scott Shaw! (yes, the exclamation point is part of his name) as the iconic artist for “Captain Carrot and His Amazing Zoo Crew” from DC Comics.  Animation fans know him as the producer of Saturday Morning’s “Camp Candy” and “The Completely Mental Adventures of Ed Grimley.”  Breakfast Cereal fans know him as the long-standing art director for the advertising for Post Cereals Fruity Pebbles and Coco Pebbles cereals.

Scott Shaw! is also the world-renowned expert on Oddball Comics.  For years, Scott collected and blogged about the weirdest of the weird in comics.  He also brought his Oddball Comics collection to comic cons all over the country and presented slide shows of the most amazingly bizarre comics in history to the delight of audiences!

If you’re a Southern California Resident, you’re in luck.   Starting April 7 and through the Month of May, every Saturday at 8PM, Scott is showing off his Oddball Comics, complete with his own wry and hilarious insight on the wackiness of the comics in a theater in Hollywood.

The Oh My Ribs Theater (Hey, I didn’t name it) in Hollywood is hosting Scott’s show every Saturday at 8PM.  If you like comics, if you dig comedy, if you aren’t opposed to laughing, check out the show.  Tickets are available at the theater’s website.  Buy your tickets HERE!

(Scott Shaw can also be heard on Geekscape’s own FANDOM PLANET podcast that you can listen to on iTunes)

I’ve been a huge Wonder Woman fan for almost my entire life, since back in the days of Super Friends on Saturday mornings and Lynda Carter spinning around in a giant flash of light. When DC rebooted the character the first time with artist George Perez back in 1986, I bough that very first issue and have bought every issue since then. That particular run on the book solidified her as my all time favorite super hero.  Some runs after that were great, some really sucked, but I always kept on buying, due to my intense love of the character and what she represents.  But due to what transpired in this week’s issue of Wonder Woman (Volume 4, issue #7) I’m doing what I once thought unthinkable to me. I’m dropping my monthly buying of Wonder Woman all together. Issue #7 was the last straw…I quit.

While it was the old Super Friends cartoons and the Lynda Carter television series that made me love the character, it was George Perez' reboot in the 80's that made me a hard core fan. And I've always been a loyal reader, till now.

I’ll admit, this has been coming. The revelation late last year that Wonder Woman was not the product of a mystical asexual birth but was in fact the daughter of Zeus really irked me, as I felt the subtext of that went against original Wonder Woman creator William Marston’s intent for Diana to have a purely female based power source. Whether or not the notion of giving Wonder Woman a father in the traditional sense is being non feminist or not could legitimately be debated, and although it is not a character change I could agree on, I could see the point some fans would have that this revelation didn’t fundamentally change her character. But I don’t see how anyone can see what was revealed in the latest issue of Wonder Woman as anything but blatantly misogynist. This isn’t just ugly subtext anymore, this is just ugly text, period.

So SPOILERS for the last issue of Wonder Woman, for those sensitive to such things.

In Wonder Woman issue 7, it was revealed by the god Hephaestus that the Amazons replenish their race by leaving their isolated home of Paradise Island three times a century, appearing on ships at sea as sirens in the night, and have a night of carnal fun with the men on board…after which they brutally murder said men. Then, returning home to Paradise Island, those Amazons who got pregnant keep their female children to raise as Amazons, and deliver their unwanted male children to the God Hephasteus to serve as his slaves in exchange for weapons.

In short, the Amazon race, as depicted in DC Comics for more than seventy years, meant by creator Willam Marston to represent the best of what humanity can achieve, are now a race of murderers and child slave traders. They’re monsters, plain and simple. This is akin to DC coming out now and saying that Thomas and Martha Wayne were secretly drug dealers, and their deaths were a retaliation hit, or that Pa Kent molested young Clark. Of course, DC would never dare do something like this to their two biggest cultural icons. No, only their cultural icon that happens to be a woman can have her entire heritage pissed on all over like this. Writer Brian Azzarello has stated since the begining of his run that his take on Wonder Woman is a “horror book” and not a super hero book. Judging from this latest reveal, it is only a horror book for actual fans of the character.

Images from Wonder Woman issue 7, showcasing the new brutal Amazon mating practices.

Of course, some fanboys have already risen to this loathsome development’s defense online. “Isn’t this keeping in line with the Amazons of ancient Greek mythology?” That’s one I response I keep reading.  Well yes, it is. In actual Greek myths, the Amazons mated with men once a year, kept the female children and raised them as Amazons, while the male children were outright killed at birth or left exposed in the wild to die. They also cut off one breast, as to make archery easier.  So yes, that is the actual myth the ancient Greeks had about the Amazons.

But what Wonder Woman’s creator William Marston did when he created his Amazons in 1941 was to turn that whole mythology on its head. You see, while the Ancient Greeks had a lot of virtues (they gave us democracy, the Olympics, and were pretty cool with homosexuality long before any other cultures were) they were deeply misogynist. One could interpret their myths of what the Amazons were as based in the fear that a Greek male dominated society would have had of strong women. In fact, that’s the angle Dr. Marston took when he created his Amazons in the early 40’s; what he did was take that old myth and show it as false. His Amazons were actually an advanced and peaceable people, and the old myth perpetuated by the ancient Greeks was nothing more than woman hating slander. And clearly, they kept both breasts. If the whole “one breast” thing was a lie, what else was could be a lie?

The original 1940's version of the Amazons, as created by Dr. William Marston.

And it has been that version of the Amazons that has been part of the DC Universe for all these decades. Oh, the face of it might change. Sometimes DC’s Amazons have had advanced technology; in other iterations their technology never progressed beyond the Bronze Age. Sometimes Wonder Woman’s mother Queen Hippolyta is a blonde, other times she’s a brunette. Sometimes the Amazons have been represented as being more fearful of mankind, and sometimes they’ve been shown to be more open. But they were always depicted as noble warriors, who believed in peace above all else. These are the ideals that they instilled in a young Diana, who set forth on to our world as Wonder Woman to spread those ideals to the rest of the world. And those ideals mean nothing if they come from who a race who believes in the cold blooded murder of innocents and child slavery.

In a very sad way though, what DC has done with their most recent revelations is eerily fitting for the times we live in. The timing for this reveal by DC couldn’t be more shitty, or more timely, depending on how one looks at it. Women’s rights in this country have never been more under attack then they are now, at least during my lifetime. A woman advocating reproductive rights is called a “slut” and a “prostitute” in the media, and in Arizona a bill was passed that says a doctor can’t be sued for keeping crucial information about a woman’s pregnancy from that woman if he fears she might be a candidate to get an abortion.  (so much for that whole Hippocratic Oath business) Anti-woman views are creeping back into our culture at an alarmingly rapid rate, so Azzarello’s Wonder Woman might just be the accurate Wonder Woman for our times after all, although in a truly horrible way.

If this is the Wonder Woman meant to represent our times, she has a lot to not smile about.

I actually don’t really blame current Wonder Woman writer Brian Azzarello in this instance. Simply speaking, he’s not really a Wonder Woman fan at all. He has said as much during interviews. He’s an excellent writer and storyteller, and he certainly knows his Greek mythology.  In fact, his spin on Greek myths has been one of the more fun aspects of his run on Wonder Woman so far. I gave the first issue of his Wonder Woman run a pretty glowing review here on this site in fact. But it is pretty clear since that first issue that he doesn’t care for the actual character of Wonder Woman very much, to the point where in order for him to write her, he has had to change her entire world from top to bottom.   While the whole “New 52” reboot has resulted in more or less just cosmetic changes for DC’s main icons, it is pretty clear now that everything about Wonder Woman is fundamentally different.  The Wonder Woman I have known and loved my whole life effectively doesn’t exist at DC Comics anymore…it just took this particular issue to hammer the point home for me.

No, I don’t blame Azzarello. He might have had the idea, but his bosses had to approve it. No, I blame DC Comics. More to the point, I blame Dan Didio, Geoff Johns and Jim Lee, or whoever it was that gave the OK for this decision. They clearly have no respect for the character, or her position as a cultural icon. Wonder Woman has, since day one, been a representation in our popular culture for ideals of peace, fairness and equality. But now we know that that her heritage is tainted, because it represents not equality for women, but an all out hatred of men. Because, isn’t that what strong women really all feel? Hatred of men? Because that’s what this is telling me: The empowerment of women MUST equal the disempowerment of men.  Wonder Woman now represents a culture that is Rush Limbaugh’s idea of what feminism is. Whoever it was at DC that gave their stamp of approval to this should be ashamed of themselves. I  really don’t mean that lightly. DC SHOULD BE DEEPLY ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES.

It is hard for me to be angry about this anymore. No, I’m just bummed. Bummed that the only version of the Amazons for any new reader to read about (especially any new female reader) right now are these. This being comics of course, I realize that all hope is not lost forever. After all, in 1968 DC gave us the “All New Wonder Woman,” where they got rid of her powers, her ties to Paradise Island, her costume, and gave her a male mentor figure. Oh, and a new job, not working for the military, but owning a boutique of all things. Even the writer who came up with this idea, Denny O’Neil, realizes now what a horrible idea that was and how far back it set the character. Four years later, the real Wonder Woman returned, so maybe one day I’ll get my Wonder Woman back. But I’m not holding my breath.  Until then, I have my back issues and my memories, and that’ll have to be good enough.

The CW has released their first pic of Green Arrow actor Stephen Amell in costume from the pilot for Arrow via Deadline.com. And, unlike this time last year when Wonder Woman’s look from her doomed pilot was released, I don’t think anyone will be complaining this time about the costume. It looks pretty spot on, even if it is only from an angle. The suit was designed by Oscar-winning costume designer and frequent Tim Burton collaborator Colleen Atwood, so I’d hope it would look decent, as opposed to Wonder Woman’s outfit, which was designed at Party City.

The official synopsis for the series goes like this: “Billionaire playboy Oliver Queen (Amell) who, after being marooned for five years on a remote island, returns with a mysterious agenda and a lethal set of new skills that he uses in a war on crime.” That too, sounds about right. Maybe this series won’t suck? Or is that hoping for too much?

Now, lets hope they don’t screw up Black Canary when she shows up.

Despite Hollywood and the video game industry trying to steal the spotlight as per usual at one of these large comic book conventions, WonderCon, much more so than Comic Con in San Diego, is still very much comic book centric. And thus, there was a nice amount of comic book announcements this weekend that might have gotten lost in the flurry of excitement over other media if this were San Diego, with Marvel taking adavantage of the Con more than any other publisher to make a few big announcements this time. So let’s get to Marvel’s news first:

Girl Power Returns To Marvel!

Why, it just seems like yesterday I was bitching about the fact that Marvel has been neglecting their female heroes and letting them languish without titles of their own. It appears that they are aware of this little fact themselves, and made a few announcements of upcoming projects that are attempting to please Marvel’s female hero fans.

Ms. Marvel No More; Say Hello To The New Captain Marvel

Carol Danvers is ditching the bathing suit and thigh high boots and getting a haircut, as she becomes the official bearer of the title Captain Marvel, in a new ongoing series debuting this July. Not only that, but the writer of said title will actually be a woman for a change. Writer Kelly Sue DeConnick (Osborn) and artist Dexter Soy (Army of Two) are the creative team, with initial covers being done Ed McGuinness. The new ongoing series is said to at least in part spin out of Carol Danvers’s role in the upcoming Avengers vs. X-Men. The new Captain Marvel series is said to focus on Carol’s “Chuck Yeager” like civilian life as a pilot, and her other life as an A-List Marvel super hero. Writer DeConnick also dropped the hint that we’d be seeing Mystique in the book as well (Mystique made her first appearance in a 70’s issue of Ms. Marvel, not Uncanny X-Men as most might assume) As for me, I’m just happy she’s keeping the sash.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I present the new Captain Marvel.

And Carol Danvers isn’t the only neglected female hero at Marvel getting a chance to hog the spotlight once more; At WonderCon Marvel released the first official info for X-Treme X-Men, a new ongoing series coming this July from writer Greg Pak, spinning out of a recent storyline in Astonishing X-Men. Although the series will focus on a motley crew of alternate universe versions of popular X-Men characters, like a fifty year old cowboy Wolverine or a ten year old Nightcrawler, the main focus will be on “our” world’s version of Allison Blaire, the former disco dancing mutant known as Dazzler.

What do you mean, "dead as Disco?" F**k you. I'm BACK bitches.

Writer Greg Pak had this to say about his new leading lady – “DAZZLER! It’s kind of hard for me to contain how much I AM IN LOVE WITH THIS CHARACTER. As soon as I started writing her, all the lights went on (pun intended). She’s wry and funny and tough and vulnerable and the Marvel Universe’s greatest showbiz surviver turned superhero and SHE WILL SAVE THE WORLD WITH ROCK AND ROLL.

Hmm. I think the last part of that sentence should be “save the world with Disco” not Rock and Roll, but the fact that he’s giving Miss Blaire a spotlight after so long means I’m giving the man a pass. Don’t let me down Pak.

A steampunk Emma Frost, a cowboy Wolverine and a ten year old Nightcrawler are among the stars of X-Treme X-Men, which is set to center on the regular Marvel Universe's Dazzler as the lead.

Marvel’s Thunderbolts Becomes The Dark Avengers

The long running title Thunderbolts is getting a title change, and this summer officially becomes Dark Avengers. Strangely enough, Marvel has decided to keep the numbering of the old Thunderbolts comics, so instead of Dark Avengers #1, we are getting issue #175 instead. Since first appearing in 1997, the Thunderbolts have been a team of former villains working towards redemption, with the most recent iteration being led by Luke Cage. Luke Cage will be staying on when the title becomes Dark Avengers, but it looks like he’ll be joined by Skaar (Son of Hulk), Ragnarok (the clone Thor) and Dark Spider-Man and Dark Scarlet Witch (they really need to find new names for those last two) Conveniently, all are counterparts to more famous Marvel heroes; it seems this change in title and line up has to do more with marketing and branding than anything else. On the plus side, the creative team of writer Jeff Parker and artists Kev Walker and Declan Shalvey are all remaining, so that should keep at least some of the purist Thunderbolts fans happy.

The Thunderbolts fall prey to the gods of corporate branding, and become the Dark Avengers.

Brian Wood Becomes Writer for X-Men AND Ultimate X-Men

X-Men, The book most often referred to as “adjective-less X-Men,” will be getting a new writer in June with issue #30, when DMZ creator Brian Wood joins the book. Aside from a few cast changes (Warpath is being replaced by Pixie, and Jubilee is out) what makes this X-Men line up most interesting is that for once, instead of a token female on the team, there is but one token male instead in the form of Colossus. The rest of the team will be made up of Storm, Psylocke, Pixie, and Domino. The notion of this book being Utopia’s “security team” will remain, although writer Wood said the shift will be to more grounded threats than before, including a proto-race of mutants never seen before in the Marvel universe.

The cover to the newly revamped X-Wom--uh, X-Men #30.

Also in June, Brian Wood takes over Ultimate X-Men as well. The Ultimate universe version of mutuant plight is significantly worse than the regular Marvel Universe at the moment, with mutants being rounded up and imprisoned and sometimes killed. Front and center to all of this drama will be Kitty Pryde, although which other mutants will remain on the book is still being kept under wraps at the moment. Most interestingly, Wood becoming the writer of Ultimate X-Men and regular X-Men makes him the first writer to tackle both universe’s versions of the team at the same time since Ultimate Marvel began back in 2000.

Ultimate Kitty Pryde longs for the days when her main problems were whether Peter Parker liked her or Mary Jane better, and not trying to evade government capture and experimentation.

DC Takes A Back Seat To Marvel At This Year’s Con, But Still Manages A Few Surprises

Despite having several panels at the convention, there wasn’t any huge news coming out of WonderCon from DC this year. A Before Watchmen panel was had, but it was mostly DC editorial regurgitating information we already knew and trying to defend the whole project to skeptical fans. Jim Lee’s take on Nite Owl was shown (he’s just doing a cover, not interiors) and while very pretty, just feels wrong to the whole Watchmen aesthetic. I dunno, I don’t think I’m ever gonna get behind this one, no matter what line DC tries to sell me on this. But I’m aware a lot of you out there feel differently, so for all of you guys out there who want this, I sure hope it doesn’t disappoint.

DC Nation on Cartoon Network however was a whole different story from DC Comics, at least  in terms of showcasing new stuff for the fanbase at their panel. A trailer for season two of Young Justice was shown, and confirmed by producers as joining the team were Blue Beetle (the teen Jaimie Reyes version) and Lagoon Boy. Don’t know Lagoon Boy? Neither did half the audience, so don’t feel bad. Season two will carry the subtitle “Invasion,” and producers Greg Weisman said we’d be seeing a lot more outer space action this year, as well as visits from classic DC characters like Lobo and Adam Strange.

Also previewed was the first season of Green Lantern: The Animated Series. Clips were shown showcasing the Thanagarians, Star Sapphires and even Saint Walker, the Blue Lantern, all of whom are showing up in season one. Not shown yet, but heavily hinted at in the panel, was the eventual appearance of Sinestro and his Corps. Producers didn’t rule out an adaptation of Blackest Night somewhere down the road either. Also all but confirmed as appearing are Green Lanterns Kyle Rayner and Guy Gardner, which made many fans pretty happy.

The highlight of the DC Nation panel though had to be the premiere of several shorts  focusing on various oddball characters of the DC Universe. Included among these shorts was The Doom Patrol, Animal Man, and confirmed as coming soon would be forgotten 80’s gems like Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld, Sword of the Atom, and even the much loathed Puerto Rican breakdancer character from the JLA known as Vibe is getting his own short. Most of these shorts were played for laughs, so I wouldn’t worry about a new “serious take” on Vibe coming from DC Comics any time soon. If proven successful, season two would include an all pet version of the Justice League, and even Starro the Conqueror. Yeah, you read right…the giant alien starfish.

But the highlight was the premier of the first on several 75 second shorts from producer Lauren Faust’s Super Best Friends Forever, a series featuring hyper stylized Powerpuff-esque versions of Supergirl, Batgirl and Wonder Girl.  Faust, creator of My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic explained her take on these DC Icons; “I really wanted to put a super-spin on being a teenage girl; Supergirl has all the same powers as Superman, and Superman gets all the credit, Batgirl is a superhero fan who has action figures of supervillains in her bedroom, and Wonder Girl as an isolated Amazon who doesn’t understand the world of men.”  All I know is I want Super BFF products like…now. Please get on that Warner Brothers…do it just for me.

Attention "Bronies"- My Little Pony creator Lauren Faust has all new creepy masturbation material for you in the form of Super Best Friends Forever.

A tradition these past few years at Comic Con International, be it at San Diego or at Wonder Con, has been the world premiere of the latest DC Universe original animated straight to DVD movie. I’ve had the privilege of seeing the world premiers of Batman: Under the Red Hood and Batman:  Year One at San Diego Cons in years prior, and at last year’s Wonder Con I saw the debut of Green Lantern: Emerald Knights. This year I was lucky enough to be in the crowd for the debut of DC’s latest, Superman Vs. The Elite.

Superman Vs. The Elite is based on a story by Joe Kelly and Doug Mahnke that ran in Action Comcs #775 back in 2001, originally titled “What’s So Funny About Truth, Justice, and the American Way?” Writer Kelly was brought in to do a re-do of his own original comic book script for the movie, which works for and against the film in various ways, but I’ll get to that later.

The cover to Action Comics #775, where the original story for this movie was based on first appeared.

Like the original comic book story, the animated film centers around the debut of The Elite, a team of super-powered “heroes” led by Manchester Black, a British telekenitic/telepath who is seemingly all of the members of the Sex Pistols wrapped into one person. Along with his team of equally super powerful sociopaths (all of whom are all thinly veiled analogs for the Wildstorm comics super team “The Authority”)  he gains nationwide popularity for playing judge, jury and executioner to his enemies, usually on national television.

Although appearing to be friendly towards Superman at first, the Elite show their true colors as they go out of their way to show the world how they are willing to kill their foes, instead of merely apprehending them and turning them over to the authorities. Superman’s methods seem even more quaint and old fashioned in this new world, as everyone relishes their newer, hipper “protectors.” Although this story was written and published in a pre-9-11/War on Terror world, ten years later it feels like a giant indictment of the fascist “ends justify the means” attitude that prevailed (and still does) over this country for the past decade.

The Elite, from Left to Right-Coldcast, Manchester Black, Hat and Menagerie

The Good

There’s a lot to admire about this movie; for starters, the original comic book story it is based on is easily one of the best Superman stories of the past decade,  so the producers had a lot of good material to draw from. More than any other story I can think of, this story reminds the audience why the principals Superman stands for will never go out of fashion, and are things we should all aspire to in our everyday lives. There is a scene in the movie, where the smug and sarcastic Manchester Black accuses Superman of living in an unrealistic dream world, while he and his team live in “reality.” Superman responds with this- “Dreams save us. Dreams lift us up and transform us. And on my soul, I swear… until my dream of a world where dignity, honor and justice becomes the reality we all share — I’ll never stop fighting.” Many in the audience applauded, and I even got a little bit teary eyed. When it came to representing just what it is that Superman stands for, I have to say that writer Joe Kelly and director Michael Chang really nailed that aspect of this story.

The voice acting was  also uniformly good throughout, with George Newbern (who played Superman in the Justice League animated series) reprising the role. Newbern is great at giving the Super speeches without sounding cheesy or stilted, which isn’t always easy to pull off. I have to say though, I found it odd that the producers of these animated movies chose this particular project for Newbern to reprise the role in; the recently released Justice League: Doom was a virtual reunion of voice actors from the Justice League animated series reprising their roles, except for Tim Daly, who used to do Superman for the 90’s animated series but wasn’t available when the JLU show was being done. In my opinion, they should have switched out projects for these voice actors. Daly is just a little bit stronger as a solo focused Superman than Newbern, while Newbern works better in an ensemble. But this is a minor quibble. NCIS actress Pauley Perrette was also great as Lois, and veteran voice actor Robin Atkin Downes stole the show as Manchester Black…even if his Manchester accent was a bit hard to understand at times.

Robin Atkin Downes' version of Manchester Black often stole the show.

Another thing I found myself loving was all the aspects of Superman lore featured in this movie that have been retconned out by DC Comics in their “new 52” relaunch. In this movie, Superman is happily married to Lois Lane, and their relationship is delightfully written and one of the best aspects of the movie. I didn’t realize how much I missed “Mr. and Mrs. Superman” until I saw it so well done again in this story. Also, unlike the New 52, both Ma and Pa Kent are still alive and residing in Smallville, another aspect of Super lore that has been removed. And the red super underwear is still there, right on the outside where it should be. Is it too soon to be this nostalgic for the old pre-2011 DCU? The excellent portrayal of so many aspects of Superman mythology that has recently been jettisoned made me appreciate this movie even more than I would have had it been released just a year earlier.

And the animation, especially during the many action sequences, if fairly top notch as well, although suffers a bit when compared to some of the DCU animated films of the past few years. Most of it is very fluid, and I only found it look a little choppy in certain portions of the movie.

The Bad

Unfortunately, not everything in this movie is great. As awesome as the original Action Comics story was, it was just a single issue one-shot story, and padding it out to movie length you can feel that it was meant to be brief. It would have been better and a lot more effective if it were kept shorter. If the old animated series was still on the air, this would have been an ideal two part episode, but at just 80 minutes it really felt a bit long-and that’s not a good sign when an 80 minute movie feels long. By being so faithful to the original structure of his comic book story, Joe Kelly might have been doing it a bit of a disservice.

Another fatal flaw, at least for me, was the character designs. I understand that Warner Animation wants every animated movie to have their own look, but sometimes, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Superman’s design was way too cartoony and ridiculous, and not cartoony in a cool sleek way like how Bruce Timm designed him for his original animated series. And since much of the point of the movie is that Superman is seen by many (wrongly so) as an outdated relic of another era, why go out of your way to make him look even more silly? He looks more like a MAD Magazine parody of Superman than the way he is drawn in his own comics.  It just made no sense, and was distracting throughout the whole movie. The character designs for Lois Lane also suffered in my opinion. So much of these designs suffered from being “different for different’s sake” and were distracting throughout.

Superman, or Joe from Family Guy?

Final Verdict: B-

Overall though, this movie is still quite enjoyable, and most importantly, really illustrated why Superman is such a treasured cultural icon, and one whose values will never be dated. Although never quite reaching the heights of some of the best of the DC Universe animated movies like Under the Red Hood, Crisis on 2 Earths or Wonder Woman, it is still one that is worth your time to watch when it gets released on June 12th.

I should also not that at the end of the panel, a good minute or so of footage from the upcoming animated version of Batman: The Dark Knight Returns was screened, and it looks to be a VERY faithful adaptation. DC Comics fans will have a lot to look forward to this year it seems.

Last week, we gave your our ideal casting for the movie. Now, it looks like the movie adaptation of Brian K. Vaughan and Pia Guerra’s  Y: The Last M isn’t as dead as everyone thought. The Hollywood Reporter just announced that New Line Cinema has hired the duo of Matthew Federman and Stephen Scaia  to write an adaptation of the acclaimed Vertigo comic book series. Both Federman and Scaia were writer/producers on genre shows like Human Target, Warehouse 13 and Jericho. New Line has been trying to get this made for awhile now; Director DJ Caruso was attached a few years back, with Shia LaBeouf  attached to star, but nothing ever came of it. Also attached at one point was The Incredible Hulk and Clash of the Titans director Louis Letterier, but that went nowhere twice as fast as Caruso’s take.

As described in the original article, Y: The Last Man centers on Yorick, an “escape artist who is the last survivor of a mysterious plague that has killed every male mammal in the world. With his pet monkey, he sets out to find what might have wiped out the world’s male chromosomes.”  The series of graphic novels are widely considered some of the best of the past decade, but are also very dense and hard to condense into a two hour narrative, or even a trilogy. Anyone else think this is better suited to be adapted Walking Dead style, on cable television? Just throwing it out there

As an enormous comics fan of both the Marvel and DC Universes, ever since I was a child I always gravitated to the DC universe more. Even during the periods where Marvel’s output was clearly superior, I was still a DC boy at heart. And it all probably has to do with my love of female super heroes. DC has, without a doubt, the most iconic female heroes in comics. Wonder Woman is the first and longest running of course, and along with her, characters like Supergirl, Batgirl and Catwoman are all household names. Even your grandma could pick them out of a line up. Supergirl and Catwoman have carried their own series for nearly twenty years, and Batgirl, either in the wheelchair or out if it, has been a monthly feature at DC for the better part of fifteen years straight.

At least four of the female characters are household names even to non comic book fans.

Not to say that Marvel’s heroines are anything to scoff at; In fact Marvel, without question, has some of the best female heroes in comics. The X-Men titles alone have given us possibly the most well rounded and iconic heroines in comic book history with  Storm, Kitty Pryde, Rogue, Phoenix, Psylocke, Emma Frost and several more. And yet Marvel has yet to yield one single female hero to headline her own comic for any considerable length of time, while DC continues to have success with female led books. Why is there a difference? Is editorial at Marvel more sexist, or do Marvel fanboys just not want to read stories from a female perspective?

Without a doubt, the women of the X-Men titles are the most well rounded and interesting in all of mainstream comics.

 

Marvel Women: The Early Years

When Stan Lee began the Marvel universe in 1961, the only prominent female hero regularly published was DC’s Wonder Woman. Supergirl had just been created, and Batwoman was less a hero and more just a character who would pop up occasionally in Batman’s comics and try to get him to marry her. Stan Lee was the first to change all this. While not showcasing a major female super hero character in a book of her own yet, all three of the major team books of the early Marvel Universe (The Fantastic Four, The X-Men and The Avengers) had at least one prominent female character. And not just as a love interest like Gwen Stacy and Mary Jane were for Spider-Man, but as a fully fledged super heroine in their own right. In fact, the Invisible Girl, Marvel Girl and Scarlet Witch were in fact the most powerful members of their respective teams.  So right there, that’s what Stan Lee did right.

The original female Marvel mainstays mostly did a lot of frowning and fussing, despite being way more powerful than the boys, at least in theory.

But here’s Stan Lee did wrong; the women heroes, despite their power pedigree, spent much of the Silver Age fretting over the male heroes on the team. Sue Storm was usually being kidnapped by Doctor Doom or being chewed out by her boyfriend (and later hubbie) Reed Richards, or worst of all, trying to impress him with a sexy new outfit. Scarlet Witch was pretty much a harpy or a victim, complaining about how much she hated working for Magneto, or fending off the lascivious Mastermind’s marriage proposals. And Marvel Girl, despite being telekinetic and telepathic, was mostly just portrayed as the girl next door who all the boys had a crush on. She almost never was the team’s MVP, despite the fact that her power was the easily the greatest.

It is hard to fault Stan Lee here though; he wasn’t a young man when he created the Marvel Universe, and was merely a product of his sexist times. The fact that he made as many new women superheroes as he did is to totally be commended. He created the blueprint others would later improve on in a post sexual revolution world. But maybe that sexist outlook, where women characters were just there to support the men folk, seeped into the editorial culture at Marvel and has maybe never left. Although for a few years in the late 70’s, they really did try to make up for it.

The 1970’s: Women’s Lib Catches Up With Marvel

It wasn’t until the next decade, when creators other than Lee took over the writing on most Marvel titles, that the women started to emerge as strong as their power sets would imply. Under the guiding hand of people like Chris Claremont and John Byrne,  Marvel Girl became the Goddess like Phoenix. Susan Richards dropped the “girl” from her name and became the Invisible Woman, and eventually even became the team leader. Scarlet Witch’s powers were revealed to be more than just random hexes, but the ability to alter reality itself. The Wasp…well, the Wasp got lots of new costumes and got slapped around by her husband Hank Pym.  But she did get to become leader of the Avengers for awhile, so I guess that counts for something. Uhh..right?

The slap heard round the world, as Hank Pym smacks his wife Janet, AKA The Wasp. One single comic book panel neither character would ever really recover from.

But Marvel still lacked a solid marquee female character that could carry her own ongoing title. As  the 70’s continued to roll on, and  the phrase “women’s liberation” was on everyone’s lips, just where were the Marvel solo books for women heroes? DC had Wonder Woman on television, both in live action and animated form,  not to mention non comic related female heroes like The Bionic Woman and Charlie’s Angels kicking ass on the small screen. No doubt feeling the pressure, Marvel fired back with several books to counter Wonder Woman in the late 70’s, starting with an unexpected female take on their most famous hero and corporate mascot, Spider-Man.

Taking a page out of DC's playbook, Marvel unleashed three solo series for women characters, all female analogs for popular male heroes.

In 1977, Spider-Woman was unleashed onto comic book fans everywhere. She very quickly got her own ongoing comic book, and by 1979 even had her very own cartoon series on Saturday mornings. She instantly became a staple of Marvel marketing; I was a young child during this era and remember Spider-Woman being marketed on lunchboxes and toys along with Spider-Man and Captain America as if she were “one of the guys,” and always had been.  I even remember one of those “take a pic with Spidey” events at a local mall when I was four years old, where I took an awkward Sears portrait style photo along with some poor schmo dressed up as Spider-Man…and  there was a Spider-Woman there too.  What made Spider-Woman so cool was that unlike her DC counterparts Batgirl and Supergirl, she wasn’t a Xerox copy of her more famous male namesake. Her powers, her costume, her origins were all different. Aside from living in the same universe, she had no real ties to Peter Parker at all.

During the late 70's and early 80's, Marvel marketed Spider-Woman as if she were equal to her fellow male icons. And then just like that, Marvel all but erased her out of existence.

And then, almost overnight, she was gone. In 1983 her comic book series was cancelled, and worse, she lost her powers and became just Jessica Drew, Private Investigator. X-Men writer Chris Claremont liked her well enough, so she’d show up occasionally in a panel with Wolverine or something, but that was it. No one really knows why, but rumors are that then Marvel Editor in Chief at the time Jim Shooter just plain hated Spider-Woman, as he thought a female version of a male hero emasculated him. (I guess that makes Batman and Superman giant sissies then? And what about the Hulk??) There have been rumors of sexism swirling around the Shooter years at Marvel for decades now, and their treatment of Spider-Woman merely adds fuel to that fire.

A new Spider-Woman was eventually created, but she wore a costume identical to Spider-Man’s black costume and was kept around mostly as just side character in West Coast Avengers, probably just as a way for Marvel to keep the copyright. (a blink-and-you’ll-miss-her third Spider-Woman was also created in the 90’s.)  It was over twenty years later when writer Brian Michael Bendis revived the classic Spider-Woman for New Avengers and did his best to make her a Marvel mainstay again. And so far, it has worked. But despite being announced years ago now, there is still no ongoing Spider-Woman series from Marvel on the horizon.

Julia Carpenter, the replacement Spider-Woman

Another major female character to get her own title during the period was Ms. Marvel. Originally, Carol Danvers was just a female knock off of the alien warrior Captain Marvel, even wearing a sexier version of his costume (eventually as her series progressed, she got her own costume, one which she still wears to this day)  Although her own series was cancelled in 1979, she went on to join the Avengers, where she was a mainstay for quite some time.

Avengers #200 was a very controversial turning point for the character, which essentially had her brainwashed by a villain who was obsessed with her and had her impregnated, only to have her take off with him at the end, with all the other members of the team giving their blessing. This storyline has long been referred to as “The Rape of Ms. Marvel.” This story, along with the editorially mandated death of Jean Grey, gave Marvel of the early 80’s their first accusations of misogynist undertones.  Writer Chris Claremont did his best to undo the damage done to her in his X-Men title,  and made Carol Danvers a cosmically powerful character named Binary. (essentially, he pulled a Phoenix on her)  Today, Ms. Marvel is arguably more important to the Marvel Universe and more high profile than her male counterpart, so that’s gotta count for something. But despite her high profile, her own attempts at carrying a series keep getting ignored by fanboys.

The last major new female character of the era was the She-Hulk. She Hulk has the distinction of being the last major character to be created by Stan Lee for the company, and  the reasons for creating her were similar to the reasons for creating Spider-Woman; copyright. In 1979 The Incredible Hulk was a very popular tv show, and the guys at Marvel feared that the producers would create a female Hulk much like The Six Million Dollar Man gave way to The Bionic Woman. If that was the case, they wanted to make sure THEY created her first, and therefore owned the copyright free and clear.  And so at the end of 1979, She Hulk was bornLike Spider-Woman, She-Hulk’s series only lasted until 1982. But unlike Spider-Woman, after her series ended she continued to be used in comics like The Avengers, and even joined the Fantastic Four title for a while. All this added exposure in popular team titles increased her popularity with the Marvel fanbase, and when she was given a title again in 1989. (with then popular writer/artist John Byrne at the helm) The series was far more popular this time, and lasted five years. Marvel did right this time, but then after the cancellation made no attempts at giving her another ongoing for nearly a decade.

The Present (And Future) of Marvel’s Heroic Women

For the past twenty years or so though, Marvel’s commitment to ongoing series with female protagonists has been spotty at best.  Oh, there have been numerous attempts to do so…characters like Elektra and Mystique have all been given ongoing series, sometimes with big name quality creators, only to flame out quickly after a couple of years. Even highly regarded series like Brian Bendis’ Alias never got incredible sales to go with their rave reviews. Similarly, Spider-Girl, an alternate universe version of Peter Parker and Mary Jane’s teenage daughter, has much critical acclaim but never could generate significant sales, and was ultimately cancelled. In a way, Marvel has had to resort to trickery to get fanboys to buy a series with a female protagonist; X-Men Legacy has essentially been a Rogue series now for years, and It probably would sell half as well were it simply just called “Rogue”.

A disturbing trend from Marvel has been taking their powered-up female heroes and having them become unhinged, as if too much power+ estrogen =disaster. While the Dark Phoenix Saga had a natural build up, by the time Marvel had "Dark Scarlet Witch" the undertones became creepy. I don't remember stuff like this happening to The Silver Surfer or Thor.

In fairness,  the past five or so years have seen Marvel give ongoing solo series to Ms. Marvel and She-Hulk again, but very rarely with their top tier creators, or given much fanfare in an effort to create buzz.  The teen girl version of Wolverine called X-23 was the most recent ongoing super heroine book to get the ax, leaving Marvel with no female lead books yet again. Marvel is pretty much in the exact same spot they were forty years ago, before their late 70’s “Girl Power” moment.

So is Marvel to blame? If you build it, and no one comes, can Marvel really even be at fault? Or have all their recent attempts been anemic and deserving of failure? Or is the ugly truth that most Marvel Fanboys are really just that sexist? The massive popularity of the X-Men titles, with their huge amount of strong female characters suggest otherwise. And the success of Wonder Woman, Batwoman, Batgirl and Catwoman as part of the “New 52” relaunch at DC shows that fanboys WILL buy female heroes if done right. Sooner or later, Marvel will hopefully launch a female centric property and it will stick, but only if they keep trying and don’t give up entirely, as they seem to have done lately.

So today DC Entertainment has given us a sneak peek at the all new looks for two of their most well known characters that have been missing in action since the whole “New 52” reboot hit back in August. And there’s a whole lot of lightning to be had.

First is up is Captain Marvel…er, I should say Shazam. In a story that ran today in the New York Post, writer Geoff Johns revealed the look of the new Shazam, set to debut as a back up feature in Justice League starting with issue #7, with art by Gary Frank. According to Johns, “We changed his name [to Shazam from Captain Marvel] for a lot of reasons, one of them is that Shazam is the word most associated with the character, so we just felt it made sense — a lot of people already thought that was his name, anyway. His place in the world will be far more rooted in fantasy and magic than it ever was before.”

The All-New Shazam, complete with hood, probably to illicit one less comparison with Superman.

Created in 1939 for Fawcett Comics, the original Captain Marvel was kid news reporter Billy Batson, who when saying the magic word Shazam, would transform into the adult hero Captain Marvel. Captain Marvel was so popular in fact, he started to infringe on Superman’s comic book sales, and even outsold Supes for a while. DC of course, was having none of that, so they sued publisher Fawcett Comics for copyright infringement and spent the next decade in court. Captain Marvel was no more a knock off of Superman than dozens of other characters, but since he was selling so well he was seen as a threat to Superman’s popularity. Eventually Fawcett Comics gave up the fight, and stopped publishing Captain Marvel comics altogether in 1953.

Ironically, twenty years later DC Comics bought the rights to the character they once sought to destroy. Despite intermittent attempts at launching a new Captain Marvel series (which, due to rival Marvel Comics, could never actually be called Captain Marvel, hence the title Shazam! on almost every comic series featuring the character since 1973) DC has never had much luck re-launching the character on a permanent basis. He always seemed a relic of a simpler time, even more so than Superman.  It should be noted that Captain Marvel had much more success out of comics during this time than in them, as there was a live action tv series called Shazam!  That ran for three seasons in the 70’s, and an early 80’s Saturday morning cartoon as well. Due to the popularity of both of these versions, casual fans refer to Captain Marvel far more as “Shazam” than his actual name, which is what probably prompted DC to just say “fuck it” and call him that from now on. Besides, why give free publicity to #1 rival Marvel Comics?

Even more so than Superman, Captain Marvel has always seemed a relic of a bygone era.

The second DC character to get a massive overhaul is the Golden Age Flash, Jay Garrick. Set to star as a member of the Justice Society of America in the upcoming comic Earth-2, this new version of the original speedster is clearly younger, and would therefore seemingly have no ties to World War II. In an interview with Newsarama today, Earth-2 writer James Robinson stated that the new Earth-2 JSA will have been active as heroes for the same amount of time as the regular DC Earth—meaning about five years or so.

Our first look at the newer, younger original Flash. Hey...at least they kept his color scheme right. More than I can say for Wonder Woman.

The JSA heroes have been Grandpas in spandex for my entire life, so I’ll admit to being curious about them presented as younger heroes for the first time since the 40’s. Still, I’ll miss a version of the DC Universe that has a history spanning more than a few short years. I like the notion of a DC Universe with a hero history spanning decades… why does everything that is old have to be negative? But I suppose a version of that could still exist out there; there are still fifty or so Earths we have yet to see. Time will tell.

I hate to admit it, but I'm going to kinda miss the dorky helmet and those stupid little booties.

 

DC Animation always knocks it out of the park, so this could be a winner… an upcoming multi-console video game based on the Young Justice cartoon series.

Here’s the official press release:

Fan Favorite DC Comics Franchise/Animated Television series From Warner Bros. Animation Set to Make Videogame Debut in a Multiplayer Action RPG

Little Orbit, a worldwide game publisher, announced today that it has entered into a licensing agreement with Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment for the Young Justice: Legacy video game set to ship in early 2013 for PlayStation®3 computer entertainment system, the Xbox 360® video game and entertainment system from Microsoft, Nintendo’s Wii(TM) system, and the Nintendo DS(TM) hand held system.

New episodes of the Warner Bros. Animation series Young Justice will air beginning Saturday, March 3, at 10:30 a.m. ET/PT on Cartoon Network as part of DC Nation, the network’s brand-new one-hour block of exclusive kids’ television programming and shorts based on DC Comics characters.

In Young Justice, teenage heroes Robin, Aqualad, Kid Flash, Superboy, Miss Martian and Artemis are tasked by theJustice League to act as their covert operations team. Armed with superior skills, weaponry and powers, the team must do battle against a wide array of villains from the DC Universe while trying to prove to themselves, and to their superhero mentors, that they too have what it takes to be a hero. Their journey is further complicated when they face the many unpredictable obstacles that arise in their path from inexperience and youth.

In Young Justice: Legacy fans can look forward to an original storyline set in between Seasons 1 and 2 of the television series, written in collaboration with show writers Greg Weisman and Brandon Vietti.  The game is packed with fan favorite playable characters, cameo appearances by popular Justice League heroes and villains, and includes online multiplayer as well as local multiplayer modes.

“The TV series is a fantastic combination of compelling writing, witty humor, iconic art, and exciting action sequences. The creators have done an amazing job blending over 180 DC Comics characters into their show filtered through a new, youthful perspective,” said Matt Scott, CEO of Little Orbit. “The new video game contains a slew of cool features and a large playable cast of familiar heroes, but our core mission is to create a unique experience that fits seamlessly into the world of the show and offers a new way to interact with these popular DC Comics characters.”

For more info, check out the game’s official website:
http://www.youngjusticelegacy.com

Women’s costuming is a topic often put on the block for debate, especially in comic books. Do the costumes make sense or are they simply exploitative? Fashion guru Tim Gunn even threw his hat into the ring a few years ago, critiquing an array of female superheroes and villains’ wardrobes. Among those he critiqued were Power Girl and Black Canary. Interestingly, Gunn said he believes that Power Girl owns her boob window costume and that it is less objectionable than many of the other costumes (such as Star Sapphire and even the current Catwoman costume, which is typically lauded for its utility). Conversely, upon seeing Black Canary’s costume his immediate response was, “Well, she’s a tramp.” I’m not going to accuse Mr. Gunn of slut shaming a fictional character, but as Geekscape.net’s number one Black Canary fan and doppelgänger, I feel it is my duty to defend her and the fishnets.

First of all, the costume has history. It is as old as the character, dating back to 1947 when the original Black Canary, Dinah Drake, first appeared on the scene. At first, she looked to be a villain, before she was revealed was the newest costumed hero, infiltrating a criminal gang. She was a competent hero who joined the Justice Society of America and, later, helped found the original Justice League of America. Her daughter, Dinah Laurel Lance, would follow in her footsteps and put on the fishnets herself to become the new Black Canary of the modern age.

Nevertheless, since taking over her mother’s role, Dinah has gone through several costume changes. Some more practical than others, but she eventually always reverts back to the fishnets. Although the look of the bodysuit has changed over time (from breast baring to a turtleneck on top and with varying cuts over, under and on the hips), the wide weave fishnets have been a consistent staple to the costume. In her rebooted costume, there are even references to the fishnets in the design on her pants. Although I think this particular costume is ridiculous, the fact the wide weave made it into the character design proves how important the fishnets are to the character.

In Gail Simone’s first run on Birds of Prey, Huntress dresses up and pretends to be Black Canary, while Dinah is rehabilitating from a previous mission. Helena could not handle the fishnets at all; she felt gross and exposed. A later Helena asks Dinah how she could possibly bear to wear that kind of thing on a nightly basis and not feel trashy, and Dinah quips, “At least when I go after Two-Face he can’t tell if I have an innie or an outie,” and Helena rescinds her comment.*

When it comes to costuming in comic books, it is pretty easy to look at a character and be disgusted by the way he or she looks (there are some seriously bad male costumes out there, too), but to take one look at Black Canary and call her a “tramp” is grating. It shows he doesn’t know anything about the character and her history. Which may be the point: he’s assessing based on visual alone, yet he still says Power Girl owns her costume and is fine with it. In which case, it’s possible that the pictures used for reference were poorly chosen. The things to pay attention to are the history of the costume, the personality of the character, in addition to the potential beef and cheesecake factors. I agree with Tim Gunn when he says that Power Girl’s costume works for her, in the same way I believe Emma Frost costume works for her. I can’t imagine just anyone running around in a corset, which is why Harley Quinn’s costume design upsets just about everyone who looks at it.

Of course, this is the problem we run into when a universe is rebooted and so none of the character have a history that we are familiar with. Black Canary’s mother likely no longer exists, and so her fishnet costume no longer makes sense and the traditionally conservative Harley Quinn may fit the new Quinn who we only know so much about.

In another video by Crazy Sexy Geeks, they poll convention participants on whether or not Wonder Woman should wear pants. The women asked, mostly cosplayers and artists, almost unanimously say “No.” One Supergirl cosplayer even points out that “when you’re invincible, you don’t really need to cover up.” Tim Gunn, of course, won’t say she has to wear pants, but if she wanted to work a skinny jean, she totally could. Yet every time artists change Wonder Woman’s costume, the horde comes after them and the editors, even those who hate her patriotic color scheme have taken ill with some of her changes. Perhaps because while it may get more practical in some areas (i.e., pants), impractical parts still exist (like the corset). My personal favorite version of her costume will always be the Grecian armor in her standard color scheme. It represents all aspects of her history and origin, and keeps most of her thighs covered. Everyone wins here, in my opinion. But alas, we have that “no skirts” rule, which is ridiculous.

From my understanding, the reason the “no skirts” rule came about was because there was one too many panty shots of our dear Supergirl. This should really just have been a ban on the artist exploiting female characters, as there is nothing inherently sexist or offensive about fighting crime in a skirt. The Greeks and Romans did this for years, even after the invention of pants. And this is the true problem when it comes to costumes: the artist needs to respect the characters he or she is drawing. While fanservice and pinups have their place, it is rarely within the pages of a comic.

Back when Ed Benes was the main artist for Birds of Prey, I used to count how many panels it would take before I got to one where I didn’t see any of the character’s butts. Even with Huntress’s cape, he managed to make it so her derrière was still prominent in most of the panels. Now, I’m a fan of Ed Benes’s work. His women are beautiful, I have a copy of his first art booklet and I not-so-secretly want to commission him to draw me as Black Canary someday. Nevertheless, there is a time and place. So, unless Helena’s butt is aiding in the storytelling, there’s no need for it, and I doubt Gail Simone requested that Mr. Benes put her bottom out there so often in the panels of their book.

Ed Benes just can’t help himself.

Though some writers do detail it into their scripts, though it does not always add to the story. Jim Lee was requested by Frank Miller to draw Vicki Vale in her panties and heels, waltzing around her curtains-less apartment, as she works on her next news piece. She also appears to have been knocked down from an investigative reporter to a Carrie Bradshaw-esque sex columnist. Neither of these things particularly aids her in being a realistic and respected character. Not to say that real women don’t walk around their apartment in their underwear and five inch heels, but few do it to excite an audience like Miller. Here’s an actual line from his script to Jim Lee:

“Okay Jim, I’m shameless. Let’s go with an ASS shot. Panties detailed. Balloons from above. She’s walking, restless as always. We can’t take our eyes off her. Especially since she’s got one fine ass.”

A Frank Miller “Character Moment”

What does this add to the story? Not a thing. But that’s what happens when your creators don’t respect their characters, and Miller calls himself on it with the “I’m shameless” bit. It’s heartbreaking to see that kind of behavior, but I digress.

The trick to having empowered female characters is to make sure all the creators involved respect the work they have created and view each of the characters as his or her own person and not just as plot devices or eye candy. If you’re going to write or draw a character then at least have the decency to know and understand her. Read the Wiki article and a couple of back issues. The more realistic the character, the better the story will be. It doesn’t matter if she wears pants, a skirt or fishnets, so long as it’s the kind of clothing that character could pull off.

When I dressed up as Black Canary for Comic Con this last year, I was a little nervous about the endeavor. It was less clothing than I have ever really worn out in public (during daylight hours, no less!), it was my first day at Comic Con, ever, and I just wasn’t sure if I could pull it off. But believe me, once I put it on and got myself into the character of Dinah Lance, I loved it. I didn’t feel like a tramp, I didn’t feel objectified by the people around me. I felt confident and proud of my costume. If it weren’t for the fact I got run over by a rickshaw that night, I probably would have worn it again later in the Con. And I think all of this stems from my original argument for why Dinah Lance wears the fishnets in the first place: she wears them to emulate a person she loves and respects. She wears them because they remind her of who she is and where she comes from. They help her to become the Black Canary, which is why I think her other costumes didn’t last very long, even if they were more practical.

The fishnets don’t work for everyone and each character has his or her own style. For an artist to redesign a character (be it Black Canary or anyone else), he needs to first understand who that character is, where he or she comes from and where he or she plans to go and do, before he can decide what look works for her.

* Huntress’s costume has come under its own share of fire. The costume she wore for most of the 90s was based on Roman Catholic robes and had full bodied protection. When the change came during the first Hush storyline in Batman, fans were aggravated because it no longer expressed anything about her and showed off her stomach, where she had not too long ago taken a bullet. Her current costume (a full body variation of the new Jim Lee design), is once again practical and references her Catholic roots again with the white cross.

This past weekend, I was having a lunch date with a fine gent who happens to be a fan of A Song of Ice and Fire by George R. R. Martin. While emphatically discussing the books and the show, I made a comment on how great the women are depicted in the story and how it really could be examined as feminist literature, if you were so inclined. My date looked at me, shocked and perturbed. “Are you serious? Unless you’re [a short list of female characters which has been redacted for potential spoilers], you’re going to be raped. At least once.”

I tried to make an argument for how that was realistic, given the time period, and that the fact that GRRM even allows for women to play in his Game of Thrones was pretty awesome (Yeah, Tolkien. I’m looking at you. Eowyn aside.), but the conversation pretty much ended on that note. Which got me thinking the rest of the weekend about rape in fiction. The main question that came to my mind was, since these characters are controlled by an author (or some other conglomerate), is it okay for a character to be raped or is it fridging as usual? As with all things, it depends on its purpose and how it affects the character after the fact.

Retroactive rape is still rape.

For many a costumed heroine, rape is part of her origin story, either originally (Starfire and, depending on canon, Helena Bertinelli), or retroactively tacked on (Felicia Hardy). Even male superheroes are often subjected to rape. Though, in those cases it is less often about power and usually due to a female villain trying to breed some kind of super heir. In the Batfamily, there are only two characters that I can think of who have not yet been raped, nearly raped or a product of rape and they are Kate Kane and Cassandra Cain. Don’t worry, though, they’re pretty new to the game, so they have time. Same goes with Team Arrow, although Mia (who may be retconned?) did have some serious trauma with her history in the skin trade, but she was still able to fight crime, despite having AIDS. Even Kyle Rayner of the Green Lanterns was drugged and raped and the whole island of Themyscira is made of the souls of women who were mistreated by men in their past lives. A lot of DC references, but Marvel’s not innocent here. Ms. Marvel, the lady Hawkeye and Mockingbird have also been raped.

Kyle Rayner feels used… We’re guessing he saw the Green Lantern film too.

As you can see, rape is a prevalent trope in comics, and it affects both male and female characters with almost equal frequency (which is odd, but nice to see something is at least equal among men and women, right?). The problem with these instances is that the rapes scarcely affect the character in the long run, or at all. None of these characters dwell or angst about what happened to them. This sometimes stems from the fact that comics are serials with multiple authors over time, and depending on who is currently penning the book, he or she will concentrate on certain aspects of the character’s persona. But more often than not, it’s because these characters are viewed as weak, and not in the “I can’t carry a box that weighs more than 40lbs” weak. But in the sense that they don’t carry their own title and their existence is in virtue of the fact that they support the main hero, They are not seen as characters in their own right, so they can go through the wringer, the grinder and be served as Sunday dinner, just so the villain can “get at” the lead. None of the victims need to overcome the pain or trauma they just went through, because the pain and trauma that occurred on the previous pages wasn’t about them, but their (frequently male) cohorts and how he has been able to overcome the horrible things that just occurred to his beloved.

This is why it gets put down as “Women in Refrigerators” or “Stuffed in the Fridge” (as it may happen to men). The raping, murdering, etc. happens, but it has little to do with the character it happened to and everything to do with those who care about said character. Or it’s just to have something controversial happen to keep the books selling, but after the conclusion of the arc, it is never addressed again and no real healing occurs, either for the victim or the reader. And that is why there is a problem with rape as it is often depicted.

Though, those characters that are “strong”–Kyle Rayner, Bruce Wayne, Dick Grayson–either don’t remember the event or just never bring it up again. Either way, weird. You’d think a man like Bruce Wayne, with so many emotional issues, would have a serious problem with Talia Al Ghul taking advantage of him, but apparently not! Although, I have a serious qualm with that whole scenario in and of itself, as it stems from a pretty good story (Son of the Demon), where Bruce may actually have found his one true love. And while I’m no fan of Talia (and a Cat x Bat ‘shipper to the end!), it was nice to see The Detective happy with a woman. For once. As for Dick Grayson, maybe he is so jaded by all his romantic trysts that he finds it all old hat and doesn’t care that he’s been raped–twice. I don’t know the reasons why these issues are never addressed, but I definitely find it curious. Why have a rape scenario if you’re not going to address it?

Batman: A Victim of Rape. Yes. BATMAN.

Before writing this article, I looked up the statistics for rape. According to the US Department of Justice, by way of Wikipedia, 1 in 6 women are either victims of rape or have been nearly/partially raped. In the US. That’s just under 17%, and I’m not certain if that is adjusted to include the number of rapes that go unreported. Either way, it’s a more frequent occurrence than how many women develop breast cancer in their lifetime (1 in 8), and that has a whole month dedicated to it, and it means we all know someone who is dealing with that trauma, whether we are aware of it or not. Which means, every writer of comic books knows–or, possibly, is–someone who has been raped or nearly raped, which gets me to thinking, as statistics are wont to do: if you know someone who is suffering, be it deeply or something that only crosses her mind when there is a trigger present, wouldn’t you want to create characters that actually deal with their pain rather than ignore it or pretend it didn’t happen?

Which brings me back to A Song of Ice and Fire. By virtue of the fact that it has one author, George R. R. Martin, and, potentially, a definitive beginning and end, all of the events that happen in the novels occur with purpose. Additionally, is written from 3rd person multi-perspective, meaning the reader gets to view the events from a variety of different view points. Some of these characters are women, and some of those women go through the wringer, grinder and are (nearly) served up as Sunday dinner and some of them do the wringing, grinding and serving. It’s a wild world in Westeros, but the pain is palatable. They aren’t just victims, even if we sometimes think of them that way. Despite all her faults, Sansa is aiming to survive and live through her experiences just as much as the beguiling Cersei, come hell or high water. If you can give even your most loathsome character that trait, then even if everyone around her views her as pathetic, she still has a lot of grit to her. That’s right, I said it: Sansa has grit. It doesn’t matter how much she internalizes all her fears and emotional trauma, she’s still managing through those books better than her brother Bran made it through the pilot episode of Game of Thrones. (But I don’t want to give too much away about just yet, as I still want to do an article on the awesome women of Westeros.)

Basically, what I’m saying is not to not write rape scenarios, but if you’re going to do something like that, at least understand the repercussions and ramifications such and action will cause. Not just to those who love the victim, but to the victim, too. Let them deal with the pain, on the page. Research your characters thoroughly and show us how they deal with it on the page so that those who have been hurt might be able to learn how to do deal with it, too. It’s a serious issue and one that affects more people than I’d like to think possible, and therefore should be addressed with delicacy and care. It’s not something that should be used just to sell books.

This would be a hard one to forget for numerous reasons.

As a reader and fan of fiction, I like to imagine that writers have a great duty in being stewards to the collective consciousness, by bringing humanity to a fuller understanding of each other, rather than just being purveyors of all that is wrong with the world and insight further fear or misunderstanding. So, if you’re going to abuse your characters, at least know how it will affect the character going through the experience, and not just those around her.

Back in June, I wrote a little article on DC’s reboot, and the decision made to cut the female creative force by half (from 4 to 2). At the time, I didn’t give any predictions on how that might affect the female characters or readership. I didn’t speculate because I try to be optimistic about my fandom, despite evidence to the contrary. The only negative comments I made were about the art, because–at the time–that was all I could comment on. I know Amanda Connor and Nicola Scott are talented artists and we all know Rob Liefeld is not. Art is consistent. Stories, on the other hand, can be hit or miss, be it because the creative well has run dry or the characters don’t speak to the writer anymore. For example, I hate Judd Winick’s Green Arrow, I could take or leave his Outsiders run, but I will defend his arcs on Batman to the death. I loved Devin Grayson’s Arsenal miniseries, but after the twentieth tragic event in her Nightwing run, I got bored and moved on.

Additionally, I didn’t want to wage some gender war by saying that men cannot write women (or vice versa). Obviously, that’s just not true as most of these characters were created by men. Bob Kane created Catwoman, Paul Dini and Bruce Timm created Harley Quinn, Marv Wolfman and George Perez created Starfire, John Ostrander, Len Wein and John Byrne created Amanda Waller. I am grateful for these characters and creators because I know many of them are apart of me and helped make me into the woman I am today. My beef, regarding the state of women in the DCnU, is not with men. It is with creators who write without knowing their characters, who write without thinking how it will affect their readership, let alone the world they have created. My beef is with people who just don’t think.

From Catwoman T&A to free love aliens, a lot of the damage has been discussed here and elsewhere, but there is still much to explore (not all of it bad). Really, I’m not the kind of person that looks to hate something. I genuinely want to like and enjoy things. But there are times where I just have to look at something and ask, “Why?” Are the creators purposefully trying to perpetuate the misogynistic and anti-feminist dialogue in comics, or do some of the creators just not see? It’s hard to guess and I’ve never been fond of assuming. So let’s talk about the DC relaunch and what it did and didn’t do for me, as a comic book fan and as a woman.

Let’s begin with Starfire. She’s the one we were all up in arms about, after all. Allow me to start by saying that I have never been a fan of Starfire. Be it because she amplified some insecurity I had about myself (I got deep into comics at age eleven. Who has a strong sense of self at eleven?), hit a mark on my extra-terretial xenophobia (she’s an alien! Aliens were always bad growing up, except for E.T.) or because I was a Babs/Dick shipper to the core (thank you, Batman: The New Animated Series!). The thing was, even if I didn’t like her, she was still a hero with the best intentions. She loved life, she loved earth, she loved being a hero, she loved. To be capable of such love in general, and in spite of her abusive past in particular, was amazing. Her love for humanity is what made her such a great hero, in addition to her power. It’s what made her so special, so singular, so interesting. A character who represented all the positive sides of emotion. Often in comics we focus on the negative aspects of emotion: the angst, the hate, the vengeance (yes, I’m looking at you, Bruce!). It was refreshing to have a character who reminded us that it’s good to feel. Emotions can be positive.

The new Starfire does not love. She is incapable of it, in fact. She has no interest in earth or earthlings and our silly lives. She has no memory of her friendships and previous relationship with Dick Grayson. Why, then, is she here? Why and how is she a hero? How can anyone who loved Starfire before, be bothered to care now? This is not Starfire. This is a doll, a void, a husk. Aside from some early deus ex machina (that almost any super powered hero could have pulled off), the pages that Starfire graces are a waste of ink. She brings nothing to the team, fan-service and cheesecake aside.

In my previous review of Suicide Squad, I mentioned my dissatisfaction with the new Harley Quinn. Harley was one of my favorite characters as a kid, rivaling my Catwoman as my favorite 90s/early millennia comic character (she lost out because her obsession with the Joker didn’t seem healthy, even to my pre-teen self). But she’s not the only problem I have in Squad. My other issue is Amanda Waller, The Wall: Where is she?

I want to know how DC is going to explain away two-thirds of her. Did she have a heart attack? Did her doctor warn her about something? Seriously, how can a historically large character suddenly become 120lbs? Who’s decision was that and why? There aren’t a lot of hefty characters in comics, let alone large women, so if comics are supposed to have “relatable” characters, why do that? Amanda is a widowed mother (two of her children having been murdered, with her husband) who works a sedentary, time consuming, stressful, government job. When did she find time to hit the gym?  Does DC think her deflation in size is going to suddenly urge some readers to go to the gym, or is it more likely to make someone feel ostracized? There are enough thin, stacked female leads that I find it interesting (if not offensive) that the relaunch gave someone the agency to replace The Wall with Zoe Saldana (no offense to Zoe Saldana, she’s lovely. She’s just no Amanda Waller). Next to Starfire’s heroic nonchalance, this is something I must have explained to me.

The Birds of Prey return, with only one original bird and minimal fun. The new Starling is essentially Huntress-light (hard hitter with a case of Catholic guilt) and Black Canary is all business with no time for fun. Part of the greatness of Birds was that the women were like a family. To be in the Birds of Prey was to be a part of one of the coolest, most close-knit bowling leagues ever. Now, it looks to be just another day at the office, with strained friendships and forced partnerships. It’s hard to say how the relationships with the women will change over the course of the book, but if the female characters can’t even be friends and like and/or respect each other, how can I, as a reader, be expected to be a fan?

But not all DC women were thrown under the bus in the relaunch! While I agree fully with Eric Diaz’s article regarding the unoriginal announcement that Zeus is now Wonder Woman’s father, the first issue was great. The gods are once again relevant in our world, making her relevant. Her personality has not been this solid and clear since … never. Wonder Woman was a character whose book I bought because I wanted to like it, but always failed to fully enjoy it. As the Holy Spirit in DC’s Trinity, I was ever confused and lost in the mucky muck that was her story. Her history and personality always came off as convoluted. A shame, since I studied classics in college and am all about empowered, interesting women (obviously). But now, it looks like it’s a new dawn, it’s a new day, it’s a new life for Diana and (wait for it) it feels good. She’s a warrior, in the truest sense. Dutiful, but kind. Stoic, yet compassionate. She cares for those she has sworn to protect in exactly the way the new Starfire does not.

Also, take note regarding Wonder Woman: she, like Starfire, is naked in a couple of panels of her comic. However, it doesn’t make you, as the reader, feel awkward, because it’s realistic. She’s not flaunting her nakedness around so young children can send picture texts to their buddies or post it on some celebrity blog out there. She’s naked, because it made sense for her to be so. Diana is a true Wonder Woman, both strength and beauty incarnate. She stands on her own without the baggage of fanservice and cheesecake. It’s amazing.

Batwoman continues to be brave, bold and beautiful (I seriously cannot get enough of J. H. Williams III’s art) and Batgirl as a hero dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder is inspired. Not to suggest I don’t love Oracle and was against Babs’ return to the cape when it was announced, it is still a topic that is scarcely discusses in comics and one some readers need. I’d prefer if it was another character–male or female–because the chair and Oracle are important, but I don’t know who else could address it like Gail Simone. This seems typical of Barbara Gordon. I love her previous incarnation, but am just as grateful–if not more so–for her latest version. It’s impressive.

My favorite character, The Huntress, also made her debut last week in a shiny new miniseries, and I must say, I approve. She’s a little softer (that is, she didn’t maim any thugs out right) than the pre-boot Bertinelli, but she’s still kicking ass, sporting the crossbow and donning purple. I’ll have a more comprehensive review of THE HUNTRESS #1 up soon, so look out!

I’m still on the fence about Supergirl, and fan-service and some fan-fiction-esque elements aside, I really didn’t have much of a problem with Catwoman. Also, it’s hard to talk about any character in particular in the larger (> 5 hero) team books, so I’m holding my tongue until the first arcs pan out, making this not as extensive as it could be. Obviously there are some wonderful female characters who are still rock solid. Nevertheless, there are some definite changes that I am curious about and request an explanation for the changes.

Comics have a reputation for being sexist, anti-feminist and sometimes even misogynist, but that doesn’t have to be the case.I have read several articles over the month regarding these issues, and even most–if not all–of the creators agree that these exist. So what’s it going to take before they (and we as fans) start developing a solution? Perhaps some who recognize its existence don’t view it as a problem (which is an issue I’d like to address in a different article). But what about those who do see the error in their ways, but do nothing to fix it? Here, I am pin pointing a few of the core issues in the reboot and asking the simple question, “Why?” Once we can understand each other, we can get the dialogue started.

(**I also want to note that female characters weren’t the only ones affected by the reboot. The way the Savant character in the Suicide Squad acted was a big punch in my Birds of Prey loving gut. His presence–if that is my beloved Brian Durlin–was just pointless and unnecessary. A ‘fridging if I ever saw one.)

What DC Comic had the most impact to the DCU in the past 20 years? I was thinking about this question the other day as I was looking over a fan voted list of the most influential comic runs. I’ll admit that I am a DC fanboy and that is why my mind automatically drifted to the DCU, but I think this question is equally valid (and maybe harder to answer) for the Marvel Universe. To answer this question I set out two simple rules the first was that it couldn’t be a storyline, it had to be a single issue. This issue though could be part of a bigger storyline. For example, you can’t say Batman: Murderer, but you can say Batman 600 is the most important issue. Second, as a more of a justification of my time constraint, I had to find a way to avoid Crisis on Infinite Earths, as it would be hard to argue the importance of that series to the DCU as a whole, especially the issue were the multiverse is destroyed. In essence, the issue needed an event that had some serious ramifications for the characters involved, and influenced the DCU in either a positive or negative light.

It was also easy to eliminate some of the bigger events from the 90’s such as Superman(vol. 2) 75 from contention. While a book like Superman 75, and the other major speculator events, seemed to be important at the time, they haven’t been important to the DCU in the longterm. How often do other heroes mention that Superman once died, or Batman was crippled? These events are largely forgotten.

The book that I feel had the most impact did not involve a single character, but a whole fictional city. While not creatively the best book that DC has published, its hard to argue the impact that Superman 80, part of the Reign of Supermen storyline had. Written and drawn by Dan Jurgens, this book was the turning point to the Reign of Supermen storyline as it revealed the true intentions of the Cyborg Superman, Hank Henshaw, were not to uphold truth and justice, but instead were the opposite. Over the course of the issue, with the aid of Mongol, the Cyborg destroyed Coast City.

Sure this wasn’t likely the first DC City to be annihilated by villains, and it sure wasn’t the last (remember the millions of people that died in DC One Million when Montevideo was nuked? It’s okay, DC doesn’t remember it too). But it was a city that mattered to one person, Hal Jordan. Coast City was his home, and in the course of these 22 newsprint pages, his world was turned upside down. While it took several months, and the intervention of a DC Editor or three, the destruction of Coast City set the DCU on a series of events that have continued for over 15 years.

The first major event to roll out of this issue, was the Green Lantern storyline Emerald Twilight. In this three issue arc, Jordan attempts to bring back Coast City with the power of his ring, and as a result of his failure to do so, goes to war with the Guardians and the Green Lantern Corps. As a results of these actions, Hal would go become the (ultimately) misguided hero, Parallax. Immediately following the events of Green Lantern 50, we are introduced to Kyle Rayner, ‘the boy who would be the last Green Lantern’ for the next 10 years plus.

Think about that, Hal Jordan wasn’t a Green Lantern for over ten years. We all knew he’d come back, but as the years went on, it seemed more and more like Emerald Twilight was not a flash in the pan event, like the Death of Superman, but more akin to an event like the Death of Barry Allen (albeit less heroic).

With Parallax, we saw the Hal Jordan continue to try and resurrect Coast City with the events of Zero Hour, save the world in Final Night, and adopt the role of the Spectre in Day of Judgement. That is no less then three DCU wide crossover events that are in response to the events that happened in Superman 80. The fall of Hal Jordan also played a role in the death and return of Green Arrow. Even after Hal returned to the land of the living and the good in Green Lantern: Rebirth, Coast City remained a essential element of the current Green Lantern series. Coast City even acted as the emotional climax for the recent Sinestro Corp War. This climax also lead to Coast City being renamed ‘The City Without Fear’. With this catchy title to the city, it appears that now, the saga of Coast City is finally over and with it the influence that the events that Superman 80 had on the DCU. Is the most important DC Comic of the past 20 years? I’m sure I may have missed a book or two that should also be considered, but to me, its hard to argue a book that was (in)directly responsible for three company wide events, and two character reinventions.

DC Comics next major event, Final Crisis, is set to start at the end of this month. Despite being written by the usually solid, Grant Morrison, I’m finding myself unexcited for this event to start. Do I lack confidence in Morrison ability to craft a universe-wide story? Maybe. After all it was 10 years ago that he gave us his last universe wide tale, DC One Million.

DC One Million was designed to be a four part weekly miniseries, which tied into all all DCU books cover dated November 1998. The story revolves around a group of heroes traveling from the year 85,271 (which would be the year that DC is scheduled to be publishing its one millionth issue of Action comics) to the present with the goal of sending their counterparts to the future as part of a massive celebration of the return of Superman-Prime (in this story the future Clark Kent goes by the name of Superman-Prime as in the far future there are multiple Supermen in the universe). With the aide of Hourman and his time travel abilities, the future heroes plan to send the JLA to the future, and bring them back a moment after they depart. Like most events in comics that involve time travel, things do not go as planned. Instead it is slowly revealed that Vandal Savage in the future has played a role in the sabotaging of Hourman, while concurrently in the present Vandal Savage is plotting massive world destruction with his army of Rocket Red’s. This is just a brief overview of the story, and leaves some major plot points out. DC One Million is not a story about how the present interacts with the future, but instead much more a story about how the future interacts with the present. If you want the latter, you are best to check out the books of the individual characters. For example, to see how Green Lantern reacts to the future he finds himself (unknowingly?) stranded in, you should read his tie-in issue for the month, Green Lantern 1,000,000.

That is not a typo. As part of the promotion for this event, all DCU books published their one millionth issue instead of their regularly scheduled issue. Also instead of being cover dated Nov. 1998, each book was cover dated November 85,271 and plotted by Morrison. Having Morrison plot each book helped make sure that the look of the DCU’s future was coherent amongst all the books. While some would argue this being an attempt to cash in, these books really did service the story, and helped define the future that the characters inhabit. In addition, some of these books had plot elements that were essential to help you fully appreciate the story.

The concept of this story is definitely interesting, and is filled with big fun ideas. One of which is the idea of concurrent stories involving two different Vandal Savages as the villain. This was a nice touch and acknowledgment of the fact some villainy never goes away, it just gets better with age. I was more impressed with the optimism and excitement the heroes have in the chance to see the far distant future. The feeling of excitement and joy by the heroes made me realize how human they are. Seeing heroes actually being excited is a facet that should be explored more by the creative minds at DC. It is not often that we see Superman with a look of wonderment on his face.

Reading the series ten years after its publication I couldn’t help but be surprised at some of the events referenced. For example, I had completely forgotten about the period where Wonder Woman was replaced by her mother. The other event that caught me off guard was that this series provided one of the earliest glimpses of Mark Waid and Grant Morrison’s multiverse replacing concept of Hyper-time. I also couldn’t help but smile at the scene where the Superman of the future starts to punch through time, and as a result of each punch, he slightly alters time. Was this the inspiration for the ‘Superboy-punch’ concept of Infinite Crisis? Probably not, but the similarities are there.

While the story is filled with wonderful ideas, it also fails because of them. There are to many ideas for the main series to hold, and as a result many of the plot points (and cliffhangers) being created the main series are answered in the tie-in books for month. Similarly many of the events that the characters are dealing with in the main story are the result from events that occurred in these auxiliary books. For example between issue 2 and 3 of the series, the future Justice League realize why they are trapped in time, what is happening to the world around them, and are already well into the process of creating the solution. In general as the miniseries progresses, this problem only amplifies. By the end of the series, I have little-to-no idea what is going on and can barely make sense of the last half of the book. I’m not sure if this could have been solved with more pages per issue, or entire different approach to the structuring of the event. Morrison, and in turn DC, tried to make a series where you didn’t have to read all of the tie-ins for the month to ‘get’ the story, but instead made you have to (unknowingly) read certain books. In general if you are going to do a ‘non-cross-over’ event series with tie-ins, then you should structure it much like Marvel’s Civil War did. The main series tells the story, and the other books flush out elements of the story, but do not contain major plot points. Otherwise, you need a way to distinguish the books that matter from the ones that don’t.

It is because of this seemingly large dependence on other books to tell its story, that I can’t fully recommend DC: One Million. The series had promise, and a lot of good ideas, but the need for the other books to truly ‘get’ the series stops me from making any reccomendations. I am hopeful that in the ten years since DC One Million, both Grant Morrison and DC have grown in their ability to tell event stories. Morrison has shown the ability to make tight, accessible stories that use layers of big ideas (see: All-Star Superman), while DC has made its last few event series stand perfectly find by themselves. As long as the story remains told in the confines of its miniseries, and the big ideas don’t over take the story, I fully believe Final Crisis will be an interesting tale.

Now if I can only get excited to read Final Crisis.