We are a little more than a month away to the opening day for the live-action remake of Disney’s beloved Beauty and the Beast and I can’t think of a better way to celebrate than with a new plush toy! Build-A-Bear Workshop recently launched a new line of plushes and toy clothing, themed to the upcoming film and it is adorable.

Let’s start off with the leading lady, Belle, who will get a bear inspired by her as well as a her ballroom dress, sold separately. The Belle Bear, costing $25.50, has fur with sparkling gold accents as well as commemorative paw pads. Fans will notice that the Belle Dress ($18) is designed after the version Emma Watson wears rather than the traditional one. There are also matching heels for this outfit ($8.50).

I personally prefer the Beast ($28). The dude is fluffy, with a tail and a set of horns. What’s not to love? I also like that the two plushes are to scale, with Belle being 16 inches in height and Beast measuring 19 inches. Like the Belle bear, the Beast has commemorative paw pads, one bearing the film’s logo and the other with a silhouette of his castle. Beast’s Ballroom Costume ($18) is gorgeous, with tons of embroidered detail. Round out the set with a Rose Accessory ($4) and you have a collection fit for any movie fan.

What do you think of this new line? Are you excited for the upcoming film? Let us know in the comments!

Many of today’s adult nerds can remember watching Power Rangers on their clunky television sets as children. The Amercan-ized version of the first season  is getting a very swanky movie remake and I can imagine many of us will be lining up to buy tickets. A shiny, new trailer was released today for the film. Let’s have a look.

With its somewhat darker tone, I feel like the film is catering more to the older fans who grew up with the series. That is not to say it looks bad by any means, quite the opposite in fact. I had my doubts initially but this trailer has piqued my interest in the title.

What was your reaction to this trailer? Let us know in the comments!

Dragon Quest VIII: Journey of the Cursed King was heralded as one of the finest RPGs on the Playstation 2 (and potentially of all time). Fans of the title as well as newcomers will be pleased to learn that Nintendo has announced the release date for the Nintendo 3DS remake: January 20, 2017.

This release is no mere copy, however. Beyond being portable (which let’s face it is pretty awesome), the 3DS version will feature two new playable characters, additional side quests, an alternative ending, and the ability to spot enemies on the map a la Dragon Quest VIIPlayers will also be able to speed up battle animations and make use of a “Quick-Save” function.

Players can take snapshots during battles and cutscenes, even striking special poses, then adding stickers, banners, and filters to their photo. As the heroes progress in the story, they will meet Cameron Obscura in Port Prospect, granting them access to Cameron’s Codex. This item rewards players for capturing specific events, characters, and monsters on film. With the Nintendo 3DS’s Streetpass function, photos can be shared, with other players giving images they like a “thumbs up.” The more “thumbs up” a photo has, the greater the chance of being gifted a new item.

You can learn more about Dragon Quest VIII: Journey of the Cursed King on the official site (yes, it is for the PS2 version – don’t ask me why Nintendo linked to it) or on Nintendo’s product page.

From the second I read Jim Vorel’s list of 100 So Bad it’s Good movies I knew I had to have him on the podcast to talk b-movies. Jim is an awesome writer and quickly became a friend of the internet. Be sure to check out his write ups on PasteMagazine.com and specifically the article we discuss this episode.

The intro music contains the song I Think I’ve Gone Mad (f/J-Walk) by Sinistah K from his MixTape Ugly

Follow Saint Mort on Facebook and Twitter

If you really like the show get Matt something nice off his AmazonWishList

Subscribe to Us on iTunes

 

Today USA Today showed the pictures from the remake of the 1984 classic Red Dawn. The film was shot in 2009 but was delayed due to MGM’s financial problems. The film is finally set to hit theaters on November 21st but not without some big changes having been made to the final film.

When it was shot four years ago it had a cast of then unknowns, some have since become break-out stars. The cast includes Chris Hemsworth, Josh Hutcherson, Adrianne Palicki,Isabel Lucas and Josh Peck. The film had an entirely different enemy army when it was shot but it has since been changed digitally for the final version as well as being re-edited.

“Originally it was the Chinese,” Hutcherson says. “And then there was the thought that the Chinese own most of the companies making movies and that maybe it wasn’t the best idea in the world.”

In the end, the attacking forces became the North Koreans (aided by the Chinese and Russians).

Like the original 1984 version communism is the ultimate villain. The first film starred a cast of then up and comers such as Patrick Swayze, Jennifer Grey (no body puts Baby in the corner), Lea Thompson, C. Thomas Howell, and introduced the world to Charlie Sheen. The film was set in Colorado and saw the cast play a group of teens who band together as “the Wolverines,” a guerilla unit, who fight an invasion of Soviet, Cuban and Nicaraguan forces at the dawn of World War III.  If you haven’t seen it I recommend you check it out. It’s currently available on Netflix Instant Streaming.

MTV News recently spoke with actor Sharlto Copley (District 9, The A-Team) during Comic-Con where he was promoting Neill Blomkamp’s film Elysium. Copley was briefly asked about Spike Lee’s upcoming remake of Old Boy in which he plays the villain.

“They’ve been very true to the spirit of it. It’s dark, it’s gritty. They’re not sort of softening it, which to me was important. And I’m very excited about that movie. I’m very excited about working with Spike and with Josh,” Copley said. “I think it’s going to be a film that is really worth redoing and make that idea that is such an unbelievable story accessible to maybe more people than it was originally.”

The movie is a remake of the 2003 Korean film Oldboy, directed by Chan-wook Park, which  was based on the manga by Nobuaki Minegishi and Garon Tsuchiya.

Josh Brolin is set to play Joe Douchett, an everyday man who has only five days and limited resources to discover why he was imprisoned in a hotel room for 15 years without any explanation. Copley will play the film’s villain Adrian Pryce.

In the world of horror movies, there is William Friedkin’s The Exorcist, and then there is everything else. Possibly the most disturbing horror film ever made, it still stands as the only movie of its kind to break out of the usual horror movie niche and become a genuine blockbuster. (adjusted for 2012 dollars, would have made $875 million domestically today) Even a horror buff like me can’t watch it in a dark room alone.  I know there are certain people out there that the movie doesn’t scare, but I usually find them to be the kind of people who don’t understand the difference between being “startled” and being “frightened.” The Exorcist get under your skin and stays there forever; it truly frightens.

So in the creatively bankrupt past decade in Hollywood (for horror films anyway) the one classic film that has remained untouched has remained The Exorcist. Until now. But it looks like it won’t be coming back to the big screen, but to television instead. According to the Vulture,  Sean Durkin, director of the indie movie Martha Marcy May Marlene, is developing The Exorcist into a ten-episode TV series with Roy Lee, the executive producer of The Ring. It seems Durkin’s version of The Exorcist follows the events leading up to a demonic possession and especially the after-effects of how the MacNeil family copes with it.

Since this is only being shopped as a ten episode series, it should be obvious this will end up on cable and not a network. While I usually loathe remakes, especially horror remakes, I see this is as less a shitty cash in from a studio who happens to own a property, and rather a new interpretation of a classic novel in a different medium. Not only can the original film never be topped as another film, no studio would dare make a mainstream film as scandalous and blasphemous as the original again, especially in our current cultural climate. This isn’t the free wheeling, experimental 70’s anymore; the MPAA has become considerably more conservative than they were forty years ago. There is no way that the classic movie would get anything but an NC-17 these days. Meanwhile, most HBO fare is much racier than your average Hollywood movie….the average episode of True Blood would get an NC-17 from the MPAA if it was a movie. Cable has become the new home of “racy” material, in the way movie theaters were in the past.

The Exorcist is currently being shopped around to various networks, and is said to have a lot of interested parties chomping at the bit. I’d guess we might have this new version premiere next year, the 40th Anniversary of the original film.

Ghostbusters 3 Moves Forward With No Bill Murray?

That Dan Aykroyd is just not giving up on the notion of a Ghostbusters III, despite the better judgment of everyone else on Earth, including original star Bill Murray. In an interview with Empire Online that appeared this week, Aykroyd stated that if Murray refused to appear as Dr. Peter Venkemen for a proposed third chapter, then they would consider re-casting the role.

I can’t imagine a worse idea than this, but there you go. One other recent rumor, that Bill Murray had shredded the script for part three that Aykroyd has sent him, only to send it back with a note attached that said “no one wants to see fat old men chasing ghosts” is apparently just that- a rumor. According to Aykroyd, “Bill Murray is not capable of such behavior. This is simply something that would not be in his nature. We have a deep, private personal relationship that transcends business. We communicate frequently and his position on the involvement in Ghostbusters 3 has been made clear and I respect that. But Bill has too much positive estimation of my writing skills to shred the work.”  I’ll totally bet he wanted to though.

The original Ghostbusters was that lighting in a bottle that you just couldn’t capture twice (I mean, we know…they tried to with part two) It was that perfect storm of script, casting and directing. If they had as hard a time repeating that magic formula once, why try again twenty five years later?  I’ll agree with Dan Aykroyd on one particular thing though, there are more cool Ghostbusters stories to tell, but maybe movies is not the way to go here. An animated series, maybe in CGI Clone Wars style, should be the way to go. After all, the 80’s cartoon show was pretty bad ass, imagine what they could do now? Sony could keep the franchise alive and viable this way, they could move more Ghostbusters shirts at Target and not tarnish the original, perfect film. Food for thought Aykroyd.

Guillermo del Toro To Helm Beauty and the Beast

Well, it feels like months since the last time I announced a project that Hellboy/Pan’s Labyrinth director Gullermo del Toro was attached to do. Well, here comes another one:  The Hollywood Reporter broke the news that del Toro is directing a new adaptation of the classic fairy tale Beauty and the Beast for Warner Brothers, with Hermione Granger herself Emma Watson as Belle. (or whatever she’ll be called in this one) This appears to be del Toro’s next directing gig after he wraps up work on his currently filming monster movie Pacific Rim.

According to the original story, the deal for this movie has been in the works since last spring when del Toro first began working with producers Denise De Novi and Alison Greenspan on a the project, which was initially an adaptation of the Robin McKinley novel Beauty: A Retelling of the Story of the Beauty and the Beast. It seems the project  has evolved since then, and is no longer a straight up adaptation of the book.  Aside from this movie, del Toro  is directing Trollhunters for Dreamworks, is developing a Haunted Mansion movie at Disney and is still attached to direct both a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and a Frankenstein project at Universal. This guy really needs to stop saying “yes” to everything they come at him with.

It Is Official: Michael Bay To Direct Transformers 4

So, you thought you might finally be free of Michael Bay directed Transformers movies, after Bay announced last year that Dark of the Moon would be his final entry in the saga? Yeah…not so fast. Deadline.com broke the news this week that Paramount had finalized the deal for Bay to return to the director’s chair for Transformers 4 in 2014. According to the official announcement, this new Transformers movie would be a “re-imagining” of the series, with an all new cast. I’m not entirely sure how in the hell a director can re-imagine his own damn movie series. How is this not just a sequel with a new cast?

Ninja Turtles Reboot Gets A Director Too

And speaking of Mr. Bay, The long talked about live action reboot of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles gained a little bit more traction this week, as Jonathan Liebesman, director of last year’s pretty awful alien invasion flick Battle:Los Angeles (and the upcoming Wrath of the Titans) getting the directing honors. What worries me more than Liebesman is that the production company for this is none other than Michael Bay’s Platinum Dunes, a studio known for not having a shred of originality and only remaking classic 80’s horror films like A Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th  into glossy, soulless cash grabs. Now that they’ve run out of 80’s slashers from our youth to destroy, they are setting their sights on beloved comic book and cartoon properties.

Although TMNT came out as an indie comic in 1984, I wasn’t really into it as a kid. By the time the whole franchise hit weekday afternoon kiddy appeal and mass popularity, it was 1989/90, and I was too old for that stuff, so I really have no emotional investment in this property like many of you reading this no doubt do. But I honestly feel sorry for those of you who do, because Platinum Dunes is almost sure to piss all over your beloved Turtles. Might as well brace yourselves now kiddies.

MGM Hopes Valley Girl Is The New Grease, Or At Least The New Hairspray

MGM, in an effort to crawl out of their recent bankruptcy, is looking to exploit every last movie in their library for some kind of reboot or sequel.  Joining Red Dawn, Carrie and Robocop as the latest of their classic flicks to get the remake treatment will be none other than Valley Girl, the 1983 movie that was the first starring vehicle for a young Nicolas Cage. The original movie is pretty terrible; imagine a shitty version of a John Hughes flick and that’s pretty much Valley Girl in a nutshell. However, it does have an awesome New Wave soundtrack, which still gets some heavy rotation in my itunes library I must say. Leave me alone ok? I’m a child of the 80’s.

This time, MGM is looking to remake the movie as a musical, using all the great 80’s music, maybe hoping to be for today what Grease was to kids in the late 70’s. Although Grease had original music, and Valley Girl looks to be cover versions of classics from the likes of the Go-Go’s and the Cars. The director for this is an relative unknown named Clay Weiner (best name ever, btw) who directed a few commercials and a Nickelodeon movie. Despite name director’s wanting the job, Weiner’s demo presentation for Valley Girl was apparently so awesome, with choreographed 80’s mash-ups, it won the studio over and he got the gig.  MGM is looking to fast track this one, so expect it to be out next year, the 30th anniversary of the original film.

Personally, I think MGM should have taken this thing to Broadway instead. Clearly this movie is going to be targeted at today’s teen audience, and their knowledge of anything pre-2000 is questionable to say the least. At least the Broadway audience is the right age demographic for something like this, not to mention most “jukebox musicals” do really well, as there is nothing people love more than familiarity. And besides, this makes more sense than a Back to the Future musical, and that is said to be happening. Why not Valley Girl?