If you’re anything like me, you lay awake at night pondering deeply philosophical questions.  Am I the sum of my experiences?  If I had chronic amnesia, would I lose all sense of who I am as a person, or would there still be a core sort of self?  What could be the worst possible time for a two-headed shark to attack?

I can’t answer the first two questions, but now I can answer the third.  No, it’s not during a massive volcano eruption, nor during a meteor shower and, yes, while being the middle of a human centipede and being attacked by a two-headed shark would be really inconvenient, I can say without a doubt that the worst time for a mutant shark attack would be on Opposite Day.

Spring Break at the donkey show is always a mixed bag.

Earlier this year, The Asylum, a production company with a tendency to release low budget movies with similar themes to upcoming blockbusters, released 2-Headed Shark Attack.  This, mind you, is the same company that brought us such fine films as Mega Shark v.s. Crocosaurus, #1 Cheerleader Camp, and Snakes on a Train.  (Trivia tidbit: their latest, Nazis at the Center of the Earth, is set to release on the 24th of this month.  Premiere party at Jonathan London’s house!)

This must-see film doesn’t only feature a massive two-headed shark, but also features performances by Carmen Electra (Carmen Electra’s Aerobic Striptease), Charlie O’Connell (Sliders’ Colin Mallory), and Brooke Hogan (Mrs. Hulk Hogan’s womb).  The cast, I will admit, might be more alarming than the shark.

How do these actors all come together to form the magical film that graces our presence today?  So glad you asked—otherwise this article would have ended prematurely, and I hate it when action is halted by someone being premature.  In this wild tale of fantasy, Dr. Babish (Electra) and Professor Babish (O’Connell) take a boatload of college kids out on… a boat.  What else are you going to carry a boatload of kids on?

A result of Hulkamania running wild.

As female characters are slowly being established as entities independent of their breasts, the corpse of a mega-mouth shark, a species that is normally consigned to the depths of the ocean with Amy Winehouse begin to surface.  This dead fish inconveniences the Babishes and their little army of castaways when it gets stuck in the ship’s propeller and begins to jettison a trail of little bloody bits behind them as they bob along, summoning the two-headed shark right to their lido deck.

Angry at not being allowed into the sunbathing area due to inappropriate attire, the mutant shark rams the side of the vessel, causing the hull to crack and water to seep in.  It is at this time that Opposite Day is announced.  Talk about timing, right?

This is the best shot in the movie and my new desktop wallpaper.

How to handle Opposite Day during a shark attack:

Have the captain of the ship loudly announce how the boat is sinking, the radio is broken, and everyone is, essentially, fucked.  Following that, evacuate the ship to a nearby island with well-kept buildings, groomed pathways, and the occasional electrical outlet.  While wandering these fenced paths, make sure everyone loudly complains about how the island has no sign of recent human life and that there might be cannibals.

While the ship starts to sink, insert a montage of Carmen Electra doing vaguely erotic poses as she sunbathes in order to keep the feeling of action and intensity at its highest peak.  Oh, wait, that’s when it’s Opposite Day for the director!  I’m going to insert awkward laughter here and get back to the movie.

Hah. Hah hah haaaah hahh... sigh.

We quickly learn that the shark is not subject to the laws of Opposite Day or physics—while the kids roam the island getting into nonsensical conversations with emotional outbursts that make very little sense, the twenty-foot long shark begins to slam its body into the island, causing quakes to rock the several mile wide island as pieces begin to fall off and cracks show on the surface.

What will they do?!  They can’t go into the water because there’s a two-headed shark, and they can’t stay on the island because it’s falling to pieces due to the shark’s amorous affections!  It’s the ultimate catch-22!  The horror, the tension, the… oh, fuck it, I can’t keep this fake interest up.

I’d like to go more into this movie, about how the remaining few survivors at the end of the film somehow set a t-shirt hanging out of a gas can on fire with a Zippo… while underwater, or about how the anchored – and supposedly sinking— ship constantly varies its distance from the island.  One hundred feet, two miles, what’s the difference when a boat race is going on?

Lost the boat race.

But what I’d really like to talk about is how this movie consistently fails to keep the most basic levels of realism.  How can a girl on one side of the island see what’s going on on the other side of the island?  How can a group of people on the shore see a shark swimming underwater two miles away?  How can a speedboat race along for thirty seconds, only to wind up five feet from its starting point?  How could this movie have passed anyone’s quality control?

FUCK.

I hate this movie.  I’m all about B-movies, I really am.  Nazis under the earth?  Hell, yes.  A car that runs solely on human blood?  Definitely.  Sharks with scorpion tails and prehensile tongues?  If I’m watching porn, sure.

But I can’t do this.  I need the laws of physics to be obeyed, especially if biology is being so delightfully disregarded.  This movie lives on others’ suffering and a complete disregard of the natural order of things, like eyeline matching and reality.  Carmen Electra, a doctor??  Who would believe that?  The only redeeming thing in this movie is the opening scene.  They blew their sharky load in the first three minutes.

Totally embarrassed about premature load blowing.

I want to shoot someone.  I want to find out which exact people are responsible for this mess and I want to take away whatever guild cards they may have and ship them out to Ohio where they can live as corn farmers and won’t be able to do any more harm.

So if you feel like being horribly disappointed, if you feel like screaming at your television, if you feel like designing a drinking game around Opposite Day that is sure to kill you (He leaps out of the boat to get away from the shark??  Take a drink!), fire this film up.  I’ve done my best to dissuade you while staying under five thousand words— your suffering is no longer my responsibility.

I’m full of roiling hate, oceans of roiling hate containing gigantic sharks with teeth bigger than my rather immense forehead—which is appropriate, given the movie that Matt Kelly suggested I watch this week.

Shark Attack 3: Megalodon is a frightening example of what can happen when your sound guy runs amok with his dubbing.  I fear for my safety, I fear for the safety of my never-to-be-existent children, that one day they may find themselves unable to speak, only able to laugh like assholes whenever someone of a different race speaks to them.

"Do you like movies about gladiators?"

Directed by David Worth (Lady Dragon, Lady Dragon II), written by the duo who brought you the previous two Shark Attack movies (Scott Devine and William Hooke), this steaming pile of krill was released straight to video in 2002, allowing it to bypass the average person’s radar (lucky, lucky average person).

What was the average person missing?  Actors John Barrowman (Torchwood’s Captain Jack Harkness), Jenny McShane (um…), and Ryan Cutrona (24’s Admiral John Smith and Mad Men’s Gene Hoftstadt) doing battle with a giant shark.  Sounds pretty amazing, right?  We get somebody to zap in a torpedo-rigged TARDIS right into the belly of the beast, BOOM, no problem.

Well, that’s not what happens.  So much for your connections, Barrowman.

The end of every James Bond movie I've ever seen.

This feast of a film opens with a brief, barely related, and completely unnecessary prologue where a diver for Apex Communications falls prey to a drive-by sharking.  What this bit of background establishes for us is two things: 1) there’s a shark 2) while the movie may have been released in 2002, it was clearly shot in the 1970s.

Moving past that near-useless opening, we are introduced to Colima, Mexico’s Playa Del Rey Resort, manned and visited by robotic beings programmed with an unendingly creepy laugh track.  These robots, should they be of a feminine appearance, do not have the capacity of language and only communicate with their brethren with various combinations of moans, cooing, and sounds of surprise.  As for the males, the standard issue models are able to form simple sentences regarding their female counterparts, each sentence punctuated by mechanical laughter.

Unfortunately for these robots, a robot-eating shark has decided to spent some time at the resort’s beaches and soak up some rays and munch on some communications cable—you know, typical shark activities.

Unfortunately for this shark, Captain Jack Harkness is on the case.

Wait, what?  Not Harkness???  What, just some douche named Ben and a paleontologist who could only pass for Laura Dern on account on blondness?  Fuck this movie.

Shark-cam!!

Not-Harkness (Barrowman) and Not-Dern (McShane) team up with some aging ex-Navy guy (Cutrona) and flounce around Colima ogling the scads of bare breasts while uncovering shark-hiding conspiracies set in place by heads of greedy corporations.

What’s the conspiracy?, I will pretend you cared enough to ask.  Apex Communications is laying down miles and miles of communications cable underwater with the hope of wrangling billions of dollars from an international market, but there’s a problem… the cables emit such electricity that they’re waking up dinosaur sharks.

Okay, not “dinosaur sharks” like in ScyFy’s Dinoshark, but really big, supposedly extinct sharks called megalodons.  And these megalodons are attacking the shit out of anyone who happens to be in the area when they stroll down the cable route.  Yes, attacking the shit out of them.  It’s part of the circle of life, just accept it.

Apex has learned about this side effect of their cables and, instead of doing something like taking care of the problem, they’ve decided to just keep on with it and either someone else will kill the sharks or they’ll eventually run out of customers.  Either or.

Exhibit A: Man who was, indeed, attacked the shit out of.

With all of this asinine stupidity in place, there are four very redeeming parts of this movie.

1. A baby Megalodon decides to grab the rope of a helpless paraglider and slowly drags her kicking and screaming into the ocean where it can chomp her to little bits.

2. Caught in the midst of a ship cabin panty raid, Not-Dern pumps a round of lead directly into the thieving baby Megalodon’s mouth.  Immediately before this moment, Not-Harkness is seen whacking the shark’s nose with a baseball bat, screaming “Die, die, die!!”

3. After wrapping up their shark-assassination plan, the charming and suave Not-Harkness says, “I’m really wired.  What do you say that I take you home and eat your pussy?”

4. Mama Megalodon wakes up and starts eating boats.  Please see the pictures below, as words cannot possibly wrap around the concept of how awesome this is.

I'm a shark, I'm a shaaaaark!
Suck my diiiick, I'm a shaaaark!

In sum, this movie isn’t great.  The first three-quarters of an hour is pretty tedious and entirely worth skipping, but once those forty-five minutes pass, even Disney can’t generate this kind of movie magic.  So if you’re feeling like sharking it up tonight and getting your Megalodon on, sink your hundreds of pointy teeth into this baby on Netflix on Demand.

Set within the same universe as Vivid’s very successful Spider-Man XXX and their upcoming releases, She Hulk XXX, Thor XXX & Iron Man XXX, director Axel Braun’s Avengers XXX combines the separate films into the beginning of a larger tale.

As news reports begin to flood in about the destruction being caused by an unknown entity, Agent Nick Fury (Lexington Steele) decides it’s time to go public with S.H.I.E.L.D and gathers together his superhero taskforce in order to combat this new menance.

The problem is, the “unknown” entity is actually the ragin’ and rampagin’ Incredible Hulk (Jordan Lane).

After Iron Man (Dale Dabone) attempts to subdue him on his own and fails, Fury realizes he needs to call on bigger guns… like the son of Odin, Thor (Brenden Miller) and a mystery hero who will be revealed at the end of the film.

Also working on Fury’s taskforce are the Scarlet Witch (Dani Cole), Ms. Marvel (Lexi Swallow), Spider-Woman (Jenna Presley), She Hulk (Chyna), Black Widow (Brooklyn Lee), and Hawkeye (Eric Masterson).

Among these heroes, we’ll see the naughty team-ups between Ms. Marvel and the Scarlet Witch, Black Widow and Hawkeye, She Hulk and Thor, and other surprise moments. This’ll certain be be better than most erotic fan “art”.

I visited the set on a day scheduled for two sex scenes: the Black Widow/Hawkeye pairing and the She Hulk/Thor pairing. Watching the painstaking work of the make-up artists as they transformed the wonderfully sweet Chyna into sassy She Hulk and being able to see the amount of work put into the some of the sets was incredible.

So please enjoy our Geekscape exclusive shots from the set of Vivid’s latest superhero parody, Avengers XXX!

Starting here...
...to get to here.
Stop, it's hammer time? (Brenden Miller)
Take one Hawkeye (Eric Masterson)...
Add in a bit of Black Widow (Brooklyn Lee)
A dash of sound guy (a dashing sound guy?)
A teaspoon full of camera dude. (Ew, no.)
And that's how porn is made.

Avengers XXX is set to release on May 4th, 2012.

In celebration of the 35th anniversary of the animated classic, Wizards, FOX has released the epic fantasy film on Blu-ray, complete with a commentary by legendary filmmaker Ralph Bakshi, who was able to take the time out of his busy schedule to sit down with Geekscape.  This is the third and final part of the series, you can find part one here.

A: This has always been a point of curiosity for me: Avatar.  When he pulls out the gun and shoots Blackwolf, I was sitting there, because movies have a formula, you know.  He’s not supposed to do that, even though sometimes we wish they would.  But He’s supposed to fight with magic and then the power of love will come and suddenly he’ll get a big burst of rainbow unicorns or something.  But he shoots him.  Which left me sitting there going, “He… he totally shot him.  He shot him with a gun after backhanding that Viking.  He shot him.”  I didn’t know what to think.  What was behind that choice?

RB:  It was for a lot of reasons.  One of the reasons I went into it was your thinking, secondly, look— Avatar was old.  He was tired.  I set up the whole picture showing that he wasn’t sure what he could do.  He was brave enough to go through it and he would try to keep everyone together, but throughout the picture he wasn’t sure of himself.  He made mistakes.  And towards the end what with Eleanor and all that had happened to him, when he was popping the flowers around—he was out of it.  There was no way that he could magically beat his brother.  The only way to stop his brother was with what his brother uses to hurt everyone, and that’s the gun.  Avatar had to win for the sake of his species.  What I also say, technology for the right reasons is fine, it’s technology for the wrong reasons that’s bad.  Avatar getting rid of Blackwolf is a right reason and he blew his brains away.  He could not beat him magically.  That’s why he called him a son of a bitch.  But he did it and it worked.  He got him, which is more important than anything.

A: Do you think he felt guilt for using technology or because he was willing to take that sacrifice for everyone that would it taint him somehow?

RB:  You’re very bright.  I’m not putting you on.  Picture two starts: everyone’s happy, but Avatar is off in the woods and he’s depressed.  He killed his brother, he just shot his brother.  He hated him, but he was his brother.  He used technology which he didn’t want to use—he dirtied himself.  He’s in a very bad way.  So that’s how picture two starts.  He’s leaving the community, they’re going home by themselves and he’s leaving because of these issues.  I wanted to show that even though he hates his brother, killing him was not easy for him to do.  He took the hit for everybody.  That’s religious to some Christian people, I would suppose—not that I am pushing that.  But he had to stop the death of all those wonderful creatures.  But he had let himself down and one’s self is very important, so I’m going to be discussing how people let themselves down by selling out, by not whistle-blowing.  So yes, you’re very right, picture two starts with Avatar in bad shape.

A: And Eleanor, she goes with him.  What’s the connection between the two of them?  It doesn’t exactly seem like what one would typically expect.

RB:  I’m not sure.  I’m an old man, I was old then.  Old men and young girls—I would change that.  I wouldn’t have—I heard the end the other day—I haven’t seen the picture since I made it, and I won’t see it.  I won’t look at any of my pictures.

A: Why?

RB: I’ll tell you in a second.  But when they rode off together, I was surprised at myself.  I wouldn’t have done that today.  I’m not sure what their relationship is.  Well, he’s sexually attracted to her, but I don’t know what her reaction is.  She’s toying with him, she loves him, she’s playing with him, she’s funny, she loves him enough to play with him in a way that makes him feel good.  She’s a good girl, she likes him that way— that’s the best I could come up at the time.  Past that, I wasn’t sure where I was going with that.  And now today, as an old man, I won’t go anywhere with it.  In other words, she belongs with Weehawk or she belongs somewhere else.  And that might be how she grows up, when he tells her, listen, now you’re on your own without me, this is what is means to become a full-fledged fairy, not hanging on to me.  I’d play it that way.

A:  So why don’t you watch any of your own films?

RB: Well, I’m not sure they’re as good as people say they are,  and I’m not sure that if I looked at them, I would like them myself.  So the only way I can maintain a certain position of agreeing with people is to not to see them again.  And I’ve always done that.  It’s a question of fear—I’m not going to see Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings because I don’t want him to have done a better picture than I did.  It’s a way of hanging a certain curtain in front of yourself.  People enjoy my movies and they send stuff in and they love the films and I want to agree with them.  The only way to agree with them is by not seeing the movies myself.  It’s a thing I have, but listen, once in a while I will walk by a screen and take a peak, and it’s not bad, what I see.  The picture that I can look at over and over again is CoonskinCoonskin I could look at forever, it was the greatest picture that I ever made.  Because it’s got all these ideas– Miss America, imagine Miss America being Palin before she was Palin.  It’s amazing.  But that’s why I don’t look at them.

A:  You said you would change the ending, or you wouldn’t do the ending the same way.  What would you do now?

RB: I bet it would be very happy.  Everyone would be dancing in the firelight and Eleanor would be dancing and singing and they’d be playing music, a great Lawrence of Arabia scene.  Everyone’s singing and dancing and and Weehawk would say, “Has anyone seen Avatar?” and I’d roll the credits.

A:  You said it’s supposed to be a trilogy.  Do you know what the third one is going to be about yet?

RB:  The third one will have to depend on how the second one works.  What happens in there will inspire the third one.  It’s always worked that way, one picture will get me to the next.  Heavy Traffic got me to Hey Good Lookin’ so each picture was a progression of ideas I learned from before moving on.   So I’d have to see what the second came out to be.  It could be terrible.  I could do number two and it could be a piece of garbage.  I don’t know how I did one, I haven’t the slightest idea of how I wrote that.  I haven’t the slightest idea!  I just sat down and wrote it and I obviously was a different person.  But that’s what I wrote and that’s what came out.  I don’t know what I’d write today.  I don’t know that I’d be around physically for the third one either.

A: If you complete Wizards II and you’re not around for three, is there someone that you’d feel comfortable doing it, or would you just hope that the right someone comes along and picks it up?

RB: It would be somebody in the studio that would be able to do it.  If I did II, there’d be a lot of kids in there that would have to rise to the occasion.  Matter of fact, all the kids that work for Pixar right now I hired them out of school to work on Mighty Mouse.  All of them  Andrew Stanton, Jim Reardon, all the top names at Pixar trained on Mighty Mouse.  And all those guys, they all started from Cal Arts.  I yelled at them.  And they’re really yelling at this kid, Andrew Stanton— they’re blaming him for John Carter on Mars.  Everyone’s yelling at this kid.  All the press have been down this as the biggest failure in the movies because it cost three-hundred fifty million dollars to make, like it’s his fault.  But I like the kid, I’m saying get off his back.

A magical princess shows you two doors labeled “Part One” and “Part Two”.  If you choose the door labeled “Part One”, turn to page 43.  If you choose the door labeled “Part Two”, turn to page 18.

In celebration of the 35th anniversary of the animated classic, Wizards, FOX has released the epic fantasy film on Blu-ray, complete with a commentary by legendary filmmaker Ralph Bakshi, who was able to take the time out of his busy schedule to sit down with Geekscape.  This is part two of the series, you can find part one here.

A: You don’t see anything in the world of animation right now that has some sort of real idea behind it pushing forward?

RB:  Well, I don’t know everything, I don’t see everything.  I see what people call adult animation, like Ren & Stimpy because of the vulgarity… but you got to tell me, I’m not out there watching it.  I live on a mountain in New Mexico, I paint pictures, I dropped out.  I came back because FOX was doing such a magnificent job on the Wizards Blu-ray and I do want to do Wizards II.  They’re doing a fantastic job.  They’ve gotten behind the film, for the first time, this new FOX and the people, they’re just taking the ball and running with it, and upper management is surprised at the great response we’re getting.

And Wizards II would have a lot of these ideas that I’ve been talking about because Wizards was about terrorists blowing up the planet and technology wiping away magic and right now, the planet is melting, the fish are dying, technology is ripping up everything.  I’m not against technology, unless it’s used for greed and bad purposes.  I love my cell phone, but I don’t like atom bombs.  So I think there’s a lot to say in Wizards II and, of course, the religion issue is big.  Everyone’s against everybody, Muslims against Christians, Christians against Hindus— it’s nuts, it’s just nuts.  After all these thousands of years we’ve been on the planet, look.  It’s all about religion and why?  Why is this?  It’s about people’s rights.  So Wizards II would have those kind of issues.  Now, if someone else was doing that in animation, then someone else would be doing it, but no one else is.  Those are the issues that I think should be discussed in animation, because it’s perfectly aimed to discuss issues.

A: So, you’re talking about Wizards II.  Is that something that’s in the works?  Is it going to be the same set of characters in the same world?

RB: It always was supposed to be a trilogy.  The fact that it took 35 years to get the next one started is not my fault. [laughter]  I’ve always been a slow learner.  Yeah, it’s the same set of characters but things have changed, you know.  Blackwolf dies, to give you a rough idea, and everything collapses, but then the mutants break off into separate little units with all these guys trying to become religious leaders of each group—they’re thinking they’re the new Blackwolf.  Then you have all the stuff under the ground slowly crushing together and forming this sort of internet of ideas but Blackwolf is dug up and put on a throne and wired to it.  So basically you have the beginning of the internet, the clash of religions, the various factions fighting, Avatar is trying to get home with the victorious people and is having a hard time, and Weehawk probably falls in love with Eleanor which gets Avatar furious.  And there’s old age.  I’m an old man now, and Avatar was always old, but now he’s really going to be old.  I have a hard time walking from here to my hotel and that’s affected the way I’m thinking, so I’ve been thinking about old men and young women, and I’m thinking there are some funny issues there to address.

But basically I want to discuss how the planet is dying and nobody cares and that there are certain people that say it’s not dying at all.  Rush Bimbo is on the radio every day lying to the American people for the rich companies and I’ll probably have a guy on talk radio like Rush Bimbo lying, because that’s all he does.  I get so mad listening to him.  He’s come close to calling my president a… never mind,  I think Obama is doing the best job he can under the conditions that he got and I’m going to vote for him again.  Yes, so Wizards II is in the works.

A: Are you going to be using the same animation style and team, or are you going to start hiring newer animators and designers?

RB:  All of the guys that did Wizards are dead.

A: All of them??

RB:  All of them.  My animators are dead.  You have to understand that when I came into the business, I was in my twenties.  The guys I hired were in their 60s and 70s.

A: I didn’t realize.

RB:  That’s why I’m telling you.  Some people you can’t tell this to—they don’t get it.  All the guys, when I came into the business, were all the older guys.  They had been laid off from Warner Brothers, MGM, and Disney.  All the studios closed down their film shorts—there were no more.  Animation in theaters was dead, so I hired these guys and they were unbelievably great and they understood what I was doing.  They supported my ideas and they supported my adult thrust.  The trouble I had was with the younger animators, believe it or not.  The younger animators thought I was toying with Disney and Disney’s legacy and the fact that they all adored Disney and loved Disney and worshipped Disney, then who was I to go in there with my accent—I’m from Brooklyn—and destroy that myth?  Because they all wanted to work for Disney and they all felt that they could only feel they were great if the Disney animators said they were great or if they animated like they did at Disney, so they were on the march to be another Disney.  I was on the march to kick Disney in his pants.  But Disney went to World War II in the studio but none of it represented the fact that Auschwitz was happening and that was nuts.  There was no Auschwitz.  It’s crazy.  With that kind of power you’ve got to do some films that mean something.

Yeah, I would hire new animators.  The technique would be the same, and the metaphor would continue to be technology versus magic, but now I think that all the technology would be computer animated.  But that’s perfect because it is what it is.  And all the magic would be animated just like the original Wizards but with new animators that would have to learn how to animate for real and stop using their machines.

I’ll have more money— Wizards was done on a million dollars!  That was almost undoable, if it wasn’t for my professional-grade animators, I wouldn’t have made it.  It was these guys that came behind me and I think that now the young kids would come behind me.  They didn’t then, which is hard—no one believes that, but it was the older guys who were tired of what they were doing!  They’d done all this stuff all their lives, they were grown men.  They couldn’t believe it, they were so happy at my studio.  They were so happy.  They’d come in and say, “Ralph, do you really want me to do this?” and I’d say, “Yep!” and they’d say, “You’ll really let me do this?” and I’d say, “Go do it, Irv, and leave me alone,” and they were great animators and they did it.  But they couldn’t believe that I was allowing them that kind of freedom.

So, yes, Wizards II would be done that way.  Old fashioned 2D animation, all new technology, and the internet which is so important.  We didn’t have the internet when Wizards was made.  It’s incredible.  Anything I want to find out, I push a button on Google and there it is.  It is mind-boggling—I do it all the time and it’s mind-boggling!  You go to the library and you spend a week trying to find the one book, and it’s such an unbelievable tool and, of course, it’s helping spread freedom in the world.  The whole Arab revolution is being done through the internet except the world doesn’t want to stop Syria from destroying those poor people because Russia enjoys that pain, Russia wants the oil.  It’s pretty sick.  Those are all the issues that I’ll bring up in Wizards II.  It wouldn’t be that blatant because the issues in Wizards were very nicely handled—you got the answers told in a magical story, so I won’t be heavy-handed, I hope, though maybe I would.  I don’t know.

A magical princess shows you two doors labeled “Part One” and “Part Three”.  If you choose the door labeled “Part One”, turn to page 43.  If you choose the door labeled “Part Three”, turn to page 36.

MST3K and Rifftrax performer, Bill Corbett, has started a Kickstarter campaign to fund his latest project: a graphic novel titled Super-Powered Revenge Christmas, where classic Christmas characters fight off a supervillan taskforce.

Check out the official message from Mr. Corbett himself and read all about this new project here.  And don’t forget to donate– I want this graphic novel under my tree this Christmas season!

In celebration of the 35th anniversary of the animated classic, Wizards, FOX has released the epic fantasy film on Blu-ray, complete with a commentary by legendary filmmaker Ralph Bakshi, a still gallery, and—much to my delight, a 24 page booklet featuring concept art of the film as well as a brief background telling the trials and victories in producing the picture.  Bakshi was able to take the time out of his busy schedule to sit down with Geekscape and bring us up to speed on his views of the world, answer some questions provoked by the movie, and shed some light on his hopeful next project, the long awaited Wizards II.  This interview will be spread over the course of multiple articles, so check back to keep up with the story!

A: I wasn’t lucky enough to see Wizards as a kid— an ex-boyfriend of mine introduced me to it and I thought it was just amazing.  It was everything I had ever remembered from leafing through old fantasy art books, and that style of art and animation is something that I rarely see anymore, not to mention the intense ideological content that it had.  I feel like we have lost so much meaning in our cartoons and now it’s stuff like Sponge Bob Squarepants— which I know has its own place, but it saddens me that animation just doesn’t seem to have the meaning it used to.

RB: It’s interesting you should say that, and I’m totally in agreement with you.  When I first started making cartoons, Disney didn’t have meanings either, cartoons were sort of the bastardized medium done for children to merchandise things.  And it has continued on without real ideas—I mean animation is the darling of the industry.  It wasn’t the darling of the industry when I was animating.  But even in my day there were no ideas at all and that was my whole point: why make a film without ideas?  And why make a film talking to children when you can’t give children ideas?  We talk down to children.

I remember when I was a kid, I didn’t understand everything, but I understood I didn’t understand so I tried to find out.  So many people come to me who have seen this film as children and have said that they weren’t sure about what I was saying, but they knew that I was saying something that they had to understand and everyone says that to me—that they knew it had ideas, they respected that, and they felt better about themselves that I wasn’t treating them like idiots.

I think that today, when I watch television animation and things like Cars 2 and Toy Story 3, I mean, why bother making those films when it’s all benign film or asinine bad toilet jokes?  You know, I was telling someone about Fritz, how you could take all the violence and sex out of the film— whatever there was—but the ideas were still there: the racist issues, white kids coming down to go to college from rich families and starting revolutions, and the minute the trouble really started, they ran away and whoever was left had to fend for themselves.  Black people, man, they had to fend for themselves.  It was all full of ideas and about revolutionaries and about greed.  Fritz had its own ideas—past the extranea everyone jumped on—that’s what all my films try to be to the best of their abilities.

Yeah, I don’t see it today and I don’t understand it.  But then again, I don’t understand what happened to the banking community, and I don’t understand why we spent ten years in Afghanistan and I don’t understand why we spent all that money and people are starving in America, and I don’t see what’s going on, I haven’t a clue anymore.  I grew up in a different time when money wasn’t the issue—ideas were.  In the fifties, when I grew up, my time, there were great things happening in art.  Pollack was painting, there was great music with jazz: Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Thelonious Monk.  It wasn’t about money— nobody was doing that for money, everyone was just doing it to do it.  So I grew up where the ideas were important but now everyone’s getting rich, and getting rich is important.  You know, you can’t get animators today, they’re making fortunes working at these companies and that’s great and they want to hold onto their money so they’re not rocking the boat.

A:  When do you think that shift happened, when it stopped being about ideas?  Was it immediate or more of a gradual move?

RB: Look, I don’t know everything, but I think the shift came at Kent State when those kids were shot, when the United States government opened fire on its own students that were protesting peacefully and that order was given to the National Guard to shoot.  When JFK was killed, when Martin Luther King was killed, when Robert Kennedy was killed, when Malcom X was killed—an awful lot of people were shot.  So the revolution stopped cold there, their ideas stopped cold there, and something changed at that point in the country, the country shifted somewhere else and— as with everything else—that’s been slowly, year after year, permeating until we have nothing left but money and greed to strive for.  Things don’t happen overnight, so that shift— to me— started then.  Now I’m not calling it a coup, but I would say it was.  In other words, you couldn’t put together all those people killed, who were all pretty much thinkers of people’s rights, without it affecting the country.  So all the young kids thought, whether they realized or not, that they better stop, they better stop revolting, they better sit down and shut up because they’re going to get killed and they can’t win anyhow.

So if you ask me when it shifted, which I think is a great question, and I’d get plenty of arguments on this, I’m sure, but that’s when I think it shifted and continues with a slow progression until today.  I mean, how could this country elect Bush in twice?  How could we be in Afghanistan for ten years?  How could only the poor people be fighting for this country?  I can’t understand it.   The same people keep going back on tours over and over and that’s crazy, I mean, no one gets out.  They keep sending the same people in and they’re mainly from the poorer class, so the poorer class is fighting these wars for the richer class, who are sitting there ripping off everybody, and the banks and everything are going crazy with the real estate market and the bad loans and blah, blah, blah.  I see Santorum trying to put church and state together and people are voting for him.  That’s what’s happening today, and that’s what Wizards II will be about.  I’m not politically minded, I’m just looking at it honestly and saying that, in the world I came from, I saw the soldiers come home from World War II and I saw how we felt proud of them, but the black soldiers still had to go to the back of the bus.  We kids said, “No!” and that taught us a lesson.  So, yeah, I think it changed when people started getting assassinated for their ideas, when people started getting killed for their ideas.

A magical princess shows you two doors labeled “Part Two” and “Part Three”.  If you choose the door labeled “Part Two”, turn to page 25.  If you choose the door labeled “Part Three”, wait until Monday to open the door.

Early this week, Mr. Matt Kelly said, “Hey, Allison, you should review Birdemic for your weekly column.  It’ll be great!”  And me, being the innocent and so naïve person that I am, trusted him and sat down to watch it.

What I thought would be an experience of greatness, of a bad movie along the lines of so many other bad movies that I love, turned out to be the equivalent of attending an eighth grade science fair where most of the children are severely autistic and prone to rocking back and forth while braiding lanyards and forcing them upon the hapless attendees, then shanking any male passersby if they are wearing Old Spice.

Possibly an eagle, possibly bad CGI.

Birdemic was released in 2008, having spent a theoretical four years in production—the delay attributed to the slow personal funding of writer and director James Nguyen (Tidbit: the IMDB biography of Mr. Nguyen contains the phrase, “Also known as Master of Romantic Thrillers Among the new generation of auteurs in the 21st Century”), and panned with such incredible intensity that it became a cult classic.

Personally, I can’t imagine sitting through this film ever again, so to imagine that there’s a large group of people out there that actually enjoy watching this flaming pile of cloaca is quite difficult.  Then to face myself with the task of hand writing letters to each of them explaining why they’re wrong… it’s rather daunting, but ultimately worth the effort.

This movie stars –and I use that term very, very loosely— Alan Bagh as the infinitely punchable software salesman, Rod, and Whitney Moore as the toothy fashion model, Nathalie.  There some other “supporting casts”, but I’m not going to mention their names so they can begin to heal from the trauma of their experience.

For when one cast isn't enough.

Because of time constraints, and the sheer volume of rant I have on this movie, I’m going to attempt to limit myself to summarizing the first ten minutes of the film—which is great, because FOUR OF THOSE MINUTES are devoted to following dipshit Rod around in his blue mustang while the opening credits roll to a looped twenty second track that wishes it had been composed by Richard Band, but can’t quite claim to be of actual musical value.

The remaining six minutes introduce us to the incredible sound quality that will plague the rest of the movie: varying levels of sound, asinine levels of sound, sound that makes you want to learn to do post-production mixing so no one you truly care for will ever have to experience what you’re experiencing.  Then if your senses weren’t feeling violated enough, Nguyen shoves a terrifying European waitress into view, who takes Rod’s order and, in a display of mercy not found often in this movie, disappears.

"Don't show fear, Nathalie, just don't show fear and maybe he'll go away."

While waiting for his bratwurst, Rod spots Nathalie and, as she flees because she feels him watching her like a total creep while she cuts her toast, he checks out her ass.  After confirming her ass is of high quality, he suddenly realizes that she is the Girl For Him, leaving Helga heartbroken by doing a dine-and-dash and not even finishing the orange juice she so carefully poured for him.

Once he manages to catch up to his darling power-walker, awkward dialogue ensues.  During this conversation, we discover that not only can he not act, he also is unable to hide his serial rapist nature.  We are also able to confirm that, yes, he has never had sex in his life and likely never will.

"I'm gonna cut out her kidneys and use them for slippers."

Nathalie, sensing that she’s spending time in the company of a terrible actor, attempts to escape his company, but he chases her down once more and holds her at the vicious knife-point of painful awkwardness until she gives him her number.

So that’s about ten minutes, give or take a couple of minutes because I cannot bear to recount the details of this awful story any longer.

In sum, birds begin to indiscriminately attack the residents of Half Moon Bay by dropping bird bombs (not a euphemism—they’re actually exploding when they crash into buildings) on them, spraying them with acidic cloaca, or doing a fly-by tearing out of throats.  Rod and Nathalie band together with another young couple and they take to the road, battling the birds and trying to save what little survivors remain in what appears to be some godawful birdocaplyse commercial for Greenpeace.

They used paper napkins, and now they must pay.

By studying this film, I’ve come up with a list of ten guidelines for those of us that will eventually be faced battling this fowl menace.

ALLISON’S SURVIVAL TIPS FOR SURVIVORS WHO WANT TO SURVIVE AN ATTACK FROM EXPLODING AVIANS THAT CHALLENGE THEIR SURVIVAL

1.  Want to picnic on the cliffs or play on the beach during a bird attack?  Go for it!  Birds hate beaches!

2.  You still need to follow basic traffic laws no matter how much your life may be in danger—there’s no excuse for dangerous driving.

3.  If you happen to come across a group of people holed up in a bus, you should probably get them out of their safe environment—it’ll toughen them up.

4.  It’s totally safe to leave your gas-filled car on the side of the road with the keys still in the ignition—no one will take it, especially during an emergency.

5.  Hippies live in the woods and will dispense wisdom.  They survive on tree bark, pine cones, and the beneficence of the Mother Goddess.

6.  Gas isn’t that important to travel.  Mom’s mini-van gets excellent mileage, so feel free to leave a few gallons behind—it’ll magically show back up in your car later.

7.  It’s perfectly safe to drink water from a creek in the California woods—they’re totally unpolluted.

8.  Convenience store clerks are devoted to their posts, and will not leave even during the birdacolypse, so don’t even think about snagging those Twinkies for free.

9.  You’ll always know when to take cover, because when birds dive towards the ground they make missile noises and explode.

10.  Don’t worry about stocking up on cash– even though the phone lines may be down, stores will still be able to accept your credit card.

Remember this face-- you'll be seeing it later tonight... at your window.

Now that you’re properly prepared for this avian devastation, I highly suggest that you never, never ever, NEVER watch this film.  Do NOT queue it up on Netflix on Demand, do NOT subject yourself to the worst editing I’ve ever seen, do NOT watch the awkward, lingering transitions and the phone conversations that make you think that both parties are suffering from some sort of brain degradation.  Pick another movie, hell, pick Troll 2 or Thankskillingboth of which Netflix offered up as suitable alternatives to this flick.

Just stay the flock away, and if you do decide to sit down and witness this debeakal, you’ll definitely egret it.

You should probably read the review of this movie first, if you want this to make any sense.  I mean, do what you want, but that’s my advice.

A:  You were speaking briefly about the idea of emotional inheritance in the movie earlier.  I was hoping if you could speak a little more about that.

JC: This movie comes from some investigation of something that I felt when I was a kid when I was having my first nightmares and, not at that time—later on, I realized that part of the nightmares I had had at that time were connected and related with some secrets of my family, things that my parents didn’t tell me.  But those secrets were living with us and, because when you’re a kid you’re completely sensitive and picking up on so many things from your parents… well, they were trying to hide those things from me and I think it was a mistake to do that.  I understand why they did it—because they were trying to protect me from the ugly truth, but the reality is that I think when you do that to your kids, they create something worse than the truth.  So this movie is about that, how sometimes secrets become a monster and how sometimes your fears are inherited from your family, and then the fear becomes a legacy.   That’s something that really drives me crazy on many levels and I felt that it was important to share that idea with the audience through this particular story.

A:  Then movie was inspired by you reflecting on your childhood?

JC:  Yes.  I was working with the screenwriters, trying to create a kind of structure with the characters and in every single sequence I was trying to track those emotions from the past and try to use them as an inspiration for the movie.  And I can tell you that the character of Juan, the Spanish boy, was a reflection of my feelings at that age because I knew that there was something strange in my house as a child and, in the movie, I used the fantasy of a boy writing a story as a sort of running away from that strange feeling which I think really shows that emotional part of myself.

A: Juan’s story also allows the creation of a monster that can be defeated, as opposed to a secret hovering around the house.  It gives a definition and a shape, something that you can combat that your parents can protect you from instead of something that your parents are creating for you.

JC:  That’s a theme in the movie for sure.

A: So, you said you had nightmares when you were young.  In the movie, the two children’s parents deal with their offspring’s nightmares in very different ways.  How did your parents deal with your nightmares? Were they frightened of them because it was like having their secrets come out, or were they dismissive?

JC:  I remember them being dismissive and, yes, part of the movie is based on that attitude.  But I’m not blaming my parents for handling it in that way, it was something that they did because they wanted to survive in a very difficult environment.  But it was, for me, a very strange thing to grow up with that lack of truth.

A:  So this movie is really addressing things for you?

JC:  Yes, absolutely.

A:  When did you realize that the nightmares you were having were connected to things going on behind the scenes with your family?

JC:  I do therapy, and there was one session with my psychiatrist where we were talking about a nightmare that I had had.  He had me imagine that I was waking up in the middle of the night and that there was somebody in my bedroom.  Then my psychiatrist told me to go and face that person, so I stood up and started walking towards the person hiding in the corner and then he asked me, “Who is that guy?” I remember seeing the face for a second in my mind and it was me, it was me in the corner and I had the revelation: “Oh my god, it’s me— I’m my own ghost,” which I completely believe.  Sometimes your nightmares and your dark side are connected, meaning that your dark side is you and your own problems.  That boy in the corner wasn’t a ghost, he was a very scared boy trying to tell me that the problem, the fear I was experiencing, was connected with something else—the things I felt when I was a kid.

A:  If you were your own nightmare, where did you get the inspiration for the Hollow Face character?

JC:  The concept of mystery in the movie gives the emotional drive to the story.  When we were thinking about the creation of an unique and special monster that would support that drive, the idea about the monster looking for his identity was something I felt was new and fresh and supported of that theme of mystery in a very visual way.  Who is this monster?  Why don’t we see his face?  And it was the perfect reflection of logic and emotional drive for the main characters to want to know who he is.  A monster without a face—if you want to defeat him, you have to see his face, you have to find the identity of this monster.

A: When I was watching it, the end actually made me feel really sad for Hollow Face.  Was there any sort of backstory for that character?

JC: In the first version of the screenplay, we had a much longer version of the background, but finally we decided to compress it to make the ending more clear and understandable. I think, as an audience member myself, that we didn’t need more than those basics to understand the story.  I really believe that if you put some small element into a movie, the audience will imagine the rest of the story.  I really love those types of movies, the way they use elements and details that makes one feel that the movie has become a mirror that the viewer reflects themselves in to think about their own stories.  So when we don’t develop certain things, we try to clearly play a note, a single note, and hopefully that note has a kind of a resonance in the audience’s mind and they build the rest of the story.  So that was intentional with the monster.

A:  Were there a lot of other scenes were cut from the movie?

JC:  In this structure, which is very back and forth and jumpy, I would say not too many scenes were cut, but there are several sequences cut that I hope you will enjoy on the DVD.  These were scenes that I thought “Yes, I would love to see that in the movie!” but finally decided not to keep them.  As we polished the story, we cut some of the English scenes out because the balance of the English story and the Spanish one needed to be equal, more or less, and some of the English scenes didn’t connect so well with the Spanish story at times.  And it’s funny, because when you’re reading the screenplay, you don’t notice, you think that everything flows so well.  Then when you watch it on the screen, you realize that you can screw up so many things that you didn’t even think of and, yes, it was one of the things that I didn’t understand when I was collaborating with the writers to produce the screenplay, that the balance of the two stories needs to be about equal.  And it was a pity because we had to pull stuff out of the movie—really good stuff, but I know the movie was better once we simplified the story.

A: So was cutting those scenes upsetting for you?

JC: W when you cut, it’s a moment of suffering, but then when I watched the whole movie without those pieces, I was happier because I saw how much better everything is when it’s clean and simple.

A: Were there going to be any different endings, or did you always know that the very last scene was going to be there?

JC:  I think from the very beginning, the concept of revealing the story in this kind of fable-like tone was clear to me.  Especially because the movie is about an unfinished story which is why, in the end, the father has to finish the story, and that was part of the concept from the very beginning.  In the process of the development, we went through different ways of doing the ending, but finally we ended up with the one you saw, which is like an exorcism almost, and a very cathartic way to end the film.

 

Intruders opens in theaters on March 30, 2012.

I have a thing for fairy tales, those simplisitic little stories that offer something different up each time I read them. I also have a thing for horror movies, where things don’t always end up happily ever after.

Few movies can effectively combine both the scare and feel of horror and the simplistic, constantly changing perception of fairy tales, but Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (28 Weeks Later) mangages to blend together those traits in his latest film, Intruders, with the creation of the monster, Hollow Face.

Hollow Face is a creature without a face that roams the streets at night looking for a child’s face to steal so he can be loved– for who could love a beast without a face?

Intruders is the tale of two children who are both stalked by this monster in his attempt to possess a face. We are fist introduced to Hollow Face in a nightmare, when he attacks Juan (Izan Corchero) and his mother (Pilar Lopez de Ayala) in their apartment in Spain. Just when we think things are going to reach a climax, Juan wakes, screaming for his mother.

But Hollow Face isn’t simply consigned to the dream world. Twelve-year-old Mia (Ella Purnel) and her father (Clive Owen) become physically endangered when the pre-teen begins to near-compulsively attempt to write the ending of a scary story she found hidden in the hollow of a tree. By reading this story and then attempting to finish it herself, she wakes Hollow Face and allows him access to her home, where he hides in her closet waiting for the right time to strike.

As she and her father attempt to do battle with the physical threat of Hollow Face, Mia’s mother (Carice van Houten) is skeptical of the danger and forces Mia away from the only person who not only believes her stories of Hollow Face, but will try to protect her from the creature.

While this battle goes on, Juan’s mother attempts to deal with what she seems to think is a possession and, as Juan’s nightmares begin to cross over into the real world, alternatively seeks out religious comfort and shuns it– which does little to address the danger Juan is in.

The story was fascinating, the overlapping tales of the two tormented children and how their respective parents attempted to deal with their offspring’s fears. The use of dark shadows in corners and Mia’s haunted closet triggered childhood memories of huddling under my blankets after reading a particularly scary story, fearfully eyeing my closet.

However, even with the characters in the story that most all of us can identify with– as either terrified children or parents dealing with that horror, and even with the fascinating story, parts of the movie’s internal logic began to fall apart at the end, leaving questions not just unanswered but unable to be answered within the system the movie put forth.

If you are one of those people that leaves theaters and rigorously complains that the movie did not make sense, that factors x, y, and z did not add up on a logical level, and you place the majority of the movie’s value on its logical consistency, this may not be the movie for you.

However, if you are able to suspend disbelief, as we are asked to do so often when dealing with fairy tales and fantasy stories, if you do not need a constant form of logical support to enjoy something as a piece of film, I highly suggest taking the time to go down to your local theater to view the tale of Hollow Face.

To read an interview with director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo on the thoughts behind this film, please click here.

Intruders releases in theaters on March 30th, 2012.

In all of my years (months) reviewing Netflix on Demand horror movies, I’ve yet to see one that quite lended itself so well to being made into a porn.

Not that I watch horror movies looking to adapt them to pornography– I just hope that they become sex-loaded on their own for my, er, viewing pleasure.

Kinda an awkward picture choice, given the above paragraph.

Which means it is with much happiness that I share with you the 2006 horror flick, “5ive Girls”. No, that isn’t a leet typo leaking out as I write, it’s the actual spelling of the actual title. As opposed to the fake spelling of the fake title. Keep up, kids.

The same man who brought us the television series Todd and the Book of Pure Evil and the movie Ham & Cheese, Warren P. Sonoda, was not only the director of this fabulous movie that lends itself to satisfying most of my sexual needs, but also the writer. So, thank you, Mr. Sonoda. Especially for the spanking scene. (More on that later.)

Unsuccessful Sequels: The People That Hang Out Next to the Stairs.

We’ve got some faces you, the reader (See, I’m the writer and, if you’re reading this, that makes you the reader. Unless you’re not reading it. Then you can fuck off.), probably won’t recognize but will definitely appreciate.

First, we have Amy Lalonde (Possibly recognizable as Tracy Thurman in Romero’s Diary of the Dead as well as a bit part in Battlestar Galactica. I mean, she’s done other stuff, but you probably haven’t watched it, so don’t expect me to write sentences about all this shit you haven’t seen because you aren’t dedicated to the art of film. Jesus.), then Jennifer Miller (playing someone called Lap Vixen Thumper from something called Bitch Slap which I now need to hunt down like a crazed stalker), and finally Jordan Madley (who is way too hot, like way, way too hot, and you might know her from, most recently, an episode of Femme Fatales).

Oh, and there’s this other guy, Ron Perlman. You might have heard of him. No? Okay, well, let’s move into the plot then.

See, he's this actor that... oh, never mind.

We open on a cute little blonde, Elizbeth, sitting in a classroom, sketching Satanic images, you know, like you do in Catholic school. It’s kinda their paint-by-numbers fallback, if you aren’t hip to such things.

After a brief interaction with Father Drake (Perlman) that gives us the not so subtle hint that he’s molesting the girls, Elizabeth is suddenly possessed by something that possesses things. It’s all very complicated. After the possession is complete, Elizabeth is gone, only a bloody mess left at her desk. (It’s too easy, so I’m not going to.)

"Come here often?" "Uh, yeah."

Before we can see the fallout of this bloody disappearance (British cursing or descriptive phrasing? You be the judge.), the movie suddenly attacks us with the phrase “FIVE YEARS LATER”. I find this all very unfair, as I wanted more blonde and less blood screen time.

So five years down the line, Alex Garrison, another young blonde chick, is getting dropped off at the same Catholic school by her father. Apparently, she’s done something (or not) that has broken the camels back, crossed the line, gone past the point of no return, thrown stones in glass houses, put two birds in one bush, allowed her loose lips to sink… wait, what?

Sour grapes cannot change their spots. What?

We learn that she is now one of five female students at the newly re-opened Saint Mark’s School for Girls, run by the kinda psychotic head mistress, Miss Pearce. Can someone please explain to me what, exactly, a “head mistress” does? I think I’ve met some in my time.

Slowly, the girls are introduced. You know, after the strip search. (Note: Not. Joking.) We have the witch, Connie, the badass, Mara, the blind anarchist, Cecila, the softie, Leah, and Alex, our female lead.

This room's feng shui is totally off.

During this time, Miss Pearce also takes blood samples and, in doing so, causes Alex to reveal her telekinetic powers. All the girls have some sort of psychic power that is eventually revealed as the movie progresses, and some of them are more useful than others.

As the classes begin, strange things begin to happen. None of it is ever spooky, jump-inducing, or even tension building. (That’s okay, because this isn’t one of those movies.) Quite quickly, we see that Elizabeth (Remember, that blonde from the beginning of the movie? Man, it was only a few paragraphs ago, how could you forget already??) is haunting the school, trapped between life and death.

Part of aforementioned strip search. And hot.

The movie, however, isn’t about how Elizabeth haunts the five girls. She barely features, appearing every so often and never being a true threat. Where the threat lies, and this is fairly obvious from the get-go so I’m not spoiling it for anyone, is in Miss Pearce, who is messing with things she ought not to be messin’ with, to quote scads of other movies.

Now, why should you watch this film? First off, it has hot girls in Catholic school girl outfits. That’s a seller right there. Secondly, there’s a bit of sexy school girl lesbianism. Thirdly, of course, there’s some bare-chestedness. Most importantly, however, we’ve got a spanking scene. Yup– plaid school girl skirt up around the waist, bent over a desk, being beaten with a yard stick by a hot blonde in a pencil skirt and blouse.

You're welcome.

And some of you might be reading this and going, “OH MY GAWD, YOU ARE THE SICKEST PERSON EVER, HOW COULD YOU PUT THIS IN YOUR REVIEW?!” But I’d like to point out that for each person that says that, there’s five people queuing up this movie right now.

Also, sickest person ever? I’d argue that. Here’s a true story, a tidbit into the life of your vaguely beloved author.

A couple of weeks ago, I was at my favorite club. A fully grown man at least a decade older than me approached me and asked if he could sit on my lap. He disclaimered it by telling me that there was nothing pervy about it. I declined, and then he explained that he had a particular fetish for women who dress as taxi cabs and let him ride them, piggy-back style. And that, if they won’t dress like cabs, he just wants to sit on them. I told him no, no thank you, please no thank you, please goodbye, and bolted.

THIS IS A TRUE STORY. MY LIFE IS HELL.

She is, admittedly, not having the best time either.

In conclusion: school girls. Spanking. Skirts. Win. Having a fetish for anthropomorphic taxi cabs? Lose.

This movie (back to the topic at hand), also has this weird Satanic Care Bear scene that is infinitely amazing. Not because it’s filmed excellently, but because it’s a fucking Devil Care Bear scene. You don’t see that every day. Or any day, really.

Was this film good? It was sketchy. Some points were great, some points, not so much. The soundtrack seemed as though every episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer was condensed into one movie. The dialogue was occasionally spotty, and some things simply did not make sense or were not followed through with (i.e. Father Drake’s love of molestation).

"It's a hard-knock life for us."

But it was an easy watch, an entertaining watch, and not exactly typical. There were some great shots in there, great lighting (sometimes), and amusing (if out of place) one-liners that tried to make this movie smarter than it was.

So do what I would do: pop some popcorn and grab some lotion and a box of tissues, and fire this film up on Netflix. Just make sure your blinds are closed before you begin– you don’t want any more awkward moments with the neighbors.

At the Silent House press conference a couple of weeks ago, its ladying lady, Elizabeth Olsen, mentioned her current favorite horror movie, a French flick called Ils. (Translation: take a goddamned French class, people! I can’t do all of your work for you.) With much curiosity, I queued it up and, days later, I’m still not quite sure how to feel about it.

They're probably watching The Orphanage. Or Bio-Dome.

There’s not a good deal to say on the film’s background. While there’s several reviews on IMDB and a middling score on Rotten Tomatoes, this movie doesn’t seem like it really entered the festival circuit or make much of an attempt (any attempt?) at the box office.

The actors are, as they tend to be in European movies, European and therefore foreign to ye old readership here at Geekscape. Not saying that you’re ignorant. Just saying that I’m ignorant and, so as not to feel so alone, projecting my ignorance onto you. It’s a bonding experience, really. Don’t you feel closer to me already?

American-centric knowledge-base-wise (I’m not sure how I feel about that phrasing.  How do you feel about it?  Comfortable?), the only real recognizable entities on this film are the directors (who also functioned as the writers), David Moreau and Xavier Palud, who directed the American version of The Eye (you know, that flick with Jennifer Lo–, er, Jessica Alba), which wasn’t that great.

She likes to hold her pillow and pretend it's Edward.

The movie starts off with the heading:

Snagov, Romania October 6, 2002 11:45p.m.

I like it when movies have a time-stamp. Makes me feel secure. Anyhow, after the time-stamp, we start with a mother and cunty daughter driving along a road at night, perfectly peaceful (oh, that’s a lie) until a strange goat-like shape darts in front of the car.

Okay, it wasn’t a goat. Could have been a person. Possibly both. A goat-person.

They go nose-first into some sort of pole, which somehow causes their radio to turn on and blast some annoying metal. When they try to re-start their car and leave, the engine won’t turn so the mother gets out, pops the hood, and fiddles with the engine.

Apparently there was a crossover with Sliders going on at the same time, as she was sucked into a portal. Or something. Basically, she vanishes, leaving her cunty daughter to plod around the car calling for her like a sad little sheep… until the bushes whisper a response.

My prom night ended similarly.

She does the smart thing (hurrah!) and bolts into the car, rolls up the windows, locks the door, and discovers that the keys are gone. Someone outside beeps the car to unlock, so Cunty Dwarf grabs her cell phone and calls the police. Who put her on hold. And it starts raining.

Then the car explodes. It’s really tragic. The phone goes flying from the vehicle and the last thing that we see before we cut to the opening credits is a tiny hand wrapping around the phone as the police dispatcher finally picks up.

I might have made that all up. I’m kinda in a mood. A mood where I make things up. Or this may be made up. YOU’LL NEVER KNOW UNLESS YOU WATCH THE MOVIE! BWAHAHAHA!

Cut to the next day. We are introduced to Clementine, hottie French teacher, as she wraps up for the afternoon and begins her drive home, complete with sexy little phone call to her husband, Lucas, and rubbernecking at the abandoned vehicle last seen with Cunty Dwarf.

It's like Titanic, but with more stabbings.

After a few scenes of domestic bliss with her husband, Clementine curls up on the couch to go through her students’ work. However, before she gets too far in, the phone rings. The noises on the other end are indistinguishable.

At 3:45AM, she wakes up, hearing strange noises outside, and selfishly wakes her sleeping husband so they can check on the noises together as opposed to letting him continue to sleep like she would if she actually loved him. On my planet, that’s grounds for a divorce right there.

Anyhow, they manage to stumble their way downstairs to discover that Clementine’s car has been moved. See, that’s what kids do these days. Forget toilet papering, it’s all about car relocation.

Honey, I think those kids relocated our car again.

When Lucas goes to confront the car, it pulls a Herbie the Love Bug and drives off into the night. Being intelligent people that were clearly designed for an indie romance rather than a horror movie, they call the cops (which turn out to be useless) and decide to deal with it in the morning.

Then the lights go out.

Too much of a cliffhanger for you? Are your fingers tightly wrapped around the arms of your chair? Mine would be, but I’m in bed. And typing. I’m not the mutant with four arms that you think me to be.

Eventually, the monster is revealed (finally, a movie to break the recent streak of showing me the big bad by the three-minute mark!) and the audience is left to mull over, well, everything. This movie takes a very common beast, one that features in a surprising number of horror films, and puts a strong slant on it, forcing it at the viewer at a new angle that they didn’t necessarily expect.

She is about to find out what makes Jack a dull boy.

Monster-digestion aside, it’s a little hard for me to make fun of this movie. It’s not that it’s fantastic– it certainly doesn’t reach the level of The Orphanage, nor is it mediocre in such a way that causes a lack of commentary. It was just the right mix of story, isolation, and disturbing claustrophobic imagery that ultimately caused me a sort of unsettled discontent.

The “seven days…” call I received after viewing this film certainly didn’t help my comfort level, either.

So, if you want something that deviates from your standard horror plot and digs itself into your bones, not so much on a fear level as much as with actual horror (in the way that we no longer use that word), Ils might be for you. Just ignore the shitty video quality Netflix gives you with this one.

In 2003, husband and wife team Laura Lau and Chris Kentis made a splash (ha!) with their low-budget DYI thriller Open Water. Nearly ten years later, they’ve come to us with their newest work, Silent House.

Silent House is the rapid American remake of a 2010 Spanish-language Uruguayan film (unsurprisingly titled La Casa Muda) that did fairly well in the festival circuit, bringing it to the attention of producer Agnes Mentre, and thus into the hands of Lau/Kentis.

What was so special about La Casa Muda was that it appeared to be shot as a continuous take. While this is not actually accurate– the movie was shot over several takes cleverly edited together, the surprising and difficult choice in style gave something different to the movie that caught the notice of audiences.

However, this might have caused a problem with the style overwhelming the plot, not simply in terms of audience attention, but also in how limited it is in terms of establishing the traditional filmic narrative we’ve grown acclimated to. More on that in a moment.

Plot-wise, this movie centers on the “true events” that took place in an isolated, semi-abandoned house that a young girl, Sarah (Elizabeth Olsen), her father (Adam Trese), and her uncle (Eric Sheffer Stevens) are trying to fix up for sale.

After basic character introductions and a tiff over home repairs between Sarah’s father and uncle that causes the latter to storm off in a fit of anger, Sarah ends up exploring the house, unable to find her father, and hearing unnerving noises that hint that she might have unwelcome company.

Without giving the plot away, most of the rest of the movie is a good deal of running, hyperventilating, and the discovery of somewhat disturbing rooms in the basement.

Shifting away from the plot so as not to pepper this article with spoilers, let’s go back to the decision to shoot this 88 minute film in such a way as to resemble one continuous take.

This obviously wasn’t an easy project. It was stressful simply listening to Lau and Kentis talk about the struggles of everyone meeting their queues at the press conference, as many of the effects were practical (meaning no CGI) and a single half-second mis-step could result in an entire shot being ruined.

There was also a matter of the camera choreography. Lau and Kentis selected Igor Martinovic, whose work you might know from Man on Wire, as their Director of Photography. It was absolutely fascinating to read the press notes on how Olsen and Martinovic had to somewhat sync to each other’s movements as he followed her through the house.

My favorite quote from the press notes, something that I felt really summed up the effort that went into filming this film came from Kentis while talking on a scene where Olsen leaves the house and gets into a car. “Two camera operators were involved in that scene and the choreography was all about preparation. They were running wth the camera and passing the camera in and out of the car and from the front of the car to back and our A.D. crew had to be totally on the ball with cues because everything had to happen at exact moments.”

While the directors likely don’t want you watching this movie just for the technical aspects– which is quite understandable, it’s something that’s amazing to watch and attempt to understand the effort that had to go into such a movie.

It also gives you an insight into how we make and watch movies. So much character development and storyline comes from little side shots that this movie isn’t really allowed. We never leave Olsen’s side which, while it adds to the feelings of being trapped that the movie encourages, it gives a stark contrast to the way we currently use film to tell stories.

In a way, this movie challenges the way we define reality through film. This film is infinitely more “real” of an experience than one where we’re jumping from person to person, place to place. There’s no b-footage filling our gaps of knowledge, setting the scene.

There are so many complex visual layers to the average Hollywood film that it’s somewhat unsettling to see a movie that is so stripped down, not just visually, but in the amount of information that it gives the audience. We see what Sarah sees, we go where Sarah goes– the usual omniscience of the audience is lost giving, while not a totally new experience, something we haven’t seen in a long while.

Silent House opens in theaters on March 9th.

Rarely do I get stir-crazy and bored while watching horror movies. There’s nearly always something redemptive about them, whether it be a great scene (Ghost Ship, I’m looking at you), a great soundtrack, or hysterically bad acting. Truly, I usually can find something to latch onto.

2007’s Ghosts of Goldfield is one of the few films that I gave up on trying to enjoy and instead embraced the boredom that comes with those few movies that aren’t good,but aren’t laughably shitty either.

This is just too easy. I'd feel guilty about taking advantage.

The acting wasn’t good, even though there’s a definite spread of talent. Our lead actress, Marnette Patterson, is a constant television actress with the standard extra roles on the even more standard host of shows. Our cliched “sexy chick”, Mandy Amano (who is quite attractive, I will say), has been in minor roles in movies such things as Coyote Ugly (one of my guilty pleasures) and Crank: High Voltage (less a guilty pleasure and more of a source of masturbation material). Really, though, the only actor of note (and the only one that can actually act) is Kellan Lutz.

You know, Kellan Lutz. Emmett Cullen from the Twilight series. Poseidon from Immortals. Kellan Lutz. Weird sorta blip there. Speaking of blips, let’s just go into the beginning of the movie summary with an awkward transition. Yay!

Kellan Lutz, god of wetness, god of moisture, and things that are wet.

The scene is set: a desert drive in a white SUV overlaid with the opening credits and pictures of old ghost towns. We hear the chatter of inane kids in their early twenties regarding their road trip to a haunted motel, where I pull the gem:

“Today we’re headin’ up to the famous Goldfield Hotel to see if we can find us some real live ghosts.”

If poor phrasing was a sin, this guy would be dead already.

Also! We get to see the ghost, prompting the following mid-movie-watching note:

Didn’t you guys learn anything from Muoi: The Legend of a Potrait? Jesus. Stop revealing the goddamned end boss 50 seconds into the movie. Who do I need to call to make this stop happening? SOMEONE, GET GEORGE ROMERO ON THE PHONE, STAT.

As we get some degree of introduction to the characters, we learn that the blonde is a psychology major, working on her thesis which, as far as I can tell, has absolutely nothing to do with psychology. Brunette is a red shirt, working on her five-finger discount and mad faux-lesbian skills. She’ll be the first to die, just before Mr. English-Ain’t-Mah-First-Language gets taken out by a rogue piece of rusty pipe. There are also three guys, but they’re indistinguishable from each other until about forty-five minutes in.

"I brought an enema bag."

The car ride continues until the blonde falls asleep in the fading light and we get to flash-forward to the scene where one of the guys, a hipster-looking douchebag, gets killed. So not only is the monster being revealed again, so is one of the deaths.

Of course, I could see hipsters being knifed in the skull all day and not get sick of it, so it’s not such a bad thing. God, I hope we see it like eight more times.

Blonde also hears, “Come back to me…” as she wakes, whispered by the ghost. When she comes to, she’s clutching her necklace.

I brightened this picture and upped the contrast just for *you*.

Okay, how many people want to bet that by the end of this movie, everyone is dead but the blonde, who is not killed by the ghost because the ghost is actually her grandmother or great-grandmother who died while looking for her baby (who was kidnapped or whatever) who ended up being perfectly fine and starting a family of her own? WHO WANTS TO LAY SOME MONEY ON THE LINE?!

I’m at the 3 minute, 15 second mark of this movie, and if this doesn’t work out like I predicted, I’m going to punish myself by eating a chocolate chip cookie. If it does work out, I’m eating a chocolate chip cookie *and* making a booty call. (Post-movie update: I might have been wrong, but the theme was there. I’m still making that call.)

Around sunset, the car dies while taking a shortcut to the hotel. Bad dialogue ensues about why the car broke down but, really, the car was probably just rebelling against the douchey-est haircut known to man that the driver was sporting. If he let someone cut it to something that contained lesser levels of douchery, the car would start again.

BRB, going completely out of my established character.

After much whining, they start walking to the hotel. I can’t even speak to the line of “We’ve been walking so long, it’s dark already,” when they started walking at goddamned sunset. Someone punch the goddamned brunette for me. Just reach through the goddamned screen and just pop her one.

During their night wanderings, they find an old cemetary. Good for them. Anyhow, the little cunty brunette decides she doesn’t wanna go into the cemetery and you can’t make her, waaaah. Until, of course, the whispering starts. “Bloooody finger, bloooooody finnggerrrr!”

Sorry. Was re-living my campfire story days.

“Where’s my baby? Where’s my baaaabyyyyyy?” followed by, “Closer, my darling, closer.” Which was followed by a coyote howl. OF COURSE IT WAS.

"This place lacks room service. I'm giving it three stars on Yelp."

The blonde experiences double-vision and a sudden sepia-toned flashback where we get to witness some godawful dancing and the reveal that one hundred (or whatever) years ago, the blonde used to be a waitress in the bar where the ghost worked (while alive, you nitwits).

When she comes out of it, the brunette is racing towards her and one of the idiots… er, men… is missing. Mike. Whichever one that one was.

He ends up popping out from behind a grave, scaring everyone, and then announcing repeatedly that he “got” them all. You know, being an idiotic horror movie stereotype.

So, death order as stands is:

1. Cunty brunette who needs a good punching
2. Mike (may or may not have English issues)
3. Idiot with English issues (may or may not be Mike)

After their brush with stupidity, the five kids head into the suddenly located ghost town to hopefully suddenly locate the hotel.

Hotel = suddenly located! \o/

Let’s take a moment to note that this is supposed to be a ghost town, you know, one of those California/Nevada/Arizona towns that was all hustle and bustle while people were working towards their Manifest Destiny or mining the shit out of the mountains and then dried up for a variety of reasons, generally in the 1920s.

So please ignore the goddamned stop sign in front of the hotel. Oh, and the open bar across the street from the hotel. You know, in the town that one of the less mentally disabled kids said had no vistors aside from the occasional tourist.

STOP: sucking so goddamned much.

After awkward and vaguely illogical conversation with the bartender and his lone patron, the Scooby gang gets a key to the abandoned (and fully furnished and clean) hotel, with instructions not to go into room 109. (Because you know those instructions’ll be followed.)

The bartender explains that George Winfield, Elizabeth’s boss and sex-patron, killed poor Elizabeth in room 109. During this story, the bartender gets incredibly, oddly emotional about Elizabeth and then, when asked if he somehow knew her (kids can’t do math), he explains that he’s seen paintings of her and basically put all of his sex drive into pastels and turned into a total dead-chick-stalking creep.

I may have elaborated on that last part.

The look of concern you're seeing is them watching the final cut of this film.

After story time is over, the kids walk over to the hotel, where the blonde has another sepia-toned flashback where she sees Elizabeth receive the gift of a necklace (Whaaat? Like the necklace the blonde was playing with at the beginning of the film? SHOCKING.) from her beau “for the baby”.

Back in modern day, the cunty brunette steals the hotel desk’s bell while the idiot who likes to scare people scares people again and then busts out the alcohol.

It’s almost like they want to die.

The next hour of this movie is spent with them roaming around multiple locations cobbled together to represent a hotel that is mostly birthed from locations that were clearly not built in the early 1900s. From fire sprinklers to uniform gray carpeting to flouresent lights to modern plumbing, the hotel fails to provide any atmosphere except for the sad sort of desperate amusement one gets when visiting one of those truck stops/mini-casinos that dot the highways in Nevada.

Topless and inebriated-- just like I like them.

What are they doing while roaming? Fuck if I know. There seems to be an overarching plot… kinda. I mean, it’s mostly there. And then there’s all these little potential side plots that amount to nothing and then there’s just severe amounts of minor plot inconsistencies that make the whole thing rather shaky, and I’m not sure if I should blame those issues on the screenwriter or the editor.

In sum: Editing fail. Script fail. Character fail. Plot fail. Location fail. Fail fail. (Or would that be “success fail”? I just wanted to write “fail fail”. Seemed like a good idea.)

I don’t suggest queuing this up on your Netflix. It’s simply not worth it. I can’t even design a drinking game around this, other than “drink every time Kellan Lutz is hot”, which is a totally gimme.

Until next week, kids.

I know some of you may have been panicking at the absence of my typical Wednesday article and I would like to let you know that I appreciate your concern and apologize. You see, when a woman likes a man (or men), she loses track of time and gains a certain… bodily soreness which results in delayed reviews.

Most of my dreams start like this.

In 2010, things happened. The Berlin Wall fell. Pearl Harbor was bombed. Napoleon was exiled to Saint Helena and two Valley kids retrieved him before becoming the biggest band to grace Earth’s history: Wyld Stallyns. Somewhere in all this uproar, a German film titled We Are the Night was released.

Much (exactly) like with other European films I’ve reviewed, no one is actually going to know who any of the actors are and, continuing with my belief that Europeans have no true emotions, we’re going to skip this section.

Pout about it, why don't you? We know you're faking.

Actually, I’m going to lie about the actors.  That seems even better.

Dick “fucking” Van Dyke plays the lead female bloodsucker, Louise. You may know Dick “fucking” Van Dyke from movies such as How I Married a Machete Murderer (the hapless Arlo) and I Know What you Did Six Summers Ago in Band Camp (Yvette’s cuckold, Gregory). We also have Macauly Culkin as Lena, Gabriel Byrnes as Charlotte, and Cillian “Oh My God, Take Me Now, You Creepy Blue-eyed Man” Murphy as Nora. If you watch carefully, you might notice a few cameos from people such as Ian McKellan and Colin Firth.

So it’s a pretty star-studded(ish) cast that you won’t want to miss. Ever. Just watch this movie on repeat and bask in its golden light, but don’t forget to turn over half-way through, as we don’t want you getting skin cancer.

It's hard to believe he played Scarecrow. He's got such range.

Before I launch into the summary of the start of this movie (which I am now beginning to question as a good format for a review), I have to really address what I feel is a truly important topic in regards to this film.

We Are the Night“? What does that even mean, really? Are they personifying the night, as I’ve always imagined a personified night to be more along the lines of a Greek goddess or something. Flowly dark robes, glitter in their hair, prone to family in-fighting.

You know what? Fuck this “we are the night” spooky bullshit. How goth do they need to sound, anyway? How about “We are three vampire bitches in Europe”?

GET OVER YO’SELFS, GOTH SUBCULTURE.

Quick summary of this film: crazy blonde lesbian vampire is focused on the idea of finding her soulmate and then never, ever, ever, EVER letting her go. No matter what. Even if she wants to leave. Kill her, cut off her limbs, bronze said limbs, make them into some sort of surrealist art on wheels that she would drag behind her for the rest of her life.

In sum: a typical lesbian relationship.

Caption screened so as to avoid hatemail.

I know that I now have at least five friends who are planning on punching me for the above statement the next time I see them. For the moment, I will wave at you across the internet and remind you that you can’t reach me from where you are now, and you’ll likely forget to inflict pain on me by the next time we meet.

With this crazy blonde we get sidekicks in the form of an adorable quirky sometimes-redhead and a sultry brunette that managed to keep my attention the entire movie. We also have the strawberry blonde love interest.

I keep trying to order her from the catalog, but she never arrives.

You might be wondering why I’m not calling these characters by their names. I’m wondering too.

There is one other character: the male lead and love interest to Miss Strawberry Blonde 2010. He’s a cop, and, to my mind, is way too young and attractive to be a cop. Well, at least an American cop. If all cops in France look like this dude, send me over. I’ll bring my own handcuffs.

He's not really my type but, you know... handcuffs.

Continuing with this hair-identified plot, we’ve got these five characters, three of which are of The Undead, one of which looks like death, and another which is there solely to be a plot device.

Simply: brunette is miserable, redhead is everything you’d expect from a hyperactive anime character, blonde is nuts and obsessive, strawberry blonde is smarter than most give her credit for, and blond is a cop that barely features but has impact on the story.

Does that make sense? No?

Okay, let’s sell you on this movie. The strawberry blonde goes exploring one night and sees two dudes climb through a hole in a fence. She follows them into DINOSAUR LAND!!!

HOLY SHIT, IT'S JURASSIC PARK!!

Dinosaur Land disappointingly turns out not to be a land of dinosaurs at all, but an underground club full of incredibly hot people in skimpy outfits. Totally fucking lame and lacking in its possibly reptilian, possibly avian content.

While at the lame club, that blonde vampiress sees the strawberry blonde’s tendency towards pick-pocket activities and strategically places some cash in eyesight and then does the “come hither, Imma lesbian with money” dance at her, which looks creepily like a seizure, but with more oral sex.

The strawberry blonde, being young and naive, takes the bait. Eventually winds up a vampire. (Serious side note: the transformation scene for this is one the best I’ve ever seen in the category of “beautiful turning into a vampire scenes”.)

Not Dinosaur Land, but a suitable alternative.

Being a vampire movie, the strawberry blonde isn’t exactly happy with this transformation, though she tries to hide it. Wants her human life back. Cries a lot. Blames Lestat for turning her. Changes Kirsten Dunst into a vampire, leaves the swamps of New Orleans, has dirty sex with Christian Slater. Dirty, dirty sex.

Shit, that was the summary of my latest fan-fic! Now the plot is spoiled!!

My grief at spoiling my upcoming novel aside, this movie goes exactly to where you think it will. However, while there’s more than a couple cliches come with the expected plot that are scattered through it’s scenes, the film itself done with a bit more pizzazz than we (I) have come to expect from the genre.

I actually enjoyed it (after the rough beginning, which was totally overdone), as it was something fun. The photography, while not amazing and epic, had more than one typically sees in a horror movie, which I have to appreciate, especially now with the nausea-inducing found-footage trend.

This movie does come with a warning, I will be honest. While there are lesbians, there’s no lesbian sex. I can’t actually remember seeing a single bare breast (not that I was manning the TitWatch 2012 campaign or anything). But there’s some dude junk, if you have a fear of dude junk.

Fears dude junk. (For which I am so, so glad. So. Glad.)

So, if you want to watch a movie that hits all the vampire cliches we’ve grown to expect (and if you can overcome your horror of dude junk), this is the film for you. Just ignore the incredibly shit dubbing and fire up Netflix.

I’ve been tapering off on my enjoyment of found footage videos. I was never that impressed with The Blair Witch Project and Paranormal Activity 3 really fell flat. I’m over it, you know?

That bitching, fortunately, has little to do with the 2007 film, Death of a Ghost Hunter. I just felt like starting this article with a complaint. A second complaint? Why the hell is my neighbor’s fire alarm going off? Take out the damn battery already!

Death of a Ghost Hunter was this little movie made by another one of those incestuous bubbles of people that seem to form in the film business. This particular bubbly set circles around such titles as: The Frankenstein Syndrome, The Great American Snuff Film, and The Greatest American Snuff Film. (I think those last two might be related.)

I thought I'd open with a nice ass-shot. Because I'm tasteless.

The actors in it are unmentionable at the moment– no one that anyone would recognize unless they’re somehow obsessed with the great or the greatest american fictional snuff films, so instead I’m going to take this time to thank my neighbor for finally removing his smoke detector’s battery. Thank y– fuck. False alarm. (Har.)

Away from that high-pitched beeping and into the film, Death of a Ghost Hunter opens as being based on true events. The highly broken up opening crawl reads:

In 1982, Minister Joseph Masterson and his family were murdered inside their home.

(insert crazy footage here of slaughter involving a Colonel Mustard in the library with the candlestick)

“Ghost Hunting” is the process in which paranormal investigators use modern technology to obtain tangible evidence regarding the existence of life after death.

In 2002, renowned ghost hunter Carter Simms, was offered $5,000 to perform a paranormal investigation on the Masterson House.

Her investigation stands as the single most tragic paranormal inquiry in American history.

It ended with her death.

This film is based on the journal entries she made during her investigation.

When I first started watching this movie, I assumed that there was some basis of fact that inspired a weird story. That was quickly dashed when I saw the name “Carter Simms”. No one names their little girl “Carter Simms”. (Found-footage screenwriters take note: don’t do shit like this.)

Ghost Hunter Detective Alucard Phantom Carter Simms-Holmes.

During the whole textual introduction, we get to watch Ms. Simms drive out to Arizona, engage with one of the remaining Mastersons, all while doing the most unbelieveable, “I’m-reading-this-from-a-script”, voice-over I may have ever heard.

From the incredibly shoddy voice over, we learn that, after witnessing an unexplainable event, Seth Masterson has not only hired Carter to examine the house, but also has brought on a journalist and a video technician to record her experiences. Carter isn’t happy about the potential interference, but she accepts that he is the client and he is going to be
paying her a chunk of money for three days of work.

Is this thing on? What?? OH HAI GUYZ!

The next day, Carter goes into the house and begins to walk through the place. While exploring she (and us, of course) gets the crap scared out of her by the tactless and slightly nerdy video technician, Colin. Shortly after, sassy and street-wise Yvette shows up on the scene, waggling her finger. (Being sassy and street-wise means she’s going to die first, by the way.)

You would think, much like Carter did, that we’d have our whole crew for the movie by this point but, much like Carter, you’d be wrong. The waif-like Mary Young knocks on the door and introduces herself as the spiritual advocate for the Masterson family, there to stand guard on their reputation as good Christians.

Mary Young Creepersmith

This is the part where I’d pull out some sort of weapon and bean her in the skull simply for being creepy, but no one in the movie seems to have my epic foresight.

After (poorly acted) introductions are made, our four-person crew starts their sleep-over party with Carter “Mood-Killer” Simms recounting the details of the Masterson murders from the police report and uncomfortably segues into Colin recording Carter as she wanders around the house attempting to take temperature readings.

When they arrive in the master bedroom, where Mr. Masterson had his throat slit, the temperature suddenly drops and everyone panics and bolts back to Command Center (AKA: the dining room) where, eventually, one of the chairs moves (making everyone panic again).

Look at that woodwork!

Two more nights with increasing paranormal activity (har har) take place and result in the culmination of this movie… which I rather enjoyed.

Parts of this movie actually surprised me, as it strayed just far enough from the usual formulaic presentation that we’ve all gotten so used to. I will admit that, about ten minutes in, I was about to switch movies. I didn’t want to watch a bunch of poorly acted crap. But I stayed with it and, yes, while the acting occasionally knocked me out of the movie, I’m
glad I stuck around.

Yvette "Oh-no-she-didn't!" Sandoval

Do I think it could have been done better, with a bigger budget and better actors? Yes, of course it could– and it would have been amazing. But the people who helped put this movie together and, yes, after a very shaky start created something pretty damn neat.

I definitely suggest putting this movie in your Netflix Instant Queue for future scary-movie-night viewing– just be prepared to wade through the first ten minutes.  Also, neighbor, thanks for finally taking care of your wailing smoke detector.  I’m now less likely to make attempts on your life.

Every so often, I have a craving to watch The Mighty Ducks, Little Big Giants, or Angels in the Outfield.  Of course, on that same front, I also get a regular craving to watch Ice Princess or Clueless, so we probably shouldn’t go by my cravings.

I admit I have problems.  And a crush on Trachtenberg.

But on the first two, there is definitely something in them that speaks to me, and I’m assuming many others by the amount of movies that have been made about underdog sports teams, even though lately it has felt like such movies are coming out more and more infrequently.

We know the type, though.  You get this team that is just slaughtered at the beginning, mocked by some big bad-ass on the other team.  Then this guy comes in and, somehow, revitalizes the team.  Could be a coach, could be the new quarterback, and suddenly everyone’s stuck in training montage mode.

The you have your key characters: the quick, smart-mouthed goalie/kicker/waterboy, the two brothers/cousins/best friends who work as a unit, the old guy that no one thinks can make it, the one guy with massive family issues whose dad shows up at a crucial moment, and then, as always, that one kid.  You know, that loveable bonehead that the other team charges into and just bounces off of.  The one you love to love, but never gets a lot of screen-time.

Michael Dowse’s Goon is about that character.

You might recognize Dowse’s name from the recent Take Me Home Tonight, and you’ll certainly recognize the lead actor playing Douglas Glatt: Seann William Scott. (My favorite roles of his?  Wayne in Evolution and Travis in The Rundown.  Note: I still make the “kawwKAWWW” noises.  Because I never update my references.  Just saying.)

Also in or related to this film, we have writer Evan Goldberg (Pineapple Express, Superbad), actor/writer Jay Baruchel (Tropic Thunder – Hot LZ), Liev Schreiber (SABRETOOTH, FUCK YEEEEEEAH!), Allison Pill (Scott Pilgrim – the drummer, Kim Pine), and Marc-Andre Grondin, who isn’t really on the American film scene yet, but is so hipstery hot in this movie I have to mention him.

Based on the true story of minor league hockey player, Doug Smith, Goon is about Douglas Glatt (Scott), and his unlikely foray into the world of hockey.

Foraying.

There are multiple things going on at the beginning of this film.  First, we get introduced to Ross Rhea (Sabreto–, er, Schreiber. But could you imagine Sabretooth on ice skates?!  Amazing!), the unofficial reigning champion of beating ass on ice.  What’s he doing when we get introduced to him?  Knitting.  That’s right.  Come on people, keep up!  He’s beating ass on ice!

Then we move to Mr. Doug Glatt at his place of employment– a bar.  He’s a bouncer, so we slide into a montage of what he does as a bouncer, which segues into him hanging out with his friend and psychotic hockey fan, Pat (Baruchel), and goes into an odd moment where Glatt starts bemoaning his goal-less station in life.

See, Doug is the loser of his family.  His father (Eugene Levy) and (gay) brother are both doctors, his mother is… married to a doctor, (Is that an achievement?  I suppose.), and Pat is running a successful hocket-based web show called “Hot Ice”.

It’s a slapstick comedy show.

To get him out of his depressive funk, Pat takes Doug to a local hockey game and loads him with corndogs.  While both happily feeding their maws, one of the hockey players begins to mouth off about “fags”.  Being his usual quirky asshole-self, Pat starts massively heckling the guy, who climbs out of the box with intent of beating Pat into little heckle-less bits.

However, Doug takes offense to the unnamed player’s use of “fags” and steps up, beating the guy into a little bloody mess and, for the climax, Doug headbutts the guy so hard his helmet splits into two.

This catches the eye of one of the coaches and, shortly thereafer, Doug is recruited.  Insert clips of him being introduced to the team, beating their asses, being unable to skate, and finally getting transferred to a bigger Canadian team, the Halifax Highlanders.

Disclaimer: This picture has nothing to do with either the above or below paragraphs.

The Highlanders have a problem.  They have an amazing player, La Flamme (Grondin), who is afraid to really play hockey.  During a previous game some time prior, Sabretooth (Rhea) (Schrieber), slammed into La Flamme so hard that he almost died.  Since then, La Flamme has been a skittish little kitten, unable to play to his full potential and instead consuming a lot of coke.  No, not the soda.

It is the coach’s hope that, with Glatt to protect him, La Flamme might be able to play again and the Highlanders might actually get out of their slump.  Unfortunately, there are several problems, starting with La Flamme’s attitude, ending with Glatt’s inability to skate, and in the middle there’s some issue with team spirit and unity.  It’s like a peanut butter and jelly sandwich of suck on ice.

There’s also the matter of Eva (Pill), Doug’s love interest, who already has a boyfriend but can’t seem to keep herself away from Doug.

Still bitter over Scott.

I’ve noticed a good deal of the PR about this movie seems to focus on how the real conflict of this movie is Glatt’s lack of skating ability, but such is not the case.

How do I know this?  Because there’s never any resolution to his childish skating.  There’s never any montage of him stumbling by himself on the ice, never any montage of him being trained by a fellow player or coaches.  It’s basically, “Huh.  You can’t skate.  Okay, then.  We’re going to make fun of you for a bit and move on.”

Did I like this movie?  It definitely had many great moments, things that made me laugh out loud (sometimes by myself, which was kinda awkward in a small theater with maybe eight other people), though nothing made me actually tip over in my seat (that honor has been reserved, thus far, for Bridesmaids and the home-birthing sequence in The Back-up Plan).

Stood up by Wolverine.  Poor guy.

I was actually surprised by this movie at some points.  It’s ninety minutes long– an hour and a half– and Dowse made sure not to waste a single minute of film.  There’s a lot packed into a tiny space and, at times, it felt as though the stereotypical moments we’d expect were discarded.

In most sports movies, there’s a lot of character-driven scenes.  Intimate moments, breakdowns, confessionals, unexpected bonding.  There wasn’t a lot of that in this movie (though there was some).  What this movie was mostly carried on was Scott’s ability to convey Glatt’s character (something I wrote in my notes as “channeling his inner golden retriever”) through every scene, even the most inconsequential.

I’ve always been a Seann Williams Scott fan, and even though I won’t watch a decent chunk of his films (like Dude, Where’s My Car?… I just can’t do it), it was really good to see that my faith in him was justified.

So if you want to watch a fun, oddly witty, hockey movie with some epic on-the-ice fights, Goon is available On Demand on February 24th and in theaters on March 30th.  You can see where it is going to be playing and  check out the trailer here in the meantime.

A few weeks ago, I had the genuine pleasure of being able to attend one ATO’s pre-screenings for the Sprecher sisters’ dark comedy, Thin Ice.

This movie brings together some amazing actors and really lets them highlight their abilities in helping create characters that you can really feel for– even if that feeling is hate.

In the lead is Greg Kinnear, playing seedy insurance salesman Mickey Prohaska, who seems to be known mostly for his role in the indie flick Little Miss Sunshine, but more recently graced us with the character of Jack Kennedy in The Kennedys.

Jack Kennedy: snazzy violinist and Russian spy.

We also have Alan Arkin as reclusive farmer, Gorvy Hauer.  You probably don’t need a list of what you’d know him from, but just in case… Little Miss Sunshine (Grandpa Edwin), Get Smart (The Chief), Sunshine Cleaning(Joe Lorkowski), Grosse Pointe Blanke (Dr. Oatman), and, most importantly, The Last Unicorn (Schmendrick!!).

Also featuring:

  • Lea Thompson (Marty’s mom – Back to the Future II and Back to the Future III) as Mickey’s mostly estranged wife, Jo Ann.
  • David Harbour (D.A. Frank Scanlon – The Green Hornet and Shep Campell in Revolutionary Road) as the gullible insurance salesman, Bob Egan.
  • Billy Crudup (Dr. Manhattan – The Watchmen, Will Bloom – Big Fish, and the incredibly, incredibly hot Russell Hammond – Almost Famous) as the psychotically violent and infinitely punchable locksmith, Randy.
  • Bob Balaban (Jonathan Steinbloom – A Mighty Wind, Dr. Theodore W. Millbank, III – Best in Show) as the (kinda creepily) intense violin lover, Leonard Dahl.

How do they all link together?  I’m so glad you asked.

Look over there.

Well, Mickey (Kinnear) is an insurance salesman who bumps into Bob (Harbour) at an insurance convention/party/gathering/fiesta(!) and, after learning that his most-hated competitor is about to hire him, snatches Bob for his own office… which only has one employee– a deservingly bitter secretary.

After the insurance fiesta, Mickey returns to Wisconsin to hopefully reunite with Jo Ann (Thompson) and get back to work.  Bob follows him into the artic (Wisconsin) shortly after and, while hunting new sales, discovers Gorvy (Arkin) living on an uninsured farm.

What, over there?

Mickey, learning from Bob of this eccentric old man, decides to accompany his new employee to Gorvy’s ranch in attempt to up the sale.  During various visits, Mickey learns that an old violin in Gorvy’s possession may be worth a decent chunk of cash, so decides to steal it and sell it himself to (creepily intense) violinophile, Leonard (Balaban).

Eventually, Randy (Crudup) comes into the scene while installing a security system on Gorvy’s farm.   Frustration, chaos, skeeviness, and murder ensue.  (Mostly chaos and frustration, if you’re running percentages.)

In sum, there’s a decent chunk of interesting characters one has to keep track of as they weave together the Sprecher’s delightfully intense story.

Yes, over there!

I’ve been noticing a number of reviewers are comparing this work to the Cohen brothers’ Fargo.  I would not say that this is the case.  Yes, the characters are in a cold environment.  Yes, they’re in that part of the country where people have odd accents and wear weird furry hats.  Yes, this is a total dark comedy that wraps itself around a murder.

It’s not Fargo.  This movie stands on its own, and to compare it to Fargo— while a good association to make in regards to certain points– is too much.

I actually found it to be a bit darker than Fargo.  I’m not a dark comedy fan at all.  I judge how “dark” a comedy is by how uncomfortable it makes me.  While I was watching this movie, I was squirming in my seat, covering my eyes, trying not to shout at the characters on screen– it got me to react and engage.  That’s saying something.

Surprise!!

By the end, I was convinced of its brilliance.  I wanted to murder most of the characters at one point or another, sure, but I recognized that it was an incredible piece of work put together by masterful hands that made sure to leave no details flapping in the wind.

Thin Ice comes to select theaters this Friday, February 17th.  I highly suggest that you put on an awkward furry hat and hunt down your nearest showing.

I have discovered that someone has allowed Uwe Boll to direct yet another movie.  I know.  How does this man keep getting money and distribution?  

In mid-2011, Blubberella was released on DVD and Blu-Ray by Event Film Distribution (just so you know who to blame).  Please reign in your excitement.  There’s not a lot of information (well, easy to access information when it’s 1AM and your groggy author wants to be soaking her pillow in drool shortly) floating around the internet on this movie– IMDB doesn’t even have a photo of the cover (which is ridiculous, by the way).

Blubberella stars Lindsay Hollister, who you might recognize as Steve Carell’s dance partner if you watched that horrific flick Get Smart (even my love for Anne Hathaway could not compel me to watch that movie), as the titular Blubberella– a smart-talking, under-sexed, cock-blocked, over-hyphenated dhampir(e) who happens to be residing in Germany in 1940.  No, not the best of times to be living in Germany.

There’s some other minor actors in here, but none of them really have a recognizable background to draw from at the present time.  We also have Uwe Boll doing an oddly charming appearance as Hitler.  

So… the plot.  I swear there was a plot in there somewhere.

We meet Blubberella as she rises from bed (curled up next to a line of dildos) and begins to narrate who she is to the audience.

“Hiiiii everyone!  I’m Blubberella and I’m a superhero!  Yes, I am!  Stop laughing!  I hope that you’re not sitting too close to the TV, ’cause you’ll be in my splash zone!  Here’s some facts about me: I’ve been a superhero for the last 800 years, in high school I was voted most likely to marry a black man…”

That pretty much sets the tone for the movie.

Awkward love interest.  Afraid of sharks and being tall.  (Still kinda hot, though.)

We follow our lovely giantess as she attempts to find sex/love from the men she’s met on HerbrewHookup.com (yes, of course they had the internet in 1940s Germany) who keep “mysteriously” not showing up for their dates.  And we also watch her fight Nazis– usually while trying to get food or sex from them.

This movie is set into chapters.  They are:

Chapter One: Blubberella’s Hobbies (in no particular order) 

   1. Walks on the beach

   2. Killing Nazis

Chapter Two: How to Make a Vampire for Dummies

Chapter Three: Titty Titty Fang Bang

Chapter Four: VILFS (vampies I’d like to fuck)

Chapter Eight: Intervention 

Chapter Ten: Highway to Hitler

I cannot tell you what happened to five through seven or nine, but I can tell you that, whatever may have happened, this movie is going to make a fat joke about it.  The sheer number of fat jokes this thing contained was ridiclous.  Sure, there were a couple of good one-liners, but overall… it was too much.  It’s like they were beating a dead horse and then decided to gangrape its corpse.

Before I start bitching too much, let’s get back to the film.

There is a series of what look to be unrelated (or very loosely related) events that this movie attempts to link together.  A dream about Hitler, rescuing Jews from a train headed for some unnamed concentration camp, experiments on a Nosferatu-looking vampire, romance with a freedom fighter, a visit to a bordello, an escape on a Segway, and (among others unlisted) Blubberella unpacking her shopping (for like two minutes and there’s so no point).

Herr Doctor?  Docktor?  Dockter?  Fuck it.

They all link up vaguely to… not much.  I have a feeling this movie was edited with an iron fist weighted down by a crazy person beating off in an alley (which I’ve seen waaaaay too much of recently).

Here’s a snippet from my notes on the story-line:

“Hitler suddenly shows up on Blubberella’s doorstep (which is odd, because a) they didn’t know where she lived, b) they didn’t know her name, but Hitler called her by it as soon as he entered, and c) A TINY BLACK MOUSTACHE DOES NOT MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE HITLER) and begins to bitch to her about how she’s ruining his war campaign.  She accuses him of cock-blocking her by sending so many Jewish men to camps and he decides to live with her.

Uwe Boll does not make a good Hitler– I kept wanting to hug him and pat his head.

Also, there’s a dude in black-face, bringing the total number of dudes in black-face to two– which is two more than there should be.  It just doesn’t work.  Also, black-face make-up = total fail.  He’s more like green-face, and the make-up artist continues to maintain this standard for excellence throughout the movie.

During his residency at Chateau de Blubberella, Hitler and Blubberella bond over board games (RISK), cooking, and intimate conversations about Hitler’s true passions and we are given amazingly epic lines like: 

“You’re just going to get lonelier the more people you kill.”

Cliched, but true.

But the whole Hitler-romance turns out to be a dream.  I was incredibly disappointed by this.

Why is there a resistance fighter dressed as a fish? (Still kinda hot, though.)

44 minutes in, and I still didn’t have a good plot summary.  That’s kinda fucked.  However, at 50 minutes in, we learn that Hitler is possibly taking over the world with an undead army.  Possibly.  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Look, I’m still waiting for a coherent plot and the movie is over.

Plot-issues aside (far, far aside), this movie is packed so full of cultural references that, in ten years, no one is going to get a single joke that isn’t about her size.  We’ve got Blade, Blade II, The Matrix, The Dark Knight, Precious, Dancing with the Stars, Nosferatu, and probably about a dozen that I didn’t catch because I live under a rock.  Doing this amount of time-stamping on a film is bone-headed.

The tone of her hands doesn’t actually need to match her face.  (Still kinda hot, though.)

However, there were some great lines that actually had me laughing out loud (“LOL” for those of you that no longer use your words), like:

“Honey, there’s no black people in this movie so the whore’s probably going to die first.”

“I’ve never seen anybody move like you do– like a caged rhino that hasn’t been fed in weeks.”

Watching this movie was a bit weird for me.  For most of it, I was sitting there feeling really bad for the lead actress.  Who wants to be the star of a film that focuses on a part of their body (or all of their body?) that is considered by most to be, at minimum, unattractive?  Who wants to be the constant butt of jokes and be force-fed into a romance role?  This movie, to me, felt like a stab at fat people.  Well, repeated stabs.  Machine gun-speed stabs liberally spread over the course of an hour and some change.

You and me could have a bad romance.  (Still kinda… no.  No, it’s not.)

But then I saw that Hollister was one of the writers for the script.  That turns my concern on its head.  She willingly wrote a movie called Blubberella that makes joke after joke about how huge her vagina must be.  That compares her to various oversize jungle animals.  That’s quite unexpected.  I don’t really know what to think about it, but I really want to sit down with her now and find out her take.

Was the movie good?  No.  But it was entertaining– mostly.  Some parts ran a little dry, some parts you knew Boll was giving the finger to various movie people.  And Hollister is fucking amazing.  I fell in love with her during the first half of the movie, watching her act out a scene with her “mother” when she gave the best puppy dog eyes I have ever seen.  

So if you want a cute little romp where the plot-line follows in the path of those damned “Family Circus” kids and is full of fat jokes, sex jokes, and gay jokes (the character of flaming Vadge was killer), queue this up on Netflix on Demand.

Hrm.  Intro.  I like puppies.

In late 2007, Muoi: The Legend of a Portrait was released and, according to Wikipedia (which is always suspect to me), was the second horror film to be released in Vietnam (the first being Haunted House/Ghost Stream) and garnered the first under-16 ban rating for disturbing imagery and violence.

I’d name the actors but, much like with Vampires, no one is going to know who they are anyway.  I’d also like to declare that Asians don’t have feelings (much like Europeans), but I don’t want to be the victim of some “accident” involving chopsticks.  So… ASIANS ARE AWESOME! <( ^_^ )>

Look at how awesome he is!

Now, this part is usually where I write up a plot summary, but I think you’re going to get my notes on the beginning instead.

Open with credits while panning through forest, then monster-lady jumps down and movie begins.

Tranny!  No, not a trannny.  So confused.  Not-a-tranny runs down street and wanders into a temple.  Smoke sweeps up from her feet, she drops her lantern, something from above swings down as she screams in despair.  DESPAAAAIRRRR!

Not the possible tranny.

Okay, back to the actual article.

Yoonhee (spelling is variable depending on translator, article, or database you are accessing but, uh… *(^o^)*) is a young Korean novelist who has, through help of her long-distance friend in Vietnam, Seoyeon, developed a mild obsession with turning the Curse of Muoi (more in a minute, simmer the hell down) into a best-selling novel.  

We meet aforementioned novelist as she receives the third degree about  Seoyeon from one of her cunty friends and leaner-on boyfriend and about her upcoming trip to Vietnam to do research for her novel.  After taunting her a second time, the cunty friend gets Yoonhee to take her camera, which comes into play later.  

Not that I’m going to talk about it in this article.  But if you’re planning on watching this thing and keeping track of inanimate objects, that’s one to pay attention to.

I need a fancy Vietnamese vacation house.

Back in l’abode de Yoonhee (that’s French for the house of Mistress Yoonhee the Mighty), we get to hear the answering machine recording of Yoonhee’s editor threatening her over the needed story.  She decides to flee the country.

I lied.  (I do that a lot.  You’ll get used to it.)  She goes to Vietnam (as previously mentioned– please pay attention) to pursue research for her book.  Chae Seoyeon, the giraffe-necked wonder who Yoonhee hasn’t seen in three years, meets her at the airport, and takes her on the city’s official Muoi Tour.

Giraffe.  Neck.

I lied again– there is no official Muoi Tour.  You should probably spank me for such naughtiness.

On the unofficial Muoi Tour, Seoyeon guides Yoonhee to a wall of photographs in some… park(?).  I’ve never heard of this, but good for them for erecting a wall outside and putting framed photographs on it.  Anyhow, Yoonhee (and therefore we) learn about how Muoi was born a normal child (even though her name means “ten”), and how when Muoi became a ghost, monks had to be called in to seal her spirit into a painting to keep her contained.

Because, you know, paintings aren’t easy to destroy or anything.  No, sir.

Seoyeon also informs us that Muoi has the power to curse on the 15th night of the month when there is a full moon (I curse during certain times of the month too) and that the curse lasts for 15 days (poor girl).  

When Yoonhee questions what the curse actually does and where the witnesses are, Seoyeon says that she doesn’t know what the curse is, but all victims of the curse are certainly dead.  Suspicous conversation follows, leaving us all with the knowledge that something isn’t right with Seoyeon, but Yoonhee isn’t socially adept enough to catch it.

Awkward vacation photo.

They get a room at a hotel and, while the little creepster sleeps, Yoonhee experiences ringing doorbells and showers that turn themselves on.  (I turn myself on all the time.  But usually not, you know, while cameras are running.)

There is, of course, a second ghost reveal.  Now, this is 13 minutes in (OOOoOOOoOOooOOO) and we’ve seen the ghost twice.  Not exactly a suspense-builder, is it?

The next day, they head to l’abode du Seoyeon le creepster (the house of Seoyeon the creepster) and have a typical Bluebeard set-up.  You know, the moment when some creeptastic creeper says “Don’t go into that part of the castle/house/shack, it’s where I do perfectly innocent things, but it’s my special place”?  And then they smile like they’re already planning about anally raping you with a loaf of banana bread next time you sleep?  That thing.

She has memorized the recipe for banana bread.

The legend of Muoi and her curse is revealed later that day on a romantic boatride that ends at Muoi’s old cottage.  Before Muoi became a ghost, the tale goes, she was a humble peasant girl who fell in love with an artist who tragically had to leave her after starting her portrait because he was engaged. Inconveinent, that.

What was more inconveinent was that this fiancee was psychotic and decided to have Muoi’s legs broken immediately before throwing a jar full of acid onto her face.  Horribly scarred from this incident (and not just psychologically), Muoi decided that she could not chase after her love with her newly gained physical deformity and instead hung herself in order to turn herself into a ghost and get revenge. (AKA: bitches be crazy.)

Probably not the best day of her life.

Seoyeon wanders outside and lets Yoonhee explore the property alone.  As alone as she could be, given that she’s being fucking haunted by a crazy ghostbitch.

The film degrades (as much as this film could degrade– it’s pretty much a flatline the entire way through) to where you’d expect: Yoonhee continues to get spooked by spooky things while pursuing her research and Seoyeon continues to be a creeper.  Eventually there’s the obvious reveal and the obvious end– which I felt was amateurly done.

Nothing to do with any of the surrounding text.  Carry on.

This movie is, while not exactly slow, terribly disjointed.  I’m not sure if the fault lies with the screen-writer, the editor, or the translator (or all three), as the subtitling is pretty damn bad and leads one (me) to believe that with as many spelling and grammatical errors as I caught upon first reading, the content of the translation itself may be dodgy.

Overall, was this movie worth watching?  Seoyeon was hot in that creepy, Wednesday Adams sorta way that I really appreciate… but did it really make up for the lukewarmness of this movie?  Does my creation of “lukewarmness” offend anyone?  These are things you’ll have to answer for yourself, though I’m not really going to encourage anyone to queue this corpse up on Netflix.

Introduction, introduction, catchy phrasing that looks good on Facebook when you share it, jerk off, jerk off, jerk off.  OKAY, LET’S GO!

HOLY FUCK.

Apparently, there’s this show called Masters of Horror which is neither full of mastery or horrific, but I suppose one has to set goals.  From what I can gather, it’s like Tales from the Crypt without the prerequiste Crypt Keeper but with the super low budget.

Normally, I would avoid such things.  Or I’d try to avoid such things, watch a movie, and then realize that, shit, I just watched an episode of a show.  Because this is a *movie* review column, not a television episode review column… thing.

But I saw the cover of this movie, “We All Scream for Ice Cream” with its little melty ice cream cone/clown head and read the description and I shouted, “Bring it!”…  at my computer.  Which was really kinda awkward, it being an inanimate object that has absolutely no chance in hell if we got into a fist fight because IT HAS NO FISTS.

You couldn’t say no to this level of awesome.

Quick actor rundown: we’ve got William Forsythe as Buster, the retarded stuttering clown, who you may know as Manny Horvitz from Boardwalk Empire (he does a good job being a retarded stuttering clown, FYI).  Then we’ve got some little kids who were from Trick ‘r’ Treat which is one of the best Halloween movies ever.  And then there’s Lee Tergesen playing Layne (who only has a retarded name and is not actually retarded like Buster), who you’ll know from a variety of TV shows like Army Wives (Officer Boone), Generation Kill (Evan ‘Scribe’ Wright), Wanted (US Marshal Eddie Drake), Oz (Tobias Beecher), and Weird Science (Chett Donnelly).  That man loves his TV.

Wow, that paragraph was too long.  Look at the size of that thing.  Jeez.  Fucking Lee Tergesen throwing off my rhythm.

Now, I know you’re sitting there going “Who cares about the actors, tell me about THE CLOWN!” and, first off, I want to let you know that it isn’t very nice to be so dismissive about their hard work.  Secondly, THE CLOWN, fuck yes, I will tell you so much about THE CLOWN.

This movie opens with an older man, assumedly “Dad” talking to assumedly “son”, Kenny, trying to convince him not to eat the ice cream bar he’s holding.  Kenny basically tells him to fuck off and bites the bar.  The dad gurgles and melts into ice cream like dads tend to do.  Kenny says, “You shouldn’t have grounded me,” and continues to munch.

Dad’s creamy filling.

Cut to: the funeral of the dead man who is now, you know, just melted ice cream.  And what I want to know is how he’s staying in a coffin– shouldn’t he be in a large tupperware or maybe even an over-sized ziploc baggy?  Where on earth were the ice cream containment consultants when the script was being written??

Anyhow, there’s some dialogue and the phrase “horse-pucky” gets worked in.  In case you were counting the amount of times “horse-pucky” gets used in a movie.

Reason #38 as to why I’m never reproducing.

Then we move to Papa Joe’s Bar, where vaguely drunk, possibly Canadian guy (possibly only Canadian when drunk, which some of us are) informs bartender (Papa Joe) and friend of the deceased about how the death of some guy named “Skip” may not have been caused by what they all think.  He informs the bartender that Skip’s supposedly totaled car was found, perfectly fine, with only Skip’s clothing inside it.  Theories about nudity and covered-up murders ensue and Layne eventually enters the bar.

On his way home later that night, Layne sees children standing on the edge of the street holding quarters while a creepy voice chants about ice cream.  AGAIN, WHERE’S THE REALISM?!  Show me a fucking ice cream truck where the most basic of popsicles isn’t at least a dollar.  WHAT THE HELL ARE THESE KIDS GOING TO BUY WITH A QUARTER?!

?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!!!!!!!!????!!!?!!!!!!

Anyhow, he pulls onto his street and his windows start rapidly icing up and he almost runs over his own kid, who also labors under the delusion that ice cream only costs a quarter.

Meanwhile, back on the route home from the bar, the drunk guy demands to have the car pulled over so he can run across the street, vault the fence, and vomit.  Instead of, you know, just opening his car door and letting the highway take his bile.  While he’s off vomiting in the woods, some unnamed and previously unseen kid bites the head off of an ice cream bar shaped like a human and the drunk guy starts… well, he’s either orgasming or someone installed a retarded hamster at the base of his brainstem.

It could honestly be either because, after a moment, all that’s left of him is creamy white… goodness(?).

As the movie-type-thing goes on, Layne has sex with his wife and, during post-sex confession booth time, he relates the story of Buster the clown, the retarded man who drove the Cheery Time Ice Cream Truck and would sell ice cream to all of the neighborhood kids, and how the local bully, Virgil, ripped off Buster’s nose and, eventually, with Layne’s assistance, accidentally killed him.

All he wanted was to get the high score on Burgertime!  LIFE IS SO CRUEL!

After some very non-logical “detective work”, Layne realizes what is going on and sends his wife and kids off to grandma’s house so he can do a vague Home Alone-type battle with Buster.

This movie in sum: HOLY SHIT, THERE’S A RETARDED GHOST CLOWN ON THE LOOSE!  HIDE YOUR WIVES, HIDE YOUR KIDS CUZ HE’S MELTING EVERYBODY UP IN HERE!

Dear out-dated cultural reference, I will continue to use you until someone pays me not to. (Email me at allison@geekscape.net if you want to arrange payment.)

He’s checked his Pyramid Head watch and determined its raping time in the hot tub.

Overall, this would have been a horrible movie, but as a Tales from the Crypt deal, it was exactly the quality you’d expect, and so it makes it okay.  The plot is, as shown above, hysterical. The dialogue is colorful but iffy, as you can find some lovely “country” phrases in it like:

“It ain’t a stretch to think that one of his wild sperms got away.”

Yes, somewhere a lone bucking bronco of a sperm is racing wild through sun-filled desert valleys enjoying his freedom.  Run free, wild sperm, run free.

That’s a severe amount of power lines.  Jesus.

This sweet little number (HA!) is available on Netflix on Demand, and I suggest you watch it if you have a hankering for new cheesy horror material.  I also suggest getting a gallon bucket of ice cream and sculpting little human-shaped dessert statues while staring creepily at your friends as it plays.

I have a thing for horror movies revolving around children.  And by “thing”, I mean that they rarely fail to at least freak me out if not leave me anxiously searching for the little midgets in dark corners for months afterwards (The Orphanage, I’m looking at you).

So when I saw the Spanish movie The Baby’s Room floating around in my Netflix queue, I was both terrified and intrigued.  More terrified than intrigued, honestly, as it took me months to get around to watching it.

My problem is actually that I simply don’t trust movies released under a heading of “This Number of Films to do Some Activity For” or “This Number of Films Will Cause You to Wet the Bed at Least This Number of Times”, and this one was released under “6 Films to Keep You Awake”.

Sweetie, now that you’ve impregnated me, I’m going to own you for the rest of your life.

However, I let my Spanish leanings towards The Orphanage eventually sway me away from a particular Korean flick I was eyeing and into this lovely little film directed by one Mr. Alex de la Iglesia, whose directing work some might know already from The Day of the Beast.

The Baby’s Room centers upon a Spanish family: Juan, Sonia, and their baby who they call “Fester” (but I’m not altogether sure if that was the actual name, a nickname, or a description).

See: owned.  Rest. Of. Your. Life.

As in most haunted house stories, the true starting event is them moving to a new (haunted) house.  (I say “true starting event” as there is a brief opening scene that, while neat and made sense overall, I think was underwhelming and could have done much more to establish the movie.)  Juan and Sonia are a truly happy, loving couple, full of tenderness and teasing as they work together on their new house and shower Fester with all the affection he’ll need growing up with a name like “Fester”.

However, the first night they sleep over in the house, Juan digs up a pair of baby monitors and stations one in the titular baby’s room and one in their bedroom (as putting it in the garage would have made *no* sense at all).  As they start to doze off, they hear Fester giggling over the monitor, which is followed by heavy breathing and, when Juan grabs the device, a suddenly angry and unintelligble male voice.  Juan  slowly gets up and walks to the baby’s room, grabbing a table leg on the way– but no one is in the room with his offspring.

I’ll admit that he does look like a “Fester”.

In American movies, things like this are dismissed the next day.  Oh, we were both tired.  Oh, it was the acid we dropped.  Oh, it’s just the neighbor’s porn channels being received.

This is not an American movie.

Juan goes to work and tells his boss that he’s late because his house is haunted.  There’s no level of disbelief or rationalization, his house is haunted and that’s the end of it.  The boss is less than impressed.

After work, Juan heads to a baby store (where you buy, you know, babies) and picks up a new monitor set– one with an infrared video camera so they can actually watch their baby sleep.  Juan wakes up in the middle of the night to see a strange, dark man leaning on Fester’s crib, which causes him to grab a nearby dinner knife and bolt into the nursery.

The eyes scare you?  What about me?!  GYAH!

Sonia is, shall we say, less than amused to wake up and see her husband hovering over their baby with a knife in his hand.  Relationship tension continues to mount from this point in the movie.

Paranoia begins to take over Juan’s brain, as not only does one of his coworkers start to feed into anxious possibilities, but the police that are summoned to inspect their house for a potential B&E are less than sympathetic to their mental state.

Basically, the policeman they question about their safety is like, oh yeah, thieves break into houses during the day and just hide and come out and night.  Yeah, sometimes they go into bedrooms and steal while the owners are sleeping.  You’re lucky you woke up, because sometimes they steal babies, too.

Very reassuring.

Anyway, after nearly being accidentally killed by Juan, Sonia decides to grab Baby Fester and head out of town for a bit.  While she’s gone, Juan’s psychological state continues downhill.

Here’s Juanny!

This rapid downhillery manifests in several ways, but the most important and freakiest of which was him buying several more infrared baby monitors once he realizes that they can “see” into the haunting.  Basically, he ends up running around the house with a baby monitor in such a way that caused certain parts of my body to clench in fear.

So, yeah, this movie repeatedly scared the crap out of me.  Yes, I’m a whuss and, as soon as the scene was over, I’d say to myself, “What the hell were you freaking out for?” or write things like “SO FUCKING DOOMED” on my notepad, but it was still scary.

Library field trip, yay!

As midnight rolled around, I started texting an ex-boyfriend.  Here’s our conversation:

 

AM: You up?

EX: Nope.

*minutes pass*

EX: Whyfor?

AM: This movie is terrifying the shit out of me.

EX: Aww.  Poor fragile Allison

AM: ‘Nother scary Spanish movie.

EX: Well, don’t worry… there’s probably nothing behind you.

AM: I hate you.

EX: I’m saying, odds are good that there’s nothing creepy outside.  That noise on the stairs is probably just a cat, so relax.

AM: AAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!

EX: It wasn’t a cat?  You should go see what made that noise.

AM: WHY DO YOU SUCK SO MUCH?!

 

Scariness aside, the plot itself was fun.  Sure, it has been done before, but that didn’t make it any less interesting and it certainly didn’t spoil the ending for me– with movies like this, you can go a variety of different ways and, as far as I could tell, there was no real lean towards any one direction, no reveal to the ending, until the actual end, which I greatly appreciate.

Spoiler: Old people are crazy.

Also of note, this is the first time I’ve ever seen a movie use Schrodinger’s Cat to explain the paranormal, so total points for that.

If I was at all prone to assigning rating systems to movies, this would fall below the level of “I’m Going to Sleep in my Parents’ Bedroom with a Lit Up Glo-Worm Doll” but above the level of “Another Goddamned Paranormal Activity Movie”.

As always (always!), if you feel like following the adventures of a man who would call his kid Fester, this movie is available on Netflix on Demand.  Watch it, call me a pussy for being frightened, and design a drinking game around cultural differences in dealing with hauntings and bad decisions that ultimately cause the main character’s downfall.

 

More than a few weeks ago, I had the pleasure of visiting the combined sets of Axel Braun Production’s latest super hero projects, Wolverine XXX and X-Men XXX.

Skin readies the Danger Room… for pleasure!

Many people have a certain idea of what being on a porn set is like.  From what I’ve determined from various sources, there’s sex all-the-time-everywhere-in-every-hole-everybody’s-just-fucking-everybody and the amount of cocaine placed on each table rivals the peaks of Disney’s Matterhorn.  

Having now been on a number of porn sets for various projects (and sometimes purely entertainment purposes), I’ve yet to ski down powdery white slopes or witness gratuitous sex in dark corners.  (Is there such thing as gratuitous sex?  Let me know.)

Fantasies = shattered.  I hope that one day you can forgive me.

Mike Moz is prepared for the chilly climate with this stylish plaid blanket.

What I did find on the set was a desperate need for thick blankets, as most of the talent (and some of the crew) retreated between shots into the make-up room where one of the sole heaters was blasting.

I also found that some filming locations have permanent sets.  This one had, among many things, a maternity ward (complete with boxes of plastic babies), a morgue, and a very scary room that contained only a  rather intimidating gyno chair, which, one of the girls remarked in passing, had been used for a scene in a different adult movie.

During the time I was there, when I wasn’t hiding in the make-up room talking to various talent or taking photos for this article (which was quite fun, by the way), I was able to watch a threeway scene between Deadpool (Derrick Pierce), Spider-man (Xander Corvus), and Rogue (Allie Haze).

Ms. Allie Haze as the previously untouchable Rogue.

Before you freak out in a bout of nerd rage, I promise you that I did quiz the screenwriter on this apparent impossible feat and there is a perfectly logical explanation as to why Deadpool and Spider-man can touch (ream, really) Rogue without, you know, dying.  But you’ll have to watch the movie to find out, as I would simply hate to spoil the plot for you.  But try to calm yourselves in the meantime.

Xander Corvus has this pose down.

(Also, did anyone else go: “Huh.  Derrick Pierce.  Deadpool.  I wonder what else starts with ‘DP'”?  Or was that just me and my own sexual fantasies manifesting via text?  Probably.)

Dark, brooding, and totally insane.  Oh, Deadpool, you hit all my buttons.

I also was able to watch the filming of the Danger Room’s control room, when Wolverine (Tommy Gunn) is introduced to the Institute by Professor X (Mike Moz) and meets Storm (Skin).  I will do my best not to mention the incredibly silly pictures that I took which will not be released of the charming Mr. Gunn holding a baby doll while Skin stands by looking absolutely shocked.

Danger Room.  Being Filmed.  Like a badass.

I left before Axel Braun’s contract girl, Aiden Ashley, did her scene for the evening as Domino for Wolverine XXX.  Aiden recently signed on to perform boy/girl scenes exclusively for ABP, as she has, until recently only agreed to girl/girl, making this a decently big step for her in the world of porn.

She’s planning on killing you… tomorrow.

While she was sitting in the make-up chair, I had a chance to chat with her about her role as Domino.  When she first announced her casting as the probability-altering mutant, she told me, fans immediately began to respond, demanding that she do the research for the part of such a surprisingly loved character.  She bought every comic book she could find with Domino and read every one of them, but she only brought Yost and Kyle’s Sex and Violence with her to set and grinned at me as she told me it was her favorite.

It was fascinating to be able to watch the characters come to life, to watch Domino’s spot be applied, to see Spider-man suit up for the first time that day, and follow Professor Xavier as he wheeled around the set (when the chair was not hijacked by other members of cast and crew and maybe– just maybe– this article’s author).

Oh, baby, that’s the spot!  (*rimshot*)

Over the days of the filming for these two movies, other characters came in, though I was unable to attend their scenes.  However, I have been told that we will be seeing Evan Stone as Sabretooth, Billy Glyde as Colossus, Chanel Preston as Polaris, Andy San Dimas as Jean Grey, and Katie St. Ives as Kitty Pride.  Definitely not a bad selection of characters, in my opinion.

I’ve nothing funny to say.  Skin’s really rather gorgeous.

I left the set late in the evening, but filming continued on for several more hours– twelve to sixteen hour days seem to be fairly common in the world of porn, though I’ve heard of, and witnessed, longer.  Double-entendre not intentional, just so you know.

His hair is pointy, his sideburns are thick, and his eyebrows are angry.  It must be Tuesday.

While neither X-Men XXX or Wolverine XXX has a release date as of yet, keep an eye out for these two additions to Vivid’s collection of adult superhero movies directed by Axel Braun.

 

A few weeks ago, I was invited to the press conference and pre-screening of Soderbergh’s new film Haywire.  If you’re like me in your cultural obliviousness, you may not recognize his name, but Soderbergh brought you such movies as Sex, Lies, and Videotape, Ocean’s Eleven, Traffic, Solaris, and Contagion just to name a few and make this paragraph uncomfortably long for one of my opening paragraphs.

See what happens when I try to educate the masses?  Fucking long opening paragraphs.  I don’t even know why I try.  Here: there’s this director and he does stuff and he directed a movie called Haywire that’s coming out on Friday, January 20th.

Haywire is the major acting debut of female MMA fighter Gina Carano, a debut backed by an impressive line-up.  Who is in this so-called impressive line-up? you may ask.  Well… Ewan MacGregor, Antonio Banderas, Michael Fassbender (who can call me anytime with declarations of love or just sexual intent), Channing Tatum, Michael Douglas, and Bill Paxton.  (Side Note: Paxton plays Carano’s father.  I kinda wanted him to be my dad until I remembered Frailty.)

So this isn’t just some bit of fluff centering around bringing some fighting star to the big screen (I’m looking at you in particular, Mr. Kane, and your See No Evil).  And Carano’s acting mostly holds for her part.  There were all of two scenes where I cringed slightly at her acting and the rest was absolutely fine– not bad at all, with this being her first movie.

Oh, hai Mr. Fassbender.

This movie, in sum, focuses on the betrayal of security operative Mallory Kane (Carano– obviously, unless MacGregor is cross-dressing) and how she handles that betrayal (spoiler: mostly with violence).  It’s an interesting collision between Ocean’s Eleven and The Bourne Identity.

This is being marketed, at least to the press, as not just another action movie– and it isn’t.  Soderbergh ensures this on multiple levels.  

On my Christmas list.  FYI.  (The gun, not Carano.  Though I wouldn’t turn her down.)

The sound effects were unexpectedly enjoyable.  It was the minimizing of unnecessary external noises, especially during pursuit scenes, and the maximizing of the noises that would be acknowledged by and matter to Carano as she fled, hunted, and waited.  In a way, it dropped the boundary between Carano’s experience and the audience’s experience, letting us experience what she was experiencing.

The soundtrack was excellent as well– a mix of the Ocean’s Eleven soundtrack and what you would expect from Yoko Kanno and The Seatbelts, sort of James Bondish, but with a more modern edge to it.

The fight scenes added an unexpected level of intensity.  So many action movies are so damned unrealistic with their action that we don’t really react to it as an audience because we know it’s fake without even having to think about it.  But while watching Haywire, sympathy groans filled theater scene after scene– you know, those “Oooh!” noises you make with your friends when you’re watching those dirt bike or skateboard injury– this film’s action never lost its edge, never went over the top.

One of the things I loved most about this movie was how the character of Mallory Kane dealt with her betrayal.  I feel that too many times I’ve found myself watching this type of movie with a female lead who, once she finds her betrayer, (while beating him to death) asks tearfully, usually at high volumes, “Why?? WHHYYYYYYYYYYY?!

Kane didn’t do that.  She discovered a problem, she took care of it.  There wasn’t a lot of emotion involved, just a tying up of loose ends, making sure everything was taken care of.  When she questioned people, it was for information, not emotional succor.  How goddamned cool is that?  A female badass who is actually a badass, not just experiencing PMS.  That’s role model material right there.

Bad ass role model, yes.  But don’t take make-up tips from her.

Was this movie amazing?  No.  Will it change the world?  No.  But did Soderbergh, his crew, and his cast create a different sort of action movie?  Yes.  Will it hold your attention from beginning to end?  Yes.   Will you be cringing as much as I was at the realistic violence?  Maybe.  I’m kind of a pussy.

 

 

Sometimes a movie just reaches across the divide between media and consumer and really touches you.  Sometimes a movie gives you the kind of feeling one would associate with your devoted pet proudly running up to you and dropping a two-month dead baby possum with AIDS in your lap.  This would be that movie.

“Shattered Lives” was released in either 2009 or 2010… or possibly 2007.  It’s all rather vague and I really don’t care. (Which is funny, as this film states that it’s a “No One Cares Production”– that’s foresight!)

This movie details the life of Rachel, a very Swedish-looking girl that is the supposed offspring of someone with a vaguely Latin-ish ethnicity and a gay Irishman.  Don’t worry too much about the genetic miscasting– when they show “older Rachel” she’s vaguely Latin-ish like her mom.  (AKA: Ethnic transformations for the win!)

Rachel is either absolutely batshit or is haunted by twin(ish) demonic clown/mime dolls who want her to kill things.  This is never made clear by the movie, though one IMDB reviewer/tool felt like fancying their review up by writing the following verbally nebulous bullshit: 

“Her fears and inability to cope with the harsh realities of life becoming so intense that they manifest themselves in an altered state of reality, a schizophrenic girl begins taking orders from a pair of clown dolls who instruct her to murder her adulterous mother.”

I don’t care how many multi-syllabic words you can put in one sentence, it’s still someone just trying to sound educated in their option of a crap movie.  Carrying on.

You might have noticed by now that all the pictures thus far are pictures of the twin(ish) clown/mime dolls and you might have noticed with some alarm that those T C/M Ds are played by midgets, therefore triggering a base-fear response in your hindbrain.  Please do remain calm and take slow, deep breaths until your animal instincts subside.

Even with my concern for your well-being, the topic of these pictures is not going to change.  I have purposefully only taken screenshots of the T C/M Ds so you can fully appreciate my immense suffering.

In order to truly submerse you in the experience of viewing this movie, instead of my usual plot breakdown and (obviously missing) list of noteable actors (there are none), I’m just going to give you snippets of dialogue from the clown/mime dolls, one of which is Geordi LaForge.

Rachel: Who are you?

Freak #1: You are not allowed to ask such questions.  We mean you no harm, we are your friends.

Freak #2: Nothing.

Freak #1: Something.

Freak #2: One thing.

Freak #1: We are everything, but everything is nothing.

Freak #2: The long-forgotten fairy tale is in her eyes.  Caught inside a dream world.

Freak #1: Feelings too intense.

Freak #2: And nothing makes sense.

Freak #1: Clinging hard to her dreams.

Freak #2: And everything shatters around her.

Freak #1: I know.  We will perform for you.  Mouth closed, eyes open, ears listening, take a peek.

Everything that is wrong with performance art as interpreted by chiaroscuro midget clowns.

Rachel: Who are you?

Freak #1: Ooooh, we cannot tell.

Freak #2: It’s a seeecret.

Freak #1: We couldn’t. 

Freak #2: We shouldn’t.

Freak #1: Noooo.  I’ll whisper it into your ears while you sleep so you can remember in your dreams.

Freak #2: Dreams?

Freak #1: Dreams.

Freak #2: Dreams?  Dreams are answers to questions that you do not know how to ask.

Freak #1: The child poking holes in reality.

Rachel: Who are you?

Freak #2: Sssh. *whispers*

Freak #1: He’s says if you ask that again, if you open your mouth one more time, I swear to god I’ll break it, so shut the FUCK up.

*pause*

Freak #1: What?  An uncomfortable siiiiilence.

Freak #2: The little child is scared.  I can smell the fear in her veins pumping through her booody.

Do you now understand how incredibly creepy and bad and so, so WRONG this is?  There are scary black and white midget clown/mimes whispering bad poetry to this little Swedish kid who has a gay Irishman for a dad.  It doesn’t get much worse.

Wait, it does.

Let’s say that you’re me.  You’re in bed in your favorite skeleton pajamas and Halloween socks. It’s late at night, you’ve been watching midgets in black and white coo at this blonde kid.  You’re starting to feel like your mind has been raped by someone’s idea of performance art and you just want the movie to either fully go over the edge or burst into flames.

And then the movie goes forward in time to deal with “older” Rachel at her high school.

And then you blink.

You blink again.

And you realize that you’re looking at footage of the high school you attended.  You see the grate you tripped on six dozen times over the years, the cafeteria where you were accidentally hit by a flying large soda, the inside of the classroom where you read Lord of the Flies.

Obviously, the clowns are speaking to you, they’ve modified this movie to reflect on your life in order to embed themselves and their bad poetry into your skull.

So you go downstairs, get a knife, and go on a free-form massacre.

The clowns wanted you to do it.  Who are you to question the clowns?

My life feels a little more empty now.  Empty and cold.  This reviewer is going to go curl up in bed for a few days and pretend that this movie, accessible on Netflix on Demand, never actually happened.

 

When one (aka: me) is sitting in on press conferences, one (me) gets to hear a lot of banal questions.  How did you feel about this script, did you like your character, what did you relate to with your character, what was it like working with so-and-so, what’s coming up the pipe for you?

I suppose this is a sign of what people like to read about in their movie reviews and their companion-piece interviews.  Personally, I’ve always found that stuff rather trite– with a few exceptions.  If I’m reading an article about someone’s experience filming a ghost movie, I don’t want to hear about all the “spooky” things that went on on set.  It’s filler, and it’s boring filler.  

I want to know more about what’s going on, how people processed certain activities and how they view themes of the movie, more than how often the lights flickered in their hotel room or what got them into acting.

So I poke and I prod and I ask (often confusing) questions.  Fortunately for me, when I sat down with The Innkeepers male lead, Pat Healy, he was willing to answer my (often bizarre) questions and do so with much thought.  

I’ve had to take out some bits so as to remove spoilers, but there still are somewhat hinting sentences, so read at your own discretion.

AM: I found it really interesting, your character and Sara’s character seem to be almost the same person except at very distinct junctures where you actually had some notion of sexuality and where your character […], but you guys seemed so much the same person until those slight diversions kept happening.

PH: Yeah, I think that they’re two of the same type of people at different  points of their life.  He [Luke] is older and dropped out of college long ago and he’s there and, like many people that I’ve known that are just as talented if not more so than I am, has seemingly no ambition for whatever reason.  She [Claire] is at this turning point where she’s just dropped out of school and he’s trying to guide her in a way to not take this stuff [ghost hunting] too seriously and to be careful and not make the mistakes that he made.  He says to her, “You start thinking that these things are real and then you’re out there and you can never come back,” to that effect.  

AM: Right.

PH: It must be because he’s been there himself and he’s older now and it’s coming from more of a place of cynicism.  I think that those are the two sides of a person, like in “Paranormal Activity”: the early go-getter– the young person fresh out and excited about everything– and the hard-worn cynic who has been there and seen that there’s nothing there and really wants nothing to do with it anymore.  It’s two very distinct stages of life of a person who has moved into the working class world with the dead end job.  

AM: “The Innkeepers” had a lot of these little interesting moments and one of the ones that caught me off-guard was when they [Luke and Claire] were going down into the basement together and they were sitting and then […].  And I was just like… it was so unexpected for me.

PH: Yeah, that was like the diversion path you were talking about, which is that at certain parts of our life we choose to believe something, whether it’s a creation myth or religion or in ourselves and sometimes we get scared and we back off.  I’ve been in those places where, in my life, I’ve had opportunities where, you know, I choked, and maybe it was because I had an impression in my mind that I was a choker.  Now that I’ve stopped thinking that about myself, when I get to a place of opportunity for myself I seize it. Luke is a person who has given up on that.  I think he sees some salvation or transformation in the form of this person that he really likes [Claire], and right before the scene that you’re talking about, that’s shattered.  

AM: Right, it was kinda heart-breaking.

PH: After that, there’s really no reason for him to stay around anymore […].  That’s certainly from an actor’s point of view, reading the script and doing it, the sort of through-line that I was working from is that he’s doing it all for her and then he sees that’s not going to happen […].

AM: So, if you’re going off of a metaphor, which Ti [West] said a lot of the side characters are like metaphors, and he was going and looking at a future with her, a future in a certain way, where he was going and believing with her, and when it came to a crunch point […].

PH:  It’s interesting. He’s operating under a complete delusion that she’s interested in him. During the movie, he moves away from this delusion into a harsh reality while she moves into this theoretical delusion of the supernatural.  They sort of move away from each other.  They have this nice camaraderie that is split apart by these ideas of things that are going on in those two people’s heads.  I imagine Ti is an astute guy and there’s possibly some of his own experience in this.  

AM: It’s funny, if you take that metaphor that she’s going forward with her belief in the supernatural and he’s going in reverse, her hopes and dreams and beliefs were the vehicle that forced her conclusion while Luke reached his own by staying cynical and not pursuing potential pathways which seems kind of counterculture.

PH: Yeah, I guess it is, though it certainly is not my personal philosophy.  It may have been at one time and it might very well  have been if I had chosen the path of least resistance in my life and not been ambitious in the way that I have been.  It certainly has been a struggle to survive in this business and I could have done what some of my friends have done and taken a regular job and still live in wherever.  So I can understand that in him and I can understand the philosophy in that it’s safer to stay that way, though it doesn’t necessarily make it better.  He’s pretty shattered, pretty devasted in the end.

AM: So if it were up to you, if there was more of you in the character, you would have acted differently as Luke?

PH: Nobody really knows what they would do in that type of situation.  I’d like to think that I’m the kinda person that would step up– and in times of crisis in my life I have surprised myself and been that person, so I’d like to think that I would be, but who knows?  I’ve seen a rat in a subway before and hidden behind a girlfriend, you know?  I just happen to be really frightened of rats– I have a phobia of them. I’d like to think in Luke’s situation that I’d help another person, but there are times when we surprise ourselves by how selfish and self-absorbed we are.  In this case, I don’t really think there was anything he could have done.  

In case the “picture break” didn’t alert you, the interview section of this article is over.  We’re now moving along to where I reflect on my years as a high school football mascot.  

One of the tag-lines of this movie is “A Horror Movie for the Minimum Wage”, which I think is terribly clever as it not only parodies the constant claim of “A *insert amazing thing here* for the modern age” line, but also touches upon not only the current economic “issues” the country has been having, but also brings us (or at least me back, if you guys aren’t going to join me in mental solidarity because you’re assholes) mentally back to that first job.

We’re told in high school that we need to determine Our Career.  They give us personality tests to determine the field we’re “best suited for” and have us shadow someone in that field so we can see what Our Future can/will be like.  We’re told to keep our grades up, to do community service, be on a sports team or in an academic club so we’re more attractive to colleges in our pursuit of Our Future.

And I’ve found that very few high school students actually know what they want to do as A Career through this “guidance”.  (Note: generally speaking, if you’re a high school career guidance counselor, your own dreams certainly have fallen by the wayside and, therefore, you shouldn’t be guiding anyone.)

So those of us that are lost either go straight into the workforce and head into college, hoping the answer to The Career Question will show itself and suddenly we’ll have A Plan and Social Value. Our parents will finally be able to stop finding creative ways to tell their friends that their child has no direction in life but is doing really well in that basket-weaving class.

During The Innkeepers press conference, Ti West spoke on the design of Luke and Claire’s characters. “I’ve either had a minimum wage job or directed movies,[…] I have no intermediate skills.  So if this [directing] doesn’t work out, then I have to go back to being a bus-boy or something.  I’m sorta terrified of that.  But I’m also very charmed by one’s weird insular work friends and being stuck in a job.  It’s not digging ditches, but it’s probably not where one wants to be, […] so I worked very hard to make a charming ghost story and I thought that if I could make these characters relatable to myself and the people that I worked with, people would relate.”  

We care about these characters because we, to a degree, understand them– whether we see ourselves as the charmingly aimless Claire or the fatalistic Luke.  It makes the film that much more entertaining and that much more frightening when we see someone we connect with in potentially dangerous situations.

The Innkeepers is available On Demand and in select theaters on February 3rd.  

 

I knew my years of French classes in high school would pay off.  Somehow, I was certain that I would wind up an American traveler in Paris, being romanced by some long-haired hippie Parisian.  (My taste in men’s personal hygenie has since changed.)

In 2011, my French still hasn’t paid off and the only long-haired hippies I see are really just hipster kids in disguise.  (Note to hipster kids: your trendy cowboy boots are not as trendy as you think they are.  And they make me want to punch you.)

However(!), also in 2011 (just two days ago, in fact), I had the pleasure of watching the IFC Films release of the Belgian mockumentary “Vampires”.  (How they came up with such an original title, I have no idea.)

This lovely little movie hit the festival circuit in April 2010 and has traveled all over the world, hitting Brussels, London, Canada, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Taiwan, Spain… well, certainly more countries than I’ve had the pleasure of visiting.  The reviews have been excellent, awards have been won, celebrations must certainly have been had.

Here is where I’d normally go over the actors in the movie, but no one cares about Europeans.

Oh dear, I hurt her Euro-feelings.  HA!  LIKE THEY HAVE ANY!

Okay, okay, so that’s wrong.  But this movie did the smart thing of only casting, from what I can see, one person that might be mildly recognizable to some people somewhere.  So it’s kind of pointless to list out non-existent celebrities.  If you want to fight about it, send me your challenge with a box of freshly baked chocolate chip cookies and I’ll consider it.

The premise of the movie is this: a film company is invited to visit the home of a family of vampires in Belgium in order to create a documentary of the vampire lifestyle within the country.  After two… uh, false starts, the third film crew assigned to the project manages to enter into a fairly non-threatening relationship with a delightful blood-sucking brood and begins to document their night-to-night activities.

Comprising the household are George Saint-Germain (+2 for historical reference), his wife, Bertha (who reminds me, in a way, of a rabid St. Bernard), his son, Samson, and his daughter, Grace.  Living in the basement are their (vampire) neighbors, Elizabeth and Bienvenu.

I like long walks on the beach, dog blood, and yoga.

What I think makes this movie amazing is not the way it was filmed (sometimes it seemed like the documentary-nature of it was lost) or the music (which was, at times, incredibly overblown), but the relationships between the characters and how real these no-name actors were able to make them– especially Elizabeth.

George and Bertha have a laissez-faire parenting style when it comes to their creations, Samson and Grace, and as a reaction to such, the children manifest this in two very different ways.  

I yell that at men too, but I’m not going to go into that here.

Samson is the “true” vampire– he loves playing up the role, loves to go out and hellraise, sometimes much to the distress of his parents, when he breaks what they call The Code (a system of vampire laws held in place by the head vampire of the region).

Grace, on the other hand, dresses all in pink.  She’s blonde, rebellious, in love with the idea of being human, of being able to die by way of hanging, drowning, or, yes, dousing herself in gasoline and lighting herself on fire.  She keeps her hair blonde, applies a fake tan when she gets up at night, and starts dating a human boy midway through the movie to underscore her rebellion even further.

George does his best to tolerate his daughter’s actions and suggests that she’ll grow out of it eventually, but Bertha, her mother, thinks it’s all disgusting– especially the pink.

Hello, understatement.

The downstairs neighbors are another source of woe for George and Bertha.  As what can only be described as orthodox vampires, Elizabeth and Bienvenu are are stuck in the basement until they decide to create a child at which point they will be given a house of their own (another rule of The Code).  They hate their unruly upstairs neighbors and their cramped living conditions, but admit that the reason they cannot have “children” of their own is because neither of them can control their own base desires. (Elizabeth, well, she eats babies.  Bienvenu, he molests older children.  Who knew?)

Which, as they say it, almost comes off with the shame of a couple who desperately wants a child, but have fertility problems.  

There’s also The Meat.  The Meat is a girl who lives in The Fridge– a cold outside storage area– who takes care of their daily needs and provides them a constant source of fresh blood with some sort of unspoken trust that they’ll do their best not to accidentally kill her.  She loves them like family and only goes into the occasional seizure from blood loss– no big thing.

I’d like to Meat her in a dark alley.

We get to learn about coffin-shopping, about how the Belgian government delivers undesirable persons to their door and offers a corpse clean-up once a week.  We meet the Belgian vampire government and go to the local school for new vampires to see what they learn and how.  We get to see what happens when you take a severely mentally-handicapped person (look at me, being all politically correct!) and turn them into a vampire.  (Note: it seems that then you have a retarded vampire.  Fuck, there goes the politcal-correctness.)

I wonder who teaches them how to dress themselves. Liza Minnelli?

What is wonderful about this is that, as opposed to many recent mockumentaries, it’s subtle.  The underlying humor stays just that– underlying.  Yes, I loved A Mighty Wind and Drop Dead Gorgeous as much as anyone, but to see a well-made mockumentary where the people and their relationships could truly be believable (well, if they weren’t vampires)… that’s really neat.

Queue it up on Netflix on Demand and follow the undeaths of the Saint-Germains.

 A couple of weeks ago, I had the pleasure of being invited to view Ti West’s (The House of the Devil, Trigger Man, Cabin Fever 2) latest horror film, The Innkeepers.

This Magnet release was an official selection of 2011’s Fantastic Fest, SXSW 2011 and also showed at the Los Angeles Film Festival this past year.  Fortunately for you, dear reader, this movie isn’t limited to the festival circuit and will be coming to select theaters on February 3rd.  And if you don’t have it in a theater near you, you can always watch it On Demand. Hooray!

“The Innkeepers” features the talents of Sara Paxton as the aimless Claire (You may know her from Last House on the Left, but since I have a *thing* for, well, chick movies, I know and love her from Sydney White.  Please stop judging me.) and Pat Healy as the equally aimless but further-along-in-his-acceptance-of-said-aimlessness, Luke (Who you’d recognize from Rescue Dawn, Ghost World, and, since you’re nerds, a bit part from Star Trek: Enterprise).  We also have Ms. Kelly McGillis dropping in as traveling psychic/spiritual healer, Leann Rease-Jones, and you’d probably not recognize her as Charlie from Top Gun, but she certainly was. 

And, yes, she took my breath away. (Why, oh why, did I just write that?  It’s a lack of shame, that’s what it is.  That and having no friends.)

“Goooooose! Nooooo!”

The plot follows thusly: The Yankee Pedlar Inn, a historic hotel in some unidentified town (actually: Torrington, CT) is about to shut down.  The two remaining employees, Claire (Paxton) and Luke (Healy) have temporarily moved into the hotel for its last few days in order to split their shifts straight down the middle: twelve on, twelve off.

And to hunt ghosts.  You see, The Yankee Pedlar Inn is rumored to be haunted by the ghost of Madeline O’Malley, a bride who was jilted at the atlar and hung herself in the hotel.  According to legend, when her body was found, the staff hid it in the basement of the hotel for three days, making the basement a site of heavy hauntings.

In pursuit of this legend (among other things), Luke has created a website that talks about the history of The Pedlar and records its haunted occurances.  This website, if you’re anything like me, will make you almost spill your drink once you cast your gaze upon its 1990s Geocities visage.  Harkening back to it, thou mayest findth yourth abilitith to typeth regressivelyth altered..th.

Claire is interested in the project, but after a few nighttime explorations, she finds herself drawn rapidly in, more so than Luke himself.  Once Claire’s idol, famous television actress Lea Rease-Jones, unexpectedly checks into the hotel and questions Claire’s goals in life, Claire violently latches onto her ghost hunting as a means of social salvation and life-purpose.

Which sounds really odd to write, but there it is.  Ghosts = success.

Jealous of his glasses? Yes. Yes, I am.

Honestly, it makes perfect sense with Claire’s character.  Paxton portrays an adorably awkward, completely desexualized girl who is wandering through her life.  As Paxton charmingly put it during the movie’s press conference, “I think it all ties into the fact that Claire– we’ve all felt like this, she’s so relatable– she’s stuck at this dead-end job at the front desk.  She’s really “murr” about life and she’s like, ‘Should I go back to school?  I don’t know.  The coffee girl is annoying.  The movie star lady made me feel like a jerk.’  I think that because she’s so “murr” about the whole thing that when the ghost stuff starts getting crazy, she’s totally into it.  She’s like, ‘This is the thing, I’m gonna do this now, because everything else is so lame.'”

The “murrness” (Which is incredibly, incredibly adorable when Paxton says it.  If you are not, in fact, as adorable as Paxton, please hunt down the most adorable person in the vicinity and ask them to “murr” at you for something reaching the full effect.) of not just Claire’s situation, but Luke’s, is something that stretches through the entire film.  It’s a sense of a sort of stuck wandering, like being trapped in a transition period– in a way similiar to the seeming awkward purgatory of puberty.  And we’re going to pretend that I didn’t just make that metaphor.

During the same press conference, Ti West likened this to the theoretical situation of ghosts, where they are tied to a place, repeating the same actions over and over again, going nowhere.  What really underscores this in the movie is the inn itself.  Older inns were stops on long journeys, transition points from one place to the next.  Occasionally, yes, inns would take on boarders, but those were still temporary inhabitants, waiting for the next stop in their lives.

Luke and Claire, however, are still trapped on this train car that (nearly… bwah hah ha..!) everyone jumped off of a long, long time ago and they still aren’t ready to leave.

Slightly philosophical discussions aside, I greatly enjoyed this movie.  It was a classic ghost story– not in the epic way of “The Haunting”, but more along the lines of a story told around the campfire with a flashlight under your chin and a host of eight-year-olds that are likely to topple over at any moment.

“Bloody finger, bloody finger!”

That being said, it is one of those slow burns.  The pressure builds over the course of the movie– there’s not a lot of gore and the real jump-inducers are pretty much all at the tail-end.  It’s fun and the dialogue is smart and, if you’re a “Real Genius” nut like me, you’ll catch a lovely reference to it in the bowels of this movie that’ll give you a good laugh.

Give the preview a gander and show this great little movie some love.

Sometimes, a movie comes along that makes you weep those proverbial tears of joy.  Sometimes, a movie comes along that moves you deep, deep inside.  Sometimes, however, a movie so great comes along and you end up typing at Matt Kelly in capital letters over Facebook IM, screaming in near orgasmic bliss and confusion.

This movie was the latter, obviously.  I mean, yeah, I’m a bit full of non sequiturs, but it’d just make absolutely no sense if I turned around and said, “And this movie was just kinda okay.”

Suck hit the film festival circuit in 2009 and worked its way through 2010, winning the Audience Choice Award for both the Whistler Film Festival (2009) and the Calgary Underground Film Festival (2010), while also snagging the silver medal for Best Canadian Feature at the 2010 Fantasia Film Festival and the Outstanding Achievement in Filmmaking award at the 2010 Newport Beach Film Festival.

There’s a “seeing red” joke here, somewhere.  If only I could find it.

Okay, who knew that Newport Beach had a film festival (Editor’s Note: I did. Gay By Dawn played there in 2005)?  I thought they only had boats and sea food restaurants.  Oh, and a Condom Revolution.  Fuck yeah, Newport, you get down with your naughty side.

For those of you who caught my review of Kiss of the Vampire, you know how I feel about vanity projects (AKA: when the writer/producer gives themselves the lead role in their movie), but Rob Stefaniuk did not only the role he assigned himself well, but the script, especially for what it was, was amazing. 

The amusing part is, this is a Capri Films movie.  No joke.

The writing was nearly consistently tight throughout the film, beautiful, beautiful lines that nearly had me falling over with laughter.  (The good kind.  You know, when you’re laughing with something as opposed to at it?  That happens sometimes.)

This film sorta broke my brain with its cast.  Here’s an excerpt of an actual conversation I had with Mr. Matt Kelly over IM while I was watching this movie:

 

AM: WHAT THE FUCK

AM: WHAT THE FUUUCK

AM: MY BRAIN IS BREAKING

AM: SAVE ME MATTHEW

AM: OH MY FUCKING GOD

AM: LOOK AT THIS!!!

AM: LOOOOOOOK AT THIS!!!

AM: I CAN’T FUCKING HANDLE THIS

AM: LOOK AT THE CAST

AM: LOOK WHAT THEY DIIIIIIIID

MK: oh wow

AM: WHAT THE FUCK

MK: hahaha

AM: I can’t even deal with this right now.

 

You don’t believe me?  I’ll send you a screen shot.  That’ll teach you to question my overuse of caps-lock when I’m excited.

Could she be any hotter?  I’m thinking no.

So let’s take a walk through this cast.  We’ve got Jessica Pare as Jennifer, the bassist and back up singer of the band “The Winners”, who you would know as Megan Calvet from Mad Men.  We have Nicole de Boer as Susan, the ball-crushing girlfriend of the band’s lead singer, Joey (Stefaniuk), who you possibly had a crush on for her role as Ezri Dax from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.  (Personally, I say fuck DSN, but I hear that some people liked it.)  

Oh, and then we have:

Iggy Pop.

Alice Cooper (who bartends and can *read your mind*).

Dave Foley.

Moby, singing some sort of thrash metal while having raw meat thrown at him by fans.

And Henry Rollins.

(Side Note: Dear 1990s Henry Rollins, I want to do dirty, dirty things with you.  If I had a time machine and an ability to override potential restraining orders, I’d be a *very* happy girl.)

There’s various other musical cameos, but we’re going to leave it at the ones I actually took screen caps of.  For dramatic effect and all.

The movie’s plot line is such: failing rock band’s back-up singer/bassist, Jennifer (Pare), goes home with Queeny, a (male) vampire, after meeting him at a gig.  Aerosmith’s “Jaded” music video ensues.

Disclaimer: Not Aerosmith, just adorable.

Oh, yeah, this is a semi-musical.  Most of the songs make sense, as there’s bands playing and all that.  However, sometimes it’s just like Stefaniuk said, “Fuck this ‘dialogue’ crap, it’s time to rock!”  And they did.

Continuing on with the plot line, Jennifer mysteriously shows up to the next venue all gorgeously gothed out and wows the audience with her sexy vampness.  Sexy vamp hijinks ensue, starting in a convenience store with the most amazing death-by-vampire scene that I’ve ever seen in my life.

Also of note: this movie also has the most amazing slaying of a vampire I’ve ever seen in my entire life.  

Are you swooning?  I’m swooning.  You’re probably masturbating.

As various musical cameos are made, we are introduced to Eddie VanHelsig, vampire hunter.  He wears sunglasses and an eyepatch, so you know he’s double-cool.  Mr. VenHelsig is on a mission to destroy Queeny, the vampire that bit Jennifer, to satisfy his need to revenge his lovely young… love.  

This movie was nothing short of amazing.  Seriously.  It’s not some work of high cinema, it’s an awesome, colorful, totally irreverent comedy with a near-complete focus on the musical– not only in the choice of actors, but subtle lines of dialogue that Stefaniuk tastefully drops into the scenes.  All things considered, it’s fun, and it’s way smarter than it has any right to be.

Oh, Hugo.  Oh, dear Hugo. <3 <3 <3

Try it yourself.  Fire it up on Netflix on Demand, watch the first ten minutes, and honestly tell me it wasn’t enjoyable.  If you get to the convenience store scene (about 28 minutes in) and you aren’t toppling over from laughter, I’m pretty convinced that you have no soul.

Jonathan London, this excludes you.  I’m already convinced you have no soul (Editor’s Note: What’s a soul?).

 

There’s something I really hate about celebrating the New Year: recaps.  It’s when we drudge up everything that was so very forgettable and put it alongside stuff we actually care about, stuff we will carry into the new year with us.  Like Breaking Dawn: Part One.

Okay, okay, I admit, that’s only me and like sixty billion fangirls.  Whatever.  Yeah, shut it.  I’ll hunt you down with a chainsaw and some canola oil.

This was my first year at the lovely and wonderful Geekscape, home of the Heroine Addict, Ms. Molly Mahan (who I almost killed earlier today in a freak float decorating accident involving some onion seeds), and my own guilty pleasure, Matt Kelly (who I did not almost kill today, but who did move to Pennsylvania, which is sort of like death), and it has been a blast.

After all, what other website would encourage me to watch things that later have me rocking back and forth in a corner, feverish, scratching at invisible bugs crawling all over my body?  What other website owner would laugh at my suffering as much as Jonathan London does (Editor’s Note: And I do… a lot)?  Ah, rhetorical questions, you delight me.

For the answer is: no other website.  None could bring me such dirty joy as Geekscape brings me.  And on that totally unrelated note, here is my 2011 anti-recap “This Geek in Netflix” awards.  

“The Most Boring Movie That I’ve Watched This Year That Happens to Have a Spider Hut” goes to… In the Spider’s Web!  (The crowd goes wiiiiild!)

The only thing I really remember from this movie: Spider. Fucking. Hut.

“The Goddamn Freakiest Ultrasound I’ve Ever Seen” award goes to… Isolation!  Inside out fetal cows are fucking scary.  Even scarier when they put on puppet shows inside your uterus.

Ultrasound not shown.  Because I’m lazy.

“Best Use of Make-up” and “Best Line From a Movie” go to Night of the Demons for its inventive(ish) use of lipstick and the line: “She put her lipstick in her boob and it fell out of her vagina!”

Not the boobs in question, but still… boobs.  I’ll just be a moment.

The runner-up for “Best Turkey Puppet Wearing a Human Face” goes to Thankskilling

Still fucking adorable.

The winner for “Most Homoerotic Dance Number” is… Santa Claus and its delightfully cocky “devil dance”.  (Just watch it.  Really.)

Puckering up after putting on his dancin’ shoes.

For “I Would Rather Rub Ground Day-Old Chili Peppers Into My Nether Bits Than Watch This Movie Again”, we have a tie between Vampire Girl V.S. Frankenstein Girl and Kiss of the Vampire!  

Kinda explains itself.

And, finally, a special appearance for this awards show, we have the non-Netflix movie Kenneyville taking home the prize for Most Incoherent Storyline! (Oh, the drama! The audience is rapt with this unexpected turn of events!)

He’s trying to make her watch Kenneyville.  She’s looking for ground chili peppers.

Thanks for tuning in, folks.  We’ll be back after a few costume changes and maybe a nipple-slip or lesbian kiss.  Welcome the band, Stryper, to the stage!!!  (Audience roars!  A reference that no one under 35 will understand, OOOOOMMMMMGGGGGGG!!)