I laid down Saturday night after a day spent Geekscaping and picked up a copy of the new Marvel adaptation of Stephen King’s The Stand. Are any of you reading Marvel’s Stephen King books? The Gunslinger books, based on his Dark Tower series, are really good reads, especially when collected and read together. The third miniseries of the Gunslinger comics just started, and like the first two, I’m collecting all of the single issues before I crack them open. I find the density of the writing and the pseudo-English that the characters use make the book hard to read from month to month without losing track. And even though Jae Lee’s artwork is amazing, it is tough to remember what happened the month before. Taken in full collections, that series is awesome.

But I lied down to read The Stand. Stephen King’s books were the fuel of my middle school imagination. Remember when you’re younger and you have to give your father a birthday or holiday present but you’re not quite a full person yet and the relationship that you have with your father is less based on two people understanding each other and more based on one person leading and another one loosely imitating out of blind adoration? I don’t know what my dad may have said to me once, maybe it was him taking my brothers and I to a screening of the movie Graveyard Shift or letting us see Creep Show or Pet Sematary at young ages, but I had it in my mind that he LOVED Stephen King. So I got him a Stephen King book every year for a very long time. Did he read them? I don’t know. But I did.

So because I love comics and I loved the Marvel Gunslinger stuff, I picked up last week’s release of The Stand, written by Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa, illustrated by Mike Perkins, with colors by Laura Martin. First off, I’ve been a fan of Mike Perkins since the awesome and short lived CrossGen book Ruse (also colored by Laura Martin). His figure work is awesome as is his use of references. The dude can draw a MEAN street corner (but no one stops to notice because his cinematic action is so good).  If you’ve been following Geekscape, then you definitely know his work from Ed Brubaker’s Captain America run.

Let’s get down to brass tacks. The comic gave me freaky nightmares. If you somehow didn’t pick up this book or add it to your pull list last week, go back to the store today and get it. By new release Wednesday, you’ll be out of luck. This is such a faithful adaptation of Stephen King’s writing and tone that it will put you right back where you were when The Stand first scared the hell out of you. And if this is your first visit to the story about a government disease that wipes out the majority of the human race on its way to a biblical showdown between good and evil, reading the comic adaptation will not cheapen the experience.

Aguirre-Sacasa’s tone and pacing is spot on with what you would expect from a Stephen King story and Perkin’s and Martin’s art give the story a “horror next door” feeling that is missing (as it should be) from Jae Lee and Peter David Gunslinger book. This is a VERY familiar Stephen King that will engross you in the full experience, much like the novels that you remember. If you’re looking for something to shake up the spandex-clad visit to the comic book shop, you may have overlooked your most potent chance at freedom.  Marvel’s adaptation of Stephen King’s The Stand put me in just the right place to have nightmares for a long, fitful night without sleep but with plenty of brief horrors.  Definitely read this book just before you turn out the light for the full desired effect.

You really should go buy this CD today.

First, let me state my horrible, horrible, blatant bias right now: I’ve been friends with the original guys in Punchline for about 5 years (on top of the fact that Jon and Steve are responsible for our Geekscape theme song). In mid-2003, I had recently moved to California from New York and had heard that the band had an EP coming out and had recently signed to Fueled By Ramen, along with another Midwest band called Fall Out Boy. I looked the band up on Friendster and sent a message saying roughly “I’m a film student, want a music video, cheap, etc. etc.”. I got a nice reply back from a Steve saying, “thanks, we’ll be in touch.” I sent back my number and waited for the band to tour so we could shoot our great $50 video.

A few months later I got a call from Steve out of the blue as I was driving to my lunch while working a job at the Glendale Hospital. We got along great but a video didn’t look like it was going to be on the horizon… or a west coast tour. Still, Steve sent me a press packet and a copy of the new EP. I recently found the press packet while moving to Culver City and I called Steve up and said “why did you mail me a copy of your tour schedule for the entire history of your band ever?” By that time, I had done two Punchline videos and the band had released two full-length albums on Fueled by Ramen. And the band had gone through two guitarists, finally landing on their current member, Jon “rhymes with Melon” Belan.

I’m not really happy with the videos I’ve done for Punchline. Maybe I stuttered at the start, knowing that these guys have gone from one of my favorite bands to some of my best friends. As it stands, the band wasn’t happy with their label, and turned down an offer to release a third full length on Fueled By Ramen in order to put out their new CD Just Say Yes on their own label Modern Short Stories. Well, I’ve seen the video that they got someone else to do for this album and it’s better than either of mine. And I’ve heard Just Say Yes… is it better than the previous two?

I don’t know. I’m pretty close to the band and their music and I still need to run Just Say Yes through the litmus test of an hour-long drive down the 405 with my dogs. When Action came out, a lot of people loved it. It was full of energy and had an honesty to it, and freshness, that made the album a darling of the pop-punk, “I hate you dad, stay out of my room” crowd. I felt at the time that I was just on the other end of the age of 25 from fully loving the album but the reception it got was huge and it stayed in my CD player’s rotation for over a year.  37 Everywhere came out in 2006 and it was the perfect CD for me. In early 2005, Paul Menotiades had left the band right before a west coast tour and when we shot the video for Getting There Is Getting By off of Action, Steve was frustrated about it but hopeful about the recent addition of Greg Wood.

37 Everywhere turned out to be my soundtrack to 2006 and 2007. The album was poppier, displayed more of a clean range than Action did and the lyrics were more literal and direct. The album to me will always be a running document on the feelings of abandonment, disappointment, hurt and (ultimately) determined hope that the loss of a close friend will leave you with. The band had obviously been let down but they weren’t going to let on. At least not while we were listening. I found a lot of comfort and inspiration in that album and it got me through my 2006 (what I have come to call “The Wasted Year”) and 2007 (“The Reset Year”). I don’t know if listeners liked the album as much in the end, but it sold as well as Action did and is easily one of my favorite CDs of all time. Just Say Yet had a lot to live up to.

Litmus test aside, the first half of the CD is more familiar than the second but also does the job of delivering you safetly to brand new, exciting ground. Steve laughed on the phone last week when I told him that they had followed the same structural pattern with the song selection as they had on their last two albums: come out of the gates with a solid first track, drop the single with the second track, keep the rhythm rolling into the track six ballad and then switch back and forth through the last track and leave them hanging. Steve swears that there’s a theme going on with the sixth track of each album, and I lied to him on the phone about getting it (I don’t beyond loving each song), but he says it’s there.

The majority of Just Say Yes was produced by Jamie Woolford with a couple of tracks done with Action’s Sean O’Keefe.  There is a lot more of Action in this album than 37 Everywhere but Just Say Yes isn’t a step backwards in any way. It’s definitely the band making the kind of album that they want to make on their own.

Ghostie starts off Just Say Yes in the same way that Open Up and Flashlight did the previous two albums with a driving rhythm and confrontational lyrics. It’s the wake up song that leads right into the single-sounding second track and Punchline have literalized things this time by shamelessly naming it The Hit. When I put an acoustic version of The Hit at the end of a past Geekscape episode, a few of you commented that it sounded like a song that you’d heard on the radio. That’s exactly where a song like this belongs.

Steve swears that Punish or Privilege was written before they entered the studio with Jamie Woolford, but when I first heard the song a few months ago it had a lot of Woolford’s bands The Stereo and Let Go in it on my first listen. Jamie’s possible influence aside, the song is clean and has a lot of straightforward writing but about halfway through it starts to get back to the familiar Punchline sound. Track four is Maybe I’m Wrong, which is probably the first song that will jump out at you. Chris Fafalios’ bass just chugs along for most of the song and the lyrics are the most heartfelt so far. This is where the band starts to show just how far they’ve come from the Action days and 37 Everywhere. The comparisons to Action have already started to creep up online and they’re half accurate. This song blows that entire album away in how earnest it is. You’re going to hum this song to yourself while kicking a can lonely down the street. And you should.

I want to make Somewhere in the Dark a hit in the worst possible way. A while ago, the band registered the domain name www.BenFolds.me and joked that they would hold it ransom until Mr. Folds took them out on tour. People will definitely put a lot of comparisons between this song and Ben Folds’ music but when I first heard the song driving around Hollywood shooting the band’s Christmas Rap video, it sounded a lot more like a Death Cab for Cutie demo and I gave Steve a look like “I like this… but are you nuts?” The song is a bit different now and I’m working hard to make sure it becomes the next jingle that causes you to turn off your TV set because you can’t risk it getting stuck in your head further. It’s okay. Let it live there. It deserves to be stuck in your head. You’ll be happier for it.

So now we have the mysterious sixth track: Just Say Yes, and with it, you say goodbye to all of the Action comparisons completely. This song starts out as a PJ Caruso drum track that goes in a couple different places, none of them you’ve heard on an earlier CD, while showcasing each of the other band members. Steve has taken on a lot of the vocal responsibilities head on with this album, and this track shows it more than others. We don’t have the harmonies from Action or the vocal hand offs from 37 Everywhere. This song will make you realize that Just Say Yes is its own monster and this iteration of Punchline are a new, fresh band, and all comparisons are best left at the door. To push the point further, How Does This Happen pops up and takes the differences even further with its Green Day style marching rhythm.

Get Off My Train! is a synthesized and crunchy rock song that offers a few more sing along moments. It contrasts a lot of what’s been on Just Say Yes so far and you get some good Jon Belan high pitched vocals in the background. You even get some harmonizing and Chris Fafalios signature gang vocals.  Developing You Camera… what a sweet little song. It gives me the same feelings you get from watch old Super 8 millimeter family films or sitting through a long sunset. There’s some guitar noodle-ing going on but none of it detracts from the sweetness of the song. It’s not one of the tracks that will come out and hit you on the first listen but it’s one that will become a heavy favorite as time goes on.

My White Collared Shirt is the kind of song I wouldn’t expect on a Punchline album. It’s a chorus song that reminds me of the senior year of college, when you know you’ve got a while to say goodbye. There’s some regret and hope wrapped together in the song and the sound is a dance between them that culminates in the last chorus “so misguided that where I’ll go nobody knows”.  I would think that that lyric describes the band as much as it does the album so far.  Where it goes is The Other Piano Man, a song that brings in a jingling piano bar feel but then lets it down here and there for some more pensive, softer moments. Then the song cuts loose into a mad sing along of a party. You can see women swinging from chandeliers and the band leading a marching parade through a burning town, Chris acting as the carnival barker. The band has completely cut loose from what you previously expected them to give you and now they are jumping on the casket of their old sound until it’s closed for good. The Other Piano Man is that festive funeral procession out of town.

So with one track left, where does that leave things? Where does the band go from here? Castaway flows out of The Other Piano Man seamlessly and right into a softly orchestrated apology and goodbye. It feels as much like a soft bedtime story as it does the sound of the storyteller quietly crawling out the window and disappearing into the night. If there is a song to catch stars to, Castaway is the soundtrack. “I don’t want to be the last one to know/even though I know what’s coming and it’s typical”. If 37 Everywhere was the rejection of something comfortable and the excitement of what comes before, Castaway is the acceptance of where you’re headed and the setting of the sails at the end of the reinvention and years of preparation.

And ultimately, that’s what we’re left with: a band that has restructured and retooled itself and has now gone further down the road than many would have predicted when they set off on their own. By the end of Just Say Yes, the signs that lead back to Action and 37 Everywhere can’t even be seen from where Punchline is standing. Faithful listeners might find it unsettling at first, and I’ll admit that it took some getting used to for me. But in the end, I prefer Just Say Yes. The excitement of what’s at work here and the energy with which Punchline are pushing forward doesn’t leave any room for doubt about the high quality of this album. Let go of your uncertainty and Just Say Yes.

Let me don my Captain Obvious Hat for a minute and tell you that Jet Li’s Fist of Legend is one of the greatest martial arts movies every made.  Beyond proving that remakes CAN work (in this case, Fist of Legend is a remake of Bruce Lee’s film Fist of Fury), Fist of Legend also proves that remakes can also improve.

Gordon Chan’s World War 2 period film about a Chinese kung fu student living in Japan who returns to Shanghai to investigate his master’s death and save his school has so much more to offer than the average kung fu fighter. For one thing, it helped to introduce Western audiences to both Jet Li and choreographer Yuen Wo-ping (who went on to choreograph Hollywood films like The Matrix films, Kill Bill & 2, etc.). Where Li’s earlier Once Upon a Time in China films helped share the responsibility for his skyrocketing popularity, the fights in that trilogy were based heavily on the creativity of the fighter’s use of the environment and makeshift weapons. In Fist of Legend, you’ll get minimal wire and variable speed work and an added emphasis on realism. The fights in Fist of Legend are brutal, heavy and more physically impressive. The final showdown lasts over ten minutes, busts through several environments and is maybe the best fight scene ever captured on film.

But that isn’t enough to warrant a great film. Like the original Fist of Fury, Fist of Legend’s backdrop of the Japanese occupation of China gives the story of a Chinese man returning home to his occupied home a lot of the drama that fuels the action. In love with a Japanese woman, there are elements of Romeo and Juliet to Jet Li’s struggle. There are also running themes of loyalty, equality and revenge that make the drama in between the action of Fist of Legend as memorable as the fights themselves. If there was one movie that would work best to convert your girlfriend over to the next level of kung fu cinema, I would suggest Fist of Legend over more recent Hong Kong films like Hero or The House of Flying Daggers.

The copy of Fist of Legend that I viewed for this review was provided by the nice folks over at Dragon Dynasty, who are doing a good job of re-releasing some of the best Hong Kong action films to DVD in the States. In the English subtitled version I saw, there was only one or two misspellings and the words were always paced well and not in opposition to the action on screen. They recently released an Ultimate Edition version of John Woo’s Hard Boiled that I would LOVE to get a hold of, especially seeing as the out of print Criterion Collection version of the film is usually going for around $60 on eBay. If you’re reading this, Dragon Dynasty, you know my address. I love every movie on your release schedule!

On top of the first disc, which includes the film, a commentary track from Hong Kong cinema expert Bey Logan, both Mandarin and Cantonese audio tracks and subtitles in English and Spanish, the Ultimate Edition also comes packed with a second disc of extras. The second disc has the regular items: deleted scenes, a trailer gallery and an interview with the film’s director (which is actually a pretty good piece on Gordon Chan’s approach to remaking such a beloved Bruce Lee classic).

In addition to this, you also get an interview with kung fu impresario Chin Siu-ho, an interview with Japanese action legend Kurata Yasuaki and a look at a screen-fighting seminar at the Kurata Action School. Kurata Yasuaki plays Uncle Fuimo Funakoshi in the film and his showdown with Jet Li’s Chen Zhen in front of his niece (and Zhen’s lover) is one of the best scenes in the film, especially once the two put on blindfolds and keep going at it. It’s cool to hear an expert in the Japanese world of action films talk about the process of being in such an incredible action film and then teach his students the methods in which they should undergo kung fu action staples like drawing your sword and tossing your opponent.

Finally, the Extras DVD features A Look at Fist of Legend with director Brett Ratner and critic Elvis Mitchell. I know that many of you have a serious hate-on for everything Ratner, but be assured. The short documentary is simply an opinion piece and in it, Ratner comes of no worse than you or I would. He’s simply a fan of the film and not a Know It All trying to one up the conversation. Mitchell is about on the same level with his love of the movie and if you can make it through your Ratner hatred, you might see the movie from a new level of appreciation.

The Fist of Legend Ultimate Edition DVD is currently in stores and online from Dragon Dynasty and I highly recommend it for those of you Geekscapists still trying to flesh out your kung fu film libraries. If you’ve missed this film (SOMEHOW!!!) up to this point, there’s no longer any excuse. My beaten and worn VHS copy of the film is already in the trash.

I love doing Geekscape. I love the community. I love the show. I love the writing. And of course I love the cool stuff in the mail. Every time my mail lady drops by, who knows what magical mystery might be waiting for me. Right now, I check it daily for my Castle Crashers action figures to arrive. Or maybe Giraffey has send a postcard from wherever he ran off to this time (if you’re reading this, Giraffey… pleasy come back home).

Friday I got a small package from our friend Alex B (that’s what I call him here at Geekscape HQ) who sent us the heads up on all of the Mortal Kombat VS DC stuff that was going down at Comic Con. That game turned out to be a surprise favorite of the Geekscape team and as I tore open the package I wondered (in rhyme), ‘what on Earth could Alex B/Send all the way here to me’.

Then Chuck Norris popped out of the envelope and I almost jumped into a fucking tree. Turns out that the company Gameloft, who make cell phone games, like the one for Assassins Creed, has made a Chuck Norris cell phone game called Chuck Norris: Bring On The Pain. Is this a warning to the player or to the villains found within? I don’t know… and maybe never will. My cell phone is as old as the one Danny Glover used in the first Lethal Weapon.

But this game looks cool. It’s like an old arcade action game like Final Fight or Double Dragon. From the images and the video on the CD that Alex B sent me, you play as Chuck Norris and fight world bad guys like Kim Jung Il either on foot, on a motorcycle or in a helicopter. In all honesty, the Chuck Norris hipster jokes that Andy Sanberg started on Saturday Night Live were old to me a year ago and when I saw that it was now a cell phone game, I braced myself for the worst (by finding the nearest doorway and bracing myself against it).

Here’s the part that I thought was cool about this specific cell phone game though: you can take the pictures of your friends from your phone and make them bad guys in the game. Anybody? Anybody? Considering that Brian Gilmore calls me at least a few times a day, this feature actually makes me want to get this little dealio just so I can have Chuck kick him in the nuts. Repeatedly.

So that’s what I’ve got to share with you all from the most recent Geekscape mailbag. There are only a few cell phone games that have been released that have made me want to join the new century with my current phone technology: God of War, South Park’s Imagination Land and now Chuck Norris: Bring on the Pain. If the game was about my beloved Jean Claude Van fuckin’ Damme and not old “The Bible Should Be Taught In Public Schools” Chuck Norris, I’d already be racking Gilmore in the nads. But as it stands, color me interested. Now someone out there download this thing and tell me if it’s any good!

“That was a delight.”
–    Brian Gilmore (as the credits begin to roll)

To Little Lord Gilmonroy’s credit (although I love nothing more than proving him wrong), in the case of The Coen Brother’s film “Burn After Reading”, he is absolutely right. Burn After Reading IS a “delight”, but for a movie with so many colorful pieces that description doesn’t paint enough of a full picture.

Coming off of last year’s indie, Oscar-winning bulldozer, the Coen Brothers have gone in a completely different direction. Where No Country For Old Men was a dark, straightforward chase after single object, Burn After Reading is a light and fun chase by several characters after a McGuffin that NO ONE knows the true nature of… and it goes to some dark and surprising places.

My biggest love for the Coen Brothers (and I imagine yours as well) stems from their ability to take a viewer by the hand and lead them through a clearly defined series of increasingly complicated actions, regardless of how farfetched the journey might be. The stories that they choose to tell, in whatever genre, start out in the comfortable territory of the simple and familiar but can end up anywhere.

Let’s get down to the nitty gritty. In the opening scenes of their take on the espionage genre, Joel and Ethan Coen introduce audiences to Osborne Cox, a veteran CIA analyst played by John Malkovich, who we immediately (and hilariously) see get demoted but quits instead. We follow Osborne home where we meet his demanding wife Katie (played by Tilda Swinton), who blows off his attempt at explaining his loss of a job in preparation for their dinner party. There we meet Harry (George Clooney), who is a married small time federal officer (“in 20 years, I’ve never discharged my gun in the line of duty”) having an affair with Katie.

Are you writing this down? You really should start. Things become quickly complicated when Katie decides to leave Osborne for Harry upon learning of the loss of his job. Osborne begins writing his memoirs (or “memwhaas”) to jumpstart a second career as a writer. When Katie is asked by her lawyer to gather Osborne’s financials for the divorce documents, the memwhaas accidentally end up in the hands of two gym employees: the dimwitted Chad (Brad Pitt) and the lonely, dissatisfied Linda (Frances McDormand), who is trying online dating, which leads her right to… Harry.

Okay. I’ve spelled enough out for you without even scratching the surface of what you have in store for you as a viewer (so if you yelled “Spoiler Warning” at any point, fear not). Now the various plates have been set spinning and we are off to the races at breakneck speed. And I do mean breakneck. Burn After Reading covers a lot of ground and throws viewers a lot of character and story details in quick, unrepeated and hilarious bursts. Unlike the exhausting speed of their film The Ladykillers (that caused me to turn it off after 15 minutes), the information and performances that we get in Burn After Reading aren’t unsympathetic cartoon sketches but clearly defined and relatable, consistent beings who inhabit and engage themselves with everything around them.

The movie is undeniably hilarious but also can be gut wrenching in subsequent strokes. You will follow beats in which you laugh out loud with ones in which you gasp in shock. The Coen Brothers have you so busy watching the plates spinning around each other that they go about leading you down whatever complicated road they choose. And with Burn After Reading, the plates never hit the ground. Although the briskness and levity of the story in Burn After Reading might be seen as a compromise coming off of a darker, more engrossing film like No Country For Old Men, I think a better frame of reference might come from Mr. Gilmore’s earlier description. If No Country For Old Men was a heavy three-course meal, Burn After Reading is a sweet, albeit quickly swallowed, delight.


 

Sidenote: Burn After Reading was produced by Focus Features and Working Title. No Country was produced by Paramount Vantage. The Coen Brothers next movie, A Serious Man, started shooting yesterday for Focus Features and Working Title.

From the press release:

“Production begins today on location in Minnesota on A Serious Man, for Focus Features and Working Title Films. Joel and Ethan Coen, Academy Award winners for No Country for Old Men and Fargo, are writing, producing, and directing the film. Working Title co-chairs Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner are executive-producing the film with Robert Graf, who has worked on the Coens’ last six features in various producing capacities.
 
The director of photography on A Serious Man is seven-time Academy Award nominee Roger Deakins, who is marking his tenth feature collaboration with the Coens. Mary Zophres is the film’s costume designer, marking her ninth feature collaboration with the Coens. Jess Gonchor is the production designer, marking his third feature collaboration with the Coens.
 
A Serious Man is the story of an ordinary man’s search for clarity in a universe where Jefferson Airplane is on the radio and F-Troop is on TV. It is 1967, and Larry Gopnik, a physics professor at a quiet midwestern university, has just been informed by his wife Judith that she is leaving him. She has fallen in love with one of his more pompous colleagues, Sy Ableman, who seems to her a more substantial person than the feckless Larry. Larry’s unemployable brother Arthur is sleeping on the couch, his son Danny is a discipline problem and a shirker at Hebrew school, and his daughter Sarah is filching money from his wallet in order to save up for a nose job. While his wife and Sy Ableman blithely make new domestic arrangements, and his brother becomes more and more of a burden, an anonymous hostile letter-writer is trying to sabotage Larry’s chances for tenure at the university. Also, a graduate student seems to be trying to bribe him for a passing grade while at the same time threatening to sue him for defamation. Plus, the beautiful woman next door torments him by sunbathing nude. Struggling for equilibrium, Larry seeks advice from three different rabbis. Can anyone help him cope with his afflictions and become a righteous person – a mensch – a serious man?

Tony Award nominee Michael Stuhlbarg (whose films include The Grey Zone) stars as Larry; Fred Melamed (Suspect) plays Sy; Richard Kind (The Visitor) portrays Arthur; and Minnesota actors Aaron Wolf, Sari Wagner, and Jessica McManus are cast as Danny, Judith, and Sarah, respectively.”

The Coens are back in Minnesota! Anyone else excited?!?

Just how does a mothafuckin’ Transformer spend their down time between shooting days?

How about sizing up the Hollywood competition.

A good friend of mine sent me this picture that they took this evening while sitting at a light in Burbank:

Bumblebee Doesn't Turn Right on Red

If you spent your first 3 miserable years in Hollywood as an entertainment industry runner, as I did, your road-trained eye could clearly makeout the intersection that Bumblebee is sitting at while waiting for the light to turn green. He’s pointed south on Buena Vista facing the entrance to the 134 freeway (and that bad boy is headed west once he gets on it).

I get a few things from this photo:

1) Bumblebee was deep in enemy territory ramsacking the Disney studios on Buena Vista (the charred remains could no doubt be seen in his left side view mirror).

2) Bumblebee’s next target is Universal Studios, just west off the 134. This little bastard is pissed after having to sit at a red and nothing’s gonna stop him.

3) 69 is just how Bumbelee rolls. If Arcee shows her purplish pink, motorcycle face anywhere NEAR Transformers 2, she is getting some serious Bumblebee action right up in her grill… and she better be ready to give it as well… ‘cuz that’s how you fucking roll in a Michael Bay movie… and there WILL be explosions! Bumblebee’s the man and he’s letting everyone know it like a 13 year old with a marker and a skateboard! 69 baby! Obviously, whoever got the plates for Mr. Bee also has the combined intelligence of both Bill AND Ted…

4) My buddy at Disney works way too damn late. The sun is almost completely set and he’s leaving work and heading home. The last time I hung out with him, I swear he had shackle sores on his wrists. And he wouldn’t take his shirt off and get in the pool because he had mouse-induced whip marks. It’s a tough business… this Hollywood thing.

So there you have it. Thanks to my brilliant deductive reasoning, you now know what a true Hollywood superstar does on his day off. And I hope to god that there was some Vince DiCola or Stan Bush music coming out of that little bastard because that Linkin Park song that you’ve heard a million times just doesn’t cut it on the mean streets of the 91521. And you know it doesn’t cut it in any Transformers movie either.

Ralph Apel, Erwin “Dirty Vato” Castillos and the rest of you Transformers loving Geekscapist mothafuckas. This post was for you. May your little, substandard entertainment loving hearts stay pure so that you never realize just how lame a movie that really was. I will always hate you for that.

A normal everyday man stumbles upon an object that grants him immense super powers.  Green Lantern?  Juggernaut?  Super Chicken?  No my friends, I am referring to the 80’s classic, “Greatest American Hero.”  In case you’re too young to remember GAH, it’s basically your standard Boy-finds-super-suit, FBI-agent-finds-boy, FBI-agent-and-boy-team-up-to-fight-for-justice premise.  Plus there’s Connie Sellecca.    
    
But that’s as much recapping as I intend on writing.  If you’ve never seen Greatest American Hero, Netflix it, Tivo it, borrow the complete series from one of your older friends.  It’s cornball goodness as only 80’s television could deliver.
    
This story, however, is about a night of celebration and memories.  A night, hosted by the gargantuan John Tesh (Connie Sellecca’s real-life husband), and featuring the creative mind that birthed TV shows like Hunter, The Rockford Files, and the ever-inspiring A-Team: Stephen J. Cannell. Mr. Cannell was a force back in the 80’s and you can tell.  Looking at the man today, you might guess that he was the inspiration for Don Johnson’s “Sonny Crocket” on Miami Vice.  Tanned, pinky ringed, and unaware of the existence of the top three buttons on his shirt, Mr. Cannell IS the 80’s.  
   
Tesh and Cannell

This past Sunday night, I had the honor of attending The Greatest American Hero 25th Anniversary Reunion (hosted by the afore mentioned John Tesh). During the course of the night’s festivities I was introduced to a number of Hollywood individuals: producers, writers, an editor and some actors.  The real treat for a behind-the-scenes junky such as myself, however, was the two gentlemen that were introduced towards the end of the night.  As they stepped out onto the stage, I instantly guessed their claim to GAH fame.  One gentleman was a stocky, bald, rough and tough kinda guy that looked like he could have been Cannell’s lead henchman.  And the other guy was a skinny dazed gentleman with long brown wavy hair that I actually mistook for Journey frontman Steve Perry when I first saw him.  I looked at these two guys and thought, “Okay we have stunt man and music writer.”  I know stunt men.  I’ve worked and been friends with many in my life, and the big bruiser was definitely reminiscent of any number of my old friends.  And the Steve Perry guy was… well, Steve Perry guy.  And I was absolutely right, but couldn’t have been more wrong.

Post and Mandalone


Big bald henchman was actually Mike Post, the genius mind that not only wrote the music for the theme song and in-show music, but also wrote the theme songs for Hill Street Blues, A-team, Magnum P.I., Quantum Leap, Doogie Howser, and Law and Order.  Mr. Post was a balls-out funny guy that knows his shit.  

Steve Perry was actually Dennis Mandalone, the lead stuntman that doubled for the title character.  Mr. Mandalone was a quiet guy, but everyone seemed to love him, and he was very humble in return.  The best part about Mr. Mandalone, though, was when I got back home and googled his name only to find this amazing treasure…

http://theworstmusicvideos.com/bad-music-video9.html

Dear god, it’s a thing of ridiculous beauty!  I guess I was more on the mark than I thought!

The actors were, well… actors.  They all have nothing but fond memories of shooting episodes of The Greatest American Hero.  They called themselves a family.  They traded stories about laughing on set and hiding pregnancies.  They were perfectly joyful people recollecting happier times.  I don’t mean to diminish the actors’ perspective, but you must forgive me. I’ve seen about a hundred of these kinds of shows before.  And whether it’s Cid Caesar and the brilliant fossils of “Your Show of Shows,” the uncomfortable and jet-lagged writers and host of “Late Night with Conan O’Brian,” or the nerd circle jerk that was the writers and voices of “Futurama,” most every group hits the same standard points.  Well this group hit their points and recounted their unique stories, and it was all very pleasant.

Sellecca and Culp

Michael Pare

William Katt


The following points of interest were brought up during the course of the show:

•    The GAH insignia was inspired by a pair of Scissors still sitting on Mr. Cannell’s desk.
•    Robert Culp used Merlin as his inspiration for the character of Bill Maxwell.
•    Connie Sellecca stole one of the suits and gave it to her children to wear for Halloween.
•    This was the first time in 25 years that this whole group got together for something like this.
•    According to Connie, John Tesh is a very busy man (this was the most shocking statement of the night for me).
•    Mr. Cannell has written a script for a GAH feature film that William Katt (the title character) has read and loves.

And that was the night.  Mr. Tesh ended the evening with a round of applause for the cast, and the room slowly dispersed into the cool Hollywood night.

Walking back to my car, I started thinking about the feature film idea, and whether this idea would work in today’s superhero chic society.  I flashed back on Warner Bros. mastermind Jeff Robinov and his “Dark superhero movies = awesome superhero movies” theory.  I also started to think of a good comparison to today’s TV market.  You couldn’t compare GAH to Heroes as that show is all about multiple people with multiple powers.  The better comparison would be to a show close to my hate, Smallville.  Both GAH and Smallville focus on one guy that’s “finding” his powers and his place in society.  Both stories feature older, and wiser characters that not only know the lead character’s secret, but also help guide him to fulfill his destiny.  

The biggest difference between the two shows is ultimately style.  GAH was, in retrospect, a romantic comedy.  That show lived and breathed with its humorous take on what life would be like if you actually did stumble upon super powers.  The jokes, whether you find them too cornball or dated, were all done with realism and respect.  

Smallville, on the other hand, follows Mr. Robinov’s theory of “dark = good.”  Clark is a brooding heap of angst and grief that is doomed to fight one monster after another in an everlasting battle of Krypto-freaks.  There is no humor in Smallville.  There is no love or happiness.  Everything in Smallville is destined for destruction.  

It’s this comparison between GAH and Smallville that proves Mr. Robinov wrong.  Smallville is dark and brooding and is NOT (in my opinion) any better than GAH.  GAH is goofy and cornball and (in my opinion) a sweet story that could easily work in today’s superhero friendly world.  The “trick” that Mr. Robinov claims to have figured out is wrong.  You want to know the “trick” to making a successful comic book based property…? Don’t worry yourself about darkness, just focus on realism.  I believe any comic book character has the potential to become a great film or TV show if you commit yourself to staying as realistic as possible.  

“What do you mean realistic,” you’re asking me. “We’re talking about people that can fly and shoot lasers out of their eyeballs!”

Okay. That’s true.  Comic book adaptations will always have unrealistic attributes to showcase, but the star of the show is never the power.  Iron Man would not have been anywhere CLOSE to as good a film as it was without the charm and realism brought by Robert Downy Jr.  It’s the character, stupid!  Treat the characters and situation that they are involved in with realism and honesty, and you will end up with a better product.  

And that was the draw to The Great American Hero, on this night 25 years after the show’s finale.  Mr. Cannell had to fight constantly with the suits at ABC to keep the characters and situations as realistic as possible, and the show was that much better for it.  In the end, the suits won, as they always end up doing, and the show suffered, floundered and ultimately failed.  But, luckily for us, we can ignore the faults washed away by time and focus on the highlights that we are left with.  And, believe it or not, I choose to see The Greatest American Hero for what it was: heart filled romantic parody of super hero bravado, unmatched a quarter century later on TV or film.

If you are a faithful and long-term Geekscapist, you know by now just how late I am to most parties involving TV viewing. It took forever for your collective cries to get me to watch Battlestar Gallactica. I have yet to watch Veronica Mars. I haven’t watched any episode of Undeclared, Freaks and Geeks or Spaced. The only shows that I really watch are Heroes, Lost and BSG. The rest are really lost to not having enough time. But because of your enthusiasm (not to mention my dad and step-mom becoming huge fans), I finally added the first season of Dexter to my Netflix queue.

Let’s get the Captain Obvious Award out of the way first: holy shit! Every piece of praise that is dropped on that OTHER show that people call “the best show on television” actually APPLIES to Dexter.  The engrossing season long story archs? They don’t live up to the hype with that OTHER show. They do in Dexter. The complex, captivating and hugely entertaining lead? It’s nonexistent in that OTHER show. It’s in your face with Dexter. The incredibly well sketched and evenly treated, compelling supporting cast? This may be the strongest thing going on in Dexter. The evidence is in the amazing quality of every episode.  Unlike every other show on television, there are no “filler episodes” here, in which every scene and every episode work towards a whole. Dexter is the best thing I have watched in years.

So of course, my mutant geek gene kicks in halfway through the first episode. I sit up straight on the couch and say out loud: “Why aren’t these guys doing a Daredevil movie?” It’s perfect. It’s TOO perfect. There’s no way it wouldn’t work to make the most kick ass Daredevil movie possible. Why hasn’t Hollywood thought about this? Have they?

It’s easy to spot from the beginning. Dexter follows a superhero story structure very similar to double D’s. You have the social and moral responsibility angle, the dark vigilantism, a strong and involved supporting cast, a crime mystery backdrop and an engaging, parrallel origin story with a strong father figure. The similarities are too obvious to miss.

On the surface, Michael C. Hall is a dead-ringer for Matt Murdock: the hair, the build, everything. But beyond that, the duality of the two characters and their constant proximity with the justice system is staring you right in the face. Dexter spends his days working for the Miami Dade PD. Matt Murdock spends his waking hours as a New York defense attorney. By night, they both take justice into their own hands as shadow lurking vigilantes.

One thing that the makers of the last Daredevil film didn’t seem to grasp is something pretty easy to see when you read it on the four-colored page: Daredevil is NOT Spider-Man Light. They got the shadows right, and the alleys and rooftops, but that’s where the rest of the movie started to fall apart. If anything, Daredevil is closer to DC’s Batman than anything (someone behind a studio desk just sat up straight at the mention of ANYTHING being like The Dark Knight’s Batman). Daredevil is the Marvel universe’s urban detective, and like The Caped Crusader, Daredevil is constantly battling with his responsibilities as the guardian of his domain. Without superpowers beyond mortal men, Bruce Wayne and Daredevil must rely on their intelligence and instincts. Batman has the advantage in gadgetry, Daredevil in enhanced senses. But like, Dexter, they are both detectives who unravel crimes using their wits.

The role of Matt Murdock’s father is very similar to that of Dexter’s. Both characters flashback to the father figures in their lives on many occasions and look to them for moral guidance or past lessons. Like Dexter, the death of his father was a character shaping moment in the young vigilante’s life. Matt Murdock vowed to bring his father’s killer to justice, leading him down the road of vigilantism. Dexter murdered the nurse attempting to shorten his dying father’s life, leading him down the path towards vigilantism.

In both cases, the hero REFUSES to go after an innocent person and strictly believe in their own code of justice. Dexter only kills the guilty. Daredevil only brings the guilty to justice. When I saw Daredevil allow that mobster, in the early scenes of Mark Stephen Johnson’s Daredevil, to be hit by the subway train, I buried my head in my hands. This cinematic representation of Daredevil was vindictive and flawed way beyond any form of retribution. It didn’t matter where the story went from there. 2003’s Daredevil was already unrecoverable. The most the character could hope for after that glaring inconsistency was “hey, look kid, we’re still wearing the same costume, right?” I knew that I would have to wait a little longer to see Daredevil on the big screen.

The supporting cast in Dexter plays out like the best Brian Michael Bendis, Greg Rucka or Ed Brubaker comic book script. In the comics, Foggy Nelson, Dakota North, Ben Urich and numerous other helpers and confidantes help Matt Murdock bring the guilty to justice. They all have unique voices, attributes and roles to play. Similarly, the characters from Jeff Lindsay’s Dexter novels come to the small screen breathing lives of their own under the careful writing of the Dexter team. Why can’t James Manos, Jr. write a kick ass Daredevil movie? The Dexter scripts are filled with mystery, action, drama and a packed supporting cast. Sgt. Doakes, Debra Morgan, “Angel” Batista and Lieutenant LaGuerta are all three dimensional, engaging characters that help move the narrative and mysteries forward while enhancing our perception of our main character. When Angel spends an entire episode telling Dexter that he’s trying to find the best gift for his wife, only to reveal that it’s a failed reconciliation gift in a gut-wrenching scene at Angel’s wife’s home, the viewer soon realizes that the supporting storylines in Dexter might be better than the main ones. These aren’t just the character moments seen in other shows. These are full fledged and engaging storylines.

Finally, you’ve got the story structures. How much do I even have to say on the subject besides taking the main characters from Dexter and moving them to Manhattan’s west side? The villains that Dexter goes after are street level criminals and organizations that prey on the weak and the innocent. In every sentence in this article, you can replace the word Daredevil with Dexter and get the same results. Structurally, every episode of Dexter is made up of an A storyline and criminal of the week, supported by the ongoing B storyline stringing viewers through the season. Beyond that, you get flashbacks to Dexter’s development as a young outsider and personal pieces from his supporting cast. What else do we want (and get) from our Daredevil comics every week if this isn’t it?

The 2003 feature film was an attempt at a superhero movie with detective elements that fell short of either. Dexter is a compelling detective crime drama with elements of super-heroism written in the structure of TV’s best mysteries and comic books’ best storylines that delivers on both promises and MORE. I know that a year ago, after seeing Gone Baby Gone, I argued for Ben Affleck to be given the writing and directing reigns of the Daredevil films at Sony. That’s still a pretty damn good choice. But after seeing Dexter, it would be even easier to supplant the talent involved in this series every week and put them on the one Marvel hero that we’ve seen on the big screen who has come the closest to being one and done. 

So now I ask, is Hollywood blind? What’s the hold up? The geeks are waiting.

Last week, geek comic book blogs and film news websites across the internets were roaring with the news that Warner Brothers has made “official” plans to reboot the Superman film franchise. Effectively scrapping the direction in which Brian Singer had put the Man of Steel in 2006’s Superman Returns and heading for darker, more brooding waters, the majority of these news stories were set in motion off of comments that Warner Bros. Pictures Group President Jeff Robinov had told the Wall Street Journal regarding the state of its DC comic book franchises (most of which have yet to even have creative teams assigned). The use of the word “dark” caused such a fuss that fanboys worldwide wasted know time in collectively jumping down Mr. Robinov’s throat.

But before Geekscape ever starts jumping down throats, we make sure to look both ways, check for cold sores and tell the intended target to say “aaah”. Well, we’re looking at Mr. Robinov’s throat, and Warner Bros. as well, and it is my opinion that you poor geek bastards have grown too bored with going to see The Dark Knight fifteen times to know where the hell you’re jumping before you leap. I will NOT follow you down that path! Guess what! This is the reason that they make fun of us!

Let me share something from my experience at the day job. Hollywood executives, for the most part, are not idiots. I know that they cancelled your favorite TV show and put organic webshooters on Peter Parker, and I’m sorry… but they SHOULD have cancelled your favorite TV show and Peter Parker SHOULD have had organic webshooters! Hollywood execs aren’t dumb. They’re just busy.

Have you ever seen that Looney Tunes cartoon where they’re furiously laying track before the train? That’s how I think of most Hollywood execs that I know. In order to keep their overhead paid for and salary justified, they have to maintain a vast amount of projects at one time. Who knows which one will flop and which will offset the losses by being the success story. When you only have time for reading coverage and not reading scripts, this is the situation you put yourself in. Hollywood is an industry that wants SO badly to run by the rules of the Ford assembly line without having the luxury of pushing out exact copies of the same product. To keep the pipeline flowing and justify your paycheck while covering a crap load of overhead, a lot of projects have to get pushed through. It’s only natural that you will look at your past successes and tailor your business model to replicate that success for as long as you can… even if the same clothes don’t necessarily fit.

As much as I enjoyed The Dark Knight, it deserves the blame (and you do too for going to see it fifteen times). But before we start shouting that the geek sky is falling, my fellow geek brothers, let’s give Mr. Robinov some breathing room.  He never said he wanted to make Superman “dark”. He said “we’re going to try to go dark to the extent that the characters allow it”. That’s a huge difference from setting a course and sticking to it. This statement implies that each character will be analyzed to see what fits. Each character might just get treated independently of each other in the fashion that Marvel Studios has put forth for their properties. When you think of Batman, the gritty, shadow-dwelling detective of the DCU, that definitely allows for going to some dark places. Superman? The friendly neighborhood beat cop to Batman’s dark detective? Now you start to see how going “dark” can become a problem. To help out Mr. Robinov, to just what “extent” will Superman’s character “allow it”?

To find out, let’s get our hands dirty, Geekscapists, and make our ideal Superman “reboot”. And of course, by “our” I really mean “mine” because I’m captain of this silly ship and you’re the ones I’ve taken hostage.

As with any reboot, before you start throwing out the baby with the bathwater and erasing the chalkboard, let’s see what we have. What did Brian Singer’s Superman Returns leave for us? As much as I didn’t enjoy the movie, it wasn’t without its successes. Here’s a list of the things that I would keep before moving forward (I know you mofos LOVE lists).

1. Brandon Routh as Kal El. The first time that I saw a photo of Brandon Routh as Clark Kent I gasped. Do you remember the first released photo of Routh as Clark Kent? He was running down the street unbuttoning his shirt to save the day. Not only did Routh look like an Adam Kubert drawing come to life, he LOOKED like both Clark Kent AND Superman. For over a decade, we weathered a storm of names rumored to be in talks for the role of Superman: Nicholas Cage, Brandon Frasier, Paul Walker. The list of Hollywood name actors was as extensive as it was nauseating. It was almost as if Warner Brother had forgotten who the real NAME in Superman was. It’s a pretty easy test. Go to a third world non-English speaking country and hold up a picture of Superman. Then hold up a picture of Paul Walker. See which one gets the most recognition. No offense to my boy Paul Walker (see you at the barbecue this weekend, man, and 2 Fast 4 is gonna be the bomb!) but it’s Superman. There are few names that are any bigger. And with Brandon Routh, Warner Brothers found an actor who could (unhampered by a heavily weighted script) inhabit the role better than anyone… arguably even better than Christopher Reeves (by a smidgen?).

2. Metropolis is NOT New York City. Singer got this right. We all love Richard Donner’s Superman… but what is the Statue of Liberty doing in Metropolis? Supposedly, one of the earlier director’s (McG? Ratner?) issue with the project was their desire to shoot the film on location in New York City rather than WB’s brand new at the time Australia-based production studios (Matrix 2 and 3 style, baby). Brian Singer did not have a problem with this and Metropolis (and even the Kent farm filmed in Australia) looked better for it. The Metropolis that he showed us had signs of the old 1940s Fleischer Studios cartoons and the world he created was inhabited and complete. We never questioned its familiarity. The look for Superman Returns was what Superman should look like.

3. Kevin Spacey. No, I didn’t write Lex Luthor. I wrote Kevin Spacey. For my money (there’s just TONS of it, too…), Lex Luthor has yet to show up in any of the Superman films. Both Gene Hackman and Kevin Spacey’s Luthors were written less as actual threats and more as ham sandwiches that elevated their voices when they wanted to be heard. Their ideas for “the perfect crime” were something that an eight year old would think of after a game of Sim City. Lex Luthor has been a pain in Kal El’s side for decades on the comic page. How come he’s a joke on the big screen? At least with Spacey, you have an actor willing to go all the way with the character as he is written. Now give him a real bad ass Luthor and you’ve got yourself someone to really fear… and a name to keep the bean counters at Warners happy.

Um… so that’s about all that I would keep.  Three things. They are huge pieces. But there’re only three of them.

Now, I think that Brian Singer is an awesome director, but Mr. Robinov and I both know that there is one step that comes first before bringing onboard your director. And without it… it won’t matter who you put in the driver’s seat (see my Kingdom of the Crystal Skull article). It’s obvious so I won’t leave you to guess. You’ve got to have your story.

Good thing that we’ve got decades of source material and a character that can reflect modern social climates BETTER THAN ANY OTHER COMIC BOOK CHARACTER EVER INVENTED. People say that it’s really hard to think of a good Superman story because “he’s too powerful” or “he’s too perfect” or “there’s no drama”. I have something to say about those people… they’re dumb and lazy.

As my first graduate screenwriting teacher would tell me: The Tree is in the Acorn (or some shit like that…). In order to write a solid Superman story with really solid drama, you have to look at the character and the origins of Superman. What is he about? Don’t tell me that Warner Brothers hasn’t looked at the success of Marvel Comics’ characters on the screen and said “how are they doing it?” because you know that they have. Well, it’s all tied into the social context of the characters themselves. None of these characters were created in a bubble. None of their creators were islands.

As Hammer would say: break it down. Spider-Man is about the changes that we all go through, both internally and physically, on our journeys to adulthood. We can ALL relate to that. The X-Men were born out of the climate of the Civil Rights Movement and the ideals of Martin Luther King (Xavier?) versus Malcom X (Magneto?). We’re getting somewhere! The Fantastic Four are LITERALLY the nuclear family of the 1950s (which is why The Incredibles embraced those familial roles and time period, resulting in a better film than the Tim Story versions) fighting against dissolution from outside pressures. All of these successful franchises that Marvel has built have a strong social and cultural context to them. When you take this context into account, you make a great movie and sell a zillion DVDs. When you ignore it… you get Daredevil, Ghost Rider and Fantastic Four; movies that open big but don’t have the legs or strength to stand the test of time.

Acknowledging this, Superman is easy. Really easy. He’s the story of our immigrant nation.  He dresses himself in the colors of our flag and protects our ideals and freedoms when challenged from within or without. In 1938, when Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster put the Man of Steel together, the United States was still a nation of first generation immigrants building upon the strength of a collective freedom and individuality. As alone and cut off as it must have felt, passing through the halls of Ellis Island, in a country you’ve never seen before, speaking a language you may have never spoken before, there is a power born from the chance at a new beginning. And you’ll defend your right to have that chance with every fiber of your being. You’ll defend OTHER’S rights to have that chance because you know it will altruistically empower YOU. Now you are talking democracy and freedom. Now you’re talking about Truth, Justice and the American Way.

Things are looking clearer, aren’t they? If you want to tackle a movie about Superman, you HAVE TO tackle a movie about America, one in which the common American, born from immigrants as we all were, must face insurmountable odds and find the strength to persevere.

This is where the script and story for Superman Returns (and even the earlier 70s and 80s versions put together by the Salkinds) left me broken hearted. There are glimpses of it in the first two Superman films (are you surprised now at why they turned out so well) but it still has never been done properly and with enough presence to carry a franchise beyond a collection of set pieces and character work. In 2006, Superman Returns missed an opportunity to make a film ABOUT something. On opening night, when I walked out of the Alamo Drafthouse South back home in Austin and told my friends Mark (Professor Wagstaff in the Geekscape house!) and Sean that I didn’t like the film, it’s because I couldn’t believe that, in the day and age that we live in, a Superman movie could have missed so clear of the mark. It saddened me and infuriated me (maybe I should get a life?). All they had to do was look around at the world we were living in and put Superman in it!

And by in it, I mean PUT HIM UP AGAINST A BAD ASS VILLIAN AND MAKE HIM DEFINE HIMSELF AS A HERO!

Everyone is so fucking ready to see Brainiac. Everyone wants to see Superman fight Doomsday. Maybe a few of you want to see Metallo or Bizzarro or Mister fucking Mxyzptlk. Well, I’m still waiting to see him go up against Lex Luthor!

In a day and age in which REAL Lex Luthors actually exist, how could you NOT write a perfect Lex Luthor story?!? We have plenty to choose from. There’s Kenneth Lay, who had to DIE in order to escape conviction for the bad business dealings that bankrupted American citizens. There’s George W. Bush and Dick Cheney! Heck, DC even took a page out of reality and made Luthor the American president a few years ago!

Fuck Brainiac! Model your Lex Luthor REALISTICALLY, the way he would (and does) exist in this world and you have a perfect villain for the Man of Steel. This is a villain that Superman cannot touch without betraying the very ideals he is supposed to uphold. Many of us sit here hostage watching the Bush Whitehouse spin and avoid scandal after scandal and there is NOTHING WE CAN DO. Why? Because they are richer and smarter than us and have been doing evil a LOT longer than we have. The average American citizen cannot touch these abusers of power… and you know what? Neither can Superman. Lex Luthor is richer. He’s smarter. And he’s been doing evil a LOT longer.

Superman’s struggler mirrors our own sentiments and this is any storyteller’s window into giving a new Superman movie a social and cultural context that an audience can invest in emotionally. Bathe your Superman movie in these themes and against a similar backdrop, Mr. Robinov, and the audience will follow you anywhere. We won’t care if Luthor comes out at the 2-hour mark alongside Brainiac, wearing a powersuit or standing on an island full of kryptonite. We’ve been frustrated by this evil jerkoff for years now and we just want to see Superman kick his ass and put him behind bars in the name of average Americans everywhere! Make him what he is in the comic books: an untouchable and believable part of the American power elite with something to hide and we will pay in droves to see him get his ass kicked. Superman is the manifestation of the American dream at its best and Lex Luthor at its worst. Lex Luthor HAS to be the villain of any Superman reboot until done right. And that definitely means he’s backed by the best… not a bunch of goons, Parker Posey and Kumar. The best and smartest villains money can buy. Realistic villains worked for Christopher Nolan and, if you want to emulate Dark Knight’s success, they will work here. Just look at them for what they are.

So now you’ve got the real world contexts that have made those damned Marvel properties so valuable. Now what do you do!?! What is the physical story?

Come on. You’ve done it before. Sam Raimi did it for the first two Spider-Man films. Go to the source material and the creators that live and breathe the characters.

Those first two Spider-Man films are my favorite comic book movies ever made. And they should be. They played like a greatest-hits mash-up of the most iconic Spider-Man stories ever told over the past 40 years. Sam Raimi embraced the stories that were time tested to have worked and laced them together. Audience loved them. If he and his brother had had the time to put as much care into the script for the third film, we’d be looking at the greatest superhero trilogy of all time. Now YOU have the chance to do it! And guess who helped you with it? The man that Marvel brought to the Hollywood landscape through it’s Blade franchise: David Goyer.

Say what you will about David Goyer’s solo outings as a director, but in the Christopher Nolan Batman movies, he’s proven himself to be a pretty damn good storyteller and barometer of things that will and will not fly in Gotham City. He received story credit on The Dark Knight and co-wrote Batman Begins. Mr. Robinov, there are two people who exist today who can do wonders like this with the Man of Steel. Their names are Geoff Johns and Grant Morrison. With All Star Superman, Grant Morrison has taken the character we all know as Superman and turned him inside out to see how he ticks, only to find that there’s no improving on him. His Lex Luthor is the perfect threat for an all-powerful Last Son of Krypton. He’s smart, he’s quick and he’s evil. In contrast, Superman isn’t a bore with too many powers. He’s a superhuman almighty lacking just one: the wits to defeat Lex. I don’t want to spoil it for you… but Lex won the battle chronicled in this series way back on page 1. And we’re still reading issue after issue.

Then there’s Geoff Johns, who’s Action Comics has delivered us the best Man of Steel stories to grace anyone’s eyeballs in fifteen years. The current Brainiac storyline running through Action Comics is the best Superman movie sequel you’ll read. The Gary Frank drawn splash page in which Superman comes face to face with Brainiac (for the first time!) makes “Kneel before Zod” sound more like “you complete me” by comparison. These are the types of cinematic moments that have been missing from the Superman films since day one and Geoff Johns is throwing them out every month like they’re dirty laundry. Does he even break a sweat when he thinks them up? Trust me. I would think of a Superman story anytime you want me to come in and pitch on the couch, but you’ve already got these two guys under exclusive contract at DC and they are truckloads smarter than me. You might as well use them.

There you have it. My thoughts on the new “dark” Superman reboot that’s supposed to be in the planning stages. People are quick to dismiss Superman as a boring character with no stories to tell and I couldn’t disagree more. He has proven himself countless times to be the most iconic and important superhero of all time and the one most engrained in our own unique cultural fabric.

Still, he proves to be extremely illusive to Hollywood and I don’t see why. The answer isn’t to go Dark Knight “dark” or to give him a huge, character reinventing reboot. It’s so much simpler than that, Mr. Robinov. Look at the world around you. Look at the country and the times that we live in. Then look inside yourself for the solutions to the problems that you see. That’s what Superman represents. You, me and everyone we share this country with. There you might find a hero that we will all want to see on the big screen. We all trust that you can bring us a solid Superman movie. Not as a reboot, but faithfully, for the first time.

It’s Going To Be Okay. The Dark Knight Will Not Sink the Titanic.  Be at Peace With That.

Going into the August 16th weekend, I have no doubts that Ben Stiller’s Tropic Thunder will reign as king of the box office come Monday morning. In doing so, it will be the first film in a month to unseat The Dark Knight at the top spot of the weekend domestic box office. We’re all okay with that idea, right? The Dark Knight has enjoyed a pretty good run (to absolutely say the least) and last weekend’s near defeat at the hands of Pineapple Express’ five day opening lay the stage for this weekend’s toppling.

It pains me to say this… but “why so serious?” Across the internet and in comic shops and cineplexes across America, geeks are on a mission. “Sink the Titanic! Sink the Titanic!” The last few episodes of Geekscape have had “sink the Titanic” conversations that have left me sitting camera-left thinking “should I be giving a shit? Am I failing my geek brethren in not taking up arms? Should I give up the cowl and cape and walk off into the night?” I’m being honest with you in saying that this entire Sink the Titanic debate is lost on me.

Is it a bunch of wasted energy? Absolutely. The Dark Knight will pass the original Star Wars this weekend at the domestic box office ultimately roll to a $500 million domestic box office (give or take $10 million). This is $100 million short of Titanic… a movie that rumbled like an unstoppable juggernaut fueled by 16 year old girls and moms WAY back in the winter of 1997… and 1998… and then the spring of 1998.  And then the SUMMER of 1998.

Let me paint you a picture of how incredible a feat Titanic’s box office performance was and why it cannot be replicated today. For months, the Titanic was present at the box office. And it built. It didn’t start amazingly well. It grew! The movie opened on the December 19th weekend of 1997 to $28 million. Not a modest bow by any means, even today, but a far cry from (in Dr. Evil voice) $600 MILLION DOLLARS! But that was just the (shit…) tip of the iceberg?

Let’s paint a picture of December 1997. Do you remember where you were? I was wrapping up my first semester at college and was excited to come home. It was freezing in Philadelphia and Austin seemed like a tropical climate by comparison. My friend Kevin McCaffrey and I had spent all night trying to finish Leisure Suit Larry: Love For Sail before racing to the airport. Before I did though, I dropped by this girl’s dorm room. We had a mutual friend and I was totally after her. She was short and from Boston. I think that’s all I remember. Shit, I don’t even remember her name (actually, I don’t remember much about her at all)! All I know is that four months earlier, I had thought college was going to be the equivalent of It’s Raining Men but instead it would be raining panties, coeds and breasts. Cut to Kevin and I playing Leisure Suit Larry in his dorm room at 3am and I think that tells you JUST HOW WRONG I HAD BEEN (and would continue to be wrong for at LEAST another year).

So I go to this girl’s dorm room just in time to see her blow me off and rush right past me to make the train. Okay. That sucked. But I got her number. Then I remember a week later asking my dad if I could call this girl. “She lives in Boston but I’ll be quick. I promise.” And it wasn’t that I was quick. She was. “I can’t talk right now. I’m rushing out the door to see Titanic with my parents.” TITANIC!?! The BOAT movie!?! With THE RETARDED KID from Gilbert Grape!?! People were going to SEE THAT MOVIE!?! WHY!?!?!

But they did. And they continued to. After opening in mid-December, Titanic went on to gross at least SEVEN FIGURES AT THE BOX OFFICE EVERY WEEKEND THROUGH JUNE 19th! June 19th! That’s over 6 months later! Can you imagine in our modern world of revolving door box office champions? Absolutely not. And for 6 MONTHS, every time I heard about “Titanic” I thought about how that chick wanted absolutely NOTHING to do with me.

The Dark Knight DOES. NOT. STAND. A. CHANCE.

Think about the factors that will lead to The Dark Knight’s 2nd place finish and a decade of change. Here’s a list just off of the top of my head that no batarang or batpod can cut through.

1)    A crowded summer marketplace. Titanic opened up against Tomorrow Never Dies. A James Bond film that was flawed but still almost beat Titanic on opening weekend… before word of mouth started separating the two over Christmas and New Years. Good Will Hunting’s platform release hadn’t picked up steam yet going into the Oscars and the rest of the competition consisted of As Good As It Gets, Mousehunt and Scream 2. Titanic and Tomorrow Never Dies landed in an opening going into the holidays, before the Oscar race had started up and after the glut of smaller October and November films. The films that Titanic and Bond were competing against were specifically targeted horror films (like Alien Resurrection and Scream 2), family films (like Mousehunt) and older slanting films (Good Will Hunting and As Good As It Gets).

The Dark Knight opened as the FOURTH superhero film in the middle of July of a summer that had already seen several large event films and family movies going back to late April. Not exactly the open arena that Titanic and Tomorrow Never Dies opened to back in 1997. And going into the rest of the summer, things were only going to get harder. As Titanic floated on at the box office, it was washing into Oscar territory. Its competition got SMALLER! Titanic gobbled them up like a big fish in a very small pond. In fact, it’s largest weekend was its SIXTH which was $36 million dollars.

2)    Dark Knight opened huge! Did you read the last two paragraphs? It’s the tortoise and the hare. Slow and steady always wins the race. What Titanic did was incredible. Never in its run did it ever make more than $40 million dollars in a weekend. Dark Knight shot out of the bat cave with FOUR times that in JUST ONE WEEKEND! Holy Hollywood Pocketbooks, Batman! What an opening! And then… what a bunch of finishes. A month out and the Dark Knight looks like it will be in single digit earnings for the weekend before September is through (not exactly the 6 month stretch of Titanic’s seven figure earnings).

3)    DVD and VOD. A movie comes out and a week later it’s on DVD. Have you noticed that trend? Well, The Dark Knight won’t be swinging onto DVD until at least the holidays, but that won’t stop Iron Man, Hulk, Hancock and any other caped crusader from dropping in on the fun and picking up all those people who waited to get their summer fix from their couch. I didn’t even OWN a DVD player in the 90s! And I seriously doubt that you did in 1997. But now many of us do… and maybe not you or me… but a lot of people are still waiting out The Dark Knight.

4)    Piracy. Hahaha! Hohoho! I must be joking, right!?! I mean, how can you do a show called Geekscape and talk to all you torrenting fiends on a weekly basis without believing that piracy can’t have THAT big an effect on the pocketbooks of the below the line Hollywood employee and distributors?!? I pwn noobs who think that I’m not the most kick @ass poon pwning pirate! LOL! ROTFL! Um, yeah. You want The Dark Knight to beat Titanic? STOP PIRATING YOUR F$%KING MOVIES! Last weekend I was grilling on my patio when across the way I saw my neighbors crowding into their living room to watch “el Batman”. No, not Tim Burton’s or Joel Schumacher’s. Not even El Batman Impiesa (El Batman Begins to the anglos). THEY WERE WATCHING EL DARK KNIGHT PERFECTLY PIRATED ONTO A DVD! I stood there with my jaw dropped open watching the opening bank heist scene as my meat burst into flames on the grill. Trust me. If my neighbors, who up until this point only watched Chespirito on TeleMundo (with the doors and windows open on full blast, mind you) can figure out how to get a pirated and perfect looking version of The Dark Knight… millions can. And they aren’t going to pay $50 plus to take the family to see it either. So “Sink the Titanic?” Uh… “stop pirating first, jerkoff?”

Okay, those are just off the top of my head. What do you think? Are you convinced yet? No? Well, watch it happen. And you know what? Whatever.

I can already hear you crying through your braces: “But Titanic’s not even a good movie!” I hate to tell you… but after repeat viewings, The Dark Knight’s not a whole lot better. Both movies are without a doubt too long and have moments where you look at your watch and think “I could be at home reading comics… and by comics I mean watching porn”. Both movies have really strong visual sequences and incredible performances. Say what you will about Leo,  but he did put on a solid performance and was so put off by his Oscar snub that he skipped the awards show all together and didn’t show his face again until Danny Boyle’s The Beach.

And if you think “Titanic’s not even a good movie!” why don’t you tell that to the thousands and thousands of American’s who DON’T make up your World of Warcraft guild that DO think Titanic’s a good movie? It’s not about whether or not the movie’s good by our standards! Shit, the prequels are in the top 10 somewhere (thanks for THAT, assholes!)! And Titanic is WAY better than ANY of the prequels (I just heard you yell “noooooooooooo!”). In fact, I don’t think it’s a bad movie at all; just not one I’m interested in seeing again.

Last night I attended a tribute to Stan Winston at the Nokia Theater downtown.  Before the tribute, there was a reception, and the whole night was hosted by Sony Imageworks, so the reception had a lot of effects guys and digital FX wizards in the room. I met a guy named John who does digital mapping of objects for films. His Second Life set up is probably The Matrix. The room was full of guys like John and effects people like John Dykstra and my friend Scott, who you have all seen on Geekscape and was nice enough to bring me along.

Then I saw James Cameron, standing there, talking to a few of his friends and coworkers. I slid past him to get in line for the buffet and immediately, the proximity to him made me think about this retarded “Sink Titanic” debate. And then, maybe the way he was standing, definitely the way he was dressed, whatever, Jim Cameron made me think of my dad. James Cameron reminded me of my dad and how he talks to his friends and hangs out with his friends. And it made me like the guy. And then it made me hate the “Sink Titanic” debate. Because in some weird way, it wasn’t just fucking with James Cameron. It was fucking with my dad. And that made me mad.

In early December of 1997, the Hollywood version of my dad’s film career could have been in ruins. Titanic was billed as the biggest budget in Hollywood History (and it was at the time). Two years previous, the previous most expensive movie, Water World, had come out and tanked. Judging by the box office of Kevin Costner’s Swing Vote last weekend… he has yet to recover from it. Water World wrecked Kevin Costner’s career. And my Hollywood dad could have very easily followed. Everyone was talking about what a risk the film was and how much it cost. The only picture that I had seen was one from a magazine that summer, of Cameron, waste deep in water, strapped to a steadicam and shooting a scene, with a giant headline alluding to Titanic being the second coming of Water World.

And last night, during the tribute, listening to James Cameron talk about his friend Stan Winston, I only started hating my fellow Dark Knight loving geeks more. Cameron talked about his friend with so much love and celebration that I couldn’t help loving him. I couldn’t help feeling sad about how he missed his Winston as he talked about how much Stan loved scaring people and pioneering and taking risks. He talked with excitement about turning Terminator 2 around in TWELVE AND A HALF MONTHS from first draft to film delivery (stop and think about what an achievement that is) with Stan’s help (and Dennis Murren at ILM). He talked about Stan directing second unit on Aliens and how he created a lot of the great shots in that film.

It was a lot of mixed emotions. I met Stan Winston for all of eight minutes last year and I MISSED HIM on a personal level last night. And after collaborating with him for over 20 years, James Cameron definitely missed him. I wondered if James Cameron, the day he was up to his waste in water holding a steadicam back in 1995 or 1996, went home and called his friend Stan Winston and vented.  I wonder if he asked him for help.  I wonder if he asked him what he could do to help save his movie and his reputation. The way James Cameron spoke made me think of moments when I catch my dad on our back patio at home sitting by himself looking at my older brother’s bench. I walk up and say “hi” and he doesn’t say anything but just takes my hand and motions for me to sit next to him and I can tell he was wondering what my brother would be doing if he was alive today. So we don’t say anything and just sit there until something in me gets too anxious and I have to get him up and in the house to go do something else.

That’s the stuff that was going through my head last night listening to James Cameron talk. And those thoughts stayed with me throughout the screening of Terminator 2 that followed. And afterwards, when Scott said “man, that movie just reigns you in, doesn’t it?” and all through my drive home. Jim Cameron’s been making our favorite movies since I was born. And a bunch of people want to fuck with his title because “it wasn’t even that good a movie.”

Well, I didn’t think I’d ever hear myself saying this… but “fuck you, Batman.” And fuck everyone that wants my Hollywood Dad’s movie sunk. The Dark Knight had a phenomenal at bat, but as you will all see, the Titanic is going to sail on.

I’m not going to hide it, but ever since I saw Adam West don the spandex, I’ve been a Batman fan. I’ve slugged through the good movies (Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Begins), the goofy movies (Original Batman movie) and the travesties (Batman Forever, Batman and Robin), all in the name of a love for the cape crusader. With this in mind, I eagerly as possible in a post-Phantom Menace world, I’ve awaited the release of Dark Knight, the newest movie in this linage of batman movies.

Its been 24 hours since I was let out of the movie, and all I can say is this:

The Dark Knight is amazing.

While there is no denying that the Dark Knight is an action film at its core it is really an ensemble film. Each core member of the cast, Bale, Ledger, Eckhart and Oldman in their respective roles of Bruce Wayne, The Joker, Harvey Dent and Jim Gordon are given equal screen time both together and alone. This results in the movie being as much a study in character as it is about exploding buildings. The biggest question addressed by the movie is of how these characters deal with their responsibility. Ultimately many of the characters, both major and minor, are shown to shy away form making any firm choices where they would ultimately be responsible. This is shown from the mob unleashing the Joker on the city to Dent’s reliance on his double headed coin.

The biggest part of this move that everyone will be talking about is the portrayal of The Joker by Ledger. Gone is the joke buzzers and mayhem of The Joker from his previous incarnations, and instead in its place is a calculating man who is severely left of centre. This Joker is an agent of Chaos who prefers to cut his victims instead of gassing them. The horror of this character is further strengthen by drawing from elements in the comic, The Killing Joke. Most notably is the idea of The Joker attempting to show that any man, no matter how good they are, can be destroyed by a really bad day.

Being a new take of the character, the film makers also made some interesting changes to his origin. The biggest being the refusal to give him any origin or motivation for his actions. As Alfred says in the movie, ‘Some men just want to see the world burn’, and The Joker is this man. While the rest of the cast is shown to struggle with the weight of responsibility and the choices that must be made, and lived with, The Joker is shown to be a primal force of nature. He comes in like a hurricane, causes his damage, and when he is finally dealt with, all are different for the experience.

Ledger, like Eckhart and Oldman owned their roles. I got chills watching the scenes where Ledger and Eckhart interacted with each other. Each monologue by Ledger is also a treat to watch, and the attention paid to the finer details, such as body language do nothing but build his case for an Oscar nomination this year. In general the casting for the film is strong, with perhaps the weakest point in it being the title character Batman. Bale is shown, and continues to be the best Bruce Wayne to grace the screen, but his Batman, and his raspy voice is at times distracting.

We cannot discuss this movie without addressing the one question on everyone’s mind, is the Dark Knight better then Iron Man? If you looking purely at the generation of money, then yes, Dark Knight will be the better movie. If you look at the question in terms of acting and story, then the answer becomes less clear. To compare Iron Man and the Dark Knight this way is like asking a father to pick between his two children.

And as comic fans, we are all the better for having two children then just the one.

I’m not that into Hellboy. I think he’s a cool looking character and Mike Mignola’s art is amazing. I think the stories are fun but it’s just a bit on the light side and I could never get too invested in them. I am, however, a huge fan of Guillermo Del Toro. So I was quite excited when the first Hellboy came out. It gave a filmmaker I adored a fun world to play in. The end result came off a bit like the Hellboy comics though. It was fun, it looked cool, but I just couldn’t bring myself to care too much.

Since the release of Hellboy, Guillermo Del Toro has grown immensely as a filmmaker and has proven himself to have one of the most vivid imaginations of any director working today. He has also earned critical acclaim and his name now carries some weight. So it’s a new, more powerful Del Toro who is tackling Hellboy 2, and it shows.

Hellboy 2 is a wild ride through a mad genius’ imagination. Del Toro finally had the freedom to go all out and every inch of the screen is filled with amazing little details. He took Mike Mignola’s world and really made it his own without betraying the source material, and in doing so turned something I only kind of liked into something I loved.

Yes, I loved Hellboy 2. I think it improves on the original in every way. The story is clearer and better told, the action is more spectacular, the visuals are breathtaking, and the characters that matter were front and center. In Hellboy we were forced to view this world through the eyes of a human outsider and as such we were one step removed from everything. This time we are with Hellboy and his crew and we are thoroughly entrenched in their world and it makes us do something we didn’t the first time around. It makes us care.

Luckily we have a good story to care about. The plot of Hellboy 2 is very simple but it’s told in an incredibly strong manner. There is a thing the bad guys want and that the good guys can’t let them have. That thing of course doesn’t really matter. It’s a classic MacGuffin that just serves as an excuse to get our characters moving. We aren’t buried under boring exposition. The real meat of the movie is with the characters and their relationships. Everyone gets screen time here and their characters are very clearly and strongly defined. We watch as Hellboy deals with doubt over his place in the world, as Liz deals with fear over the future of her family, as Abe deals with an impossible romance. We also get a villain who isn’t just “evil”. He’s not a cardboard cutout. He has depth and he has purpose and he is sympathetic, and that makes all the difference in the world.

Character and plot are all well and good, but the real star of the show here is the art design and makeup work. There are very few humans in this movie but there are tons of monsters and they all exist. What I mean by that is these aren’t empty CG shells. This isn’t one character design repeated ad naseum in a computer. These are wall to wall crazy creatures made with practical effects and makeup. They have personality, they have life, and it’s absolutely wonderful to watch. That’s not to say there isn’t any CG but it is used sparingly, and it is used to enhance rather than replace.

I was really taken aback by all of the different character designs on display here. It’s either an effects department’s wet dream or worst nightmare. The Troll Market scene in particular steals the show and has been getting a lot of comparisons to the Cantina scene in Star Wars. For my money this outdoes Star Wars by a large margin.

Makeup can only go so far without a skilled actor making it move and all the major players bring their A game here. Perlman IS Hellboy. He is so comfortable in the role and completely makes you forget that there is a nearly 60 year old human in there. Doug Jones finally gets to use his real voice in a movie and, even though I preferred David Hyde Pearce, does an admirable job as Abe Sapien. His true talent lies in his body language though and in this department he is second to none. The big surprise this time around was Seth MacFarlane, of Family Guy fame, as Johann Krauss, the German accented gas… guy. He provides some of the funniest moments in the film and is a very welcome addition.

I feel like I should say something negative about the movie, but there is really very little wrong with it. Kid Hellboy looks kind of stupid. Abe’s relationship with the elf princess seems a bit abrupt and he makes a questionable decision because of it that you don’t quite buy. I’m really having to try to nit pick here.

Point is, the movie is awesome and I’m kind of bummed that The Hobbit is going to keep us from seeing Hellboy 3 for quite some time.

It goes without saying (but I’m going to say it anyways): Our children are our future.

Me? No. I don’t have kids. I have dogs. And you can’t take dogs into public movie theaters. But if I could no doubt even they would pick up on the not so subtle messages being presented to them in recent animated family blockbusters like Wall-E and Happy Feet. Both films tell the story of cute and loveable cast-outs forced to live among the ruinous influence of man. They are both underdogs against overwhelming odds, not only in their immediate social structures (that of more advanced robots and more singing-inclined penguins, respectively), but also against the encroaching destruction wreaked by humanity and their neglect for the planet. Both movies carry huge, whop you over the head like a mallet in Whack-A-Mole, sized messages of conservation, recycling and anti-pollution.

Is this the best way to get the message across? Well, I think that each film has a varying level of effectiveness. No doubt, this is the exact audience that this message needs to reach the most. Yes. Our children are our future? Me? I’ll be joining the 30-somethings in December. The card game is already long in the tooth and everybody knows the cards I’m holding. But the future of this planet lies in the hands of children who are being told something very clear from a source that they absolutely listen to: cartoons.

You know that scene in Disney’s Pinnochio where that jackass kid leads Pinnochio astray and starts smoking gets turned into, well, a jackass? That scene horrified me. I absolutely credit that nightmarish sequence as one of the reasons I’ve never picked up a cigarette. It kept me up at night for countless nights.  It completely scared me off of gambling and smoking (I have yet to properly learn the game of poker).

That approach is what was employed in George Miller’s Happy Feet. For the first half of the movie, you have one of the most magical animated stories I have ever seen. When that little egg pops out penguin feet and starts dancing around, you are in love. The entire time Happy Feet grows into adolescence, you are there. We recognize all of the moments: feeling outcast, your first love, striving to be the best at being you. The first half of Happy Feet was one of my favorite experiences in a theater that year.

Then something just… snaps. We meet the older penguin voiced by Mork from Ork. He’s got a plastic six-pack holder stuck around his neck. Okay. It’s Robin Williams so it’s still funny… right? I’m still with it, I guess. Then the heavier pollution themes begin to appear. The ice is melting. The oil tankers are coming. There’s a horrific scene where Robin Williams’ penguin appears to have died violently while gasping for air. The story begins to get weighed down to a crawl. Then it starts to bend under this weight. The audience checks their watches. Happy Feet gets caught in a net and brought into the world of man.

Then the movie turns into a SCI-FI HORROR FILM AND I AM SCARED! In minutes, Happy Feet goes from being something that I am completely invested in to something that scares the living hell out of me. The visual language of the film is from horror films. The themes and sounds resonate the darkest science fiction, alien invasion plots of the 1950s and 1960s. I am 100% creeped the fuck out. The kid next to me is covering his eyes. We are sharing the same expression on our faces. Our jaws are agape and our eyes are wide. Complete “what the hell is happening” fear.

In Happy Feet, the humans might be represented as faceless members of a whole but they are absolutely REAL. They are realistic in their compositions and rendering. They are human in their voices. The pollution and destruction that they have wrought are real world terrors from the front pages of our newspapers (or at least the papers that Al Gore and I read). There is an immediate recognition and attribution when these horrors and humans are on screen.

Is it too much? The movie went on to rake in all sorts of cash at the box office. We lived in a world of Happy Feet for 6 months. The film won an Oscar for Best Animated Feature (over the perfect Monster House). But I can’t help but think that many of us were left behind. For me, the language of the message was too much.

With Happy Feet I felt as though I was being scared into a certain way of thinking. The stance was obvious and I was being provoked into getting in line. The gradual brainwashing sequence in the film comes to mind. Happy Feet scared you into being a better person… for the good of our world.

Wall-E goes about the same message in a very different way. Here, the problems are magnified far beyond reality. Our world is already uninhabitable and has been for centuries. The Earth has already lost. Humanity has already begun a slow devolution as punishment for their myopic and selfish crimes. But you laughed! And even though the world in which Wall-E exists is severely separated from the reality we currently live in, we felt more empathetic towards it. This is a world we wanted to see succeed, even though the odds were that much more insurmountable. Despite its distance from us and the fact that our main character spoke in beeps and whirs, we were invested in its human element.

Wall-E’s complete separation from reality is what gives the message its effectiveness. We aren’t being scared into thinking a certain way. We are painted a picture and given the exaggerated facts and then left with them to make of what we will. THIS is the world of the future. THESE are the people of the future. THAT is what we are left with. The circumstances are SO extreme and farfetched that it gives us the safety to be able to look at the situation objectively. Rather than having a finger pushed in our face and being challenged to react, we are given an image of the world in the film and are asked “how did we end up like this?”.

My girlfriend Laura has an incredible tool that she has mastered through years of working in human resources. I no doubt discovered this tool by messing up somehow but I will spare you that story and share this lesson with you freely. It works wonders.

Simply, when you are met with an interpersonal communication problem, start each sentence with “help me understand…”. It’s fucking genius. “Help me understand why you borrowed my razor without asking me first.” “Help me understand how my XBox Live profile got deleted.” “Help me understand why you thought it was a good idea to have sex in the changing rooms while we were taking store inventory.” Try it. It works in every situation.

What it does is several things. First, it diffuses the problem a bit and keeps both sides from taking immediate defensive positions going into problem solving. Second, it places the ball in THEIR hands. It asks THEM to help YOU. Rather than defensively responding in a rush of excuses, the other side problem solves and processes the series of events that led to the current situation. YOU are the open-armed good guy. THEY are now on your team, working with you to make things right. Someone might be in the wrong, but you start digesting the problem from a neutral and balanced place.

Pixar’s storytellers are so damn smart. The entire world of Wall-E is presented in this way. Even in the opening shots, the film is saying “Help me understand…”. We see spires and mountains and skyscrapers of abandoned junk. The audience is asked by these images to answer… “what happened here?” They are shown the problems of the film’s world on a grand scale but never forced or manipulated into judging. Just given a simple “help me understand.”

On the flipside, Happy Feet does to audiences what I do to my dogs when they won’t eat their pills. I start them off with their food and I watch as they eat it. While they do, I quietly get a treat and bury a pill into it. Then I feed it to them. By the time the pill has been swallowed, it’s too late. I have tricked them! They definitely hate me for that and are defensive about it. Any human would be.

So I pose the question to you: when it comes to using animated films to teach our children lessons, what approach is more effective or welcome? The open armed, humorous distancing of Wall-E? Or the cold, harsh reality lessons of Happy Feet? At the end of the day, is the message getting through? Is the storytelling lost in the lesson or the lesson lost in the storytelling?

Please. Help me understand. Did the message get through to you?

Despite the shoe-in of a spectacular box office performance, the reviews have spoken loud and clear. This is not a review. This is an analysis.

The long in development Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull delivers more misses than hits. A lot more misses. The film has three things that work strongly in its favor: Harrison Ford’s performance, Stephen Spielberg’s camera and the story’s pacing. Cate Blanchett’s performance as the Soviet villain Irina Spalko is a plus, but the treatment of her character in the film’s script is so unfair and flaccid that we are left with is one of the top acting talents on the planet swinging for the fences with the equivalent of a rubber hose. In the instance of Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, I do not hate the players. I completely loathe the game.

WARNING! SPOILERS FOLLOW FROM HERE ON OUT! AND NOT JUST REGULAR SPOILERS, BUT HARDCORE SPOILERS THAT WILL GIVE YOU NIGHTMARES! READ ON ONLY IF YOU’VE SEEN THIS FILM!

The lethal problems in this movie might be numerous, but they all stem from one place: the script. Below I’m going to work through what I believe to be the most dead end problems with Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. But let’s be very clear on two things first:

Monday Morning Quarterbacking is always easier than committing the act itself. During the course of a film’s production, the shooting script is worked and reworked countless times and for countless reasons, none of which we will ever be privy to. Budget, acting, physical complications, the list is endless. Add to that the constant reworking and adjustments that happen during the post process and who knows where this script could have gone. The only thing we are left with is what is on the screen. Knowing that, I’ve limited my criticisms and solutions to the larger aspects of the story instead of nitpicking things that could easily have been production or editing decisions.

Second thing: out of the four of us, Stephen Spielberg, George Lucas, screenwriter David Koepp and me, THREE have made some of the greatest films of the past four decades. ONE is a fledgling video director who does a podcast from his couch. I am not saying that I am a better storyteller than any of these three. Put me in the shoes of any of them and the pressure on my head would be the equivalent of standing at the bottom of the Marianas Trench. Stephen Spielberg is… I’m not even going to quantify him. It’s a ridiculous gesture. George Lucas is a storyteller so powerful that he gave us all our childhoods… and then took it all away. He once was quoted as saying that making an audience emote was easy. You give a little girl a pet and then you take it away. He did this to us over the course of thirty years! And David Koepp brought us the scripts to Jurassic Park, Spider-Man (and my personal favorite Toy Soldiers) among so many others in his incredible career that listing them would be like listing a lot of people’s favorite blockbusters list.

So now that we have our perspective on the players and the game, let’s begin. This is not a review of the movie. This is an analysis. And because I don’t run a website where we throw stones at other filmmakers from behind the defense of keyboards, I have provided what I think are solutions to some of the story’s biggest problems. Please, use the comment section below to agree or disagree with my points. They may or may not be any more valid than the opinions voiced during the production of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull aka The Most Heartbreaking Film I’ve Seen Since The English Patient For Reasons Other Than Those In The English Patient… Frustrating Reasons That Leave Me Cold At Night Wondering “What Could Have Been?”.

First things first: The Three Biggest Problems

The Diluting of Our Hero – Harrison Ford owns the role. Always has. Always will. That being said, the presence of several “side-kicks” in this movie takes attention, time and, more importantly, work, away from our hero. As in the past three films, we want to see our main guy earn his victory. The more you give screen time and attention to other characters (who provide varying degrees of anything) the less Indiana has to do on his own. Everyone loves the shots of Indiana Jones standing alone in silhouette. This is why. It’s one man against an army. Raiders of the Lost Ark‘s very first shot provided this and in one shot an icon was born. The Paramount Pictures logo dissolved to the looming sight of a tall mountain peak… but it was soon dwarfed in the frame by the sight of our hero… and he was headed towards it with determination. In one shot, Raiders gave us more information about our protagonist than is provided in the opening sequences of Crystal Skull. Already, things are not looking good.

The Flaccidity of Our Villains – This has nothing to do with Cate Blanchett being a woman. It has to do with the fact that Crystal Skull gives us zero context or urgency to our villains. There is an end goal in sight (to deliver the crystal skull to its rightful place and inherit vast powers) but we never learn what a Soviet victory will really cost. We get a few lines about mind controlling the populace of the United States but we never see these powers ever materialize or on display. The threat is never literalized for us in order to give us that “holy shit, that’s bad” moment. No hearts are ripped out. No armies march. And even worse, Spalko spends the entire movie bluffing. Several times she threatens characters with her rapier skills and supposed psychic powers. We never see her deliver on either and the more she cries wolf, the less we believe she’s capable of anything. By the end of the film, she delivers no tension whatsoever. Giving us the equivalent of Keystone Cops as villains works even further in diluting Indiana in our eyes. Of course he’s going to win! They’re not as ruthless as the other villains were!

The Lack of Stakes – This is the ticking time bomb that drives the story. And the bomb is diffused in the very first scene. The villains are chasing the crystal skull… but they need our hero to use it. In Crystal Skull, Indiana Jones does something he has never done in any of the previous three films: he pursues the wrong goals for the wrong reasons. In Raiders he wants to keep the ark from the Nazis. But not keep its power for himself. In Temple of Doom, Indy wants to recover the stones for the villagers. In Last Crusade, Indiana finds the Holy Grail but makes the choice to leave it and not benefit from its powers. In Kingdom of the Crystal Skull? Jones retrieves the all powerful skull… and then does exactly what the villains would do: he takes it to see what happens when the power bestowing legend is fulfilled. Literally, all Indiana Jones needs to do is tell the Soviets to get lost and the threat is gone! For the majority of the film, he’s in possession of the skull! Why does he lead the bad guys towards their ultimate goal? What is really driving him? If the goal is to stop the villains, once the good guys are safe… why don’t they just take the skull on vacation? I would take pictures in exotic locales with the crystal skull and mail then to Stalin with the words “you snooze you lose” written across them. There’s a brief moment where Indiana and his son need to rescue Professor Oxley and this is a sufficient driving force… but once we get there the guy is jumping and dancing around! He’s not tied up! He’s not tortured! He’s on a scout retreat in the Amazon! Come on! Where are the stakes!?! These are the Reds we’re dealing with! Give the action in the film a larger context and then set the bomb ticking! This problem really leads back to the diluting of our hero and our villain.

So let’s set things right. Let’s make the version of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull that we want to see! So where do we start? Well… at the beginning of course:

The Nevada Desert Compound Sequence – Up to this point, things can still be made good. We’ve had our villains kill some army soldiers (good so far!) and a gag with a prairie dog that alludes to the first three films’ intros. This gag works great at first but it never gets paid off so it becomes more infuriating over time than it is satisfying. No, the biggest problem with this opening sequence is that two things happen that are huge: our villains ask Indiana Jones for help and Irina Spalko bluffs for the first time. Already our villains are put at the mercy of our hero and we’re starting to see that our main baddie is full of shit when it comes to delivering on the pain. What we need is something that will establish them immediately as people not to be fucked with and that they will find what they are looking for whether Jones helps them or not (the difference being that they’ll let him live… like anyone would ever believe that!).

Solution – Irina Spalko runs Mac through with her rapier once Indy protests helping.

Bam! Now we’re not fucking around. In one move, the story has established how far the villains are willing to take things (at the very least) and we’ve eliminated a superfluous character. I love Ray Winstone, but Mac really hurts the overall story with his character’s moral fence sitting. Over the course of the film, he forces the audience to like him, then hate him, then be confused by him, then frustrated and ultimately apathetic towards him. By the time he dies in the closing scene, Mac means nothing to us or, more importantly, Indiana. Even worse, Jones’ inability to put his foot down and take a stance against his former friend distances us from our protagonist. Does anyone feel anything for Indiana when we watch Mac die in the end? No. By making this one change, we have given Indiana’s choices emotional weight (the loss of a friend) and something more valuable… a kickass villain. From here, Indiana can begrudgingly help the Soviets while he (and the audience) ponder ‘damn… how am I going to get out of this one?’ This starts our clock ticking. At the end of the sequence, when we finally see Indy escape and standing victoriously against the expanding mushroom cloud (in a throwback to and escalation of the Raiders mountain shot) we won’t be able to avoid thinking ‘okay, this is going to be harder than anything he’s faced up to this point’. Plus, the villains have what they wanted and they’re ruthless! He’d better get around to stopping them.

The FBI, University Sequence – The story stops and we lose sight of the bigger picture: the bad guys just got what they were after! Where’s the urgency? He’s teaching classes! Oh no. He lost his job! Come on! Am I in Crazy Town?!? THE BAD GUYS GOT WHAT THEY WANTED! WHY!?! Indy’s apathy towards this fact stops the story in its tracks. What’s this guy doing?

Solution – He’s a scholar. They’re not. Indy returns to the University for either help or answers. Dean Charles Stanforth has already dealt with the feds and breaks Indy the sad news of his resignation. Wow. Whatever this is about… it’s pretty big. In a much better exposition than in the film, Indy would naturally turn to his father… but now we learn that he’s no longer with us. Maybe he can find them elsewhere.

The Introduction of Mutt Williams – Funny that this sequence takes place on a train because this is where the movie starts to really derail. Shia’s Mutt Williams never stood a chance. He comes off less like The Wild One and more like The Mild One. He rides in with a blasé attitude and keeps it up for the first half of the film. This is an adventure movie. No one should be introduced sitting down unless they’re total wimps (and poor Mutt comes off as exactly that)! The following scene… it’s contagious! He AND Indiana are now sitting down! Come on! Spit it out! There’s some rescuing to be done! Some Soviets to be stopped!

Solution – “Mutt” (shudder) races onto the train in search of Indiana. He’s desperately looking for him. His avoidance of the train conductor and staff show us that he’s smart and resourceful. He knows what Indiana looks like. He finds him on the train but not without causing a commotion with the ticket taker. You want a throw back to the original films? Why not have Indiana save “Mutt” (shudder) from a ticket taker claiming that “Mutt” (shudder) broke onto the train and has “no ticket”? At that point, the Soviet heavies in pursuit of Indiana further complicate the altercation and lead into the motorcycle chase. You can bet Indiana, who just got swept into someone else’s problem, would be wondering “what this is all about”. Cue exposition from Shia! But now you are getting it during our chase scene! So it works in service to the action and story rather than at the expense of it. The story isn’t put on hold while he spills the beans. It’s unfolding around them. On top of that, throw in some disagreements about “Mutt”s conducting of the escape (Indy’s done this a few times) and you start to establish the character’s disapproval of each other while getting some better laughs.

All in all, Mutt’s arch was written away from Shia Lebouf’s strengths. He’s a much better actor than this arch gives him room for. And the solution is also easy: start him out as a loser. The first time we see him he looks like a guy who doesn’t think his shit stinks. He ends as a guy who doesn’t think his shit stinks. It’s just not believable unless we see the transformation for ourselves and see it proven for us. This is what Lebouf does, people!

Disturbia – starts out as a loser and then saves the day.
Transformers – starts out as a loser and saves the planet.
The upcoming Eagle Eye (from what I can tell from the trailer) – starts out as a broke loser and then needs to figure it out quick (I’m guessing in order to save the day)!

We love seeing Shia do this time and time again in movies. Why not give him that kind of arch here? Why not start him off as “Mutt” (shudder) and end him as the TRUE heir of the hat and whip (with an actual name)? Is he even the right actor for this? The way Crystal Skull unfolds, we’ll never know. Here he comes off as completely inadequate. Does he save anyone during the course of the film? Uh… no.

Wait. Rubber snake. Never mind.

I’m going to pause for a second to ask: WHY WAS THE MOTORCYCLE BROUGHT ON THE PLANE!?! DID ANYONE THINK THIS WAS NOT ONLY POINTLESS BUT RIDICULOUS?

Okay. I’m good.

Graveyard Sequence – These warriors have protected the burial site of their ancestors for hundreds of years! But hit them with a shovel and make one swallow a poison dart and they go away for good. Whatever.

Solution – They chase Mutt and Indy into the tomb… but are stopped by something unseen. We actually see them refuse to take one step further out of fear for something terrible happening to them. They are religious protectors of the tomb! And they fear something even greater within the tomb. But our heroes will go for it! Will they ever!

Here’s a big missed opportunity. Especially in continuing to develop Mutt and Indy’s relationship. It’s obvious that Oxley didn’t remove the crystal skull from the tomb… but why? There’s a lot of importance given to the concept of “return” in this part of the script… and the audience is never told why. There should absolutely be a price paid for Indy and Mutt removing the skull… and we know just the price don’t we?

A GIANT TRAP!!!

How awesome would it be if removing the skull, like removing the idol in Raiders, set off a sequence of traps that Indy and Mutt needed to escape together? What a completely missed opportunity to build on themes from the first film without all of the nostalgia gags that already dragged down this script? How great would it be if Mutt asked Indy to throw him the whip, and then DIDN’T betray him? How much would Indy learn from this one moment? How much emotional weight would we have gained on both their parts? Oh man. A guy can dream. This one really hurts.

The Soviet Camp and the Powers of the Crystal Skull – This scene should be called “Liar Liar Pants on Fire”. Everyone is lying to each other. Mac. Spalko. Indy. The lying is out of control. Spalko has the chance to do something terrible here and doesn’t. Oxley is introduced… but we feel nothing.

Solution – Indiana is forced by Spalko’s psychic power of the crystal skull to kill Oxley.

But it doesn’t fully work! How great would this scene have been? Spalko’s not bluffing! She has powers! The skull has powers! Oh crap! Now we see JUST HOW BAD THE SOVIETS WINNING CAN BE! On top of that… we see that Indy is even STRONGER! He fights Spalko’s control but his nose starts to bleed and he begins to choke Oxley. Then he hears Miriam scream in the background and his willpower doubles. He breaks the psychic control and gets to work escaping with the skull, Miriam, Oxley and Mutt. Lots of punches get thrown. Alright. Now we’re rocking.

The Quicksand Sequence – Okay. The Soviets officially suck. While they are Keystone Copping around the jungle, Indy, Miriam and Mutt are YELLING at each other just on the other side of a bush. The exposition is painful and the scene’s lack of action or urgency is even worse. I think this is another missed opportunity for not only laughs, but some action.

Solution – The Soviets are in hot pursuit and Miriam saves Indiana. Oxley and Mutt work to buy them more time. Now you can get just as much exposition if not more between Miriam and Indiana. Plus, you get even more history. You give Oxley and Mutt something to do with possibly comedic results. And of course, the Soviets get to them and capture them. These aren’t the losers we saw in the actual film. They mean business.

The Chase Sequence – One problem: monkeys.

Solution – No monkeys. This sequence wasn’t just bad. It was insulting.

The Fire Ant Fight – Here’s where some story problems really get worse. The crystal skull becomes a cure all problem solver. The heroes can use it to as a cure all without any need to devise a solution themselves. There’s a major difference between Indiana fighting a physically superior opponent against the threat of an exploding plane and a dangerous propeller and Indy fighting a stronger opponent and simply having to sumo with him. First one out of the circle loses… badly.

Solution – King of the hill! How great would it be if the ants were racing Indiana and his opponent up a tree, in a tree or up a small hill? Now the ants work as your ticking clock, adding the same urgency to the fight as the exploding plane in Raiders. On top of that, light the other end of the tree or hill on fire and you’ve got a rock, a hard place and a solution to the ants… if only Indy lives long enough to get to it. As the two ends start to converge on each other… Indy had really better in this fight quick.

The Waterfalls – Really?!? Okay. We can believe them surviving two. But that third one? Uh uh. You just told the audience that your main characters were invincible (and amazing swimmers). If that third waterfall doesn’t kill them, what’s a Ruskie going to do?

Solution – Jump ship! Indy is always jumping out of things that are going over cliffs or headed towards disaster. This boat should be no different. By having he characters work together to avoid being killed, you’ve got yourself a pretty good action sequence. It’s not major, but it’s similar to the mine car and airplane raft landing scenes in Temple of Doom. Add to this, the Soviets in pursuit in their own motor vehicles, firing away at them and things get really stressful for our main characters. Stress = good.

The Race to the Golden Temple
– Here’s another creepy and cool sequence completely neutered by the cure-all of the crystal skull. All Oxley does is wave the skull around and the natives WHO HAVE DEFENDED THE TEMPLE FOR CENTURIES start stammering and hanging out in the background like the bad guys in kung fu movies. Well, that was easy! Oh yeah: easy = bad.

On top of this, all of them are killed OFF SCREEN by Spalko’s troops. Wait! You mean this lady actually does something ruthless!?! FINALLY!?! AND WE DON’T EVEN SEE IT!?! Oh man. That’s not good.

Solution – Run faster. And then add Russians. And give the Russians the skull.

Here’s a lesson I learned from Jean Claude Van Damme (among many lessons that I learned from Jean Claude Van Damme). His enemies always had an easier time at achieving their goals than he did. Why? Because they cheated! And he didn’t! He just kicked ass harder! This always made the stakes and tension go way up.

The crystal skull is a giant cheat. I hated how much it was used to solve problems in this movie. But guess what? In my version, Mutt loses it in the first temple. It gets rocked out of his hands by a sling. And they can’t turn back for it. All they can do is race to the golden temple. The Russians though, strolling in after the action and hard work has been done, retrieve the crystal skull. Spalko uses it to manipulate the natives and gain entry into the temple that our heroes have found refuge in (after racing their asses off and doing some puzzle solving to get into).

So now you have the set up for the final act. Spalko has the skull and obvious psychic powers. Our heroes? Well, they’re kind of between her and her goal. And somehow they need to stop her from getting it.

You can put in whatever finale you want. But keep the aliens. I like the aliens. They work for me.

I would also use the final action sequence to resolve the Indiana/Mutt storyline and provide the real passing of the torch. Mutt should come off as a hero and redeem all of his screw-ups in the film. He should also say goodbye to Oxley. Yup. In one final act, poor Oxley eats it. Use your imagination. But make it good, make it heavy and make it meaningful. Like Bruce Willis in Armageddon meaningful. And make sure it buys the three remaining heroes the time needed to get away before the temple buries them and the spaceship “returns” (is that what they were talking about the whole time?).

In the end, Mutt gets a real name and decides to finish school (anyone else wonder where that story thread went?)… but only if Indy makes an honest woman of his mom and stops “running off”. This sets up the wedding and resolves the story completely… or at least until the next adventure looms.

In 2005, Socratic’s album Lunch for the Sky provided listeners with enough colorful, smile enducing piano driven rock songs to fuel the rest of summer’s memories as they faded in the rearview mirror. Now, with their new album Spread the Rumors, the band is back for another crack at becoming your soundtrack for the three hottest months. Produced by Mark Hoppus (front man for Blink 182 and +44), Spread the Rumors is a more diversified and fleshed out album than the band’s previous effort. Catchy songs like Boy in a Magazine and Contant Apology will have you singing along with them long after the CD has stopped spinning. Long Distance Calls does a respectful job of channelling Paul Simon (without the annoying Chevy Chase bits) while bringing its own Socratic spin. Trust me. Once the steel drum kicks in, you’ll be sold on this band. Maybe the meanest trick of the entire affair is the song May I Bum a Smoke, a love letter to toking-induced, carefree daydreams. I’m as straight laced straight edge as a guy can get and I still catch myself singing this incredibly fun song out loud constantly.

The second half of the album mellows out a bit (Spread the Rumors and The Diamond in a World of Coal) and makes for perfect nighttime driving music after the fun of a summer’s day has been had. The latter song (possibly my favorite of the bunch) will have you built up and elated during its final chorus in a way that only a really great rock ballads can. All in all, if what you’re looking for is a rock album that is at times poppy toe tapping melodies and other parts reflexive lyrical and instrumental arrangements, I don’t think you can be dissapointed with Spread the Rumors. I recently got a chance to talk with Socratic’s new bassist and lead singer Louis Panico. The following is what he had to say about recording the Spread the Rumors, becoming a member of the band and what to expect when you come see them live (which I recommend to all of you):

How long have you guys been working on this thing?

We had songs for a while. The last album was Lunch for the Sky in 2005, I think. And then we did a free EP. So this our second release. We had a few demos and recorded them in Ohio with a few friends of ours. We sent them along to Mark Hoppus and he said he wanted to do our record. We were like “cool”. We had those 5 songs. He was like “you wanna come in in 2 weeks?”. We were like “sure!” . We had 5 songs and two months to write the rest of our record. It was pretty cool. I mean, we had a few songs floating around for a while and that gave us a chance to just sit down and for a few weeks straight: just play, play a bunch of new material. It was cool.

If you guys went into the studio with just five songs, how much was he involved in the songwriting to flesh out the rest of the album?

All of the songwriting is ours. We did some preproduction with him, and he listened. He gave us thoughts on arrangements and stuff. “You need to make this part shorter, this part longer.” That was basically it as far as songwriting. We came in to record the songs. And he was a cool guy to work with. He knows what he’s doing. He knows how to write songs. He’s a good songwriter, obviously. So musically, when it came down to instruments, he gave his opinion. We asked him a bunch of questions. “What do you think we should do? This or that?” You know? His influence is definitely there. And I know when it came to the lyrics, he worked on a few things with us actually. He heard a line from us and then said “you know, maybe you can try this line this way”; change a few melodies here and there. He’s an awesome guy to work with.

When you and I talked the other night, you were describing this new album, in comparison to Lunch for the Sky, as a more fleshed out, fuller sound. I don’t really know what that means. I’m not a musician at all. Nor do I aspire to be!

Lunch for the Sky was a pretty long record. I actually, personally, wasn’t even a part of the band then. I wasn’t a part of that record and just overall that record was a bit longer, was more a “let’s just go out and play” type deal. This record is a lot more cohesive. A lot of the songs are shorter. They get to the point. We’re still ridiculous in the sense that Socratic is always going to be ridiculous. It’s pretty simple. Nothing’s too long. The whole record, I think, is 40 minutes. Maybe right around 40 minutes long so it’s pretty cool. There’re 12 tracks. And it flows. It flows very nicely.

What was the process of you coming into the band and becoming a part of the songwriting?

I’ve known them my whole life. I played guitar and sang in a band called The Showcase and before that a band called Blue Star Drive. All of the bands I’ve been in, I’ve known them. I’ve played with them. I live in the same town like 5 minutes away from Duane and Vinnie. I went to school with Kevin. I went to highschool with him. I knew him for a long (time), like very well. He had another band too. We’d always hang out and play music. It was very cool. What’s cool about Socratic, I think, is that everything’s split. And it’s cool because we all contribute and we all listen to each other. Even if someone else wrote an entire song, we play it and we’re like “oh man, let’s try this. Let’s try that.” Everyone’s very open. And everyone writes. I wrote all of my songs in my last band. I would write guitar even though I write bass now. And Duane obviously writes. Vinnie writes. And Kevin writes and Tom knows what’s up; our drummer. And Tom’s actually a really good guitar player. It works out.

If some of my listeners/viewers/readers aren’t too familiar with your band, how would you recruit them into your audience? How would you sell your band?

I would just tell them to give us a chance, to check us out. Come see us play. We all like playing. We enjoy it very much. We all have a good time. So just check us out is what I would say. In terms of our music and stuff, I think we’re fun. I think we’re just real down to earth people and I think it’s more than then music too when you come to check us out. We love to just hang out too. When you come watch the show, when we’re done we’re off stage. We’re hanging out at the bar. Whatever. I think Socratic is all about having a good time. And if you want to have a good time, come hang out with Socratic. That’s what I would say.

Socratic’s new album Spread the Rumors comes out Tuesday, May 6th everywhere. For more info or to hear a few tracks visit http://www.myspace.com/socratic

During the summer of 1999, Dan Myrick suddenly found himself in a position for which there was no preparation or warning. The small indie film that he had co-created, The Blair Witch Project, had gone from a buzz-filled indie release to a national phenomenon almost overnight. Immediately, his world changed. Today, Myrick is preparing to exhibit his latest film The Objective in front of an audience at New York’s Tribeca Film Festival. We got a chance to talk about the differences and similarities between his characters’ extreme experiences and those that he’s found himself in over the course of his career so far.

So why don’t you tell me a little bit about The Objective?

Well, it’s sort of like a psychological sci-fi thriller that revolves around this CIA operative on this mission in Afghanistan to find this so called cleric. But it’s revealed later on that he’s got a different agenda and uses this group of special forces guys to help him find it. They realize that they’re up against something that none of them had planned for. So basically it’s sort of a UFO hunt that the CIA guy is on.

But they’re brought in under false pretenses-

Correct.

And one of them is the protagonist or a group of protagonists?

Yeah. It kind of dabbles a little bit into how there’s kind of conflicting rivalries within our own military structure where you’ve got special forces guys who are tasked to help this CIA agent but they don’t quite trust him and they’re not quite sure what his ulterior motive is. And the CIA agent is out on sort of a personal quest, even outside of the mandate by the CIA headquarters that he’s been tasked to find this so called Romanus. So a lot of conflicting forces going on which I think is pretty typical of any conflict but I just find that interesting. There’s a lot of analogies in there but at the end of the day I think it’s this personal journey. This kind Hearts of Darkness journey of this one guy going down this path to find this so called Romanus or this UFO. And ultimately he is enlightened in some way. It’s open to speculation what ultimately that is but I just find it interesting.

There’ve been a lot of movies made about the war but they’ve all been done realistically. What do you think is going to be the reaction to a movie that uses that as a backdrop but tells more of a sci-fi supernatural story?

Well, I hope the reaction is good.

You’re playing it in New York where the war started.

Yeah. I like to think that the New York audience in particular will respond well to this film. I think it’s a thoughtful film and it really is not a war movie. It’s not a political commentary even though I think some people will derive that from the film. But for me I just wanted to set a thriller or a psychological thriller with the background of the war and the desert in particular because I just hadn’t seen it done before. I think it really goes beyond the war itself. It delves into human nature. And certainly people will draw parallels to Blair Witch with it and allegories to the war maybe. But first and foremost I just wanted it to be a good visceral experience and an old fashioned kind of scare movie that makes you think a little bit and ask some questions about human nature that may not have answers. At least ask the questions, you know?

How do you deal with those sort of comparisons to something that was such a big phenomenon like Blair Witch? How do you get out from under the shadow of that and free yourself to make a film that you feel is completely original and unaffected by those kinds of pressures?

Well, I don’t know if you ever do get out from the shadow of that. All I can do is just focus on the same thing we did when we made Blair Witch which is just make movies that we would want to go see ourselves. And hope that your body of work is recognized as being a good thing rather than one particular movie, you know? I’ve certainly derived a lot of benefit out of Blair Witch and it’s a big part of me and I have a special place in my heart for that film. But the only way I think I’m going to show audiences and critics or whomever that I’m more than one movie is just to concentrate on making the films I want to make. And hopefully they respond to them and then people can step back a little and say “okay, this guys got a body of work here rather than just one project”. So staying focused on the project at hand. Hopefully that will translate into something that people will respond to.

You’ve used the topical war as a backdrop in this one. You did a movie that had the canvas of a suicide cult (in 2007’s Believers). It seems like a lot of your stories draw inspiration from the headlines.

Well, certainly headlines and the topical conversation is gonna contribute to the recipe to the inspiration behind the projects that I do. But what I think kind of intrigues me is how kind of paradoxical our human nature is. I think like when I did Believers it touched into religion and the dichotomy and the separation of science and religion. And I wanted to turn our preconceptions of cults on their head. What if one of them was right? I think The Objective taps into that as well on another level- that the human condition is more complex than we give it credit for and that there are forces out there that we’re driven by. Some good. Some bad. And that when we think we’ve defined something it finds a way to force us to reevaluate. I like it when films do that to the audience and make you challenge and question your preconceptions. And that’s been kind of a theme through what I do and certainly inspired by headlines. No doubt.

It’s tough because I remember seeing Blair Witch at the Angelica in ’99 the week it was released without a whole lot of word of mouth and I was rocked by it. I thought it was great. I had assumed that it was not a real life documentary but at the same time it was quite an accomplishment to inject those kinds of feelings and sensations into a live audience. But now you’re working against people and audiences that see you coming and are ready. How do you tackle the hurtles of an audience coming in with the belief that you’re going to put one over on them or cause them to have those kinds of reevaluations throughout the film. How do you surprise them?

I don’t think you can pander to the audience. They’re much more sophisticated with regard to these fake documentaries now than I think they were years ago. It’s not something that I feel like I can fool people into thinking or anything on the next movie I do or whatever. It’s a weird struggle we had with Blair Witch. We never really intended Blair Witch to be a hoax per se. We wanted to create a movie that felt real but wasn’t real. We were never secretive about how we made the film. We let the press in pretty early on on our sort of technique on how we made it. We were just kind of experimenting with an aesthetic- a sort of documentary aesthetic. And the conceit of which I think played well for that story. And we had hoped that the audience would embrace that. Fortunately people did. So on these subsequent ventures I just think of the audience as being smarter than what I think Hollywood gives them credit for. And not all my films are going to be successful, certainly, but I’d like to think that if I’m going to direct something or write something that I’m doing it with- you know, taking a little of a risk and making audiences- challenge them a little bit and think a little bit and hopefully they’ll appreciate that. And no doubt there’ll be comparisons made but I just think I would drive myself insane if I tried to outdo Blair Witch or do something as innovative or whatever. All I can really do, all I can hope to do, is make a film that I would want to go see myself and trust that there’s a market out there that thinks the way I do. And that’s all I can really do.

So speaking of our market, we’re a geek oriented website. I noticed in an interview that you have a calculator watch. Are you still sporting the calculator watch?

I actually have to of ’em! It was kind of one of those merchandising things. If you’re looking closely, all of the cult members in The Believers movie wear ’em. And we were able to get our hands on some of those vintage calculator watches which I think are pretty cool. You know, little red LED watches. They’re neat!

Is that as geeky as you get, Dan?

Oh no! I’m much geekier. I definitely drive my wife nuts with all the gadgets I have around and we do all of our own post production here at my little facility. I’m very much into geeking out on that sort of thing- computers and kind of the do it yourself approach to filmmaking. So I’ve always been a frustrated engineer, if you will. I think I get it from my dad.

Dan, I really hope the film goes over well at Tribeca and congratulations on getting it in.

Great. Thank you very much!

The Objective makes its world premiere Thursday, April 24th at the Tribeca Film Festival. For screening times, tickets and more information visit www.tribecafilmfestival.org

Our faithful reporter, Matt Kelly (SaintMort from the forums), has revealed to us that during the NYCC panel for June’s The Incredible Hulk it was revealed that our old friend Lou Ferigno (Geekscape Episode 15?) will voice the Hulk in the upcoming film. both Tim Roth and Lou Ferigno appeared to reveal this information in front of a room full of excited fans.

The more I hear about the film, the more I realize that Norton and company are determined to make a film as close to the original TV show as possible.

Could this possibly work in today’s blockbuster climate? Maybe with some influence from the Bruce Jones run of books and some Jason Bourne style “man on the run” action…

I really am excited to see the film. I know everyone reacted badly to the trailer but I am still optimistically stoked for it.

 

This weekend’s kung fu family film The Forbidden Kingdom seriously opens with Jet Li, playing the mischievous Monkey King of Chinese legend, on top of a mountain above the clouds, kicking soldiers’ asses while jumping around in a giant display of wire fu. Try as they might with their weapons, they can’t touch the guy. He smacks them around with his magic staff and laughs at their failed attempts. The display is a mix of classic kung fu spectacles like Warriors of Zu Mountain and something out of a Hannah Barbera cartoon.

If what I just described sounds really cool to you, you’ll probably enjoy the film. If this sounds just whatever, you’ve got yourself a future Netflix. If you think this opening sounds retarded as hell, it’s time to theater jump before you waste any more of your time. The Forbidden Kingdom is EXACTLY what I just described for about two hours: a mix of larger than life characters performing a repetitive series of larger than life acts in pursuit of a larger than life goal… all rolled into a cinematic love letter to
the kung fu spectacle.

More than almost any recent movie I can remember, The Forbidden Kingdom comes 100% as advertised. If you’ve seen the trailers, do not expect to be surprised by anything here. With almost a drummer’s precision, the story plots the beats out in advance and hits them one after another. A part of this audience will find this kind of storytelling satisfying while the other part will find it predictable. Regardless, this is both the strength and the weakness of The Forbidden Kingdom. As much as it pays respect to the kung fu films that came before, it doesn’t work too hard at adding to the tradition.

The film centers on highschool kid Jason Triptikas, who (you guessed it) is new to his school and keeps to himself… or at least tries to, but the local bullies love pushing him around. Jason’s only real escape is his foracious love of all things kung fu, one that brings him regularly to an old pawn shop in Boston’s Chinatown neighborhood (run by an old man that is played comedically by a heavily made up Jackie Chan). This is where Jason (played by Michael Angarano who I just saw in Snow Angels and will soon be revealed to have more chest hair for a highschooler than I’ve ever had in my entire life) first comes into contact with the Monkey King’s staff (this is still a kid’s movie, by the way!). The shopkeeper (ie, his only friend) explains that the staff was left there by the shop’s original owner over 100 years ago and you pretty much know where this is headed.

Cut to a scene where the bullies are forcing Jason to betray the shopkeepers trust in order to rob the place, the shop keeper gets shot, Jason escapes with the staff, is cornered by the bullies and WHAM… is transported to old school China, population Everyone’s Kung Fu Fighting ‘cept The New Guy From Boston. The land is ruled by a big, baddy named the Jade Emporer and you’re really starting to get the idea of what Jason needs to do. Before long, Jason befriends a Drunken Master (played by Jackie Chan), a beautiful girl named Sparrow bent on revenge (and bent on being a romantic interest) and a Silent Monk (your main man Jet Li). Together they must journey a path riddled with danger to return the staff to the Monkey King who has been frozen and imprisoned by the Jade Emporer. This is the only way in which the kingdom can be freed from tyranny and Jason can be returned to the mystical land of Boston. There’s the set up and you can pretty much guess the execution.

The movie really is an exercise in plus and minuses. As many times as the film makes you go “oh, that was pretty cool” or “they totally just referenced ‘X’ kung fu movie”, The Forbidden Kingdom also leaves you saying “that was a little too simple” or “that’s really all that happens?”. As incredible as Woo-Ping Yuen’s choreography is, sometimes it gets completely undersold by the over reliance on wire effects. I am a big fan of a well choreographed fight scene. Some of those pre-wire kung fu films are the coolest displays of human athleticism in cineman this side of Buster Keaton. But I do have my limits with wire-fu and it does play a bit too cold or unrealistic when it doesn’t seem justified.

Which brings me to what you really want me to tell you about: Jack Chan and Jet Li in the same movie for the first time. It really is the absolute highlight of the film and director Rob Minkoff knows it. That first fight scene between the two of them is completely played for broke and I can only imagine the director of The Lion King, which made more money than god, finding himself with the two biggest living kung fu legends saying to himself “DO NOT FUCK THIS UP!”. And for the most part, he doesn’t. The fight scene is a lot of fun and if you’re a fan of the genre you will definitely giggle with geek delight at how cool it is to finally see these guys working together. Could I have used less wire work? Any day. But with the skill and experience that these two stars have, it really doesn’t come off as mechanical or unbelievable as it does in other parts of the film.

The only serious drawback that I experienced watching these two heavyweights in the film wasn’t ever when they were displaying their kung fu mastery… it’s when they were speaking English. I’m being serious. There are entire lines and conversations in the film where I have ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE what either Jackie Chan or Jet Li were saying. I can guess based on the contexts of the story but I found myself scratching my head more often than following the scene. Maybe they thought it was safe that a family audience would be comprised mostly of blabbering and mumbling children anyway and that these mini-people could easily translate the gibberish on screen but I found it to be pretty distracting.

Maybe it’s because I grew up on dubbed kung fu. I might elicit gasps in saying this… but I prefer dubbed kung fu. Actually, I prefer ANY foreign action film to be dubbed. Yeah. Yeah. You think it’s an insult to the way in which the story was intended or that many of the dubs are poorly translated. But I’ll tell you what. I’d rather spend my time watching the action on screen without distraction than having it compete with subtitles. Plus… it is funny when their mouths are still moving and nothing is coming out. Regardless, Mr. Li and Mr. Chan’s performances would have benefitted greatly from, at the very least, a little ADR to smooth the performances along.

 

This morning I was thrown into a bit of reflection when Harry Knowles over at AICN ran a story about the passing of Ollie Johston. As of my last checking, IMDB has yet to pick up on this news. Harry says that he has known about Ollie Johnston almost his entire life. And it’s not hard to believe. Ollie Johnston was one of the Nine Old Men who, with Walt Disney, animated the classic Disney films and cartoons that we all grew up with.

We have ALL known Ollie Johnston our entire lives. We just didn’t know him by name. You’ve seen his animated characters countless times and you’ve even seen his face. Ollie Johnston, along with his best friend Frank Thomas, cameod in both of Brad Bird’s movies The Iron Giant and The Incredibles. Bird credits the pair as both his friends and his teachers. I was sitting in a press screening for The Forbidden Kingdom (expect a review tomorrow) and I overhead a conversation in the row behind me in which a woman was going on and on about how perfect the Pixar films are. They are perfect because John Lassetter and Brad Bird and all of the animation directors at Pixar worshipped in the church of the Nine Old Men!

My story about Ollie Johnston and Frank Thomas is a bit different than Harry’s. During the summer of 2005 I was broke. Flat broke. In March, I had finished my work as a runner PA on the Kirstie Alley show Fat Actress and was looking for work. Up to this point, in two years in Hollywood, every job that I had was either as a runner or as a PA. Some of these stories are so rage-inducingly horrible that to share them with you now would be to invite the shattering of your own souls and your abandonment of cinema forever. Okay, it was bad and I was broke, but it wasn’t THAT bad. The consistency of my blood was mainly top ramen at that point.

Anyhow, in early May I received a phone call from an Austin friend who was leaving a job and wanted to know if I could take over. I didn’t care what it was. I had to take it. I asked what it entailed. “Being an office assistant.” For who? “A documentary filmmaker and his wife.” Oh man… I was getting further and further away from the box office Hollywood dreams with every word! What’s he done? “His name is Ted and he made a movie called Frank and Ollie. His dad animated the spaghetti scene in Lady and the Tramp.” Huh?!? What?!? My mind flashed back to being 8 and learning to read Spanish from a Donald Duck comic book on the steps of a pharmacy in Ajijic, Mexico while visiting my grandparents. My entire childhood was in worship of Mickey Mouse. Financial needs aside, I had to take this job!

Theodore and Kuniko lived 5 minutes away. Their office was local and they needed help with phones and transcriptions on some older projects plus a new documentary that they had in production. They were laid back and incredible to work with. I’ll tell you all about the new documentary as soon as Ted says it’s ready for festivals or exhibition but it is Disney history related. And for those few months that I worked for Theodore Thomas Productions, I felt as though I was showing up every morning to step into a time machine to my childhood.

For weeks I transcribed interviews that had been done with original Imagineers, animators, John Lassetter, Roy Disney, Brad Bird, you name it. This was footage that would end up mostly on the editing room floor in lieu of snippets and sound bites. But I got the lucky job of seeing and hearing how these people related to each other and worked with each other on a daily basis! After two years of seeing how I didn’t want Hollywood to work… I was finally seeing how Hollywood should! I was seeing how the magic that you and I joke about, actually was created by every day people doing their jobs!

Ted’s resemblance to his father Frank is incredible. Like Frank, Ted is a jazz musician. He sported a cool beatnick goatee and was excited about my beginning music video work. He and Kuniko acted like my biggest fans whenever I would show them my latest project or relay to them the latest news. Frank showed me photos of his dad and Ollie Johnston working alongside Walt Disney in the new Burbank offices after the company left the studio in Silver Lake. I watched interview footage of Ollie Johnston talking about how he got Walt into trains or the jokes they would tell or pranks they would pull.

In a few months, Hollywood suddenly became closer and working within it became more attainable. Watching films today or reading gossip rags or overhearing rumors you can quickly assume that the system does not work. You can become very cynical of anything and everything around you. Thousands and thousands of young filmmakers and aspiring creatives move out here every year but turn right back around when they are met with the intense negative climate associated with the industry. It’s a rat race with more rats than cheese.

But that summer with Ted and Kuniko taught me that you can’t focus on the rats. You have to focus on the mice. You have to celebrate the mice and you have to celebrate being a mouse. You have to do good and you have to do good work. You have to love to do it. Frank and Ollie loved what they did. I transcribed the love and saw photos of the love. We all sat in front of a television or in a theater as kids and RECEIVED that love through our eyes and ears. Frank and Ollie and the original Disney animators had talent in spades. But the inkwell that they dipped their talented pens into was the love for what they did. Magic was just the byproduct.

I love working. I loved working for Ted and Kuniko. I loved listening to the old stories and watching the footage of how the love of storytelling can overpower any myopic studio decision or cut-throat firing. Those months in the summer of 2005 recalibrated completely and refueled my creative engines. I haven’t looked back since. Hell! The main character in my project Singledom is a fledgling animator! I am SO thankful for this short period in my life!

The world of entertainment lost one of their biggest grandfathers in Ollie Johnston. But be thankful for all of the people that he has inspired in his time here. We will feel their magic but we may not yet know them all by name.

Frank and Ollie (Special Edition) and Walt – The Man Behind the Myth are both available for purchase or Netflixing. I highly recommend both of them for a better picture of Ollie Johnston, Frank Thomas and this incredible period in storytelling.


 

Some movies are crowd pleasers that make you laugh and cheer. Some movies are cute and cuddly and warm the cockles of your heart like hot cocoa. Some are well-crafted, exquisite works of art.

GAUNTLET movies are none of the above.

GAUNTLET movies are watched in bulk. TWO, THREE, even FOUR in a sitting. They are an endurance contest for only the strong of will and weak of taste. Lesser men have clawed out their eyes rather than finish, and then crawl away to die alone in shame. We call those people Cinema Studies majors. Even when they’re bad, we love them the way a pervert loves a vacuum cleaner.

BUT BE WARNED: only those with the most effulgently brassy of mighty brass testes (or ovaries, we’re not prejudiced here) can make it through a GAUNTLET. Those who do are a rare breed. We don’t just laugh at bad taste, we EMBRACE it. We don’t just appreciate schlock, we REVEL in it. And we don’t just watch these movies, we CONSUME them! And then we tell you about it because we wish to inflict our madness on others!

The GAUNTLET has been thrown down. But don’t just pick it up. Smell its fingers. Then put it on and pick your nose with it!

 

Back in the 80s, you could apparently sell a karate movie that didn’t come from Hong Kong, or Japan, or Thailand. Or star performers with acting skills as well as intensive martial arts training. You could cast anyone, and go to someplace equally exotic like the former Yugoslavia. Or South Africa. Or, er…Phoenix, Arizona. A good martial arts movie could come from any of these places.

In theory, anyway.

My friend Quinton and I did this gauntlet about six months ago. For the purposes of journalistic research I recently subjected myself to it again. When I told him of my plan and invited him to join me, Quinton suddenly remembered an appointment he had in Sri Lanka to have himself trepanned using a heavy rock and a wooden stake.

Title: Gymkata
Genre: Your average Olympic gymnast is recruited by the CIA to become a human weapon in order to preserve democracy.
Tag Line: The skill of gymnastics…the kill of karate!
Filmed In: The former Yugoslavia…and perhaps letting it film there was a more heinous crime than anything else Milosevic ever committed. Including the manufacture of the Yugo.
Year of Release: 1985
Cast: Kurt Thomas, Tectchie Agbayani, Richard Norton, Edward Bell
Director: Robert Clouse
Writer: Charles Robert Carner
Running Time: 90 minutes

 
Plot: Parmistan is a crappy little backwater country that has yet to appear in any Frommer’s guide. Mainly because any foreigner who enters is forced to play ‘The Game,’ which is kind of like a boot camp obstacle course, only with ninjas trying to kill you and a town full of mentally ill folk who have a lot of pointy objects. Unfortunately Parmistan is geographically located so it would be a great place to have a Star Wars defense installation. After his father is killed playing the game, Olympic gymnastics champion Jonathan Cabot goes in to win the game and convince the ruler, the Kahn (no relation to Shao Kahn) to let the defense department set up shop. Seems kind of selfish, since he could use his one request from winning the game to, I don’t know, let the people of Parmistan have things like cars, telephones, indoor plumbing or maybe modern dentistry. But hey, in ’85 we still had the cold war.

Breaking Point: About twenty minutes in. After she tied him up, strangled him and kicked him in the balls in their first training session, the Princess Ruballi of Parmistan seems to be Cabot’s kind of girl: mute AND paranoid. In order to seduce her, Jonathan performs both sides of their conversation. He says good morning, then does a neat back flip and answers as Ruballi in a girlish falsetto. I once seduced a girlfriend using this exact technique. Well, I used a sock puppet. OK, I seduced the sock puppet.

Similar Films: Mean Guns, The Warriors, Rat Race
Pain Equivalency: Being forced to wear Kurt Thomas’ jock strap like a surgical mask after he’s been doing floor exercises for 90 minutes.

Number of Asian Actors: 2
Review: After showing off his half-mullet haircut and gymanstical prowess in a nice slow-mo opening, Jonathan Cabot gets recruited to play the aforementioned game which resulted in his father getting killed. To prepare, he runs a lot of miles behind a guy on horseback, learns to walk up a flight of stairs on his hands (letting us get too many close looks at his package…fucking short shorts) and beaten up by a mute Thai girl.

Then Cabot and Princess Ruballi travel to Karabal, on the Caspian Sea. We know this because the title card tells us that they’re in Karabal, on the Caspian Sea. Their local contact is named the Stork and has cool hatchets and spring loaded knives for them to use, which are never seen after their Q division style introduction. While enjoying the Karabal nightlife, a guy in a turban spits in Jonathan’s face, and tells him ‘Yankee go home.’ Apparently Karabal has more Mets fans. Their CIA handlers get killed, Ruballi gets kidnapped, and Jonathan decides to rescue her by stealthily breaking into a mansion in a bright red sweater. He tries the front door, but finds it locked and gets chased away. After finding a convenient highbar (look closely and you can see the chalk on his hands) Jonathan kicks several of his pursuers in the chin and goes back and rescues Ruballi.

Then they sneak into Parmistan, where Cabot meets the Kahn, a sweet old guy in a big ass fur hat whose job consists of denying the 20th century’s existence and getting the crowds of citizens to yell ‘Yak Mallah!’ which is a phrase probably best left untranslated. He also meets the Kahn’s chief aide Zamir, who possesses bad ass feathered hair, a fearsome rat-tail braid, and big-ass pectorals that he displays proudly under his goat-fur vest. Hey, if my man boobs were that toned, supple and hairless I would too. Zamir has also been plotting to fix the games, so that he can take over the country and sell it out to the Commies. It goes to show you can’t trust a dude with a modern haircut in a back-assward country. Zamir also has it out for Jonathan because of the princess; Zamir’s supposed ot marry her for the good of the country or something, and after all, she’s the only chick with straight teeth in the whole place, probably because her mother was a Thai hooker they brought in for the Kahn. The last person worth mentioning is Thorg, a big slab of beef on two legs who looks like he could barely run, but is set to compete. Jonathan has some bizarre hero worship of the guy, but you know he’s a douche because he refuses to shake hands when Jonathan tries to kiss his ass.

So of course the game starts, and both Zamir and this Thorg douche are cheating like hell, trying to kill Jonathan. Tripping him up and kicking hi in the face right at the start? Check. Set fire to his climbing rope when he scales a cliff? Check. Cut his climbing rope above a deep gorge? Check. But Jonathan makes it through all this shit to the best set piece in the whole movie, the ‘Village of the Damned.’

While Parmistan may lag behind in every other field, they are progressive in the field of mental health. Rather than confine people or shock them with electricity (especially since the entire country doesn’t have so much as a flashlight battery) they let their mentally ill roam free in a walled city with access to all the pitchforks, sickles and machetes they could ever possibly want. And boy are they happy! They giggle, they chortle, they make random animal noises, they hack off their own limbs only when extremely upset, and there’s even one dude with an extra face on the back of his head for some reason. Not sure if it’s a mask or a deformity, but Jonathan kicks him in the head several times regardless. So when they all begin to realize that Jonathan could report them to the UN World Health Organization and get them all hooked on prozac, they collectively decide to skewer his mulleted ass. Unfortunately for them they short-sightedly put a pommel horse in their village square. Oh you silly crazy folk, your capriciousness is always your own undoing…putting that pommel horse there just results in a whole lot of you getting kicked in the face the next time a gymkata master comes through, didn’t you see that coming?

So after he escapes there’s a fairly lame 11th hour twist, Jonathan fights Zamir (here’s a hint to the outcome-when it’s feathered hair vs. mullet – ALWAYS bet on the mullet) and the world is safe for Reaganism until Red Dawn gets released. Oh and for some reason Ruballi runs in around in some lycra spandex.

Title: Kill And Kill Again
Genre: Your average martial arts champion/mercenary is hired by the government to prevent a madman from conquering the world.
Tag Line: He’s not one of the best, he is the best!
Filmed In: South Africa, apartheid still clearly VERY much in effect, see below
Year of Release: 1980
Cast: James Ryan, Anneline Kriel, Michael Mayer, Marloe Scott-Wilson, Bill Flynn, Ken Gampu
Director: Ivan Hall
Writer: John Crowther
Running Time: approx. 100 minutes…the DVD case has no time…it may feel like longer, though


Plot: While concocting a formula to make superfuel from potatoes, Dr. Horatio Kane stumbled on a mind control drug as a byproduct. So naturally an evil billionaire kidnaps the doctor, renames himself Marduk (pronounced like Marmaduke, just without the –ma- in the middle) and uses the drug to take over a small town as a precursor to world domination. Of course the government, rather than carpet bombing the place or sending in soldiers with lots of guns, instead recruits world champion martial artist Steve Chase to pull together his team of trusty yet unarmed mercenaries to liberate the town. Ok, Chase does have a pair of nunchucks, but he mostly uses them to show off how he can blow out candles.

Breaking Point: About 40 minutes in. Apparently in 1980 it was still acceptable to have an African character nicknamed Gorilla. Gorilla is the team strong man, banned from pro-wrestling because after every time he wins, he has to ‘…bite the other guy’s ear off. I just can’t help it!’ Apparently Mike Tyson saw this movie and took it to heart. Anyway, while the team is flying by jet, Gorilla experiences an urgent call of nature, but the lavatory is occupied. He hurriedly breaks down the door, forcibly removes the occupant and does his business. Steve Chase apologizes to the stewardess, saying, ‘Please excuse him ma’am. He’s never flown before.’ To that the stew replies, ‘I thought he’d never been let out of the zoo before.’ Steve answers, ‘Actually we bribed his keeper.’ Apartheid clearly was far from over when they produced this one. Later on one of Gorilla’s teammates calls him ‘Captain Midnight’ and complains he should be made to sit at the back of their wagoneer.

Similar Films: The Magnificent Seven, The A Team (ok, not a film)
Pain Equivalency: Like getting hit in the jaw with a two by four…then realizing the reason it’s stuck to your face is because it had nails in it.

Number of Asian Actors: 1

Review: The opening says it all about this movie. Lead James Ryan strikes poses in silhouette to imitation porno music in desperate attempt to remind the audience of the James Bond franchise.

In the opening scene, instead of receiving yet another trophy for his ability to backflip and face kick, we are introduced to our hero, Steve Chase as he defends the very blonde Candy Kane from a group of unidentified assailants, by deftly knocking them (and six attendees of the presentation) into the swimming pool. After foiling a bombing attempt in her hotel room (never trust the bellhop with sideburns, particularly if your room service was already delivered), Steve is recruited by Candy to rescue her ‘father’ (read: convenient excuse to have her tag along for eye candy) Dr. Horatio Kane from the evil Marduk and his insidious fake beard. Marduk is assisted by the obnoxious Minerva, a sultry lass with a penchant for bubblegum pink hair, lycra spandex and calling Marduk pet nicknames like ‘pumpkin pie,’ ‘chuckles,’ and ‘dimples.’ For a rich guy, Marduk acts an AWFUL lot like a commie pinko, right down to huge-ass pictures of his face on every building, which just makes clear how fake his beard really is. So maybe he isn’t such a good red-they all could grow their own facial hair.

You may think I’m making too much of how fake Marduk’s beard is. But if ever you see it for yourself you’ll probably spend an hour wondering just how long it took to glue together all the pubes required to make it.

Steve spends the next half hour recruiting his teammates. First there’s the Fly, who has some extra cool special skills, including lighting incense with his feet, short term levitation, climbing down sheer walls and being the whitest character alive to have dialogue that could be found in a fortune cookie. Observe his inscrutable bullshit for yourself:

‘Your outer eye sees clearly. Your inner eye is equally aware.’
‘For this mission feet alone are insufficient. The mind that leads the feet needs to be wise.’
‘House of merriment usually breeds trouble.’
‘Question: why are eagles wearing umbrellas?’
‘The animal trap lies quietly before it springs.’

Next is Gorilla, the most un-PC character ever concocted outside of Disney’s Song of the South. We first see Gorilla in a tug of war with an entire construction crew. When Steve knocks him into the mud, he remarks that ‘that color looks good on you.’ Before you can say Harriet Beecher Stowe, Gorilla has joined the mission. Next is Gypsy, a redneck living in a trailer park that would need a few grand in repairs to qualify as condemned. Even though Steve is going to pay him a small fortune for coming on the mission, Gypsy insists on fighting half the trailer park for his $5 security deposit before he leaves. Last is Hot Dog, a cigar smoking slob whose combat skills consist of throwing thumbtacks under peoples’ feet and a shitty Bogart impression. Before they recruit him, Hot Dog whiles away his days playing a bastardized form of Russian roulette where someone throws a gun on the ground to make it go off and see if anybody gets shot; the winner is the last one crazy enough to keep playing. And Hot Dog is supposed to be the clever/conniving one on the team.

The team then races to foil Marduk’s plot. Actually, the team wanders through the countryside in an SUV, with Steve Chase hitting on Candy at every opportunity. And Marduk, rather than say, buying a bunch of guns and shooting them all, sends his own martial artists out to fight them, even dropping in a squad of them by parachute. After unsuccessfully infiltrating the town, the gang is captured and made to fight in a one-on-one tournament, culminating in Steve Chase battling a big doof with a bad moustache named the Optimus. Sadly this Optimus can’t transform into a semi, and doesn’t come close to hitting like one. After winning his fight by performing a gratuitous number of backflips, Steve forces Marduk to free the town. Marduk then attempts to flee in the world’s smallest two-seater helicopter, but Gorilla holds it down bare-handed long enough for Marduk’s own men to blow it up (so hard to find good help that aren’t brainwashed). Steve then rushes to Dr. Kane’s lab to deflect the slowest bullet in the world and save his life from one of the guards. The gang then goes off into the sunset with Gorilla behind the wheel, and Hot Dog and his newly adopted parrot screaming in terror that Captain Midnight might kill them all with his primitive driving skills.


Title: Ninja III – Domination


Genre: Your average aerobics instructor/telephone linewoman is possessed by a ninja seeking to avenge his own death.
Tag Line: He’s the ultimate killer. She’s the perfect weapon.
Filmed In: Phoenix, Arizona
Year of Release: 1985
Cast: Sho Kosugi, Lucinda Dickey, Jordan Bennett, David Chung, James Hong
Director: Sam Firstenberg
Writer: James R. Silke
Running Time: 92 minutes


Plot: Shooting a ninja 50 times isn’t enough to kill him, at least not permanently. When Phoenix’s finest try to apprehend a ninja, they make that mistake, one pissed off ninja takes over the body of one hot-assed aerobics instructor to exact his revenge. A good ninja tries to save her and put the evil ninja to rest for good.

Breaking Point: About 40 minutes in, during the most baffling seduction scene EVER-worse than the above mentioned Gymkata scene, even! After repeatedly rejecting the advances of hunky Travolta-esque Phoenix P.D. Officer Secord, feisty 80s gal Christie randomly decides to invite him over to her apartment for some V8 juice. Apparently she’s a health nut. Anyway, after coming out of the shower nearly naked, she lays back on the couch, and dribbles V8 juice down her neck and chest for him to lick off. It’s about as erotic as Rosie O’Donnell in Exit to Eden.

Similar Films: The Exorcist, The Manchurian Candidate, Flashdance

Pain Equivalency: Being forced to fellate a revving chainsaw.

Number of Asian Actors: 15 or so…including superninja Sho Kosugi and Lo Pan himself, James Hong!

Review: First of all, this one doesn’t exist on DVD, so I get to see it in the full glory of VHS. No widescreen here, baby!

First off, some fun facts about Ninjas I learned from this film:

1) Ninjas, good or evil, ALWAYS wear eyeliner. No exceptions. Even when they’re possessing another person, that person will suddenly be wearing eyeliner. If they have only one eye, that eye will have eyeliner. The socket under the patch? Probably has eyeliner.
2) When they want to show how badass they are, ninjas will crush balls. Doesn’t matter what kind, whatever’s handy. Golf balls, billiard balls, scrotal balls-and they will typically look you in the eye and growl at you when they do. The most likely reason is to get you to mess your pants, making it harder for you to run.
3) A golf cart is NOT a reliable conveyance to use when fleeing a ninja. And a police bike or police cruiser isn’t a reliable vehicle with which to catch one.
4) Bad moustache = bad ninja Eyepatch = good ninja
5) A ninja will possess a hidden lair in a cave where they store all their implements of death. Said cave will be out in the boonies not convenient to any public transportation.
6) When possessing a woman’s body, a ninja is not above acting like a big hobag in order to get close to a target.
7) Only a ninja can kill a ninja. So kiss your ass goodbye if you’re white.

The opening of this movie is priceless. Our evil ninja, complete with grey pajamas and enough pointy bits of metal to kill the cast of The Last Samurai, assassinates a VIP on a golf course. This sequence has it all.. Ninja demonstrating superhuman strength, speed and stamina? Check. Swordplay? Check. Blocking a gun barrel? Check. Blowgun? Check. Flash powder? Check. Climbing trees? Check. Shurikens going into gun hands? Check. Shurikens going into faces? Check. Shurikens going into faces thrown using the ninja’s foot? To bring down a police helicopter after he jumped into it from a tree top? BIG CHECK, MOTHERFUCKER!

Unfortunately, when you kill a white guy on a golf course in Phoenix, the cops drop their donuts and come running from miles around. Now, a few bullets only piss off this ninja. But 50 or so and he’s hurting. So when he finds a telephone repair girl in the middle of the desert, he gives her his sword before he croaks-which of course means she’s going to be an unwitting tool in his revenge on the cops who shot him.

So our heroine is a typical 80s girl. Which means she works out constantly, has big hair, never wears a bra and dances around her apartment half naked, pretending to be Jennifer Beals. She resists the sexual attentions of the cop who talks to her after her ninja encounter, but his wily charm and extremely hairy back win her over. But not even his wooly shoulders can protect her from the spirit of a pissed off ninja and the wrath of a special effects department armed with lasers, smoke machines, wind machines, and enough monofilament to dangle a sword in front of her. And whenever she sees her new boyfriends’ co-workers, the ninja spirit will take her over. We know this because the lighting changes, a fan blows her hair back and the camera zooms in on her eyes looking all enraged. Then faster than you can say ‘Niagara Falls,’ she drives out to the cave containing his arsenal, which she then uses to go apeshit on the cops that brought him down. Wash, rinse, repeat.

Cop boyfriend is full of good ideas on how to help her, including taking her to see James Hong, who ‘all the Asians in this town swear by.’ But not even Lo Pan can exorcise the ninja, even with his mystic gangja smoke, colored lights and assorted bondage gear. The ninja then goes seriously Linda Blair, only without the head spinning or being even remotely scary.

Nope, only Sho Kosugi (who apparently was a real ninja, or something) is badass enough to tame this evil spirit. So he comes to town, draws the ninja out, fights her, then gets the ninja back into his own body and fights him there. Which is good, because hairy cops usually don’t tap an aerobics instructor’s ass all that often, even in an era when men weren’t obligated to shave that shit off like girls or swim team members.

Let’s face it. People like us don’t have many places we can go. I know I don’t. And I never really have.

Take a look at me. Age 11. Yup. Big Pimpin’. That’s what I look like when I’m up to my ears in all of the granny pinches and “you’re so cute” comments I can take over a holiday at Grandma’s. But I wasn’t cute. I was a geek. I’m standing in the back row to hide my painted wolf Christmas sweater behind a relative’s beehive. I’ve got glasses that could scorch bugs under the proper sunlight. My mullet is a mix of Lou Diamond Philips’ in Young Guns and a rat’s greasy tail and if I was smiling in this photo you’d see a metal picket fence worth of braces stretched across my forced smile (which is why I NEVER smiled).

I know I’m not much better looking now… if at all. But you have to admit the physical changes are there. The internal ones? Not so much. The face you see in this photo is of a kid that couldn’t wait to take Holiday pictures so he could slink off to the guest bedroom to finish reading a copy of Avengers Annual #17. I HAD to see if the High Evolutionary actually succeeded in setting off his mutation bomb on the living island of Krakatoa (he didn’t)!

Today I experience a similar problem. I’ll find myself at a social event (why do I even leave the house, right?) and within the first five minutes of a conversation with a newfound stranger will hear myself contributing to it in one of the following ways:

a) “Yeah, it’s like that one movie…”

b) “Did you ever play that old game…”

c) “What’s more magical? The magestic Pegasus or the mystical Unicorn?”

And that’s all I’ll have to say! I know! What is wrong with me!?! Well, what is RIGHT with me is a shorter list…

Almost without fail, I fail.

It’s okay. The outside world isn’t always for people like you and me. And it’s not because it’s a bad place. It’s not because it doesn’t understand us. It’s not because it thinks that we’re weird.

It’s us! The problem is us! It’s always been us!

From an early age, we discovered that these stories and games and worlds of escapism were so cool and so great and so stimulating that the REAL world never stood a chance! At every chance we sidestepped our responsibilities as members of society to partake in worlds of adventure and feats of heroism beyond compare!

And this is where we find ourselves today… standing with a blank look on our faces in the middle of a cocktail party with nothing to add to a conversation about subprime mortgages than “It was a trick question… the Griffin is actually more magical than both the Unicorn AND the Pegasus because the Griffin is THREE animals in ONE! And the female ones have titties! Yeah! Titties!”

So now that we’re all socially retarded (and if you’re getting defensive reading that… you’re insecure enough to be pretty socially retarded) what do we do? Where do we go? Who do we talk to?

I would say it. But it’s obvious. And if it’s not, we are all here for you regardless.

Welcome to the new Geekscape website. I’d love to outline all of the features of the site but I think it’d be more fun for you all to click around and discover them for yourself. I have a lot of far reaching plans and ideas for Geekscape (the show, the site, the theme park) but this website is the starting point. Our little flag in the ground. If I was a serpent-themed leader of an international terror group made up from the DNA of the greatest war leaders of days gone past, this would be our terrordrome! Cobra-lalalalalalala-

BUT I’M NOT! So let’s just get to it…

This website would not be here if not for the help, advice and contributions of the following people:

Jarrett Gossett – Jarrett coded this site based on a pretty crappy Word document I had written up back during the Geekdrome days based on what my perfect Geekdrome website would be. We now have something better! A Geekscape site! Jarrett has taken the little ideas I wrote down and run with them. This site is full of ideas and opinions that Jarrett put in after a lot of time (as you all know!) and care. We could have slapped together another quick fix site just to get something here but Jarrett and I decided on making sure that all of the features should be present and functional from the beginning, if only in an initial state. We got it down. We’re putting it up. And we’ll grow from here. For the past month he’s been sending me IMs and e-mails stating “I already have some cool ideas for the next phase of the website… let me bounce them off of you real quick.” Yeah. The guy gets ahead of himself. But now that we’re launched… let’s hear those ideas, buddy! His enthusiam is contagious and his patience with my tech-retarded questions is massive. If something breaks… let him know. It’s my fault but I have no idea how to fix it…

Georg Kallert – My old friend, producer and business partner. Georg’s first impression of me came while watching our college
television network. El Phantasmo Blanco had just made a crash introduction on the closed circuit TV network and was in the middle of hitting The Golden Comet across the head with a phone book. Whoever this masked moron was, Georg knew he wanted to work with him. My first impression of Georg was probably “you thought that was funny? Cool! I have this script…” Now I owe Georg money, patience and friendship until the end of time. Yeah. Bum deal on his end! I made out like a masked bandit on the other hand… Can’t say he didn’t know what he was getting into from the very start!

Brian Gilmore – Yeah. He makes me crazy. He makes you crazy. He doesn’t know this (but by now he should at least be getting the sense that) every time I see the guy, about 10 seconds before I see him, I’m still deciding on whether to hug the guy or push him into oncoming traffic. Regardless of how the coin lands (he’s had an incredible run of good luck so far), Gilmore put a lot of work into this site. You won’t be shocked to know that he had plenty of opinions about its inception but he also put in a lot of hours and nights in the content of the features site. From the start, Brian volunteered to make sure that the content on the site was up to par with our peers and that the writing was fun and in on time. He’s also been a good guy to bounce ideas off of and for midnight pep talks when I “just want to walk away from the whole thing and move to Montana”. Now I think that he has so much invested in seeing Geekscape continue out of fear that he’ll have nothing else to do if it disappears! Regardless, he’s here and his contributions have been substantial.

Martin Scherer – It’s true. Canadians are the nicest people in the world. Martin and I met in Toronto last year and we shared a bed together in a hotel room for one night (but it’s cool… I bought him breakfast the next day which is more than I got Gilmore at Comic Con ’07 and we spent FOUR nights sharing a bed). Martin is always quick to help us out with a technical, server or community problem and his advice is without fail. The one draw back may be one of his greatest strengths. He’s in Canada. If he moved to the States would he still be this nice to us? Martin is our resident work horse and without him we’d just be a bunch of studs eyeing each other with no real example to lead us. I work hard because Martin works harder. Read this paragraph again quickly and you’ll read: “Martin and I met in Toronto… shared a bed… bought him breakfast… quick… back… strength… studs… hard… harder…” Yeah. Total man crush. Guilty as charged.

Jeff “Thundercat” Wilkerson – This polarizing listener and forum member is the reason we have all these snazzy banners at the top of our articles. The man is a graphics wizard and his proficiency with Photoshop is only second to his biting (but incredibly hilarious) comments on the forums. The man is a master of observing, deconstucting and then making the subject wish they’d never been born. And those banners look f’ing awesome.

Matt Kelly – Matt IMs me on average every 20 minutes. Keep in mind that I am pretty strict about getting 7-8 hours of sleep every night. So I think that moves the average time of his IMs to every 7 minutes during the waking hours. Most people would be annoyed by this behavior. I see it as invigorating. Either Pennsylvania is REALLY that boring or the guy is EXTREMELY excited about writing and contributing to the Geekscape website! You’ll read more from Matt… especially if he starts posting his relentless IM conversations.

Noel Nocciolo – This girl is as proficient as she is lovely. Noel is our resident music writer and her articles are to be trusted. I’ve never been steered wrong or dissapointed in a recommendation from Noel and my parents adore her. Not in a “we want Jonathan to marry Noel” sort of way either. They like her too much. So it’s more of a “we want to build a time machine, go back to his infancy and replace Jonathan with Noel” sort of thing. She definitely would have done better in sports than I did.

Jim Pelligrinelli – Jim’s a buddy from film school and the one man who I trust the most when it comes to running a gauntlet. If The Gauntlet was The Bermuda Triangle or The Amazon, Jim’s the guy I would hire to take me in… because I know at least some of us would make it back. Almost from the moment Jim said “wait… you’re telling me you’ve never seen Deep Rising with Treat Williams?” it’s been a match made in the deepest, darkest depths of cinematic hell.

And of course I have to thank you guys. As much as we collectively shun society in lieu of movies, comics, videogames and anything else we choose to geek out on… it’s not much fun doing it alone or to four blank walls. Some of you have been here from the start and the rest of you are here to keep things getting started. Thanks for giving me an outlet and a mission.