‘The VelociPastor filmmaker Brendan Steere returns to Geekscape for a full episode of filmmaking talk! We talk about making the film on such a tiny budget, the challenges of hiring the right people and how making The VelociPastor compares to making Predator (which you should never see for the first time on a plane)! Along the way we talk about Brendan’s film school thesis, getting away with making a feature film for almost nothing and whether or not he’d like to make more VelociPastor films! I take the opportunity to pitch Brendan on a VelopiPastor spin off film and we start plotting the insane idea together! Plus! I tell you guys about a time I got bullied in middle school for being a geek! Enjoy!

Subscribe to Geekscape on iTunes!

Follow Jonathan on Twitter and Instagram!

Join the Geekscape Forever Facebook Group!

Visit Geekscape.net for more Geekscape goodness!

Opening this weekend is Ridley Scott’s  sci-fi horror thriller “Alien: Covenant” from 20th Century Fox. This ones takes place ten years after “Prometheus” and deftly answers many of the questions that left “Alien” fans somewhat disenchanted.

The command crew aboard a colonization ship is suddenly awakened from hyper sleep after their ship carrying 3,000 passengers and 10,000 fertilized embryos suffers a malfunction. In the midst of making repairs a discovery is made. A planet that may be the perfect place to settle is just a mere two weeks away versus their planned destination being another four years journey.

There’s a saying… when it’s too good to be true, it probably is. Which would you pick?

In perfect “Alien” form, “Covenant” revisits a similar plot structure that is evident throughout the franchise. This one keeps those same beats; the initial hope of finding a new planet, that first attack and death, a turn coat, the imminent death of everyone who doesn’t escape back to the ship, and of course the traditional ending where you think it’s over, but it’s not. Those familiar beats made the first one work, and even though familiar they still make “Covenant” a very worthy sequel.

What sets this one apart is that it begins with a flash back. It’s Peter Weyland (Guy Pierce reprising his role) at the “birth” of his creation, David (Michael Fassbender). It becomes apparent that David’s idea of perfection and creation will exceed Weyland’s idea of godhood. This is later realized in brilliant fashion as David does some pretty twisted experiments in search of his own godhood.

When all hell starts to bust loose and the horror truly begins.

Another twist to this story is the dual role that Fassbender plays as not only the aforementioned “David” but also a less emotional “Walter” who is accompanying the colonization ship in a similar role as David in “Prometheus.” Fassbender a true talent, is able to instill a new persona in “Walter” and realize his “David” as two completely different synthetic humans but still similar. I never once felt like his performance was in any way overly contrived.

In an early scene where both David and Walter appear on the screen together, the special effects are so well executed you can’t tell that there’s digital compositing going on. The scene takes place in a wheat field during an attack and “Walter” protects a crew member from a Xenomorph and David shows up just when it looks like everyone is about to die, saving the day.

Another mesmerizing scene is when David teaches Walter how to play a flute, and then sort of seduces him. The reality of Fassbender seducing himself on camera is quite the visual treat and added a bit of light heartedness to the horror film.

As is a common theme of most horror films, the characters invariably start making bad decisions that cascade into catastrophe. The Xenomorphs are relentless and hungry, and they come in several varieties including one that looks vaguely human.

In true “Alien” fashion the only one who seems to be making good decisions and has a bit of luck is Daniels (Katherine Waterstone), a lady who has the resolve to run the right way and when invariably cornered has the wherewithal to trap the Xenomorph inside a flying tractor-like vehicle and then eject that out of the space craft (yes, just like Ripley without the cool “get away from her you bitch!” line.)

“Alien: Covenant” is the culmination of Ridley Scott’s movie making career. You can see bits and pieces of characters and styles from many of the films he’s famous for, even “Blade Runner.” This film works on many levels as a horror film first and foremost. Earlier this year Scott made an appearance at SXSW and said his goal was “to scare the shit out of you” with this film. On that front, he succeeds as well as the existential experience he creates with his story that speaks to God, creation, genocide, and even rebirth.  Every frame of this picture can be seen as a symbol. As for what those symbols mean, begs for repeated viewings to take it all in.

5 out of 5

In the mood for something strange and different? Polish film maker Agnieszka Smoczynska’s “The Lure” played at Sundance last week to a mixed  (but mostly positive) crowd.

The story is definitely a doozie. Two young mermaids decide to take a land vacation and end up in Warsaw, Poland where they join a night club band as singers. It’s set in the 80’s so the costumes, music, and set stylings reflect that era.

Golden and Silver are looking for fun and when one of them finds love for a human and the other  for human flesh, two worlds collide. Even a visit from Triton (as a heavy metal reveler) warning them of the consequences of their folly isn’t enough to put the brakes on these two mermaids.

There are a few challenges in watching the film. First off, it’s a musical and the Polish to English translation of the lyrics doesn’t always seem to make lyrical sense, so there’s that. There’s also some confusion going on for me as to the character motivations. I’m not sure if it was the language barrier, scenes being deleted for this cut, or not fully flushed out characters – but there were numerous times where dream sequences, cut scenes, and side stories did more to confuse than move the story forward. That uneven flow made the film less enjoyable despite some wonderful performances from the cast.

“The Lure” has a certain attraction. As a first time director, Smoczynska does a intriguing job with essentially a unique story, set in a place not often seen in modern movies, and using music as a medium to tell the tale, it certainly falls into the spectrum of weird but good.

However, due to poorly executed character development (and translation issues) the film barely rises to above average. The film screens great as a Midnighter and will certainly find its audience.

2.5 out of 5

https://youtu.be/vxhi_3hDUPE

M. Night Shyamalan returns to form with his engaging potboiler “Split” opening this weekend wide from Universal Pictures.

A man named Kevin (James McAvoy / X-Men) kidnaps three young ladies who come to discover that their captor has 23 distinct personalities.

<Spoiler Free>

You’ve seen enough Shyamalan films over the years to know that his style is all about stories where you don’t know what’s going to happen next, and then when it happens, it’s not at all what you’d expect. That twist has become his signature move, and how well he takes us on the journey to that twist, is the defining aspect of his film being a hit or miss. “Split” easily classifies itself as one of his films that works and is true-to-form to what first put Shyamalan on the cinematic map. “Split” is definitely on the same page as his breakthrough film “The Sixth Sense” and later “Unbreakable,” but where those two films are quiet and somber this one is more visceral in scope.

“Split” is best enjoyed knowing little going in, so with respect to that I touch on only the most broad strokes of the film.

Easily the biggest factor to what makes the whole movie come alive is McAvoy’s performance. Not unlike Joanne Woodward who starred in “The Three Faces of Eve” back in 1957 who took home an Oscar for her role depicting three personalities, McAvoy takes it beyond the next level. His character is comprised of 23 personalities, of which 6 are featured in the film. With minor wardrobe changes, McAvoy convincingly portrays each character with different speech patterns, walks/shuffles, and idiosyncrasies that convey an impressive array of skill as an actor. Even so, Oscar rarely pays attention to films of this nature but in the genre of sci-fi thrillers, McAvoy kills it!

Running in hand with him is another striking performance from emerging talent Anya Taylor (The Witch) as the lead of the three who are kidnapped. She gave an enthralling performance in “The Witch” and takes some of that raw inner energy she brought to that role, and instills it in her character “Casey.”

Shyamalan pays attention to details in character development giving back-story as to why “Casey” is reacting the way she does. Doing so gives her character depth and gravitas so that the character feels real and reacts in ways that make sense avoiding mismatched character motivations so evident in films of this nature.

While “Split” isn’t quite on par with ‘The Sixth Sense” it far exceeds many of Shyamalans films in recent past. However it isn’t anything new and ground breaking, rather it’s just more of the same. “More of the same” meaning, his stories are generally about a situation that may or may not be supernatural but in the end probably is, and has twists, and probably another twist. That sums up all his films that come to mind. Shyamalan’s “Split” is ranked as one of the better incarnations of his repertoire as his characters are flushed out and equally well acted. The delivery of information is well-paced and the style is engaging mostly from start to finish.  However because he didn’t break any new ground, despite the spectacular acting from McAvoy, the film scores just above average.

4 out of 5

 

After my write up on Dirty Work Jonathan has asked me to do a more detailed Guilty Pleasures. So unlike previous guilty pleasures I’ll be discussing content of the movies, so I guess that means spoilers. Be warned!

 


Don’t be fooled by the cover. Luke Skywalker in tact does not play the Guyver

 

THE GUYVER

 

When I was a child I used to watch A LOT of cable television. I don’t know if that’s considered good parenting or brilliant parenting but it meant I saw a lot of weird shit (in my blog I even discussed the time that I accidentally watched Re-Animator and had many a sleepless night). On one particular moment of unsupervised television viewing I saw two monsters boxing and one crushed the other’s head and I was freaked out and turned off the TV.

 

Later, as if by some type of twisted torture (or a moment of divine intervention) that weekend, I stayed at my friend’s house and he had rented a movie called The Guyver. The film began with a long text scroll and voice over. This is always a good sign. I mean, Star Wars had text scrolls and that movie was good. In reality though, this means that the film is too complicated for someone to understand it ‘off the street’. The Guyver was no exception. The text explains how Aliens created humans (the scientologists were right) but gave some humans the ability to transform into super monsters. However to even the playing field the aliens created a device called “The Unit” which gives no advantage to this super monsters but can turn the average human into THE GUYVER (hey that’s the name of the movie).

 

Immediately after the text scroll, it shows an Asian scientist running from Jimmie Walker, a fat Russian dude and Michael Berryman. I remember in my brain thinking ‘oh shit, this seems familiar’. Then the Asian and Michael Berryman transformed into Monsters and started boxing ‘oh no, this is the scene I saw earlier this week! I can’t act scared in front of my friend.’ Luckily the scene was nothing in reality and I was able to enjoy the film.

 

It turned out that that the Asian scientist was supposed to meet up with a detective (overacted by Mark Hamill). He witness the murder from afar (thus he didn’t see the monsters) and informs his daughter about it. Her boyfriend Sean Baker follows them (thinking that something is going on between them) and stumbles onto the unit and through a humorous mishap of falling into The Unit turns into the Guyver.

 

Meanwhile Detective Skywalker and Asian girlfriend are kidnapped. Sean goes through a 30 minute or so battle only to lose and die (or so we think). The evil head of the monsters is giving Asian daughter a tour of the labs where they meet Dr. East (played by Jeffery Combs; apparently cast in the role because in Re-Animator he plays Dr. West). Despite Sean dying, the Guyver tries to clone itself and brings Sean back from the dead. Why? Because in cinema the laws of logic take a backseat to the laws of convenience. Sean saves the day and walks off into the sunset.

 

The Guyver was a direct to video release by a first time director. This basically means it’s already set to fail from the start. Add in the fact that it’s also based on a beloved manga and there wasn’t much of a chance for this movie to begin with. However, it became one of my favorite movies at the time and I’d constantly show it to people (almost all of them hating it).

 

I can understand why people would hate this movie. For starters, Mark Hamill over acts like there’s no tomorrow. His character is like Sam Spade without the charm, wit or likability.

 

Beyond that there’s a massive amount of monster characters in this film, most of which are there as comedic relief. They’re so overly animated though that all the humor (for the most part) falls flat (although I thought it was hilarious as a kid). They actors walk around throwing random shit across rooms and it feels like your watching a Ghoulies movie with actors playing the titular characters instead of puppets. The only one who brings in a slightly enjoyable performance is Jimmie Walker. Most of the humor of his character though is driven on the fact that he’s a walking ball of rapping and jive talking stereotypes.

 

 

The fight sequence in the middle is so extended and hard to follow that there’s a clearly ADR-ed line of dialogue in which a character says ‘Oh Good, The Whole Team is Here Now’. This dialogue exists strictly because it’s hard to keep track of exactly HOW many monsters there are and this is truly a shame because the best element of this movie (and the reason I still love it) is Screaming Mad George’s creatures.

 

Screaming Mad George might be ass at directing, but he’s an incredible effects man. Before directing this he did the creature effects for Arena, Predator and Nightmare on Elm Street 4: Dream Master. In the latter, he did the infamous cockroach death scene considered by many fans to be the best death in Freddy history. His quality in effects continue in the Guyver which legitimately contains some impressive transformation sequences.

 

The original intention of this film was to be a modern American Tokusatsu film. In that, it’s more successful in it’s goal than say 1998’s Godzilla remake. For those of you who don’t know, Tokusatsu is an Asian film genre in which people in rubber monster costumes fight. It has even inspired a wrestling federation (Kaiju Big Battel). However, Screaming Mad George’s mistake is going too far in the real of Monsters. He’s trying to make Destroy All Monsters but instead he should have aimed for Godzilla Vs. King Kong. What made Destroy All Monsters work is that over the years we had gotten used to these various monsters and cared about some of them (mainly Gojira). In the Guyver, we have so many different monsters and our hero that we barely have time to get to like them (even the villains, we hardly get to enjoy the creature design).

 

The Guyver was followed by a sequel Guyver: Dark Hero which was much more well received and while I enjoy it, it will never hold the space place in my hear that the original head-squishing Guyver has.

 

 

When he’s not watching poor Americanized adaptations of classic Japanese manga Matt Kelly is found tweeting, writing in his blog Pure Mattitude and hosting his podcast The Saint Mort Show.