Jem and the Holograms was always a special case when it came to children’s programming.

Much like the recent success of My Little Pony, Jem and the Holograms premiered on October 26th 1985 with the intention to be just another tie in cartoon aimed at young girls through Hasbro’s eyes. However, the team behind the show decided to treat the show with as much respect as they would with any regular TV show. Some of its appeal came from the fact that it was an animated soap opera that both boys & girls of all ages can enjoy.  You’d think that with Hollywood’s recent obsession to make crazy experimental movies off of 80’s-90’s properties with big budgets that surely Jem would fit in perfectly.

Enter 2015’s Jem and the Holograms, a film supposedly “based” off of said beloved franchise. Directed and produced by the same people who made 2 documentaries centering on Justin Bieber and the production house that made Paranormal Activity, surely this could only end well right? Sadly, what follows is an under budgeted, cheaply made, clichéd rags to riches story that feels more like an after school special and barley even resembles its source material. Where do I begin?Jem 1

Let’s start with story.  Here’s the synopsis of the animated series lifted directly from the season 1 DVD:

Upon the death of her father, Jerrica Benton inherits Starlight Music and finds herself the new co-owner executive alongside the greedy, power-hungry Eric Raymond. Eric is on a mission to seize complete control of Starlight Music, as well as, use it to launch to stardom his latest discovery — rockin’ rebel girl band The Misfits.

With the help of Synergy, a computer holographic machine created by her father, and a pair of special jemstar earrings, Jerrica is able to transform into the megapop sensation named Jem! With her sister, Kimber, and their band, The Holograms, Jem undertakes a battle-of-the-bands competition against Eric and The Misfits for control of Starlight Music. Can Jerrica keep her superstar identity a secret? Will The Misfits rock the charts? Will Synergy fall into the hands of evil? Watch and find out!

Jem 2

Sounds pretty cool huh? Well forget about all that because nothing mentioned above is carried to the film. Instead, we get a story about 18/19 year old Jerrica Benton who’s insecure about her singing. One night she throws on a pink wig and some make-up to record her singing under the mysterious name Jem. The next day Jerrica wakes up to find out that her sister Kimber uploaded the video to YouTube, and now Jem has become instantly internet famous to a point where she is offered a recording contract for only having 30,000 views on her video. This quickly turns her whole life upside down and now she has to struggle between her 2 identities to find out who she really is.

As you can tell, the plot follows the generic, paint by numbers story of some regular Joe Shmoe that’s all of a sudden thrust into popularity. It also doesn’t help that just like Jerrica; this movie suffers heavily from an identity crisis. At one point it wants to be a modern teen drama movie, other times it’s trying to force in un-necessary subplots that add virtually nothing to the film. Some subplots include going on a tedious treasure hunt trying to find the missing pieces of their robot Synergy so they can recover a hidden surprise that Jerrica’s father was trying to hide. The other includes a very tiresome and cliché story of Jerrica, the evil corporate band manager, trying to force Jem into signing a solo contract.
Jem 4

The only problem is that the movie is so confused on what it wants to be that nothing comes together in the end, and as a result, the movie just ends up being a giant mess.  It also doesn’t help that the characters are more bland and dry than a loaf of white bread sitting out in the sun. I’ll give them credit that the cast at least tries to make their roles convincing, it’s just too bad that they have to suffer due to the clunky script or awful mis-casting. Such mis-casting is 28 year old Ryan Guzman as Rio who in the movie is trying to pass himself off as an 18 year old college intern/son of Erica Raymond. It’s so laughably bad the dialogue he’s given that it’s impossible to take him seriously every time he’s on screen.
Jem 3

Another major problem with the movie is the music. In the show, there were usually 2-3 songs per episode that lasted about 45 seconds to a minute, making for some quick, but catchy songs. The movie however, tries in some areas, but sadly ends up botching them. Besides sounding like the most generic and manufactured pop songs, are too long and very forgettable.

This is another area where the movie really fails hard since you need good music in a movie adaptation that’s all about music. The worst thing about the audio is that they don’t even use their own background music. During what’s supposed to be a tense or emotional scene the background music chosen will start playing. The problem with this however, is that these BGM’S are taken from random people on YouTube playing their own music and for some reason the film seems to think randomly cutting in grainy low quality footage of said music videos would be a good idea (it isn’t.)Jem 5

Thought you heard the worst? Well I’m sorry to say, but the worst is yet to come.  When it comes to scene changes and transitions they will more often than not resort to using Google Earth. I know this film was made on a small budget of $5 million, but do they really have to be that lazy. I counted at least 6-7 times where they used this lazy excuse of transition (you can still see the Google Earth logo lazily cropped in the lower right hand corner of the screen.)

Finally, the worst part of this film is it’s mis-treatment of fans and lazy excuse of “cameos.” Throughout her rise to fame, the movie will start random cutting to cameos talking about Jem. These include Chris Pratt, Jimmy Fallon, and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. The only problem? It’s all archival footage. The Pratt interview was taken from a Lego Movie Interview with USA Today in which he talks about growing up with the Jem dolls and pretending to date them. The Fallon interview comes from an old episode where he and a guest reminisce about the 80’s cartoon. The 3rd and most offensive is The Rock’s cameo which was just a very low quality video that was actually about him praising Taylor Swift’s song Bad Blood.

Jem 6

At the end of the day though, the fans themselves were treated the worst. When the film was originally announced, they made it a point to tell the online world that they were doing open casting for the film and that you had a chance to land a starring role in the film if you expressed how much you love Jem to them. What ended up happening was that they ended up using that footage randomly throughout the movie to show her rise in internet popularity.  The absolute biggest insult to this is that throughout all the videos you’re constantly seeing the 80’s logo and show in the background and right in front of the camera.  This alone was enough to pull me out of the movie and feel sorry for all the fans that got gipped of a proper appearance as initially advertised.

The only good thing about this movie was the end credits scene. That one scene was the only time the movie actually felt like it was actually putting in effort to be a real Jem movie. The only problem? The film ends after that.

Hint Hint.
Hint Hint.

So, after all of this should you still go see Jem and the Holograms? Yes. This is one of those rare movies that comes along every couple of years or so that completely fails in what it’s trying to do and is so horrendously bad that you have to watch it to believe it. If somehow there’s a theater near you showing this film, you should either try sneaking into it, or just going to another movie and then catching the end credits scene at least. If you want to see a more faithful adaption movie, go see The Peanuts Movie.

FINAL RATING: 0.5/5 WATCH IT! (or just watch the after credits scene)

So, with us getting reboots to a number of franchises I decided to look at five properties that could really use a reboot (as well as the status of each property). Alright, lets start it off!

5. Fantastic Four (2005)

That trailer started off so good looking. And then we hit the 30 second mark and it is all downhill from there. This movie could have been great but turned into a giant joke. I don’t blame the actors because they tried their best and weren’t horrible (with Chris Evans being the best of the bunch playing a great Johnny Storm) It was just the cheesiness of this movie and the constant bad humor that really ruined it. Well…that and just not being interesting at all. A pretty “meh” movie that led up and impressive fight against a far from intimidating Dr. Doom led fans to toss this on their “worst” lists. But worry not true believers…a reboot is already in the works (after Fox apparently learned how to do a comic movie right from ‘X:Men First Class’ ) with ‘Chronicle’ director Josh Tranks name (yes please) linked to it.

4. Spawn (1997)

Let me start off by saying by no means do I consider ‘Spawn’ one of the worst comic movies. Quite the contrary! For its time it was pretty damn good. It had a cast that pulled off their roles well and a sweet soundtrack. People criticized it for being “overwhelmingly brutal, dark and cynical.” Aka what we love to see these days. So, if it wasn’t a bad movie then why is it on the list? Because of the advancements in movie making technology in the past 15 years since its release. Just imagine how much cooler a ‘Spawn’ movie would be coming out nowadays? And they could definitely go darker like the comics versus the “lightened dark” that the ’97 movie did. Now while McFarlane has been talking about making a new movie for awhile…McFarlane has been talking about making a new movie for AWHILE. We will see if it ever actually gets into production.

Side note: you could bring Michael Jai White back to reprise the role and i’d be okay with that.

3. Witchblade (2000)

Man…was this bad. I watched this and walked out of the room half way through. So, i’m thinking some of you may not be familiar with the Image title that this is based on so let me give you some info on it.

The series follows Sara Pezzini, a tough-as-nails NYPD homicide detective who comes into possession of the Witchblade, a supernatural, sentient artifact with immense destructive and protective powers. The weapon has bonded with various other women throughout history, the most recent being the series’ former co-lead, Danielle Baptiste. Others who have come into contact with the Witchblade include Cleopatra and Joan of Arc. Sara struggles to hone the awesome powers of the Witchblade and fend off those with a nefarious interest in it, especially entrepreneur Kenneth Irons. She also struggles to maintain a personal life.

Thanks Wikipedia. But for real…this TV movie/series sucked in comparison to the comics. I’m just going to leave it simple like that. And it looked nothing like the comics or even really attempted to. A remake has been in development ever since 2009 when a teaser poster popped up on the internet. However there hasn’t been much development since then minus IMDB having a Witchblade movie listed as coming out in 2013. We’ll see on that one.

However this teaser poster does look to be more true to the comics and Michael Rymer (Queen Of The Damned, Battlestar Galactica) has had his name attached to direct.

2. Swamp Thing (1982)

This fan-favorite film is one of DC’s titles that is rumored to be getting a reboot that desperately needs it. I saw the movie as a kid and thought it was cool. Then I saw it years later and wanted to slap younger me for ever thinking that. No disrespect to Mr. Craven because he did the best he could at the time but just like ‘Spawn’ this movie truly needed the current technology and can be a great film if done right. Aka follow current Snyder Swamp Thing…thanks. This film is currently on the backburner with Joel Silver (way too man films) producing, Akiva Goldsman (A Beautiful Mind, The Da Vinci Code) writing and Vincenzo Natali (Cube, Splice) set to direct. The film got put on hold as of May so Natali can pursue other projects.

1. Daredevil (2003)

Well…here is another one where i’m definitely not blaming the actors at all. Affleck was pretty good. Farrel played a great head case. Garner was useless. The real problems here were the piss-poor costumes, romantic sub-plot that wasn’t really needed in a first film and the god-awful need to include some alt-rock soundtrack versus a score. Daredevil is definitely a movie that needs a score being that he’s a blind man using sound/sonar. Sorry but I would be pissed if I was Matt Murdock and you threw on Nickleback. Facepalm one.

The movie did capture some of his conflict with his Catholicism and I thought that was great and the action wasn’t horrible. But this movie (and especially with current series success) really needs a remake. While the Directors Cut was better than the one we got in theaters, by no means was it a great enough improvement to make me ignore the bad parts of this flick. Currently David Slade (30 Days Of Night) is attached to direct but we’ve really heard no news on it in awhile and it could end up in film limbo like many other projects. Hopefully we will get some news on this one soon.

Runner up: Generation X (1996 – Made for TV movie)

Until today I never knew this was made. I wish I still didn’t. Scratch that. Let’s forget this thing exists and just wait for the sequel to ‘First Class’ and the rumored ‘New Mutants’ movie instead. Face palm two.