It didn’t.

But you wouldn’t know that based on the reaction of the Internet, where many of its denizens are totally convinced that Blizzard has forsaken them due to a detail of a character’s personal life that was shown outside of the game. Allegations ranging from pandering, to being unnecessary, to flat out saying that a company that has delivered free characters, new maps and a wealth of new items to keep the game alive has lost their respect have been lobbied at the game and developers. And why? Because the girl on the cover likes to bump clams?

If you somehow haven’t heard by now, the latest Overwatch web comic features the heroes and villains of the game celebrating the holidays with their loved ones. Primarily focusing on Tracer as she rushes to find the perfect Christmas gift for her significant other before meeting with the lonely Winston, the moment in question comes when the gift is given to a red head female who happens to thank her with a kiss. A rather mundane scene has now become the talk of the gaming world over the last week between those who are praising the reveal and those that I referenced above who have numerous problems with it. What are they saying, you ask? Here’s a sample of what some of the negative reactions have been funneling in on various forums.

I really wish they wouldn’t do stuff like this for this game now really. We’re not allowed to just enjoy the game anymore because we have to put up with a load of braindead social correctness bulls***. I’d rather put up with dark souls 3’s crowd telling me to kill myself again than this.

Yes, because a single character in a cast of 23 characters is “social correctness bulls***”. Because a web comic is keeping you from enjoying a game. Newsflash, being gay is becoming more acceptable these days, which is why we’ll more than likely see homosexual characters be featured in future games. I hope you find a way to continue enjoying your games despite gay people existing in them, but it sounds more like the medium is passing you by. Being gay isn’t “PC”, it’s reality, and it’s time to get used to it.

The purpose of the comic was to exploit LGBT awareness to stir up controversy for a game the week before Christmas.

The teasing and “Hype” for an alternative sexual character was intentionally a path leading to Christmas sales.

Because Overwatch was having such a hard time building a player base, right? 20 million in a few months really shows how desperate Blizzard was for those few extra sales. But we’re now at a point where anything other than heterosexual representation is either “pandering” or “exploiting”, despite the idea of again, having ONE character among a cast of 23 being a lesbian is pretty normal these days considering about 3.8 percent of the US population identifies as LGBTQ according to this 2015 Gallup poll. Then again, gay people can’t exist in fiction without an agenda, right? Because a single character in a growing cast of 23 and counting is asking for “special treatment”, as I’ve seen mentioned on other forums.

1. Tracer was not presented as gay from the beginning, so it seems like she was changed to being gay.

2. Tracer was paired with some random nobody that was just made up rather another playable or important character.

3. Not that Overwatch’s story is deep or anything, but it seems like the presentation of Tracer being gay served no other real purpose than to show that she’s gay, so the presentation didn’t seem organic, and more agenda driven.

Wasn’t presented as being gay? What, was she supposed to weigh 300 lbs with a shaved head and a biker jacket with a rainbow flag stitched to it? It may come as  a surprise to some, but many gay people don’t wear their sexuality on their sleeve. They aren’t walking stereotypes. They’re actual people. Which makes the last claim that it’s not organic ironic since she apparently needed to wear a “Hi, I’m gay!” sign around her neck for this to feel organic. And the fact that she’s paired with a “nobody” instead of a different character? Do you *really* think it would be better if two characters were revealed as gay instead of one?

It simply didn’t need to be. There’s no plot arc for any character. Sexual orientation doesn’t select the way a character plays. It has exactly 0 bearing on anything.

However, it’s SUCH a big deal to liberals nowadays that companies pick up on the hype and use it to their advantage. This is known as pandering. Most people don’t have a problem with gays, it’s this bulls*** pandering that pisses people off.

No one on this cast needed to be gay or straight. They’re not real, and their orientation doesn’t change how the game plays.

You can tell what the mindset is coming from this comment based on using “liberal” as an attack, but I just want to point out that “this bulls*** pandering that pisses people off” completely contradicts the idea right above this quote that “It has zero bearing on anything.” I don’t see how someone would be pissed off to begin with if they really felt it didn’t matter, but even if it doesn’t matter to you, it obviously matters to those who found a character in the game they can identify with. Then again, I *REALLY* don’t think that the issue is that “No one on this cast needed to be gay or straight.” Because I can’t seem to find the outrage for Pharah’s unnecessary and forced boyfriend in the same comic.

Or Reaper following an unknown family in the same comic.

Or Torbjorn and Reinhardt’s families being revealed… IN THE SAME COMIC!

But I’m guessing that none of the images above make you feel icky when you look at them, so those are A-OK. Objectively, you could say that the Tracer scene is equally as pointless as all of the above ones. Yet, hers is the only one being labeled as such. Hmm… I wonder why?

Now that we got that out of the way, let’s talk about the real issue here. Gaming has come a long way as a medium, and I feel that making the poster child of one of the most popular games of the year was a bold, yet necessary move by Blizzard if we want to keep moving towards normalizing homosexual characters in the way that many of the posters above and those like them pretend they already are. But reactions like these show how much farther we have to come, because we’re still sifting through comments calling the move a desperate plea for holiday sales despite the fact that Blizzard has been talking about this since at least 2015. Their goal was to reveal it in a natural and tasteful way. What better way to do it than to reveal it in a side story that’s all about spending time with loved ones during the holidays?

Let’s be real though. To these people, the only way for the reveal would have been “tasteful” and “natural” would have been for it to have never happened at all. Remember that in decades past, including minorities in prominent roles was also considered “pandering”, but with diligence and the continued usage of diverse characters in a variety of roles, seeing it has become more and more commonplace. Not that there isn’t a ton of room to improve, but homosexuality in the public consciousness is still behind in so many ways. So I can only hope this trend continues until we stop seeing gay characters as a gimmick and more as a facet of a more complex whole. And that won’t happen if we pretend they don’t exist.

Or you know, keep typing away furiously when girls kiss each other.

As a Nightmare on Elm Street fanboy, I absolutely 100% could not turn down a chance to interview Robert Rusler (star of Nightmare 2: Freddy’s Revenge & Weird Science). Luckily for me the new project he’s promoting Black Asylum looks pretty fucking amazing too. Check the teaser trailer below


Be sure to show him some love by following Black Asylum’s twitter and their main website

The intro music contains the song Master Versus Master from Pterofractyl’s  album The Missing Animal.

Follow Saint Mort on Facebook and Twitter

Subscribe to Us on iTunes

 

 

Well, earlier this week we speculated just who it was going to be when they said “One of the major iconic DC characters will reveal that he is gay in a storyline in June”.

According to the folks over at Bleeding Cool one of their sources revealed to them at Phoenix Comic Con just who the character is.

Well ladies and gentlemen… I’ll fill you in.

Dramatic pause.

Additional unnecessary line.

Wait for it…

 

 

It’s Alan Scott. The original Green Lantern. (Who… oddly enough was number one on Eric Diaz’s list)

For those unfamiliar with Alan Scott…

Alan Scott is the ORIGINAL Green Lantern introduced in July of 1940 in All-American Comics #16.

Scott was a charter member of the Justice Society Of America, beginning in All Star Comics #3 (Winter 1940). He served as the team’s second chairman, in #7, but departed following that issue and returned a few years later. He has been a key member of the group ever since, appearing in all three titles bearing the teams’ name.

After the reboot of the DC universe Alan Scott was first reintroduced in Earth-Two #1. So, I definitely can say alot of people are about to start rushing to pick that book up and retailers may just be bumping up their orders for #2.

 

Tim and Sax rush into action to try and guess who DC comics is going to out as gay in the next few weeks. Speculations include sgt rock, wildcat, and jerry Lewis, along with the most famous members of the DC Elite. Come with us on a journey of sexual-forensics, laughter, and a lengthy discussion of who counts as “iconic”.

Sax and Tim’s note: Just after we recorded this it was reported that the group “One Million Moms” came out against DC having this or any gay characters and suggested they would boycott the books.  In response the folks at Fandom Planet would like to suggest we all buy whatever issue announces the Gay character in record numbers.

Being gay is nothing to be ashamed of, and we support DC in bringing more homosexual characters into everyday comics. From Renee Montoya to Kate Kane to whomever this turns out to be (Plastic Man?) we support them.

Oh and at the end of this episode we talk for a bit about Batgirl: Spoiled (Sax’s new webseires) check it out here: http://bit.ly/BatgirlTeaser

At this past weekend’s Kapow Comic Convention in the UK, DC Editor-In-Chief Dan Didio dropped a pretty big bombshell; a fan asked the question asked at the DC Nation panel about Dan DiDio’s interview with prominent gay magazine The Advocate, specifically over the decision not to change any character’s sexual orientation when restarting the DCU. In the interview, Didio said that they would introduce new LGBT characters instead of switching someone’s orientation, but the fan asked why DC would switch race, size, age, every kind of other feature, but not sexual orientation. Not the company policy  anymore, according to Didio; in fact they are about to reintroduce a previously existing DC character who was previously straight and now will be “one of our most prominent gay characters.”

In fact, since the story broke, DC’s Senior VP Publicity Courtney Simmons has clarified even further: “One of the major iconic DC characters will reveal that he is gay in a storyline in June” Well, now we know he is considered “iconic” and that it is a He and not a She. So who will it be? DC has no shortage of candidates, but as a longtime DC fanboy (and a gay one at that) here are my top ten guesses for who is coming out of the phone booth closet come June:

#10. Vibe

The first Latino member of the Justice League, and also the first member of the Justice League to die in the line of duty. Earthquake powered Paco Ramone was pretty much a racial caricature, breakdancing and speaking in a badly written spanish accent (things like saying “chu” instead of “you” and so forth. It was pretty shameless.)  He was promptly killed off way back in 1986, a mere two years after he was introduced. But now he’s being brought back in the new 52, minus the racism and breakdancing (one would assume) While he seems like a likely candidate, DC has said that that the character would be “iconic”, and just being a Leaguer didn’t help Paco make icon status. So he’s at the very bottom of the list for that reason.

The Detroit version of the JLA was like a weird snapshot of 1984 pop culture; you got the All American bionic athlete (how very '84 Olympic Fever), a Madonna/Cyndi Lauper clone, Tina Turner with powers, and a latino breaker dancer named Vibe. How could this NOT be dated within a couple of years??

#9. Wally West/The Flash

I admit, this one is a long shot, which is why it is way down the list at number nine. And if it turned out to be true I can only imagine how pissed off some longtime fans would be. Wally has been missing in action for over a year now, one of the most iconic DC characters to be MIA since the whole “New 52” reboot. But even my gay ass would be annoyed at bringing back the ultimate hetero family man of the DCU and making him gay for the sake of sales. But since we know that Dan Didio and the guys in charge at DC are hardly above stunts like this to make headlines, anything is possible.

#8. Jimmy Olsen

Making Superman’s best pal a gay guy would make TONS of mainstream headlines, and we know how much DC loves that. But I have a hard time seeing DC giving the ok to this, as every version of this character since 1940 has been heterosexual, especially in other media like movies and television were the majority of the world knows him from the most. Still, something could be made out of the fact that he’s always getting himself into trouble so that a muscular god like male alien in mutli colored spandex can come save him.

#7. Alfred Pennyworth

For decades there have been jokes about how the all male Wayne household is super gay, including Bruce Wayne’s trusty butler Afred. And let’s face it, most upper crust British types come across as gay to most Americans. And DC would probably want to avoid making the de-facto patriarch of the Wayne Household a gay man. But if they did go ahead and make Alfred gay, I doubt many people would drop their jaws in shock about it.

#6. Shazam!/Billy Batson

DC has been making a lot of noise about re-introducing the new Captain Marvel Shazam to their newly rebooted universe in the pages of Justice League. This time, young Billy Batson is a darker, tougher version of his old self (we know he’s tougher…he wears a hoodie now!) DC has been trying to make this character click with modern audiences and failing for decades, as many see him as merely a Superman clone and not much else. But by possibly making Billy Batson a bullied gay teenager who “with one magic word” becomes the ultimate in male power fantasy, well…people might quickly stop making the Superman comparison and Shazam will have finally found his modern “hook.”

#5. Green Lantern/Kyle Rayner

Just having the title of Green Lantern makes Kyle Rayner “iconic” I suppose, so he makes the list. The current DCU main Earth currently has four Green Lanterns, and making one of them gay would help to make him a bit more distinct from the others. Besides, he’s an artist living in Greenwich Village with a bad dating history with women. Screams “closet case” to me.

#4. The Atom/ Ryan Choi

Ryan Choi replaced Ray Palmer as shrinking hero The Atom in the previous continuity, before being killed off like a red shirt on Star Trek. Considering how few Asian super heroes there are in comics, readers made a lot of noise about how poorly DC treated one of their few Asian heroes. So no surprise, Ryan Choi is back alive and kicking as the new Atom once more in the new DCU. But seeing as this character is relatively new, DC knows there is a lot less of a chance of fans making a stink if his sexuality is suddenly switched. But then again…if no one cares, then why bother?

#3. Red Robin/ Tim Drake

There have been jokes for decades about Robin being gay, but most of those jokes have been about original Robin Dick Grayson. Well, clearly those people making those jokes aren’t comic book readers, because if they were they’d know that Dick Grayson is a bit of a pussy hound, with hot superhero chicks like Starfire and Batgirl all on his booty call list.

However, the third Wayne ward to wear the mantle of Robin, Tim Drake (currently going by Red Robin) has had a different history with women. Oh, he’s dated, but most of his relationships with girls seem to go nowhere, and where Dick Grayson was getting’ it on with various women when he was a teen hero, Tim Drake seemed more focused on other things. In the pre-Flashpoint DCU, his biggest obsessive relationship was seemingly with Conner Kent/Superboy, which many fans found to be very telling. Having one of Batman’s teen sidekicks would certainly make a lot of noise in the media, but it also might be a shade to close to the old Seduction of the Innocent “Batman and Robin are gay lovers” hysteria from the 50’s that nearly killed the Batman titles.

#2. Hawkman

I admit, I’m not reading the new Hawkman series (is anyone?) so I don’t know if it has been revealed what his sexuality is yet or not. But really, just look at that leather daddy outfit…the harness, the hairy chest, the muscles…I dunno, maybe the answer was in plain sight all along. Add to that this his former love Hawkwoman is now on another Earth, and well…you do the math.

#1. Green Lantern/ Alan Scott

The new Earth-2 is very different one than the original so far, with the future members of the Justice Society of America being modern day heroes with no ties to World War II. In the recently released issue #1 of Earth-2, it was revealed that the Flash Jay Garrick was in a long term relationship in college with someone named Joan, so that seemingly crosses him off the potential gay list.

But what about Alan Scott, the original Green Lantern? Would DC have the balls to make one of their original icons a gay man? It should be noted that in the old pre-Flashpoint continuity, Alan Scott’s son Obsidian was gay, and he seemingly no longer exists, so maybe by making his former dad gay they are hoping to balance that out. In any event, Marvel got a lot of headlines and sales by making Spider-Man (or a Spider-Man) “Blatino.” While GL isn’t on the level of Spidey, it still says a lot if the first hero to hold the title of Green Lantern at DC was suddenly a gay man.

One strike against Alan Scott being a gay man...red, green, yellow AND purple? Every gay man I know would know better than that.