History has a way of repeating itself. And with his second directorial effort, Academy Award Winning screenwriter, Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network), transports us back in time to 1968, during the pinnacle of Vietnam protests where demonstrators and law enforcement clashed in an eruption of violence that mirrors the recorded imagery of present-day America. People were divided, political animosity had reached a boiling point, and a pivotal election was on the horizon. Ultimately, it was the result of that bitter 1968 election which set the stage for Sorkin’s latest film, The Trial of the Chicago 7, one that he demanded to be released by its distributor prior to election day 2020, with the hopes that maybe this time around history won’t repeat itself.

The Chicago 7 opens with a montage of footage regarding the assassinations of both Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert Kennedy over a mere two-month span. Advocates for peace were being buried with bullet holes in their head, leaving anti-war groups with little hope that a non-violent approach would enact change and end the bloodshed abroad. Protest leaders like Tom Hayden (Eddie Redmayne), Abbie Hoffman (Sacha Baron Cohen), Jerry Rubin (Jeremy Strong) and David Dellinger (John Carroll Lynch) attempted to obtain permits for peaceful protests in Lincoln Park, but were denied by the city’s mayor. After many days of protesting that included multiple violent encounters between law enforcement and protesters, disarray surrounding the Democratic party resulted in a loss of the election. Five months later, after Nixon took office as President of the United States, the surprising arrest of these protest organizers on federal charges of crossing state lines to incite violence sparked a controversial, months-long trial that placed the usage of America’s judicial system as a tool for political warfare under the public microscope.

The true story behind this iconic moment in United States history is unavoidably complex and detailed. Yet, the living wordsmith Aaron Sorkin delivers such a sleek and crisp script that unveils key components of these event in a purposeful and periodic non-chronological manner. Sorkin wastes very little time placing the audience inside the courtroom, where a majority of the film occurs and a setting that is a true comfort zone for the writer-director. And while The Chicago 7 never quite reaches the same heights as Sorkin’s legendary 1992 screenplay for A Few Good Men, there is still plenty to appreciate in this newest work. Humor and heaviness do a delicate dance between the pages of this script. The silliness of Sacha Baron Cohen’s and Jeremy Strong’s hippie figureheads make for exceptional comic relief when it’s so desperately needed. However, their hilarious quips and antics clearly take the backseat to a more serious and ominous tone that addresses themes of racism, politicizing our criminal justice system and violence at the hands of law enforcement.

The Chicago 7 is not only a brilliantly-penned screenplay, Sorkin also steps-up his game behind the camera as the direction here represents a stark and noticeable improvement over his debut film, Molly’s Game. Furthermore, it would be a grave injustice to avoid mentioning this star-studded cast and the outstanding onscreen performances given by this ensemble. Outside of the stellar and obvious lead performances from Redmayne, Strong and Sacha Baron Cohen, Oscar Winner Mark Rylance (Bridge of Spies) brings to life such a noble and naïve character as defense attorney William Kunstler, and Frank Langella will crawl under your skin as Judge Julius Hoffman, an unfair ruler of law. These performances, in conjunction with Sorkin’s writing, create a handful of unforgettable onscreen moments. Yet, the constant busyness of having to provide an abundance of details occasionally leaves the film feeling flat in between these masterful scenes. The Chicago 7 may not be Sorkin at his best, but Sorkin not at his best is still extremely worthwhile. You can catch this bona fide Best Picture contender streaming on Netflix right now.

Stars: 4/5

Today is a good day for Harry Potter fans. After the lackluster announcement yesterday, showing off the new films logo, we’ve got something of value TODAY! The cover of Entertainment Weekly is all about the Harry Potter prequel, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them. Check out the gallery below!

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’ will star Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Alison Sudol, Ezra Miller, Dan Fogler, Colin Farrell, Jenn Murray, Jon Voight, Carmen Ejogo, Gemma Chan and newcomer Faith Wood-Blagrove. The films is set to be directed by David Yates and the film follows Newt Scamander (Redmayne), the Wizarding World’s preeminent magizoologist, who in his travels has encountered and documented a myriad of magical creatures, ultimately leading to his penning the Hogwarts School textbook “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them”

The Potter Prequel hits theaters November 18th 2016!

By now you may already know all the nominees for the 87th Academy Awards, set to take place on February 22nd. The full list is reproduced below for your convenience. (Source: Oscars.com, obviously, and Entertainment Weekly.)

Best Picture

American Sniper

Birdman

Boyhood

The Grand Budapest Hotel

The Imitation Game

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CjKEFb-sM

Selma

The Theory of Everything

Whiplash

Best Director
Alexandro G. Iñárritu, Birdman
Richard Linklater, Boyhood
Bennett Miller, Foxcatcher
Wes Anderson, The Grand Budapest Hotel
Morten Tyldum, The Imitation Game

Best Actor
Steve Carell, Foxcatcher
Bradley Cooper, American Sniper
Benedict Cumberbatch, The Imitation Game
Michael Keaton, Birdman
Eddie Redmayne, The Theory of Everything

Best Actress
Marion Cotillard, Two Days One Night
Felicity Jones, The Theory of Everything
Julianne Moore, Still Alice
Rosamund Pike, Gone Girl
Reese Witherspoon, Wild

Best Supporting Actor
Robert Duvall, The Judge
Ethan Hawke, Boyhood
Edward Norton, Birdman
Mark Ruffalo, Foxcatcher
J.K. Simmons, Whiplash

Best Supporting Actress
Patricia Arquette, Boyhood
Laura Dern, Wild
Keira Knightley, The Imitation Game
Emma Stone, Birdman
Meryl Streep, Into the Woods

Best Cinematography
Emmanuel Lubezki, Birdman
Robert Yeoman, The Grand Budapest Hotel
Lukasz Zal and Ryszard Lenczewski, Ida
Dick Pope, Mr. Turner
Roger Deakins, Unbroken

Best Foreign Language Film
Ida, Poland
Leviathan
, Russia
Tangerines
, Estonia
Timbuktu
, Mauritania
Wild Tales
, Argentina

Best Adapted Screenplay
American Sniper, Jason Hall
The Imitation Game, Graham Moore
Inherent Vice
, Paul Thomas Anderson
The Theory of Everything
, Anthony McCarten
Whiplash
, Damien Chazelle

Best Original Screenplay
Birdman, Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris, Jr. & Armando Bo
Boyhood
, Richard Linklater
Foxcatcher
, E. Max Frye and Dan Futterman
The Grand Budapest Hotel
, Wes Anderson & Hugo Guinness
Nightcrawler
, Dan Gilroy

Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Bill Corso and Dennis Liddiard, Foxcatcher
Frances Hannon and Mark Coulier, The Grand Budapest Hotel
Elizabeth Yianni-Georgiou and David White, Guardians of the Galaxy

Best Original Score
The Grand Budapest Hotel
The Imitation Game
Interstellar
Mr. Turner
The Theory of Everything

Best Original Song
“Everything Is Awesome” from The Lego Movie; Music and Lyric by Shawn Patterson
“Glory” from Selma; Music and Lyric by John Stephens and Lonnie Lynn
“Grateful” from Beyond the Lights; Music and Lyric by Diane Warren
“I’m Not Gonna Miss You” from Glen Campbell…I’ll Be Me; Music and Lyric by Glen Campbell and Julian Raymond
“Lost Stars” from Begin Again; Music and Lyric by Gregg Alexander and Danielle Brisebois

Best Animated Feature
Big Hero 6
The Boxtrolls
How to Train Your Dragon 2
Song of the Sea
The Tale of Princess Kaguya

Best Documentary—Short
Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1
Joanna
Our Curse
The Reaper
White Earth

Best Film Editing
Joel Cox and Gary D. Roach, American Sniper
Sandra Adair, Boyhood
Barney Pilling, The Grand Budapest Hotel
William Goldenberg, The Imitation Game
Tom Cross, Whiplash

Best Production Design
The Grand Budapest Hotel, Production Design: Adam Stockhausen; Set Decoration: Anna Pinnock
The Imitation Game
, Production Design: Maria Djurkovic; Set Decoration: Tatiana Macdonald
Interstellar
, Production Design: Nathan Crowley; Set Decoration: Gary Fettis
Into the Woods
, Production Design: Dennis Gassner; Set Decoration: Anna Pinnock
Mr. Turner
, Production Design: Suzie Davies; Set Decoration: Charlotte Watts

Best Animated Short
The Bigger Picture
The Dam Keeper
Feast
Me and My Moulton
A Single Life

Best Live Action Short
Aya
Boogaloo and Graham
Butter Lamp
Parvaneh
The Phone Call

Best Sound Editing
American Sniper, Alan Robert Murray and Bub Asman
Birdman,
Martín Hernández and Aaron Glascock
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies,
Brent Burge and Jason Canovas
Interstellar
, Richard King
Unbroken,
Becky Sullivan and Andrew DeCristofaro

Best Sound Mixing
American Sniper, John Reitz, Gregg Rudloff and Walt Martin
Birdman,
Jon Taylor, Frank A. Montaño and Thomas Varga
Interstellar
, Gary A. Rizzo, Gregg Landaker and Mark Weingarten
Unbroken
, Jon Taylor, Frank A. Montaño and David Lee
Whiplash
, Craig Mann, Ben Wilkins and Thomas Curley

Best Visual Effects
Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Dan DeLeeuw, Russell Earl, Bryan Grill and Dan Sudick
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Joe Letteri, Dan Lemmon, Daniel Barrett and Erik Winquist
Guardians of the Galaxy, Stephane Ceretti, Nicolas Aithadi, Jonathan Fawkner and Paul Corbould
Interstellar, Paul Franklin, Andrew Lockley, Ian Hunter and Scott Fisher
X-Men: Days of Future Past
, Richard Stammers, Lou Pecora, Tim Crosbie and Cameron Waldbauer

Best Documentary — Feature
Citizenfour
Finding Vivien Maier
Last Days of Vietnam
The Salt of the Earth
Virunga

Best Costume Design
Milena Canonero, The Grand Budapest Hotel
Mark Bridges, Inherent Vice
Colleen Atwood, Into the Woods
Anna B. Sheppard and Jane Clive, Maleficent
Jacqueline Durran, Mr. Turner

As internet humor have seeped into mainstream ideology, there has been an increased awareness over the near-parodical “Oscar-bait” sub-genre. You’ll never find a permanent Oscar genre in the racks of Best Buy — maybe older winners on discount on a display during the season — but you’ll recognize the cues of “Oscar-bait” well enough. You might remember this from a few years ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbhrz1-4hN4

But several times in the last decade the Academy Awards have once or twice awarded truly outstanding feature films that not only buck this trend but also give hope that the popular image of the Academy — stuffy, old farts mentally stuck in a generation long past gone — are just an incorrect notion.

This year is not one of those years.

I will not speak so much on the quality of the films chosen for the “big” categories, like Best Picture; whether it’s because I haven’t seen them or elaborating for or against would be exhausting and longer than anyone would care to read (it depends on what film we’re talking about here). But as someone who hopes to be involved in the industry one day, this year’s list is extremely discouraging.

I have not seen The Theory of Everything, so I cannot judge Eddie Redmayne’s performance critically. I’m sure the effort and work to become Stephen Hawking was a harrowing, challenging experience for the young actor and he executed it in picturesque fashion. His work may or may not deserve some recognition, sure. But as pointed out by critics like Vince Macini of UPROXX, his mere selection can draw blood from the most fervent of anti-Academy critics.

A handsome British heartthrob playing a tousle-haired, permanently smiling physicist with crooked glasses and a degenerative disease isn’t a performance that should be nominated for an Oscar, it’s a performance that should be nominated at a parody of the Oscars. Playing a nuanced character with depth and complexity seems a lot more impressive to me than smiling a lot and looking placid while feigning a disability. Aside from that, the filmmakers are trolling you. This film has been discussed as an Oscars vehicle since the first moment it was announced. It’s a film so blatantly pandering the producers knew all they had to do was get through it with a straight face and it would automatically rain laurels. It’s sort of like the awards movie equivalent of calling in sick and your excuse is a giant carbuncle on your sphincter, something so embarrassing no one will question it.

Along with Eddie Redmayne’s nomination, you may have noticed the movie Selma is hardly on this list. For Best Picture and Best Song (uh, OK) it remains in the race, but it has no stake in any of the awards that celebrate the individual effort where a lone figure is front and center for the world. Best Director for Ava DuVernay? Best Actor for David Oyelowo as a compelling Martin Luther King Jr.? Best Actress for Carmen Ejogo? Nope.

Our own MCDave had this to say in his review of Selma.

Some naysayers will declare DuVernay’s assumed Oscar nomination for Best Director as nothing more than a flashy headline, as she’d be the first female of color to ever be nominated. Yet, truth be told, she does a remarkable job and would be worthy of any such recognition.

Unfortunately we will never even see that headline. Ava DuVernay’s snub for Best Director is one of the strongest central points of contention this year against the Academy, and the Academy’s blunder is doing nothing to encourage new perspectives beyond the default settings.

DuVernay as a black woman — two characteristics that immediately separate DuVernay not just physically but in perspective and world view from the rest of the nominees — just her selection would have been a step forward for what feels like leaps backwards in social politics from the past year. Decades upon decades of misunderstandings and ill-communications between racial and gender divides came to a head in 2014, whether it was #GamerGate or Ferguson, and the awards celebrating the art from the Year of Turmoil has been spit in the wound. We’re parents in Toys ‘R Us and our children have piled on one too many toys in the shopping cart.

When I mean decades, I really do mean decades. The Huffington Post has pointed out that the 2015 Oscars is the whitest crop since 1998.

This is especially troubling when you consider that last year’s Oscars was a banner year, with a Best Supporting Actress award for Lupita Nyong’o and Steve McQueen taking home the Best Picture title as producer for “12 Years a Slave.” “Selma” is nominated in that category this year, so we may have a victory for Ava DuVernay’s film, but that nod — and another “Selma” nomination for Best Original Song — hardly counts as redemption here. As Chris Rock can tell you, there are still far too few people of color in the industry, but at least one non-white person* has been nominated each year in the four acting categories since the last whitest Oscars ever nearly two decades ago. Here’s the whole list:Screen Shot 2015-01-16 at 1.52.59 AM

I joked on Facebook after the nominees were announced that one of the most popular and critically-acclaimed movies of the year that featured an ethnically diverse cast was Disney’s Big Hero 6, which was nominated “only” for Best Animated Film. That’s not to knock animation, it’s just telling that among the only films of the year where people of all backgrounds came together as one unit to receive the richest prize in the game was a cartoon. Kinda shitty that a great movie like Guardians of the Galaxy could not be in the running, isn’t it?

Side note: I’m still trying to process that Big Hero 6, a totally random 5-issue Marvel series I bought on a whim a few years ago while in high school, is now in the running for Best Animated Feature at the Academy Awards. Fucking mind-blowing.

https://twitter.com/CNNLADavid/status/555722621216518145

Trending now is #OscarsSoWhite, a scathing response to the upsetting nominations. Like most sarcastic hashtags, many of the tweets are downright hilarious, further proof that the laughter sometimes is the best medicine. But wouldn’t it be nice to never have to be sick?

There is no remedy or magic serum. It is a terrible problem, which is bound to happen when the voting board is obscenely narrowed to one particular taste. But why do the Academy have such a limited palette? Consider who their voters are.

From The LA Times:

Even with the 432 new voting members, the overall academy is still 93% white, a decrease of less than 1% from what The Times found in a 2012 membership study, and 76% male, also a less than 1% decrease from what The Times found two years ago.

If you have gotten to this point and you still ask yourself “Why is this such a bad thing?” the first thing I want you to do is seriously ask that question to yourself again. The second thing I want you to consider is that art is human expression, and yes even commercial films are art, and if the human expression is expressed by only one kind of human, is it really the complete experience?

Let me clarify that even the most popcorniest of movies are still art. The kid watching Batman undergoes an audio-visual experience and by doing so may learn a thing or two about the world, or increases his visual literacy, a woefully underrated subject that is barely taught in academia. But when the stories that compel him or her are influenced and formed by the elite few, the coming generations do not expand their perspectives or their worlds are co-opted and their living is not validated because they feel alone and isolated. They feel no one can relate to them. I know this, because when I was young and until I saw movies with other Asians in low to middle class households, I didn’t think I actually existed. This divide, in my humble opinion, is killing us; we lack empathy for others because we simply don’t see them enough, be it on the street or the screen.

With all my heart I want to believe that the Oscars are nothing but utter bullshit, they are pure posturing and if anything poisons the industry with Thunderdome-esque blood feuds, pressure, and decadent glamour. Yet, they cannnot be outright ignored. The theoretical kid I made up isn’t probably going to watch Foxcatcher or The Imitation Game, but kids grow up sometime.

The Oscars, in some monstrous way, still matter. Consider, again, Vince Mancini of UPROXX.

Maybe not to you, maybe not to me, maybe not to NFL Hall of Famer Howie Long, but in terms of which movies actually get made, awards matter because they matter to actors. Who are rivaled only by sparrows and military junta in their love of shiny medals. And because awards matter to actors, awards affect actors’ choice of projects. Which affects which movies get made, which affects which movies we see. Put simply, a lot of bad movies wouldn’t get made if A-list and up-and-coming actors weren’t jumping aboard solely for the chance to win awards. To say nothing of the more interesting scripts and novel approaches to material that get shoehorned into predictable awards vehicles in the hopes of pleasing predictable awards voters.

Typing with fury on my keyboard is therapeutic but it will do nothing to sway any of the Oscar voters who, in the incredibly slim chance are reading this at 2 AM. So, onwards to February 22.

Academy Award winning filmmaker James Marsh, best known for his popular documentaries Man on Wire and Project Nim, debuted his new biopic, The Theory of Everything, at the Toronto International Film Festival in early-September. The result was a shake-up in nearly all of the major Oscar races thanks to beloved performances from a pair of young up-and-comers, Les Miserables‘ Eddie Redmayne and the adorable Felicity Jones. And although I wasn’t nearly as enamored with the overall final product as those in Toronto, the fact remains that The Theory of Everything has the staying power of a late-year Best Picture contender.

As a remarkably gifted doctoral student at the University of Cambridge in 1963, a young aspiring physicist named Stephen Hawking (played by Redmayne) discovers that he’s suffering from a motor neuron disease (ALS) and is given only two years to live. Deeply depressed and feeling utterly hopeless, only the loyalty and devotion of a recent love interest named Jane Wilde (Jones) can keep Stephen motivated enough to continue his scientific pursuit of understanding the origins of the universe. Yet, many years after the two young lovers marry, Stephen’s deteriorating physical abilities and Jane’s tireless efforts at caring for their family prove to be the ultimate match for the couple.

theory1

Building a flourishing career upon the foundation of documentary filmmaking, it appears that very little changes with James Marsh’s approach in The Theory of Everything. The director takes the audience through a realistically shaped journey with both of its lead characters who are brilliantly portrayed by superstars in the making, Eddie Redmayne and Felcity Jones. Redmayne, who was highlighted in my Top Rising Stars write-up back in May, accepts the daunting task of transforming the virtually paralyzed genius, Stephen Hawking, to the big screen, and he does so with remarkable ease. But don’t be fooled, The Theory of Everything isn’t just Stephen’s story. The film also forces the viewer to relive the physicist’s escalating physical limitations through the eyes of his wife, Jane. Hence, Felicity Jones’ powerful turn as the rock of the Hawking household and a woman who valiantly stares down any obstacle even tends overshadow Redmayne’s work by the closing credits. Make no mistake about it, though, both performances are equally deserving of all their praises.

theory2

While top notch portrayals clearly highlight this biopic, where the movie fails is in its pacing and lack of depth to Hawking’s ideas and achievements in the science community. Rather than exploring the brain inside of this living genius who has soared past unspeakable odds, The Theory of Everything takes the safe systematic approach by following the presumed biopic template. Thankfully, Marsh receives exemplary performances that almost single-handedly support his relationship-driven narrative. While it’s true that very few couples can admit to facing life-altering hardships comparable to those that Stephen and Jane had to endure, the couple’s complicated marriage and unfathomable circumstances are vastly outstretched and inundated with glossed-over milestones. A more earnest approach would have been to examine the daily grind associated with a loved one suffering from ALS. Instead, The Theory of Everything stumbles along from checkpoint to checkpoint giving it a somewhat artificial feel.

The talent surrounding James Marsh’s The Theory of Everything is magnificent, and the film is almost certainly going to stand out as the feature that elevated both Redmayne and Jones’ careers to new heights. However, the true mark of a great film is to counterbalance transcending performances with an equally effective story, which doesn’t happen here. For people with any knowledge of Hawking’s personal life, The Theory of Everything will open very few doors into the unknown of the man at its center. And for someone as groundbreaking and exceptional as Stephen Hawking, that just doesn’t feel acceptable.

GRADE: 3.5/5

Check out other reviews, movie lists and more from MCDAVE at his HOST SITE

It has been revealed that actor Eddie Redmayne (Les Miserables) is in talks to join the cast of the Wachowski’s upcoming sci-fi film, Jupiter Ascending. While the actor has not signed on for the film yet, if he does sign on you can take his name off the list of actors up for the role of Star-Lord in Marvel Studios Guardians Of The Galaxy. Production on both films will take place around the same time making it impossible for Redmayne to do both.

If Redmayne does indeed sign on for Jupiter Ascending, he will join Mila Kunis (Ted) and Channing Tatum (G.I. Joe Retaliation) in the film which takes place “In a universe where humans are near the bottom of the evolutionary ladder, a young destitute human woman is targeted for assassination by the Queen of the Universe because her very existence threatens to end the Queen’s reign”.

Source: Variety