Sir Ridley Scott recently spoke with Collider and not only did he express his interest in doing a sequel he also spoke about an extended cut of the film as well as some of the deleted scenes. Warning: minor spoilers lie ahead if you have not seen the film.

On Deleted scenes:

SCOTT: This is fundamentally the director’s cut. But there will be half an hour of stuff on the menu because people are so into films—how they’re made, how they’re set up, and the rejections in it. That’s why it’s fascinating. So this will all go on to the menu.

Collider: Well I’m curious about the deleted scenes. Specifically in this film, Noomi [Rapace] mentioned maybe there was a fight scene with her and an Engineer.

SCOTT: The Engineer fight scene was pretty good. It will definitely go on the menu. It won’t go on the long version. The problem about it is, while she gives as good as she gets with an axe (she’s very physical), he’s so big, for him to be clouted with a conventional weapon somehow diminished him. It’s subtle. It’s drama. I didn’t want to diminish him by having this person who has a weapon to be able to back him off. It minimized him. That’s why when he deals with people inside his cockpit, it’s over. Wham, wham, wham. Even the shot doesn’t mean anything. And so all she has time for is introducing him to the big boy inside the lab.

Collider: You’re going to do an extended cut on the Blu-ray/DVD. Is it a lot longer?

SCOTT: Twenty minutes.

Collider: So there’s, like, twenty minutes that will be added back in for a longer version?

SCOTT: Maybe. But I’m so happy with this engine, the way it is right now. I think it’s fine. I think it works. It can go in a section where, if you really want to tap in, look at the menu. To see how things are long, and it’s too long. Dramatically, I’m about putting bums on seats. For me to separate my idea of commerce from art—I’d be a fool. You can’t do that. I wouldn’t be allowed to do the films I do. So I’m very user friendly as far as the studios are concerned. To a certain extent, I’m a businessman. I’m aware that’s what I have to do. It’s my job. To say, “Screw the audience.” You can’t do that. “Am I communicating?” is the question. Am I communicating? Because if I’m not, I need to address it.

 

Personally, I love the film and can’t wait to see this extended cut to see if it adds onto the film. And with how the film has already surpassed its budget in under two days of being out domestically…a sequel is pretty much guaranteed.

‘Prometheus’ is in theatres now.

Spoiler warning ahead! If you haven’t seen ‘Prometheus’ by now I advise you to turn away. But if you have seen ‘Prometheus’ by now and stayed through the credits you saw this mysterious date flash across the screen with the Weyland Industries logo.

What is the significance of this date? As we all know Ridley Scott and the cast were very secretive about just what ‘Prometheus’ was about from the start and even the internet snoops didn’t know just how it was going to end and tie things together. And upon seeing it (I wont give my review…but I thought it was very smart and great) you understand why Ridley Scott kept saying “strands of DNA” the whole time. But once this flashed across after the credits people were left wondering “What is 10.11.12?” being that this is about four months from now. Is it more viral campaigning? Are they pushing forward with a sequel already based on international numbers and very impressive midnight showings?

Only time will tell. But there is a website and the first piece to this next puzzle has been revealed:

So now we play the waiting game and lose our minds trying to figure out just what is the significance of 10.11.12.