aka The Los Angeles Film Festival and What Molly Saw There, pt. 3

Now that you geek plebeians have had a chance to watch the trailer, let me give you my review of Robot & Frank, which was the last movie I saw at The Los Angeles Film Festival this year. I will do my best to stay spoiler free, and I will warn you if I cannot keep to it.

Now, the way I saw it was pretty cool, because before hand there was a short called “Robot” which actually showed the current state of robotics in our country and what we were using the AI for (typically as an educational aid) and what was being done to get people to treat robots as if they were real people. This was done typically cheating in a game of rock-paper-scissors would do the trick. Rather than reacting to the person observing them,  they’d say, “You cheated!” to the robot. As if the robot knows what it means to cheat. It was rather interesting and cool, and it definitely got you in the mood to feature to follow. You can watch the short here.

Robot & Frank is set in a very believable near future. Technology is familiar yet more advanced–Skype calls answer to your voice, the latest edition of the smart phone is  thin and practically transparent until in use, and cars still look like cars (though the director admits if they had the time and money for hovercrafts, they would of course have gone that route)–and the paper medium is a novelty of the past. It is both beautiful and terrifying; and a plot point surrounds the fate of the local library (where Susan Sarandon plays the lovely Librarian). It’s about the library environment as an experience rather than the books themselves, as everything is now settled into the cloud.

Susan Sarandon and Frank Langella with the archaic technology known as the book.

The story centers around the character Frank (Frank Langella). An aging ex-thief who in recent years has begun to have spurts of Alzheimer’s. Some days he’s good, others not so much. His son (James Marsden), no longer wanting to drive 10 hours roundtrip to make sure he is eating okay, decides to give him a robot helper. Although Frank is initially against it, the mechanical bundle of wires and AI eventually warms up to him.

Robot (voiced by Peter Sarsgaard) is tasked to do one thing: make certain Frank takes care of himself. As a robot, he has no sense of morality, but he does have an understanding of risk. Believing a project will keep Frank’s mind active, Robot suggests they create a garden, but after seeing Robot’s ability to pick a lock, Frank gets his own idea about what kind of project they should undertake.

Better to pick a lock than to pick your nose, right Frank?

Grounded in a highly plausible reality, Robot & Frank grapples with some serious issues, in addition to being sweet, funny, and all around entertaining. Divorce, senility, and many more issues anyone with a family can share and relate to. Robot & Frank is one of those movies that should be remembered. It is also one of those rare movies that actually makes me feel sympathy for a robot, technology that I typically refuse to trust thanks to Skynet and Asimov (sorry, Wall-E). I believe it is Robot’s recognition that he has no morality that allows for me to trust him, but it may just be Peter Sarsgaard’s voice (sorry, Alan Tudyk). It’s hard to say.

Needless to say, this is a movie I would definitely recommend to anyone, though I do think it is geared to a somewhat older (35+) crowd. I look forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts come August 24, 2012, when it receives a wider release.

aka The Los Angeles Film Festival and What Molly Saw There pt. 2

Unlike Dead Man’s Burden, which I saw with a definite idea of what I was going to see, when I walked into the theatre to see The History of Future Folk I had no idea what to expect. Based on the title, I had assumed it was going to be a documentary about some kind of early millennial music scene (it was in the “Beyond” category, so it could have literally been anything), but once the opening credits began with child-like drawings of crimson clad astronauts from another appeared, I knew I was wrong and that I was going to be in for a treat.

The History of Future Folk is nothing short of a delight. It tells the story of a humanoid alien named General Trius (Nils d’Aulaire) who comes from the Earth-like planet Hondo, who have been sent to earth to eradicate the human population so that the Hondonians may come and populate it, as their planet is pending destruction by a meteor. When he arrives to Earth, he is ready to set off his Doomsday device when suddenly he hears music for the first time! Enraptured by the sounds, he decides to assimilate with the earthlings and find a way to save his planet without having to kill off a species that created the beautiful gift of music.

Flash forward about 10 years. General Trias has settled in Brooklyn and now goes by the Earth name “Bill”. He is married with a daughter (Onata Aprile), and works as a at an aerospace museum that sits on top of a deactivated warhead, while moonlighting as a bluegrass musician at a bar owned and operated by Larry (Dee Snider), where he uses his backstory as an alien for his stage persona. Each night he tells the audience the story of his life, and no-one is the wiser that he is actually telling the truth. He is still trying to find a way to save his home planet, but his new life has taken the front seat. That is, until another alien from Honda, Kevin (Jay Klaitz) comes to assassinate him. Fortunately, Kevin is a terrible assassin, so Bill is able to subdue him easily enough and he opens his mind to music, and shortly thereafter Kevin learns to play guitar and the two become a bluegrass duo.

From there, the film comprises of a series of wild antics, getting in trouble with the law, which for Kevin leads to falling in love with a lady of the law, giving us a sweet, almost-tender-if-the-circumstances-weren’t-so-damn-creepy love ballad–in Spanish!–, and having to fight a serious alien assassin, while trying to save both Hondo and Earth from certain destruction. It’s a brilliant, fun mix, and with a running time of 86 minutes, every second counts.

The film is co-directed by John Mitchell and Jeremy Kipp Walker, based on Mitchell’s script which is in turn based on the actual band known as Future Folk (which d’Aulair and Klaitz are the members). It is truly a film that “dares to be different”–which is what the Beyond category for the festival is all about–and it’s as much fun as you can have without causing any trouble yourself.  The story is fitting for children of all ages and will have you screaming, “Hondo!” by the end. If you like music (even marginally), you’ll enjoy this fantastic ride. I know I did. Hondo!

If you’re still not convinced, here’s a little clip.

aka “The Los Angeles Film Festival and What Molly Saw There, Part 1”

This past week, I was lucky enough to spend some time at the Los Angeles Film Festival, presented by Film Independent. As such, I decided to play it smart and prepare for it by watching two or three movies I had carefully selected from the line up, so as to not suffer from film fatigue. Of the films I saw, Dead Man’s Burden, was my first.


I was drawn to watch this particular film, because it was touted as “traditional western”. Yes, I realize not everyone is so easily swayed, but as a lover of American myth and legend, Westerns will always be my all time favorite genre (and since they are, in part, a subgenre of action, I don’t have to sacrifice my love of bullets!). Additionally, given that it is so rare to see a new western, in the classical sense, on the big screen, I knew I had to muscle my way in to get a seat. And I was not disappointed. Written and directed by Jared Moshe, Dead Man’s Burden is a labor of love by a true western aficionado. A tale layered with moral ambiguity in a time where people truly could make themselves out to be who they wanted to be. Dead Man’s Burden delivers the goods and reminds everyone why the Western is such an important part of film history.

Like all tradtional westerns, Dead Man’s Burden takes place some time after the Civil War, where some Southern families have decided to move West to may a new name for themselves, where there is less baggage of losing the war. And like many westerns, the topic of land ownership and acquisition comes into play.: After the sudden death of Joe McCurry, his daughter Martha (Clare Bowen), his only known living progeny, after all his sons died fighting for the South. . The land is desirable, because it contains the largest underground water source in a town ripe for mining copper ore. Her father did not wish to sell the land, but Martha finds the property to be hold too many bad memories and to be too much for her and her husband Heck (David Heck), so she decides to sell it and move to California.

At the funeral for her father, it is a closed casket ceremony, which leads Three Penny Hank (Richard Riehl) to believe that there may have been some foul play–i.e., that the buyers must have killed him. A few weeks after the funeral, a man named Wade McCurry (Barlow Jacobs) shows up on the scene, with a letter from Joe who he claims is his father.

The reunion between sibilings is bittersweet. Wade was Martha’s favorite brother (whom she claims raised her more than their father ever did) whom she was led to believe had died on his way to fight for the South. In truth, he moved North to fight for the Union, and was thereby banished from ever returning home. “If you come home, I will shoot you myself,” their is quoted to have said to Wade when he left. It is only the mysterious letter from their father that causes him to return, and fight for the land rights which his sister is eager to get rid of for the right price.

The dynamic between the siblings is amazing. They act as foils to each other, rather than opposites, in a way that is in line with the modern western. Both are proud, strong willed, with their own sense of justice and what must be done. Neither is truly good, nor truly bad; their motives and desires are understood by the audience, even if their choices aren’t ones we must (or should) necessarily agree with. A story that allows you to empathize with characters you do not typically identify yourself with is one worthy of note, and Dead Man’s Burden is filled with such characters.



Not to mention, the acting is remarkable as well. I could definitely sense Jacobs’ performance channeling Clint Eastwood’s Blondie/Man With No Name, down to his speech patterns and the timbre of his voice. David Call is likewise exceptional;  showing the range and depth of Heck’s love for Martha that can be completely startling–if not disturbing–at times, and he sells it to the last drop. But the true show stopper is new comer Clare Bowen. Playing a woman of the time with the kind of subdued strength, nearly brimming with an inner-ferocity and pride that audiences don’t get to see too often from women. Not to mention she is a hell of a shot. The supporting actors are likewise enjoyable in their respective roles, with each actor  giving a solid performance, but the dynamic of the main three is what makes or breaks this story. Lucky for us, they give it out in spades.

Finally, I cannot get by with writing this article without mentioning the landscapes and visual tone. Shot on 35mm film rather than digital, the all encompassing, panoramic views and wide shots show the kind of difference celluloid truly makes. Granted, the great outdoors shots caused for a few more lens flares than I would have liked, but they were soft and not garish, working with the aesthetic rather than distracting from it. The film itself is beautiful and enjoyable to look at even without the emotionally heavy content and plot.

This is how light naturally reflects off a lens.

The film premiered Saturday, June 16th, as part of the Official Selection of the Los Angeles Film Festival, nominated in the Narrative category. Please stay posted for more on my trip to LAFF, including more film reviews and an interview with Dead Man’s Burden writer/director Jared Moshe later this week!